Genetics: junk DNA as an evolutionary force.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Cristina Vieira.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
It has now been established that transposable elements (TEs) make up a variable, but significant proportion of the genomes of all organisms, from Bacteria to Vertebrates. However, in addition to their quantitative importance, there is increasing evidence that TEs also play a functional role within the genome. In particular, TE regulatory regions can be viewed as a large pool of potential promoter sequences for host genes. Studying the evolution of regulatory region of TEs in different genomic contexts is therefore a fundamental aspect of understanding how a genome works. In this paper, we first briefly describe what is currently known about the regulation of TE copy number and activity in genomes, and then focus on TE regulatory regions and their evolution. We restrict ourselves to retrotransposons, which are the most abundant class of eukaryotic TEs, and analyze their evolution and the subsequent consequences for host genomes. Particular attention is paid to much-studied representatives of the Vertebrates and Invertebrates, Homo sapiens and Drosophila melanogaster, respectively, for which high quality sequenced genomes are available.
Tirant is a long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposon with an average of 11 insertion sites on the chromosome arms of Drosophila melanogaster flies collected from natural populations worldwide. In the sibling species Drosophila simulans, tirant is found only in African populations, which harbor a few insertion sites (1 to 5) on the chromosome arms, although some tirant sequences are present in the heterochromatin of most populations. This distribution in D. simulans reflects either the recent genomic invasion of African populations by a new variant of tirant, or a loss of tirant from the entire species apart from some sequence relics still present in Africa. In an attempt to clarify the situation, we focused on the LTR-UTR region of tirant copies from various populations of both D. melanogaster and D. simulans. We found two distinct types of regulatory region: one type was present in both D. melanogaster and D. simulans, and the other was present only in D. simulans. Copies of this latter type of tirant were transcriptionally inactive in gonads. Here we propose that the present day distribution of tirant in D. simulans populations reflects an ancient invasion of D. simulans by tirant copies followed by the loss of active copies from most populations, apart from the African ones, suggesting that this loss is still ongoing in this species.
There are no doubts that transposable elements (TEs) have greatly influenced genomes evolution. They have, however, evolved in different ways throughout mammals, plants, and invertebrates. In mammals they have been shown to be widely present but with low transposition activity; in plants they are responsible for large increases in genome size. In Drosophila, despite their low amount, transposition seems to be higher. Therefore, to understand how these elements have evolved in different genomes and how host genomes have proposed to go around them, are major questions on genome evolution. We analyzed sequences of the retrotransposable elements 412 in natural populations of the Drosophila simulans and D. melanogaster species that greatly differ in their amount of TEs. We identified new subfamilies of this element that were the result of mutation or insertion-deletion process, but also of interfamily recombinations. These new elements were well conserved in the D. simulans natural populations. The new regulatory regions produced by recombination could give rise to new elements able to overcome host control of transposition and, thus, become potential genome invaders.
Transposable elements (TEs) in the two sibling species, Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans, differ considerably in amount and dynamics, with D. simulans having a smaller amount of TEs than D. melanogaster. Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain these differences, based on the evolutionary history of the two species, and claim differences either in the effective size of the population or in genome characteristics. Recent data suggest, however, that the higher amount of TEs in D. melanogaster could be associated with the worldwide invasion of D. melanogaster a long time ago while D. simulans is still under the process of such geographical spread. Stresses due to new environmental conditions and crosses between migrating populations could explain the mobilization of TEs while the flies colonize. Colonization and TE mobilization may be strong evolutionary forces that have shaped and are still shaping the eukaryote genomes.
Genome size displays an important variability between species without any direct link to complexity. This paradox, so-called "C value paradox", now becomes understood as resulting from a differential abundance of numerous repeated sequences, among which transposable elements. Genomes indeed contain a important proportion of such sequences (95 % of DNA in man, about 45 % of which are transposable elements, up to 99 % of DNA in some plants). While most investigations until now are focalized on genes or coding sequences, which thus represent a small part of the genome, more attention now is dedicated on so-called non-coding sequences. Transposable elements, which are capable of moving around in genomes, inducing mutations, chromosomal rearrangements, gene expression regulations, thus appear as major actors in diversity and evolution. We present here a brief review of the most prominent acquisition in this expanding domain.
Traditionally, the primary function of oligodendrocytes (OLGs) in the CNS has been considered to be myelination. Here, we investigated whether OLGs may play a trophic role, particularly during development. Neurotrophin expression was assessed in postnatal day 7 basal forebrain (BF) OLGs, using in situ hybridization and detection of myelin basic protein. Nerve growth factor, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and neurotrophin-3 (NT-3) mRNAs were revealed in OLGs in vivo and in culture. To determine whether OLGs support nearby neurons, we examined the influence of OLGs on BF cholinergic neurons. Neuronal function was enhanced by cocultured OLGs and OLG conditioned medium. Moreover, trophic effects of OLG conditioned medium were partially blocked by K252a, a trk tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and by neutralizing anti-BDNF or anti-NT-3 antisera, indicating that neurotrophins may mediate these effects, perhaps in concert with other signals. Our studies support a novel role for OLGs in providing local trophic support for neurons in the CNS.
BACKGROUND: Genome size is known to exhibit interspecies differences, but also to vary between populations within a given species and even between individual cells within an organism. Major differences have often been reported and attributed to differences in measurement conditions, in internal controls of genome size, and in the stains used. Flow cytometry using intercalating dyes is the most attractive method for measuring genome size. METHODS: We estimated relative genome size of nuclei from heads of Drosophila melanogaster adult males using a FACScalibur flow cytometer and propidium iodide. RESULTS: We have shown that the genome size estimates depended on the temperature and humidity of the rearing medium and decreased with age in adult flies. There were large differences in genome size estimates between the vials in which the flies were maintained, but only slight variations within the vials, supporting the idea that the size estimate depends on the fly rearing conditions. Changes in the temperature of the solution of head nuclei analyzed by the cytometer also influenced the genome size estimate. CONCLUSIONS: These findings clearly show that the environmental conditions under which the flies were reared influence the genome size estimate, perhaps as a result of a change in the accessibility of the DNA to the fluorochrome. Caution is therefore called for when estimating genome size. Experimental artifact rather than adaptation may account for some of the correlations between genome size and environmental conditions reported in the literature.
Transposable elements (TEs), which promote various kinds of mutations, constitute a large fraction of the genome. How they invade natural populations and species is therefore of fundamental importance for understanding the dynamics of genetic diversity and genome composition. On the basis of 85 samples of natural populations of Drosophila simulans, we report the distributions of the genome insertion site numbers of nine TEs that were chosen because they have a low average number of sites. Most populations were found to have 0-3 insertion sites, but some of them had a significantly higher number of sites for a given TE. The populations located in regions outside Africa had the highest number of sites for all elements except HMS Beagle and Coral, suggesting a recent increase in the activity of some TEs associated with the colonization patterns of Drosophila simulans. The element Tirant had a very distinctive pattern of distribution: it was identified mainly in populations from East Africa and some islands in the Indian Ocean, and its insertion site number was low in all these populations. The data suggest that the genome of the entire species of Drosophila simulans may be being invaded by TEs from populations in which they are present in high copy number.
Genome size varies considerably between species, and transposable elements (TEs) are known to play an important role in this variability. However, it is far from clear whether TEs are involved in genome size differences between populations within a given species. We show here that in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans the size of the genome varies among populations and is correlated with the TE copy number on the chromosome arms. The TEs embedded within the heterochromatin do not seem to be involved directly in this phenomenon, although they may contribute to differences in genome size. Furthermore, genome size and TE content variations parallel the worldwide colonization of D. melanogaster species. No such relationship exists for the more recently dispersed D. simulans species, which indicates that a quantitative increase in the TEs in local populations and fly migration are sufficient to account for the increase in genome size, with no need for an adaptation hypothesis.