Pathos in practice: exploring the affective domain of oncology nursing.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to D A Boyle.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
INTRODUCTION: Carvedilol, a chiral compound possessing nonselective beta- and alpha1-blocking activity, is used for the treatment of hypertension and congestive heart failure (CHF). The enantiomers of carvedilol exhibit similar alpha1-blocking activity; only S-carvedilol possesses beta-blocking activity. Carvedilol is primarily hepatically metabolized, with less than 2% of the dose excreted renally as unchanged drug. METHODS: The pharmacokinetics of carvedilol, R-carvedilol, and S-carvedilol were studied in hypertensive patients (control; n = 13) versus patients with hypertension and advanced renal insufficiency not yet on dialysis [GFR < or = 30 ml x min(-1) (CRI, chronic renal insufficiency), n = 12] following single (12.5 mg, Day 1) and multiple (25 mg once daily, Days 2 9) dosing. RESULTS: Mean with (SD) AUC(0-24h) (ng x h x ml(-1)) for carvedilol was 220 (120) and 618 (335) in CRI compared with 165 (83.5) and 413 (247) in controls on Days 1 and 9, respectively, primarily due to higher R-carvedilol concentrations. Mean with (SD) Cmax (ng x ml(-1)) for carvedilol were 53.4 (31.4) and 128 (63.3) in CRI compared with 46.7 (23.3) and 104 (58.9) in controls on Days 1 and 9, respectively. The difference in group mean values was characterized by considerable overlap in individual AUC(0-24h) and Cmax values between groups. There was no apparent difference in mean terminal elimination half-life for carvedilol between groups on each study day. Less than 1% of the dose was excreted in urine as unchanged carvedilol in both groups. Blood pressure and heart rate declined in both groups to a similar degree. CONCLUSION: Compared with controls, average AUC(0-24 h) values for carvedilol were approximately 40% and 50% higher on study Days 1 and 9 in patients with renal insufficiency, primarily due to higher R-carvedilol concentrations with only a small change (<20%) in S-carvedilol concentrations, the isomer possessing beta-blocking activity. These changes in pharmacokinetics are modest in view of the large interindividual variability. Carvedilol was well tolerated in both groups. Although the present study cannot provide a final conclusion, based on the results of the present study, no changes in dosing recommendations for carvedilol are warranted in patients with moderate/severe renal insufficiency.
The potential for nonprescription cimetidine (200 mg twice daily) to affect the pharmacokinetics of sustained-release (SR) theophylline was assessed in 26 male subjects, 13 smokers and 13 nonsmokers. This was a concentration-controlled drug interaction study in which the subjects were administered a dose of SR theophylline every 12 hours to provide a mean steady-state concentration between 8 and 15 micrograms/ml. To determine individual theophylline dose, a test dose of aminophylline was administered, and baseline theophylline pharmacokinetics were determined. Subjects remained on SR theophylline for 23 days and were treated in the following sequence: run-in phase (4 days), treatment 1 (7 days), washout (5 days), and treatment 2 (7 days). During the treatment phases, subjects received cimetidine (200 mg at approximately 08:00 and 12:00) or placebo for 7 days in a randomized crossover fashion. Theophylline pharmacokinetics were determined on days 1, 4, and 7 of both treatment phases. A large day-to-day variability in the oral clearance of theophylline was evident for the theophylline-placebo treatment and the theophylline-cimetidine treatment. Nonprescription strength cimetidine resulted in a mean 5% decrease in theophylline oral clearance on day 1 and a mean 12% decrease on days 4 and 7 combined. There were no significant differences in the cimetidine-theophylline interaction between smokers and nonsmokers. Oral clearance during the nighttime dosing interval was 13% greater than the daytime oral clearance for nonsmokers and 22% greater for smokers, showing a greater circadian rhythm for smokers. In summary, nonprescription doses of cimetidine (400 mg/day) have the potential to produce small changes in theophylline concentrations during steady-state dosing with SR theophylline; however, this effect appears less than changes that occur as a consequence of theophylline's intrasubject variability.
OBJECTIVES: To provide a review of the unique features of both Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in pediatric and geriatric patient populations. Treatment approaches and nursing care interventions at the extremes of age will be discussed. DATA SOURCES: Review articles, research studies, and book chapters. CONCLUSIONS: Lymphoma is a highly heterogeneous malignancy whose classification and management have undergone significant evolution. Of particular concern has been lymphoma's prevalence and treatment at the extremes of age. Appropriate treatment by age and subtype remains controversial. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: The nursing care of pediatric and geriatric patients with lymphoma presents numerous challenges in education, symptom management, and supportive care.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of ranitidine on the pharmacokinetics of eprosartan in healthy male volunteers. DESIGN: Single-center, randomized, open-label, two-period, period-balanced, crossover study. PATIENTS: Seventeen healthy men aged 19 to 43 years. INTERVENTION: In each period (separated by a > or = 7 d washout), subjects received a single 400-mg oral dose of eprosartan alone, or a single oral dose of eprosartan 400 mg and ranitidine 150 mg on day 4 after 3 days of ranitidine 150 mg twice daily. Serial pharmacokinetic samples were obtained for up to 24 hours following eprosartan dosing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Plasma and urine eprosartan concentrations during each treatment session. RESULTS: Eprosartan maximum concentration (Cmax), the AUC from time-zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t), and renal clearance (Cl(r)) values were approximately 7%, 11%, and 4% lower, respectively, when administered with ranitidine compared with eprosartan alone. The 95% CIs for the ratio of eprosartan plus ranitidine compared with eprosartan alone were 0.81 to 1.07, 0.77 to 1.03, and 0.64 to 1.43, for Cmax, AUC0-t, and Cl(r), respectively, indicating no statistically significant difference between regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated doses of ranitidine did not have a marked effect on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of eprosartan.
The purpose of this article is to review information relative to the administration, stability, and compatibility of paclitaxel (Taxol, Mead Johnson Oncology Products, Princeton, NJ). The unique formulation used to solubilize paclitaxel has led to an increased awareness of plasticizer-leaching issues, paclitaxel stability in solution, and paclitaxel compatibility with other medications. Particularly with longer paclitaxel infusion schedules (greater than 48 hours), both drug stability in solution and pump apparatus congruence require careful consideration to minimize plasticizer-leaching problems and to ensure optimum drug delivery. Despite knowledge of the physical compatibility of paclitaxel with numerous drugs, a paucity of research has documented the specifics of paclitaxel's chemical compatibility with other medications.
Carvedilol is a novel multiple-action cardiovascular drug that has recently been introduced to the market for the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension. Clinical studies have demonstrated that once daily therapy with carvedilol is efficacious and has a favourable side-effect profile. Clinical studies are in progress to establish the utility of carvedilol in angina and congestive heart failure. Carvedilol is a beta-adrenoceptor antagonist and a vasodilator, with the vasodilating activity resulting primarily from alpha 1-adrenoceptor blockade and possibly also from calcium channel blockade. The reduction in BP produced by carvedilol results from the vasodilating activity of the drug because peripheral vascular resistance is significantly reduced. The reduction in BP produced by carvedilol is not associated with reflex tachycardia owing to the beta-adrenoceptor blocking activity of the compound. Throughout its antihypertensive dose range, carvedilol has been a renal-sparing antihypertensive agent in animals and also in humans, inasmuch as renal blood flow, glomerular filtration rate and sodium excretion are all maintained. In preclinical experimental models of acute myocardial infarction, carvedilol has produced marked reductions in infarct size in the pig, rat and dog. The cardioprotection observed with carvedilol is greater than that provided by beta-adrenoceptor antagonists alone, suggesting that the additional activities of carvedilol may provide benefit in the setting of myocardial ischaemia.
Eighteen patients with New York Heart Association class III congestive heart failure were given single 100 mg oral doses of fenoldopam with food or fasting in a random-order single-blind crossover trial. Before and after each fenoldopam dose, thermodilution cardiac output, right atrial pressure, pulmonary artery pressure, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) were measured with a balloon-tipped pulmonary artery catheter, and heart rates and blood pressures were recorded with an automated sphygmomanometer. Compared with fasting, bioavailability of fenoldopam was decreased significantly when administered with food: mean peak plasma fenoldopam level decreased from 26.5 (+/- 4.1 SEM) ng/ml to 10.9 (+/- 1.7 SEM) ng/ml (p = 0.0004) and mean area under the concentration-time curve was decreased from 44.7 (+/- 5.8 SEM) ng.hr/ml to 26.8 (+/- 4.1 SEM) ng.hr/ml (p = 0.0001). Fenoldopam administration to fasting patients resulted in decreases in mean arterial pressure, systemic vascular resistance, and PCWP and significant increases in cardiac index without change in heart rate. The maximum changes in mean cardiac index, systemic vascular resistance, and PCWP were greatest 1 hour after oral administration and did not persist beyond 3 hours after administration. In fasting patients, changes in cardiac index were correlated with plasma fenoldopam levels, whereas changes in PCWP and mean arterial pressure did not correlate significantly with the observed fenoldopam level.
The ability of a Bayesian regression program (Warfcalc) to predict warfarin response was evaluated retrospectively in 48 inpatients and prospectively in 10 inpatients. The prothrombin ratio (PR) on the last day of inpatient therapy was predicted using zero (naive) to five sequential, daily PR feedbacks. Bias and precision were measured using mean error (ME) and mean absolute error (MAE), respectively. Root mean squared error (RMSE) was used as a combined measure of bias and precision. In the retrospective group, the use of five PR feedbacks yielded the lowest ME, MAE, and RMSE (0.22, 0.30, and 0.45, respectively). The use of two and three daily PR feedbacks resulted in larger prediction errors compared with the use of naive parameters. Further evaluation of the retrospective patient data indicated that deletion of PR feedbacks associated with an activated partial thromboplastin time greater than 100 s and exclusion of metabolic inhibitors in the estimation of warfarin clearance resulted in more reliable predictions (ME = 0.07, MAE = 0.20, RMSE = 0.28). Similarly, deletion of such PR feedbacks and metabolic inhibitors from the prospective data and use of PRs for the first 5 days of therapy yielded ME, MAE, and RMSE values of 0.07, 0.21, and 0.27, respectively. The variance for prothrombin complex activity (PCA) as a function of the variance in the prothrombin time (PT) was investigated using Monte Carlo simulation assuming four different random error models for the PT measurements. These error models yielded functions that exhibit a maximum coefficient of variation at PCA values of 40-70%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
The absolute bioavailability and dose proportionality of betaxolol [(+/-)-1-(p-[2-cyclopropylmethoxy)ethyl]phenoxy]-3- (isopropylamino)-2-propanol hydrochloride], a cardioselective beta-adrenergic antagonist effective in the treatment of angina and hypertension, was studied in 12 healthy male subjects using a four-way crossover Latin Square design. Each subject received a 10-mg iv dose administered by constant-rate infusion over a period of 30 min and three oral doses (10, 20, and 40 mg). Blood and urine were collected over a 48-h period and analyzed for betaxolol using gas-liquid chromatography with electron capture detection. Maximum concentrations occurred 3-4 h after the dose. The maximum mean (+/- SD) blood concentrations normalized to the 10-mg oral dose were 21.6 +/- 3.7, 21.1 +/- 3.7, and 22.5 +/- 4.0 micrograms/L following the 10-, 20-, and 40-mg doses, respectively. A significant lag time of 10-80 min was observed after oral doses but was not related to dose size. The terminal slope (ts), absolute bioavailability (F), and renal clearance (CLr) were likewise not affected to an important degree by dose (ts: 0.043 +/- 0.006, 0.044 +/- 0.005, 0.046 +/- 0.006 h-1; F: 0.88 +/- 0.08, 0.82 +/- 0.06, 0.84 +/- 0.07; CLr: 0.68 +/- 0.22, 0.69 +/- 0.19, 0.65 +/- 0.22 mL/min kg). Unlike many beta-adrenergic antagonists, betaxolol has a long half-life (13-20 h) and high and consistent bioavailability (70-90%), and its disposition is independent of the size of the administered dose.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The effect of multiple oral doses of carvedilol on steady-state plasma digoxin pharmacokinetics was evaluated in 12 patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Area under the curve (AUC), mean maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), mean time to maximum concentration (Tmax), concentration at 24 hours after the dose (C24), creatinine clearance, renal digoxin clearance, and urinary digoxin excretion were determined after patients took oral digoxin 0.25 mg once/day for 2 weeks. Carvedilol was added to the regimen, and digoxin pharmacokinetics were assessed after 2 weeks of concurrent treatment. The AUC and Cmax for digoxin increased by 14% and 32%, respectively (p < 0.05), with no change in Tmax. The 24-hour urinary digoxin excretion and 24-hour renal digoxin clearance increased by 45% and 26%, respectively (p < 0.05), with no change in creatinine clearance. Carvedilol appears to increase digoxin's oral bioavailability as well as renal elimination. The absolute change in digoxin pharmacokinetics was small and not clinically significant. The significance of the interaction in other patient populations remains to be studied.