Search PubMedSearch

Biomedical subjects

Claude Houdayer

Publications and source records attributed to Claude Houdayer.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Hereditary cancer: Germline testing practices across ERN GENTURIS member countries.

Germline genetic testing practices for hereditary cancer vary across the European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN GENTURIS) member countries. We surveyed experts in genetic testing from 20 EU member countries and Norway to assess multi-gene panel usage, availability of genome-wide sequencing, first-tier testing approaches, implementation of polygenic risk scores, and the roles of non-genetic healthcare professionals. National experts and members of the ERN GENTURIS completed a structured questionnaire covering founder germline pathogenic variants (gPV) testing, panel testing for common genetic tumour risk syndromes, use of whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome sequencing, polygenic risk score implementation, use of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour samples, laboratory accreditation, and the clinical roles of physicians, genetic counselors and nurses. Significant inter-country heterogeneity was observed. Most countries rely on next-generation sequencing (NGS) multi-gene panels. Founder gPV testing is first-line in a few high-prevalence populations (e.g., BRCA1/2 founders). All 21 countries offer NGS panel tests for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, and ≥19 countries do so for colorectal and prostate cancers. However, NGS panel size and gene composition exhibit substantial variability. WES is available in 12 countries on a routine basis. Most countries implemented genetic testing on stored tumour tissue from deceased patients. In all countries, clinical geneticists can order germline genetic tests, and in 9 countries, any physician can do so. These findings show differences in accessibility to germline genetic testing of hereditary cancer in Europe. We propose EU-wide guidance via pathways, standards of care, and sharing of best practices to further optimize access to hereditary cancer genetic molecular diagnostics.

Humans

A functional assay to classify RB1 variants of uncertain significance.

PURPOSE: The RB1 gene encodes the retinoblastoma protein (pRB) playing a major role in cell cycle control, particularly by its interaction with E2F transcription factors. Familial forms of retinoblastoma are caused by germline pathogenic variants in the RB1 gene predisposing to retinoblastoma and other tumors. By analyzing the RB1 gene in patients with retinoblastoma, we found that missense variants often remain variants of uncertain significance (VUS). METHODS: To classify RB1 VUS, we developed a functional assay evaluating their impact on the ability of pRB to inhibit the activity of the E2F1 promoter, with a luciferase reporter gene. A set of 14 pathogenic/likely pathogenic and benign/likely benign RB1 variants was used for validation. RESULTS: We tested 16 VUS detected in patients with retinoblastoma and found that 9 VUS reduced the ability of pRB to inhibit E2F1 promoter. Among them, the (RB1) c.2263T>G p.(Phe755Val) variant showed a reduced level of pRB on Western blot, suggesting a defect in pRB stability. By applying the criterion PS3_moderate of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology classification to this functional assay, 5 of the 9 VUS with functional impact could be classified as likely pathogenic. CONCLUSION: This functional assay can improve the molecular diagnosis of retinoblastoma predisposition by a better determination of pathogenic/likely pathogenic RB1 variants.

Humans

The risk of a second primary cancer in PTEN Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome (PHTS).

PURPOSE: Patients with PTEN Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome (PHTS) have high hereditary cancer risks for breast, endometrial, and thyroid cancer. Patients develop multiple primary cancers, but these risks remain uncertain. We aimed to provide the second primary cancer risk. METHODS: This European cohort study assessed second primary cancer risks with Kaplan-Meier analyses using data from medical files, registries and/or patient questionnaires. RESULTS: Overall, 279 adult PHTS patients with (a history of) cancer were included (80% female). Among females, 106 (54%) developed a PHTS-related second primary cancer after a PHTS-related first primary cancer, whereas 10 (29%) males developed a PHTS-related second primary cancer after a PHTS-related first primary cancer. The 5- and 10-year PHTS-related second primary cancer risks were 24.5% (95% CI = 18.1-32.5) and 45.7% (95% CI = 36.9-55.4) in females and 14.5% (95% CI = 5.7-34.1) and 19.8% (95% CI = 8.6-41.9) in males, respectively. Furthermore, 5- and 10-year risks for a second primary breast cancer after a first primary breast cancer were 23.3% (95% CI = 14.9-35.2) and 45.6% (95% CI = 33.0-60.2) in females, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that PHTS patients have high second primary cancer risks, which is driven by breast cancer in females. Hence, identifying patients with PHTS before or at first primary cancer diagnosis is essential to enable potential early detection or prevention of a second primary cancer through surveillance or risk-reducing surgery.

Humans