Biomedical subjects
Claudio Ronco
Publications and source records attributed to Claudio Ronco.
Practice patterns in the management of acute renal failure in the critically ill patient: an international survey.
BACKGROUND: Several controversies have developed over acute renal failure (ARF) definition and treatment: which approach to patient care is most desirable and which form of renal replacement therapy (RRT) should be applied is an everyday matter of debate. There is also disagreement on clinical practice for RRT including the best timing to start, vascular access, anti-coagulation, membranes, equipment and finally, if continuous or intermittent techniques should be preferred. In this lack of harmony, the epidemiology of ARF has recently displayed an outbreak of cases in the intensive care units and nephrologists and intensivists are now called to work together in the case of such a syndrome. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We report on the responses of 560 contributors, mostly coming from Europe, to a questionnaire submitted during the third International Course on Critical Care Nephrology held in Vicenza, Italy in June 2004. The questionnaire was divided into several sections concerning demographic and medical information, definition of ARF, practice of RRT, current opinions about clinical advantages and problems related to different RRTs and modalities, and beliefs on alternative indications to extracorporeal treatments. RESULTS: More then 200 different definitions of ARF and about 90 RRT start criteria were reported. Oliguria and RIFLE (an acronym classifying ARF in different levels of severity: Risk of renal dysfunction; Injury to the kidney; Failure of kidney function; Loss of kidney function; End-stage kidney disease.) were the most frequent criteria used to define ARF. In 10% of centres all forms of renal replacement techniques are available, and in 70% of cases two or more different techniques are available: absolute analysis of different techniques showed that continuous renal replacement therapies are utilized by 511 specialists (91%), intermittent haemodialysis by 387 (69%) and sustained low efficiency dialysis by 136 (24%). Treatment prescription showed significant differences among specialists, 60% of intensivists being uncertain on RRT dose prescription compared to 40% of nephrologists (P = 0.002). The most frequently selected dosage was '35 ml/kg/h' for urea (25%) and creatinine targets (26%), and '2-3 l/h' for the septic dose (25%). Of the participants, 90% said that they used RRT for non-renal indications, 60% although responders admitted the lack of scientific evidence as a limiting factor to its use. CONCLUSIONS: New classifications such as RIFLE criteria might improve well-known uncertainty about ARF definition. Different RRT techniques are available in most centres, but a general lack of treatment dose standardization is noted by our survey. Non-renal indications to RRT still need to find a definitive role in routine practice.
Early isovolaemic haemofiltration in oliguric patients with septic shock.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of early short-term, isovolaemic haemofiltration at 45 ml/kg/h on physiological and clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock. DESIGN: Retrospective study before and after a change of unit protocol (study period 8 years). SETTING: Intensive care unit of metropolitan hospital. PATIENTS: Eighty patients with septic shock. INTERVENTIONS: Introduction of a new septic shock protocol based on early isovolaemic haemofiltration (EIHF). In the pre-EIHF period (before), 40 patients received conventional supportive therapy. In the post-EIHF period (after), 40 patients received EIHF at 45 ml/kg/h of plasma-water exchange over 6 h followed by conventional continuous venovenous haemofiltration (CVVH). Anticoagulation policy remained unchanged. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The two groups were comparable for age, gender and baseline APACHE II score. Delivered haemofiltration dose was above 85% of prescription in all patients. PaO2/FiO2 ratio increased from 117+/-59 to 240+/-50 in EIHF, while it changed from 125+/-55 to 160+/-50 in the control group (p<0.05). In EIHF patients, mean arterial pressure increased (95+/-10 vs 60+/-12 mmHg; p<0.05), and norepinephrine dose decreased (0.20+/-2 vs 0.02+/-0.2 microg/kg/min; p<0.05). Among EIHF patients, 28 (70%) were successfully weaned from the ventilator compared with 15 (37%) in the control group (p<0.01). Similarly, 28-day survival was 55% compared with 27.5% (p<0.05). Length of stay in the ICU was 9+/-5 days compared with 16+/-4 days (p<0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with septic shock, EIHF was associated with improved gas exchange, haemodynamics, greater likelihood of successful weaning and greater 28-day survival compared with conventional therapy.
The place of early haemoperfusion with polymyxin B fibre column in the treatment of sepsis.
Direct haemoperfusion with polymyxin B-immobilized fibre (PMX-F) is a promising treatment for Gram-negative sepsis in critically ill patients. Indeed, it has been used routinely in Japan for a decade. Recent evidence presented in this journal suggests that PMX-F can have a positive impact on outcome in patients with sepsis, although other reports in the literature have presented confusing or even conflicting results. This commentary considers whether the available evidence allows us to establish an appropriate role for PMX-F treatment in sepsis and what further work is needed.
Pre- versus post-dilution CVVH.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Year in review: Critical Care 2004 - nephrology.
We summarize all original research in the field of critical care nephrology published in 2004 or accepted for publication in Critical Care and, when considered relevant or directly linked to this research, in other journals. Articles were grouped into four categories to facilitate a rapid overview. First, regarding the definition of acute renal failure (ARF), the RIFLE criteria (risk, injury, failure, loss, ESKD [end-stage kidney disease]) for diagnosis of ARF were defined by the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative workgroup and applied in clinical practice by some authors. The second category is acid-base disorders in ARF; the Stewart-Figge quantitative approach to acidosis in critically ill patients has been utilized by two groups of researchers, with similar results but different conclusions. In the third category - blood markers during ARF - cystatin C as an early marker of ARF and procalcitonin as a sepsis marker during continuous venovenous haemofiltration were examined. Finally, in the extracorporeal treatment of ARF, the ability of two types of high cutoff haemofilters to influence blood levels of middle- and high-molecular-weight toxins showed promise.
Acute renal failure in critically ill patients: a multinational, multicenter study.
CONTEXT: Although acute renal failure (ARF) is believed to be common in the setting of critical illness and is associated with a high risk of death, little is known about its epidemiology and outcome or how these vary in different regions of the world. OBJECTIVES: To determine the period prevalence of ARF in intensive care unit (ICU) patients in multiple countries; to characterize differences in etiology, illness severity, and clinical practice; and to determine the impact of these differences on patient outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Prospective observational study of ICU patients who either were treated with renal replacement therapy (RRT) or fulfilled at least 1 of the predefined criteria for ARF from September 2000 to December 2001 at 54 hospitals in 23 countries. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Occurrence of ARF, factors contributing to etiology, illness severity, treatment, need for renal support after hospital discharge, and hospital mortality. RESULTS: Of 29 269 critically ill patients admitted during the study period, 1738 (5.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.5%-6.0%) had ARF during their ICU stay, including 1260 who were treated with RRT. The most common contributing factor to ARF was septic shock (47.5%; 95% CI, 45.2%-49.5%). Approximately 30% of patients had preadmission renal dysfunction. Overall hospital mortality was 60.3% (95% CI, 58.0%-62.6%). Dialysis dependence at hospital discharge was 13.8% (95% CI, 11.2%-16.3%) for survivors. Independent risk factors for hospital mortality included use of vasopressors (odds ratio [OR], 1.95; 95% CI, 1.50-2.55; P<.001), mechanical ventilation (OR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.58-2.82; P<.001), septic shock (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.03-1.79; P = .03), cardiogenic shock (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.05-1.90; P = .02), and hepatorenal syndrome (OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.07-3.28; P = .03). CONCLUSION: In this multinational study, the period prevalence of ARF requiring RRT in the ICU was between 5% and 6% and was associated with a high hospital mortality rate.
Study protocol: the DOse REsponse Multicentre International collaborative initiative (DO-RE-MI).
INTRODUCTION: Current practices for renal replacement therapy in intensive care units (ICUs) remain poorly defined. The DOse REsponse Multicentre International collaborative initiative (DO-RE-MI) will address the issue of how the different modes of renal replacement therapy are currently chosen and performed. Here, we describe the study protocol, which was approved by the Scientific and Steering Committees. METHODS: DO-RE-MI is an observational, multicentre study conducted in ICUs. The primary end-point will be the delivered dose of dialysis, which will be compared with ICU mortality, 28-day mortality, hospital mortality, ICU length of stay and number of days of mechanical ventilation. The secondary end-point will be the haemodynamic response to renal replacement therapy, expressed as percentage reduction in noradrenaline (norepinephrine) requirement. Based on the the sample analysis calculation, at least 162 patients must be recruited. Anonymized patient data will be entered online in electronic case report forms and uploaded to an internet website. Each participating centre will have 2 months to become acquainted with the electronic case report forms. After this period official recruitment will begin. Patient data belong to the respective centre, which may use the database for its own needs. However, all centres have agreed to participate in a joint effort to achieve the sample size needed for statistical analysis. CONCLUSION: The study will hopefully help to collect useful information on the current practice of renal replacement therapy in ICUs. It will also provide a centre-based collection of data that will be useful for monitoring all aspects of extracorporeal support, such as incidence, frequency, and duration.
The human nephron filter: toward a continuously functioning, implantable artificial nephron system.
BACKGROUND: Nearly 900,000 patients worldwide have end-stage renal disease and require dialysis or kidney transplantation, and this number is expected to more than double by 2010, placing considerable stress on healthcare systems throughout the world. Despite the availability of these forms of renal replacement therapy for nearly four decades, mortality and morbidity is high and patients often have a poor quality of life. METHODS: We have developed a human nephron filter (HNF) utilizing nanotechnology that would eventually make feasible a continuously functioning, implantable artificial kidney. The device consists of two membranes operating in series within one device cartridge. The first membrane mimics the function of the glomerulus, while the second membrane mimics the function of the renal tubules. FINDINGS: The device has been computer-modeled and operating 12 h/day, 7 days/week, the HNF provides the equivalent of 30 ml/min glomerular filtration rate (compared to half that amount for conventional thrice weekly hemodialysis). CONCLUSIONS: The HNF system, by eliminating dialysate and utilizing a novel membrane system created through applied nanotechnology may represent a breakthrough in renal replacement therapy based on the functioning of native kidneys. The enhanced solute removal and wearable design should substantially improve patient outcomes and quality of life.
Pulse high-volume haemofiltration for treatment of severe sepsis: effects on hemodynamics and survival.
INTRODUCTION: Severe sepsis is the leading cause of mortality in critically ill patients. Abnormal concentrations of inflammatory mediators appear to be involved in the pathogenesis of sepsis. Based on the humoral theory of sepsis, a potential therapeutic approach involves high-volume haemofiltration (HVHF), which has exhibited beneficial effects in severe sepsis, improving haemodynamics and unselectively removing proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory mediators. However, concerns have been expressed about the feasibility and costs of continuous HVHF. Here we evaluate a new modality, namely pulse HVHF (PHVHF; 24-hour schedule: HVHF 85 ml/kg per hour for 6-8 hours followed by continuous venovenous haemofiltration 35 ml/kg per hour for 16-18 hours). METHOD: Fifteen critically ill patients (seven male; mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE] II score 31.2, mean Simplified Acute Physiology Score [SAPS] II 62, and mean Sequential Organ Failure Assessment 14.2) with severe sepsis underwent daily PHVHF. We measured changes in haemodynamic variables and evaluated the dose of noradrenaline required to maintain mean arterial pressure above 70 mmHg during and after pulse therapy at 6 and 12 hours. PHVHF was performed with 250 ml/min blood flow rate. The bicarbonate-based replacement fluid was used at a 1:1 ratio in simultaneous pre-dilution and post-dilution. RESULTS: No treatment was prematurely discontinued. Haemodynamics were improved by PHVHF, allowing a significant reduction in noradrenaline dose during and at the end of the PHVHF session; this reduction was maintained at 6 and 12 hours after pulse treatment (P = 0.001). There was also an improvement in systolic blood pressure (P = 0.04). There were no changes in temperature, cardiac index, oxygenation, arterial pH or urine output during the period of observation. The mean daily Kt/V was 1.92. Predicted mortality rates were 72% (based on APACHE II score) and 68% (based on SAPS II score), and the observed 28-day mortality was 47%. CONCLUSION: PHVHF is a feasible modality and improves haemodynamics both during and after therapy. It may be a beneficial adjuvant treatment for severe sepsis/septic shock in terms of patient survival, and it represents a compromise between continuous renal replacement therapy and HVHF.
In vivo validation of the adequacy calculator for continuous renal replacement therapies.
INTRODUCTION: The study was conducted to validate in vivo the Adequacy Calculator, a Microsoft Excel-based program, designed to assess the prescription and delivery of renal replacement therapy in the critical care setting. METHODS: The design was a prospective cohort study, set in two intensive care units of teaching hospitals. The participants were 30 consecutive critically ill patients with acute renal failure treated with 106 continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRT). Urea clearance computation was performed with the Adequacy Calculator (KCALC). Simultaneous blood and effluent urea samples were collected to measure the effectively delivered urea clearance (KDEL) at the beginning of each treatment and, during 73 treatments, between the 18th and 24th treatment hour. The correlation between 179 computed and 179 measured clearances was assessed. Fractional clearances for urea were calculated as spKt/V (where sp represents single pool, K is clearance, t is time, and V is urea volume of distribution) obtained from software prescription and compared with the delivered spKt/V obtained from empirical data. RESULTS: We found that the value of clearance predicted by the calculator was strongly correlated with the value obtained from computation on blood and dialysate determination (r = 0.97) during the first 24 treatment hours, regardless of the renal replacement modality used. The delivered spKt/V (1.25) was less than prescribed (1.4) from the Adequacy Calculator by 10.7%, owing to therapy downtime. CONCLUSION: The Adequacy Calculator is a simple tool for prescribing CRRT and for predicting the delivered dose. The calculator might be a helpful tool for standardizing therapy and for comparing disparate treatments, making it possible to perform large multi-centre studies on CRRT.
Tailoring high-cut-off membranes and feasible application in sepsis-associated acute renal failure: in vitro studies.
BACKGROUND: As removal of pro-inflammatory cytokines is limited in conventional diffusive or convective extracorporeal therapies, we studied in two polysulphone membranes with an industrial albumin sieving coefficient of 0.05 (Type A) and 0.13 (Type B) cytokine (IL-6, IL-8, IL-1beta, IL-1ra, TNF-alpha) and plasma protein (albumin, cystatin C, total proteins) permeability profiles. Based on the convective membrane permeability, we evaluated in vitro the dialytic modality that could provide an acceptable balance between high cytokine and low albumin clearances. METHODS: Cytokine and plasma protein sieving coefficient (SC) and clearance were studied in (i) post-dilutional haemofiltration mode at 20% fixed ultrafiltration rate; (ii) haemodialysis mode (dialysate flow rate of 3 and 5 l/h); and (iii) haemodiafiltration mode (dialysate flow rate of 3 or 5 l/h with 0.5 l/h of ultrafiltrate). RESULTS: In haemofiltration mode both Type A and Type B haemodialysers at QB 150 ml/min exhibited similar median SC nearly up to 1 for IL-1beta and IL-1ra, at about 0.6 for IL-6, 0.4 for IL-8 and 0.7 for TNF-alpha, with clearance values ranging from 15 to 30 ml/min. SC were independent of blood flow and were stable throughout the whole experiment. Albumin SC was higher in Type B than in Type A and rapidly decreased from 0.2 to 0.02 and from 0.5 to 0.04 within 3 h for haemodialyser Types A and B, respectively. Cytokine SC was lower in haemodialysis than in haemodiafiltration and haemofiltration mode, and by increasing dialysate flow from 3 up to 5 l/h in both haemodialysis and haemodiafiltration mode, SC for all tested cytokines decreased. However, at 5 l/h clearances were not different or were higher, since increased amounts of dialysate outlet compensated for the decreased SC. Albumin clearances in haemodialysis and haemodiafiltration mode after 360 min at 5 l/h were 0.81 and 0.91 ml/min, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our studies show that a mixed convective and diffusive technique ensures high cytokine clearances with an acceptable loss of albumin.
Extracorporeal therapies in acute rhabdomyolysis and myoglobin clearance.
Rhabdomyolysis is a pathogenetic cause of acute kidney injury. In such circumstances, not only should therapeutic strategies to replace the failing kidney be implemented, but measures should also be explored to prevent further damage by circulating myoglobin. Volume expansion and forced diuresis have been used, but when a kidney fails, renal replacement therapies are instituted. The techniques and devices used for classic dialytic techniques have displayed a limited capacity for the removal of circulating myoglobin. In a recent paper, Naka and colleagues have proposed the use of a super-high-flux membrane in continuous hemofiltration. The removal of myoglobin was greater than in than any previous report. Thus, if the removal of myoglobin is desirable, a combination of continuous hemofiltration and hyperpermeable membranes seems to be the most effective. However, care must be exercised to prevent unwanted albumin losses.
Renal replacement II: dialysis dose.
Improved survival of critically ill acute renal failure patients can be correlated with therapy dose. The overall solute elimination can be measured by the product of clearance and time (Kt), which is usually normalized for the volume of distribution (V) of the solute as "Kt/V." Setting a Kt/V threshold of 1.4 can guide clinicians toward adequate treatment. This is a slightly higher prescription than the current value for chronic dialysis. However, the true uraemic toxins probably diffuse among body compartments less readily than urea and, as such, the frequency of renal replacement therapy should be more important to its efficiency, and should be optimal with continuous therapy. In the absence of an optimal dialysis dose, it can only be recommended that the prescription should exceed that calculated to be "adequate."
Acute renal failure in cancer patients.
Acute renal failure (ARF) is defined as a sudden decrease in glomerular filtration rate leading to an acute rise in blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine levels. It is a serious complication of cancer and constitutes a major source of morbidity and mortality. Current data suggest that ARF has the potential to substantially jeopardize the chances of cancer patients receiving optimal treatment and a potential cure. The pathways leading to ARF in cancer patients are common to the development of ARF in other conditions. However, ARF may also develop due to aetiologies arising from cancer treatment or the disease itself, including: nephrotoxic chemotherapy agents, post-renal obstruction, compression and infiltration by malignancy, tumour lysis syndrome, uric acid, sepsis and contrast agent nephropathy. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the causes of ARF in patients with cancer and guidance on how to prevent and treat this condition. Ultimately, the key to managing ARF in cancer patients is to ensure that a multidisciplinary approach provides adequate assessment, appropriate preventative measures and early intervention.
External validation of severity scoring systems for acute renal failure using a multinational database.
OBJECTIVE: Several different severity scoring systems specific to acute renal failure have been proposed. However, most validation studies of these scoring systems were conducted in a single center or in a small number of centers, often the same ones used for their development. Therefore, it is not known whether such severity scoring systems may be widely applied. DESIGN: Prospective clinical investigation. SETTING: Intensive care units. PATIENTS: One thousand seven hundred and forty-two intensive care unit patients with acute renal failure who were either treated with renal replacement therapy or fulfilled predefined criteria. INTERVENTIONS: Demographic and clinical information and outcomes were measured. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Scores for four acute renal failure-specific scoring systems and two general scoring systems (Simplified Acute Physiology Score II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) were calculated, and their discrimination and calibration were tested with receiver operating characteristic curves and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of fit-tests. For the receiver operating characteristic curves, blood lactate levels were also used as a reference. All scores had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve <0.7 (Mehta 0.670, Liano 0.698, Chertow 0.610, Paganini 0.643, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II 0.645, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment 0.675, lactate 0.639). For scores that can calculate predicted mortality, the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test showed poor calibration. CONCLUSIONS: None of the scoring systems tested had a high level of discrimination or calibration to predict mortality for patients with acute renal failure when tested in a broad cohort of patients from multiple countries. A large, multiple-center database might be needed to improve the discrimination and calibration of acute renal failure scoring system.
Prophylactic fenoldopam for renal protection in sepsis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial.
OBJECTIVE: Acute renal failure is common in septic patients. Fenoldopam, a dopamine-1 receptor agonist, increases renal blood flow and may, therefore, reduce the risk of acute renal failure in such patients. Accordingly, we sought to determine the safety and efficacy of fenoldopam for the prevention of acute renal failure in septic patients. DESIGN: Prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Three multidisciplinary intensive care units at a university hospital. PATIENTS: Three hundred septic patients with baseline serum creatinine concentrations <150 micromol/L. INTERVENTIONS: We randomized patients to a continuous infusion of either fenoldopam (n = 150) at 0.09 microg x kg x min or placebo (n = 150) while in the intensive care unit. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of acute renal failure, defined as a serum creatinine concentration increase to >150 micromol/L, during study drug infusion. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The incidence of acute renal failure was significantly lower in the fenoldopam group compared with the control group (29 vs. 51 patients; p = .006). The odds ratio of developing acute renal failure for patients treated with fenoldopam was estimated to be 0.47 (p = .005). The difference in the incidence of severe acute renal failure (creatinine >300 mumol/L), however, failed to achieve statistical significance (10 vs. 21; p = .056). The length of intensive care unit stay in surviving patients was significantly lower in the fenoldopam group compared with the control group (10.64 +/- 9.3 vs. 13.4 +/- 14.0; p < .001). There were no complications of fenoldopam infusion. A direct effect of treatment on the probability of death, beyond its effect on acute renal failure, was not significant (odds ratio = 0.68, p = .1). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with placebo, low-dose fenoldopam resulted in a smaller increase in serum creatinine in septic patients. The clinical significance of this finding is uncertain. A large multiple-center trial is now needed to confirm these findings.
Primary prevention of acute renal failure in the critically ill.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Acute renal failure is both common and highly lethal in the intensive care unit, with hospital mortality rates in excess of 50%. To date, no therapy apart from renal replacement therapy has been shown to improve survival or enhance recover. Thus, efforts to prevent acute renal failure are eagerly sought. RECENT FINDINGS: Fluids and avoiding hypotension and nephrotoxins appear to be the most effective strategies to prevent acute renal failure. N-acetylcysteine has been shown to prevent the increase in serum creatinine in high risk patients given intravenous radiocontrast agents, although there is some evidence that N-acetylcysteine may reduce serum creatinine without increasing glomerular filtration. SUMMARY: The best evidence suggests that nonpharmacologic strategies are more effective than drugs in reducing the risk of acute renal failure. Evidence also exists that strategies that improve survival in critically ill patients also reduce the incidence of organ failure, including acute renal failure.