Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Clifford Hudis

Publications and source records attributed to Clifford Hudis.

49 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

Factors influencing treatment patterns of breast cancer patients age 75 and older.

PURPOSES: To retrospectively determine the factors influencing treatment decisions in older breast cancer patients at a single center. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: 216 patients age > or = 75 seen in post-treatment follow-up between January, 1997 and June, 2000 were identified in the Memorial Sloan-Kettering breast cancer database. Eligible patients were > or = 75 years old at diagnosis, had a diagnosis of stage I, II, or III breast cancer, and received their follow-up care at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. A retrospective chart review was performed. Patients were stratified by: (1) prognostic factors (age (75-79 or > or = 80), Charlson comorbidity score, tumor size, nodal status, stage, ER, PR, creatinine, albumin, hemoglobin, and liver function tests), (2) local treatment (lumpectomy, axillary lymph node dissection (AxLND), radiation (XRT), modified radical mastectomy (MRM)) and (3) systemic treatment (tamoxifen, chemotherapy). Combined local treatment was defined as (a) lumpectomy, AxLND, XRT or (b) MRM, AxLND, XRT (if tumor > or = 5 cm or > or = 4+ lymph nodes). RESULTS: 96 patients were eligible for this study: 46 patients (75-79 years); 50 patients (> or = 80 years). The majority of patients (74%) were treated with lumpectomy but those > or = 80 were less likely to receive XRT (94% age 75-80; 45% age >80; P<0.01). Patients > or = 80 were also less likely to receive AxLND (94% age 75-79; 62% age > or = 80; P<0.01). A logistic regression model identified two independent prognostic variables for not receiving combined local treatment: increased age (P<0.01) and increased comorbidity score (P=0.01). Increased age did not correlate with increased comorbidity (P=0.48). 5.2% of patients received adjuvant chemotherapy (all age <80). 83% of ER positive patients received tamoxifen (89% age 75-79; 79% age >80). CONCLUSION: We hypothesize that both comorbidity and age play a significant role in influencing treatment decisions in the older breast cancer patient but these two variables are not necessarily correlated. Prospective studies are needed to determine the relative impact of these variables.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2003

Follow-up care of breast cancer survivors.

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women, affecting thousands of people each year. The majority of women are diagnosed with early stage breast cancer, which is curable. The follow-up care of the breast cancer survivor requires an understanding of the goals of follow-up and the short and long term side effects of breast cancer treatment. In this article, we will discuss the principles of follow-up care of the breast cancer survivor.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2002

Celecoxib, a selective cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitor, protects against human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2)/neu-induced breast cancer.

Cyclooxygenase 2 (HER-2) (Cox-2), an inducible form of Cox, is overexpressed in HER-2/neu-positive human breast cancers. The aim of this study was to determine whether celecoxib, a selective Cox-2 inhibitor, protected against HER-2/neu-induced experimental breast cancer. Cox-2 protein was detected in breast carcinomas from mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV)/neu mice. Treatment with celecoxib (500 ppm) significantly reduced the incidence of mammary tumors in MMTV/neu mice (P = 0.003) and caused about a 50% reduction in mammary prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) levels. Because mammary glands from MMTV/neu mice expressed all four PGE2 receptor subtypes, we speculate that signaling through PGE2 receptors is important for mammary tumorigenesis. These results strengthen the rationale for developing clinical trials to determine whether selective Cox-2 inhibitors possess anticancer properties in humans at risk for breast cancer.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Prospective exploratory analysis of the association between tumor response, quality of life, and expenditures among patients receiving paclitaxel monotherapy for refractory metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the association between tumor response, change in quality of life (QoL), and hospital expenditures in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) receiving single-agent paclitaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had bidimensionally measurable MBC and any number of previous therapies, excluding taxane chemotherapy. Paclitaxel was administered by various different infusion schedules. QoL measures were evaluated for each patient at baseline and serially using the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS)-Global Distress Index (GDI) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) instruments. Patients were assessed for early (first 6 weeks) and ever changes in QoL parameters. Charges were monitored through the hospital's centralized computer billing system and converted to cost ratios for the analysis. Correlations between response and improvement in QoL were assessed by Fisher's exact test statistic. Associations between improvements in QoL with cost ratios were assessed by logistic regression and likewise between response and cost ratios. RESULTS: Of the 59 patients treated, 50 had sufficient data for comparative analyses. The overall response rate was 24% (all partial responses). Minor responses were observed in 17% of patients, 25% had stable disease, and 29% had progression. Responding patients had significant improvement in QoL as assessed by MSAS-GDI (P =.004) and FACT-B (P =.028). The mean total cost/month ratios for patients experiencing improved GDI QoL scores was 1.31 versus 1.56 for those without QoL benefit (P =.52) and 1.05 versus 1.76 for responders versus nonresponders, respectively (P =.07). CONCLUSION: Patients with evidence of tumor response on paclitaxel had a QoL benefit not observed in nonresponders, and this response was associated with a trend for lower overall costs.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

American Society of Clinical Oncology technology assessment on the use of aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant therapy for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: status report 2002.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct an evidence-based technology assessment to determine whether the routine use of anastrozole or any of the aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant breast cancer setting is appropriate for broad-based conventional use in clinical practice. POTENTIAL INTERVENTIONS: Anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane. OUTCOMES: Outcomes of interest include breast cancer incidence, breast cancer-specific survival, overall survival, and net health benefit. EVIDENCE: A comprehensive, formal literature review was conducted for relevant topics and is detailed in the text. Testimony was collected from invited experts and interested parties. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)-prescribed technology assessment procedure was followed. BENEFITS/HARMS: The ASCO panel recognizes that a woman and her physician's decision regarding adjuvant hormonal therapy is complex and will depend on the importance and weight attributed to information regarding both cancer and non-cancer-related risks and benefits. CONCLUSION: The panel was influenced by the compelling, extensive, and long-term data available on tamoxifen. Overall, the panel considers the results of the Arimidex (anastrozole) or Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial and the extensive supporting data to be very promising but insufficient to change the standard practice at this time (May 2002). A 5-year course of adjuvant tamoxifen remains the standard therapy for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. The panel recommends that physicians discuss the available information with patients, and, in making a decision, acknowledge that treatment approaches can change over time. Individual health care providers and their patients will need to come to their own conclusions, with careful consideration of all of the available data. (Specific questions addressed by the panel are summarized in Appendix 3.) VALIDATION: The conclusions of the panel were endorsed by the ASCO Health Services Research Committee and the ASCO Board of Directors.

Anastrozole↗
PubMed2002

Assessment of molecular markers of clinical sensitivity to single-agent taxane therapy for metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The taxanes affect tubulin polymerization and interfere with mitotic transition. A checkpoint blockade at the G(1)-S boundary would be expected to promote taxane-induced apoptotic cell death through a mechanism that may involve p27. Other proposed determinants of clinical taxane sensitivity/resistance include p53, members of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) superfamily (e.g., HER2, EGFR), and estrogen receptors and progesterone receptors. These molecular markers and their correlation with clinical taxane sensitivity are investigated in this retrospective clinicopathologic study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed immunohistochemistry (IHC) for estrogen receptors, progesterone receptors, HER2, EGFR, p53, and p27 on 144 breast tumor specimens from patients treated for metastatic breast cancer on a series of clinical trials of single-agent taxane chemotherapy for correlation with clinical response (complete or partial response). Patient characteristics that could influence response (i.e., performance status, extent of disease, and prior therapy) were also examined. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, Karnofsky performance status > or = 90% and no prior history of anthracycline therapy correlated with a good clinical response to single-agent taxane (P =.003 and P =.041, respectively). None of the IHC variables tested were predictive of clinical response to taxane therapy, although p27 negativity showed a trend toward significance (P =.075). Concordance between the polyclonal antibody with HercepTest (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA) and the monoclonal antibody CB-11 (BioGenex, San Ramon, CA) was noted (kappa = 0.943); however, neither univariate nor multivariate analysis demonstrated an association between HER2 status and response to taxane chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: The IHC biomarkers studied were not predictive of response to single-agent taxane chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Identification of molecular correlates of taxane response remains an important goal.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗
PubMed2002

Cardiac dysfunction in the trastuzumab clinical trials experience.

PURPOSE: This study sought to estimate cardiac dysfunction (CD) risk for patients receiving trastuzumab; to characterize observed CD by severity, treatment, and clinical outcome; to assess effects of baseline clinical risk factors on CD; and to assess effects of cumulative doses of anthracyclines and trastuzumab on CD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of records for patients enrolled onto any of seven phase II and III trastuzumab clinical trials was performed. Predefined criteria were used for the diagnosis, and the New York Heart Association functional classification system was used to document CD severity. Product-limit estimates were used to summarize the cumulative anthracycline and trastuzumab doses at the time of CD onset. RESULTS: Patients treated with trastuzumab were found to be at an increased risk for CD. The incidence was greatest in patients receiving concomitant trastuzumab and anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide (27%). The risk was substantially lower in patients receiving paclitaxel and trastuzumab (13%) or trastuzumab alone (3% to 7%); however, most of these patients had received prior anthracycline therapy. CD was noted in 8% of patients receiving anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide and 1% receiving paclitaxel alone. Most trastuzumab-treated patients developing CD were symptomatic (75%), and most improved with standard treatment for congestive heart failure (79%). CONCLUSION: Trastuzumab is associated with an increased risk of CD, which is greatest in patients receiving concurrent anthracyclines. In most patients with metastatic breast cancer, the risk of CD can be justified given the improvement in overall survival previously reported with trastuzumab.

Anthracyclines↗
PubMed2002

Adjuvant use of taxanes for patients with breast cancer: we see the tip of the iceberg.

Advances in screening techniques for breast cancer have led to the diagnosis of more patients at earlier disease stages at which time the possibility of a cure is more likely. Adjuvant chemotherapy with anthracycline-based regimens has proven to reduce the risk of relapse and cancer-related death in women with early-stage breast cancer. Recent studies have aimed at integrating the taxanes, paclitaxel and docetaxel, into the adjuvant setting, but to date, we are still in the earliest stages of the study of patients with operable breast cancer. Adjuvant trials now require thousands of patients and many years to reach maturity. Many of the trials began in the late 1990s and are not yet mature. For node-positive patients, the available evidence supports the use of taxanes as adjuvant treatment since they are safe and appear to provide benefit. Going forward, docetaxel holds significant promise in the adjuvant setting, and further trials as well as further follow-up of existing trials are eagerly awaited to help us determine whether docetaxel is best given sequentially to, or concurrently with, doxorubicin or epirubicin.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Radiation pneumonitis in breast cancer patients treated with taxanes: does sequential radiation therapy lower the risk?

Taxanes are now routinely used in conjunction with radiation therapy (RT) as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Recent publications have reported several cases of radiation pneumonitis (RP) in patients receiving RT and taxane chemotherapy, thus raising concern as to the safety of this combination. To decrease the potential risk of RP, we sequenced RT after taxane chemotherapy with a target interval of 3-4 weeks in two consecutive institutional breast protocols. Forty patients were treated on two adjuvant systemic protocols consisting of modified radical mastectomy (n = 9) or breast-conserving surgery (n = 31), followed by adjuvant doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and a sequential taxane (ACT), followed by RT. All patients had either node-positive or high-risk node-negative breast cancer and were treated between October 2000 and September 2002. Postmastectomy, a median dose of 5040 cGy was delivered to the chest wall. After breast-conserving surgery, a median dose of 4680 cGy was delivered to the breast plus a 1400 cGy boost to the surgical cavity. Information regarding RP was gathered retrospectively by reviewing patient records. With a median follow-up of 28 months (range 6-42 months), no cases of clinical RP were identified and no local failures had occurred. The median time interval for all patients between the completion of chemotherapy and the initiation of RT was 34 days (range 5-70 days). At the latest follow-up, 2 patients were diagnosed with metastatic disease and 38 patients were without evidence of disease. Sequencing of RT after taxane therapy with a target interval of 3-4 weeks does not appear to result in increased pulmonary toxicity and is associated with good local control.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer: an update.

BACKGROUND: Tamoxifen has been the endocrine treatment of choice for patients with breast cancer. The development of selective aromatase inhibitors has offered an alternative management approach for patients in whom a hormonal approach is indicated. METHODS: The authors reviewed reports in which aromatase inhibitors were compared with tamoxifen for the treatment of metastatic disease, as well as information pertinent to their use as adjuvant therapy. RESULTS: Both nonsteroidal (anastrozole and letrozole) and steroidal (exemestane) aromatase inhibitors for metastatic disease appear to provide superior efficacy and a better toxicity profile in first- and second-line treatment of metastatic disease than tamoxifen. Early results from the ATAC trial suggest anastrozole is superior to tamoxifen for disease-free survival, particularly in receptor-positive patients, and in reducing the incidence of contralateral breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Aromatase inhibitors have important roles in optimal management of postmenopausal patients with hormone-responsive metastases in both the adjuvant and advanced-disease settings.

Aminoglutethimide↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Screening chest imaging studies are not effective in the follow-up of breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To determine the utility of chest imaging after adjuvant therapy for breast cancer in detection of recurrent disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 786 patients diagnosed with early stage breast cancer between 1996-1998 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. 250 of these patients had a chest radiograph or CT scan performed greater that one year after their original diagnosis. Patients were stratified as to whether the chest imaging study was ordered for screening or to evaluate symptoms. RESULTS: 533 chest imaging studies were performed: 397 (74%) chest radiographs and 136 (26%) CT scans. Ten (4%) patients developed metastatic breast cancer. Two patients (0.8%) were found to have metastatic disease by chest radiographs: one (0.4%) was symptomatic and one was not. The remaining eight patients had a negative chest x-ray within one year. No patients were found to have metastatic disease by chest CT. A 2nd primary cancer was found in three patients (1.2%) all of whom had a negative chest x-ray in the past year. There were 20 abnormal radiology studies: 2 true positive (2/20 = 10%) and 18 false positive (18/20 = 90%). CONCLUSIONS: Within this duration of follow-up, we conclude that chest imaging is of limited value for asymptomatic patients with a history of breast cancer and has a high false positive rate.

Breast Neoplasms↗