Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D A Grimes

Publications and source records attributed to D A Grimes.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

Mutations in the epsilon-sarcoglycan gene found to be uncommon in seven myoclonus-dystonia families.

Myoclonus-dystonia syndrome (MDS) is a disorder for which the major cause appears to be mutations in the epsilon-sarcoglycan gene (SGCE). The authors have now performed mutation screening in 22 affected individuals from seven families with findings of typical MDS. A novel 5-bp deletion in exon 7 of the gene in one family and the previously reported R102X nonsense mutation in exon 3 in two other families were identified. Mutations in the SGCE gene were found in the minority of families screened in this series.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Non-latex versus latex male condoms for contraception.

BACKGROUND: The male condom, which consists of a thin sheath placed over the glans and shaft of the penis, is designed to prevent pregnancy by providing a physical barrier against the deposition of semen into the vagina during intercourse. Beginning in the 1990s, nonlatex male condoms made of polyurethane film or synthetic elastomers were developed as alternative male barrier methods for individuals with allergies, sensitivities or preferences that prevented the consistent use of condoms made of latex. OBJECTIVES: The review sought to evaluate nonlatex male condoms in comparison with latex condoms in terms of contraceptive efficacy, breakage, slippage, safety and user preferences. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE using PubMed, EMBASE, Popline, and LILACS for randomized controlled trials of nonlatex condoms. The references of eligible publications were assessed for inclusion. We also wrote to the manufacturers of nonlatex condoms and known investigators in an attempt to locate any other published or unpublished trials not identified in our search. SELECTION CRITERIA: The review included all randomized controlled trials identified in the literature search that evaluated a male nonlatex condom made of polyurethane film or synthetic elastomers in comparison with a latex condom. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We evaluated all titles and abstracts located in the literature searches for inclusion in the review. Two reviewers independently extracted data from the identified studies. We entered and analyzed data with RevMan 4.1. Peto odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the outcomes contraceptive efficacy, condom breakage and slippage, discontinuation of use, safety and user preference. The number of condoms, men, or women was used as the denominator for the ORs. Contraceptive efficacy, early discontinuation, and safety outcomes were also measured with survival analysis techniques and entered into "Additional tables." MAIN RESULTS: While the eZ.on condom did not protect against pregnancy as well as its latex comparison condom, no differences were found in the typical-use efficacy in the comparisons between the Avanti and the Standard Tactylon and their latex counterparts. The nonlatex condoms were associated with higher rates of clinical breakage than their latex comparison condoms. The statistically significant odds ratios for clinical breakage for the nonlatex condoms versus their latex comparisons ranged from 2.6 (95% CI: 1.6 to 4.3) to 5.0 (95% CI: 3.6 to 6.8). Few adverse events were reported. In almost all of the comparisons, substantial proportions of participants preferred the nonlatex condom or reported that they would recommend its use to others. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Although the nonlatex condoms were associated with higher rates of clinical breakage than their latex comparison condoms, the new condoms still provide an acceptable alternative for those with allergies, sensitivities or preferences that might prevent the consistent use of latex condoms. The contraceptive efficacy of the nonlatex condoms requires more research.

Condoms↗
PubMed2003

Skin patch and vaginal ring versus combined oral contraceptives for contraception.

BACKGROUND: The delivery of combination contraceptive steroids from a skin patch or vaginal ring offers potential advantages over those administered via the traditional oral route. The skin patch and vaginal ring could possibly require a lower dose due to increased bioavailability and improved user compliance. OBJECTIVES: The review's objective is to compare the contraceptive efficacy, cycle control, compliance, and safety of the contraceptive skin patch versus combination oral contraceptives and the contraceptive vaginal ring versus combination oral contraceptives. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the computerized databases MEDLINE, Popline, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, EMBASE, and LILACS for trials of the contraceptive patch or the contraceptive ring. We also searched the references of the publications identified for inclusion. We contacted the manufacturers of the skin patch and the contraceptive ring in an attempt to identify published or unpublished trials that we might have missed. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomized controlled trials in any language comparing the combination contraceptive skin patch with a combination oral contraceptive or the combination contraceptive vaginal ring with a combination oral contraceptive. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Titles and abstracts identified from the literature searches were assessed for potential inclusion. Data were abstracted by both the primary and second reviewers to ensure accuracy and were entered into RevMan 4.1. Peto odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for all outcomes. Six- and 13-cycle Kaplan-Meier pregnancy rates were also entered into "Additional Tables." No sensitivity analyses were conducted since the eligible trials used different comparison oral contraceptives. The trials were critically appraised by examining the following factors: the study design; blinding; randomization method; group allocation concealment; exclusions after randomization; loss-to-follow-up; and early discontinuation. MAIN RESULTS: We found three trials of the skin patch and no eligible randomized controlled trials of the combination contraceptive vaginal ring. The six-cycle and 13-cycle Kaplan-Meier cumulative probabilities of pregnancy showed that the combination contraceptive skin patch was similar to the control combination oral contraceptive in contraceptive efficacy. One trial found that patch users discontinued early from the trial more often than oral contraceptive users (OR 1.6; 95% CI, 1.3-2.0) but a second trial found no differences in discontinuation between the groups (OR 2.6; 95% CI, 1.0-6.7). Patch users had more self-reported cycles of compliance than oral contraceptive users; the odds ratio of compliance was 2.1 (95% CI, 1.8-2.3). Patch users were more likely to report breast discomfort than oral contraceptive users with an odds ratio of 3.1 (95% CI, 2.3-4.2). The remaining commonly reported adverse events did not differ by group assignment. One trial found that women assigned to use the patch were more likely to discontinue due to adverse events than those assigned to use the oral contraceptive (OR 2.3; 95% CI, 1.6-3.3), but a second trial found no difference (OR 2.8; 95% CI, 0.7-11.3). Few serious adverse events occurred that were considered possibly or likely related to the use of the patch or oral contraceptive. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The randomized controlled trials comparing a combination contraceptive skin patch to a combination oral contraceptive showed similar efficacy rates for the two methods. The patch group had better self-reported compliance than the oral contraceptive group. On the other hand, breast tenderness was more common among those randomized to the patch. The patch might lead to early discontinuation (overall and due to adverse events), but the trial results on this outcome were mixed. No conclusions can be drawn regarding the vaginal ring as no eligible trials were available.

Contraceptive Agents, Female↗
PubMed2003

Combined hormonal versus nonhormonal versus progestin-only contraception in lactation.

BACKGROUND: Contraception for women who are breastfeeding is a public health issue of global importance. Each year over 100 million women make decisions about beginning or resuming contraception after childbirth. These decisions include both the choice of contraceptive method and the time at which its use begins, both of which continue to be debated by experts. Choices of contraception may be limited for lactating women due to concerns about hormonal effects on quality and quantity of milk, passage of hormones to the infant, and infant growth. Ideally, the contraceptive method chosen should not interfere with lactation. Additionally, because the return of menstruation and ovulation can be unpredictable in breastfeeding women, the timing of contraception initiation is important. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of combined oral contraceptives and progestin-only contraceptives on lactation. The a priori hypothesis is that combined oral contraception impairs lactation, making it less appropriate than progestin-only or nonhormonal contraception for breastfeeding women. SEARCH STRATEGY: We used PUBMED, POPLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register computer searches, supplemented by review articles and contact with investigators. SELECTION CRITERIA: We sought all randomized controlled trials, reported in any language, that included any form of hormonal contraception compared with another form of hormonal contraception, nonhormonal contraception, or placebo during lactation. Hormonal contraception could include combined oral or injectable contraceptives, progestin-only oral or injectable contraceptives, hormonal implants, or hormonal intrauterine devices. Study participants included breastfeeding women of any age or parity who desired contraception. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We evaluated the methodological quality of each report and sought to identify duplicate reporting of data from multicenter trials. We abstracted data onto data collection forms. Principal outcome measures included quantity of milk; biochemical analysis of milk composition; initiation, maintenance and duration of lactation; infant growth; efficacy of contraceptive method while breastfeeding; and timing of contraception initiation and its effects on lactation. Because the trials did not have uniform interventions, often lacked quantifiable outcomes, and had poor methodological quality, we could not aggregate the data in a meta-analyses. MAIN RESULTS: Seven reports from five randomized controlled trials met our inclusion criteria. Most of the five trials did not specify their method used to generate a random sequence, method of allocation concealment, blinding of treatments, or use of an intention-to-treat analysis. Additionally, high loss to follow-up rates invalidated at least two studies. The findings from two reports comparing oral contraceptives to placebo during lactation were conflicting. Another trial found no inhibitory effects on lactation from progestin-only contraceptives. Finally, the WHO trial found no effect of progestin-only contraceptives on lactation but a decline in breast milk volume from combination contraceptives during lactation. High loss to follow-up rates, however, undermine the credibility of the WHO trial. No significant differences in infant growth or weight appeared in any of the included trials as a result of the use of hormonal contraception during lactation. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from randomized controlled trials on the effect of hormonal contraceptives during lactation is limited and of poor quality; results should be interpreted with caution. The existing randomized controlled trials are insufficient to establish an effect of hormonal contraception, if any, on milk quality and quantity. Evidence is inadequate to make recommendations regarding hormonal contraceptive use for lactating women. At least one properly conducted randomized controlled trial of adequate size is urgently needed to address this question.

Contraceptives, Oral, Combined↗
PubMed2003

Combination contraceptives: effects on weight.

BACKGROUND: Weight gain is often attributed as a side effect of combination hormonal contraceptive, and many women and clinicians believe that an association exists. Concern about weight gain can limit the use of this highly effective method of contraception by deterring the initiation of its use and causing early discontinuation among users. Nevertheless, a causal relationship between combination contraceptives and weight gain has not been established. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the review was to evaluate the association between combination contraceptive use and changes in weight. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the computerized databases MEDLINE, Popline, CENTRAL, EMBASE, and LILACS for studies of combination contraceptives. We also wrote to known investigators and manufacturers to request information about other published or unpublished trials not discovered in our search. SELECTION CRITERIA: All English-language, randomized controlled trials at least three treatment cycles in duration that compared a combination contraceptive to a placebo or with a combination contraceptive that differed in drug, dosage, regimen, and/or study length were eligible. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: All titles and abstracts located in the literature searches were assessed. Data were entered and analyzed with RevMan 4.1, and a second reviewer verified the data entered. Depending on the data available, the weighted mean difference using a fixed effects model with 95% confidence intervals was calculated for the mean change in weight between baseline and post-treatment measurements or the Peto odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals was calculated using the proportion of women who gained or lost more than a specified amount of weight. MAIN RESULTS: The three placebo-controlled, randomized trials did not find evidence supporting a causal association between combination oral contraceptives or a combination skin patch and weight gain. Most comparisons of different combination contraceptives showed no substantial difference in weight. In addition, discontinuation of combination contraceptives because of weight gain did not differ between groups where this was studied. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Available evidence is insufficient to determine the effect of combination contraceptives on weight, but no large effect is evident.

Body Weight↗
PubMed2003

Nonlatex vs. latex male condoms for contraception: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

This systematic review sought to evaluate nonlatex male condoms in comparison with latex condoms in terms of contraceptive efficacy, breakage, slippage, safety and user preferences. We searched computerized databases and contacted manufactures and investigators to find randomized controlled trials of nonlatex vs. latex male condoms. Two reviewers independently abstracted data from the 10 identified trials. While the eZ. on condom did not protect against pregnancy as well as its latex comparison condom, no differences were found in typical-use efficacy between the Avanti and the Standard Tactylon and their latex counterparts. Nonlatex condoms were associated with higher rates of clinical breakage than their latex comparisons, with statistically significant odds ratios of clinical breakage ranging from 2.6 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6-4.3) to 5.0 (95% CI: 3.6-6.8). Few adverse events were reported. Substantial proportions of participants reported preferences for the nonlatex condoms. Despite higher rates of clinical breakage, nonlatex condoms still provide an acceptable alternative for those with allergies, sensitivities or preferences that might prevent the consistent use of latex condoms. The contraceptive efficacy of nonlatex condoms requires more research.

Condoms↗
PubMed2003

Sponge versus diaphragm for contraception: a Cochrane review.

The contraceptive vaginal sponge was developed as an alternative to the contraceptive diaphragm. Unlike the diaphragm, the sponge can be used for more than one coital act within 24 h without the insertion of additional spermicide, and it does not require fitting or a prescription from a physician. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials that compared the vaginal contraceptive sponge with the diaphragm used with a spermicide in order to evaluate the efficacy and continuation rates of the two devices. The sponge was statistically significantly less effective in preventing overall pregnancy than was the diaphragm in the two trials that met our inclusion criteria. The 12-month cumulative life table termination rates per 100 women for overall pregnancy were 17.4 for the sponge versus 12.8 for the diaphragm in the larger US trial, and 24.5 for the sponge and 10.9 for the diaphragm in the UK trial. Similarly, discontinuation rates at 12 months were higher with the sponge than with the diaphragm [odds ratio 1.3; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-1.6]. Allergic-type reactions were more common with the sponge in both trials, although the frequency of discontinuation for discomfort differed in the two trials. Other randomized controlled trials will be needed to resolve the role of spermicides in preventing sexually transmitted infections or in causing adverse effects.

Contraceptive Devices, Female↗
PubMed2003

Hormonal contraception during lactation. systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Contraception choices may be limited for lactating women due to concerns about hormonal effects on quality and quantity of milk, passage of hormones to the infant and infant growth. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials to determine the effect of hormonal contraception on lactation. We sought all randomized controlled trials, reported in any language, that included any form of hormonal contraception compared with another form of hormonal contraception, nonhormonal contraception or placebo during lactation. Seven reports from five randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Most of the five trials did not specify their method used to generate a random sequence, method of allocation concealment, blinding of treatments or use of an intention-to-treat analysis. Additionally, high loss-to-follow-up rates invalidated at least two trials. The findings from two trials comparing oral contraceptives to placebo during lactation were conflicting. Another trial found no inhibitory effects on lactation from progestin-only contraceptives. Finally, the World Health Organization trial found a statistically significant decline in breast milk volume in women using combined oral contraceptives compared to women using progestin-only pills. However, infant growth for the two groups did not differ. The limited evidence from randomized controlled trials on the effect of hormonal contraceptives during lactation is of poor quality and insufficient to establish an effect of hormonal contraception, if any, on milk quality and quantity. At least one properly conducted randomized controlled trial of adequate size is urgently needed to make recommendations regarding hormonal contraceptive use for lactating women.

Contraceptives, Oral, Combined↗
PubMed2003

Tremor--easily seen but difficult to describe and treat.

Tremor is a common movement disorder yet many physicians struggle with its terminology as well as with its treatment. Attempts have been made to develop standard terminology and criteria for tremors but this process continues to evolve. In this review, a summary of the currently-proposed phenomenology and syndromic classification of all types of tremor is presented. The diagnosis and management of essential tremor is presented in more detail, as it is the most commonly encountered tremor.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2002

A novel locus for inherited myoclonus-dystonia on 18p11.

OBJECTIVE: Inherited myoclonus-dystonia (IMD) is a new term for an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by myoclonus and dystonia. Recently, IMD was linked to a region on chromosome 11q23 with two different mutations identified in the D2 dopamine receptor gene and linked to chromosome 7q with five different loss-of-function mutations identified in the epsilon-sarcoglycan gene. METHODS: These two regions and genes were excluded in a large Canadian family with IMD in whom 13 individuals are affected. A 25-cM genome scan of this large family with 32 individuals was performed. RESULTS: Two-point linkage analysis revealed a maximum lod score of 3.5 (recombination fraction 0.00; affected only) for the microsatellite marker GATA185C06-18 and a multipoint lod score of 3.9 across the 18p11 region. Haplotype analysis demonstrates that all the affected individuals shared a common haplotype between markers D18S1132 and D18S843 that defines the disease gene within a span of 16.9 cM. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that a novel IMD gene exists on chromosome 18p11.

Child↗
PubMed2002

Sponge versus diaphragm for contraception.

BACKGROUND: The contraceptive vaginal sponge was developed as an alternative to the contraceptive diaphragm. The sponge, made of polyurethane impregnated with nonoxynol-9 (1g), releases 125 mg of the spermicide over 24 h of use. Unlike the diaphragm, the sponge can be used for more than one coital act within 24 h without the insertion of additional spermicide, and the sponge does not require fitting or a prescription from a physician. How the sponge compares with the diaphragm in terms of efficacy and continuation is not clear. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and continuation rates of the sponge compared with the diaphragm (used with nonoxynol-9 as a spermicide). Our a priori hypothesis was that the sponge would have a higher failure rate and higher discontinuation rates than the diaphragm. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the computerized databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, Popline, LILACS, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. In addition, we searched the reference lists of all potentially relevant articles and book chapters. We also contacted investigators involved with both trials identified to seek other published or unpublished trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials comparing the vaginal contraceptive sponge (Today; Collatex) with any diaphragm used with nonoxynol-9 to prevent pregnancy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We examined the studies identified through the literature searches for possible inclusion and evaluated their methodological quality using the Cochrane guidelines. We contacted an author involved with both published trials for supplementary information about randomization and allocation concealment. We entered data into RevMan 4.1 and calculated Peto odds ratios for overall pregnancy and 12-month discontinuation using numbers of women as the denominator. We also abstracted 12-month cumulative life-table ratios for these same outcomes, but were unable to aggregate these data. MAIN RESULTS: The sponge was statistically significantly less effective in both trials in preventing overall pregnancy than was the diaphragm. The 12-month cumulative life-table termination rates per 100 women for overall pregnancy were 17.4 for the sponge versus 12.8 for the diaphragm in the larger U.S. trial and 24.5 for the sponge and 10.9 for the diaphragm in the U.K. trial. Similarly, discontinuation rates at 12 months were higher with the sponge than with the diaphragm (odds ratio 1.3; 95% CI 1.1-1.6). Allergic-type reactions were more common with the sponge in both trials, although the frequency of discontinuation for discomfort differed in the two trials. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The sponge was less effective than the diaphragm in preventing pregnancy. Discontinuation rates were higher at 12 months as well. Other randomized controlled trials will be needed to resolve the role of spermicides in preventing sexually transmitted infections or in causing adverse effects.

Contraceptive Devices, Female↗
PubMed2002

Cervical cap versus diaphragm for contraception.

BACKGROUND: The cervical cap and the diaphragm are vaginal barrier contraceptive methods that prevent pregnancy by covering the cervix. The two devices also act as a reservoir for spermicide. The cervical cap is smaller and can remain in place longer than the diaphragm. Two types of cervical caps, the Prentif cap and the FemCap, have been compared to the diaphragm in randomized controlled trials. OBJECTIVES: The review seeks to evaluate the contraceptive efficacy, safety, discontinuation, and acceptability of the cervical cap with that of the diaphragm. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched MEDLINE, Popline, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, EMBASE, and LILACS for randomized controlled trials of cervical caps, and we reviewed the references of the included publications. Also, we wrote to the manufacturers and known investigators to request information about any other published or unpublished trials not found in our search. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomized controlled trials in any language comparing a cervical cap with a diaphragm were eligible for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: All titles and abstracts located in the literature searches were assessed, and articles identified for inclusion were independently abstracted by two reviewers. Data were entered and analyzed with RevMan 4.1, and a second reviewer verified the data entered. Outcome measures include contraceptive efficacy, safety, discontinuation, and acceptability. Outcomes were calculated as Peto odds ratios with 95 percent confidence intervals using women as the denominators. Life-table and Kaplan-Meier cumulative rate ratios for selected measures were also presented in "Additional Tables." MAIN RESULTS: The Prentif cap was comparable to the diaphragm in preventing pregnancy, but the FemCap was not as effective in preventing pregnancy as its comparison diaphragm. The curves for the life-table cumulative pregnancy rates through 24 months for the Prentif cap and the diaphragm were not statistically significantly different (p-value of 0.39). However, the six-month Kaplan-Meier cumulative pregnancy rates for the FemCap and the diaphragm did not meet the a priori definition of clinical equivalence. The Prentif cap had a higher proportion of Class I to Class III cervical cytologic conversions at the three-month visit than the diaphragm; the odds ratio was 2.3 (95% CI, 1.0-5.1). The FemCap trial did not find differences in Papanicolaou smear results between the cap and diaphragm groups. Prentif cap users had a lower odds ratio of vaginal ulcerations or lacerations (0.3; 95% CI, 0.1-0.7) than diaphragm users. FemCap users had a higher odds ratio of blood in the device on removal (2.3; 95% CI, 1.3-4.1), but a lower odds ratio of urinary tract infections (0.6; 95% CI, 0.4-1.0) than those in the diaphragm group. In the FemCap trial, similar proportions of women reported liking their assigned device "somewhat" or "a lot" at the two-week interview. However, FemCap users were less likely than the diaphragm users to state that they were "probably" or "definitely" likely to use the device alone after completing the trial (odds ratio of 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-0.7) or that they would recommend it to a friend (odds ratio of 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-0.8). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The Prentif cap was as effective as its comparison diaphragm in preventing pregnancy, but the FemCap was not. Both cervical caps appear to be medically safe.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Terbutaline pump maintenance therapy after threatened preterm labor for preventing preterm birth.

BACKGROUND: Women with preterm labor that is arrested with tocolytic therapy are at increased risk of recurrent preterm labor. Terbutaline pump maintenance therapy has been given to such women to decrease the risk of recurrent preterm labor, preterm birth, and its consequences. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness and safety of terbutaline pump maintenance therapy after threatened preterm labor in preventing preterm birth and its complications. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register (searched May 2002) and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2002). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized trials comparing terbutaline pump maintenance therapy with alternative therapy, placebo, or no therapy after threatened preterm labor. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed the studies for inclusion and then extracted data from eligible studies. MAIN RESULTS: We included two studies. Terbutaline pump maintenance therapy did not appear to offer any advantages over the saline placebo pump or oral terbutaline maintenance therapy in preventing preterm births by prolonging pregnancy or its complications among women with arrested preterm labor. The weighted mean difference (WMD) for gestational age at birth was -0.1 weeks (95% confidence interval (CI) -1.7 to 1.4) for terbutaline pump therapy compared with saline placebo pump for both trials combined and 1.4 weeks (95% CI -1.1 to 3.9) for terbutaline pump versus oral terbutaline therapy for the first trial. The second trial reported a relative risk (RR) of 1.17 (95% CI 0.79 to 1.73) of preterm birth (less than 37 completed weeks) and a RR of 0.97 (95% CI 0.51 to 1.84) of very preterm birth (less than 34 completed weeks) for terbutaline pump compared with saline placebo pump. Terbutaline pump therapy also did not result in a higher rate of therapy continuation or a lower rate of infant complications. No data were reported on long-term infant outcomes, costs, or maternal assessment of therapy. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Terbutaline pump maintenance therapy has not been shown to decrease the risk of preterm birth by prolonging pregnancy. Furthermore, the lack of information on the safety of the therapy, as well as its substantial expense, argues against its role in the management of arrested preterm labor. Future use should only be in the context of well-conducted, adequately powered randomized controlled trials.

Drug Administration Schedule↗
PubMed2002

Parkinson's genetics--creating exciting new insights.

Parkinson's disease is a complex disorder in which the genetic aspects are only just being realized. The underlying cause for the degeneration of dopaminergic substantia nigra neurons and the formation of Lewy bodies in Parkinson's disease is unknown. The identification of clear inherited forms of the disease has provided important clues as to how this complex process may be occurring. Mutations have now been identified in the alpha-synuclein (4q21.3-23), parkin (6q25.2-27), and ubiquitin carboxy terminal hydrolase-L1 (4p16.3) genes in families with Parkinson's disease. Four additional chromosomal locations; 2p13, 4p14-15, 1p35-36, and 12p11.2-q13.1 have been linked to Parkinson's disease families but no pathologic gene mutations have been identified to date. As additional Parkinson's disease loci are mapped and their genes identified we will continue to add to our understating of the critical biochemical pathways involved and be able to develop effective disease altering treatments.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Phenocopies in a large GCH1 mutation positive family with dopa responsive dystonia: confusing the picture?

BACKGROUND: Dopa responsive dystonia (DRD) is a disorder characterised by childhood onset dystonia but a wide range of clinical presentations has now been described. OBJECTIVE: To study a large Canadian family with presumed DRD. METHODS: The clinical features of the family were collected before molecular genetic mutational analysis. RESULTS: All nine individuals in whom a clinical diagnosis of DRD was definite or probable were heterozygous for a GCH1 gene deletion. However, eight of nine possibly clinically affected members did not carry the GCH1 mutation. CONCLUSIONS: Great care must be taken in diagnosing DRD even in families with the classic phenotype, because of potential phenocopies of the disease.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Clinical breast and pelvic examination requirements for hormonal contraception: Current practice vs evidence.

Clinical breast and pelvic examinations are commonly accepted practices prior to provision of hormonal contraception. Such examinations, however, may reduce access to highly effective contraceptive methods, and may therefore increase women's overall health risks. These unnecessary requirements also involve ethical considerations and unwittingly reinforce the widely held but incorrect perception that hormonal contraceptive methods are dangerous. This article reviews and summarizes the relevant medical literature and policy statements from major organizations active in the field of contraception. Consensus developed during the last decade supports a change in practice: hormonal contraception can safely be provided based on careful review of medical history and blood pressure measurement. For most women, no further evaluation is necessary. Pelvic and breast examinations and screening for cervical neoplasia and sexually transmitted infection, while important in their own right, do not provide information necessary for identifying women who should avoid hormonal contraceptives or who need further evaluation before making a decision about their use.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Biphasic versus monophasic oral contraceptives for contraception.

OBJECTIVES: To compare biphasic oral contraceptives with monophasic oral contraceptives in terms of efficacy, cycle control, and discontinuation due to side effects. Our a priori hypotheses were: (a) biphasic oral contraceptives are less effective in preventing pregnancy than are monophasic oral contraceptives, and (b) biphasic oral contraceptives cause more side effects, give poorer cycle control, and have lower continuation rates. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched computerized databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, Popline and the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register. Additionally we searched the reference lists of all potentially relevant articles and book chapters. We also contacted the authors of relevant studies and pharmaceutical companies in Europe and the U.S. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials comparing any biphasic oral contraceptive with any monophasic oral contraceptive when used to prevent pregnancy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We examined the studies found during the various literature searches for possible inclusion and assessed their methodological quality using the Cochrane guidelines. We contacted the authors of all included studies and of possibly randomized studies for supplemental information about the study methods and outcomes. We entered the data in RevMan 3.1, imported the data into RevMan 4.1, and calculated Peto odds ratios for the incidence of intermenstrual bleeding, absence of withdrawal bleeding, and study discontinuation due to intermenstrual bleeding. MAIN RESULTS: Only one trial of limited quality compared a biphasic and monophasic preparation. Percival-Smith et al. (1990) examined 533 user cycles of a biphasic pill (norethindrone 500 mcg/ethinyl estradiol 35 mcg for ten days, followed by norethindrone 1000 mcg/ethinyl estradiol 35 mcg for eleven days; Ortho 10/11) and 481 user cycles of a monophasic contraceptive pill (norethindrone acetate 1500 mcg/ethinyl estradiol 30 mcg daily; Loestrin). The study found no significant differences in intermenstrual bleeding, amenorrhea and study discontinuation due to intermenstrual bleeding between the biphasic and monophasic oral contraceptive pills. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Conclusions are limited by the identification of only one trial, the methodological shortcomings of that trial, and the absence of data on accidental pregnancies. However, the trial found no important differences in bleeding patterns between the biphasic and monophasic preparations studied. Since no clear rationale exists for biphasic pills and since extensive evidence is available for monophasic pills, the latter are preferred.

Contraception↗