Biomedical subjects

Cindy Grines

Publications and source records attributed to Cindy Grines.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

Frequency, determinants, and clinical implications of residual intracoronary thrombus following primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

The presence of intracoronary thrombus after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) worsens clinical outcomes. We performed this study to assess the incidence of intracoronary thrombus after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and the clinical impact of nonocclusive thrombus. In 2,148 patients enrolled in the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI)-2, Stent PAMI, and PAMI No-Surgery-On-Site trials, we compared clinical and angiographic characteristics of 131 patients (6%) who had angiographically visible thrombus after PCI with those who did not (n = 2,017). In the subset of 2,115 patients with post-PCI Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 2 or 3 flow, we assessed the impact of post-PCI thrombus (n = 110) on in-hospital, 1-month, and 1-year outcomes (reinfarction, ischemic target vessel revascularization [I-TVR], death, and major adverse cardiovascular events [MACEs] [i.e., death, reinfarction, or I-TVR]). Lack of stent use, presence of thrombus before PCI, and no history of PCI were independent correlates of post-PCI thrombus. Patients with nonocclusive thrombus after PCI had more reinfarctions during the index hospitalization (5.5% vs 2.0%, p = 0.03) and at 1 month (6.8% vs 2.3%, p = 0.01) and had nonsignificantly higher I-TVR (during hospitalization 5.5% vs 2.8%, p = 0.13; at 1 month 5.9% vs 3.4%, p = 0.17), but similar mortality and MACE rates as those without post-PCI thrombus. In multivariate analysis, post-PCI thrombus was not a significant predictor of in-hospital or 1-month reinfarction. At 1 year, clinical outcomes were similar between patient groups (reinfarction 8.3% vs 4.7%, p = 0.14; I-TVR 12.5% vs 12.1%, p = 0.91; death 5.9% vs 5.0%, p = 0.68; and MACEs 21% vs 18%, p = 0.54). We conclude that residual intracoronary thrombus after primary angioplasty is relatively uncommon. In patients who achieve TIMI 2 or 3 flow after PCI, intracoronary thrombus is associated with worse cardiovascular outcomes. However, differences in outcomes between patients with and without residual thombus are related to baseline clinical differences rather than thrombus per se.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗

PubMed2003

Comparison of outcomes of diabetic and nondiabetic patients undergoing primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

We sought to determine whether diabetes mellitus independently conferred poor prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In 3,742 patients enrolled in the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) studies with the intention of undergoing primary PCI, we compared in-hospital mortality, 6-month mortality, and 6-month major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), i.e., composite of death, reinfarction, or ischemic target vessel revascularization (TVR), between diabetics (n = 626, 17%) and nondiabetics (n = 3,116, 83%). We evaluated the independent impact of diabetes on outcomes after adjustment for baseline clinical and angiographic differences. Diabetics had worse baseline clinical characteristics, longer pain onset-to-hospital arrival time, and longer door-to-balloon time. They had more multivessel coronary disease and lower left ventricular ejection fractions, but better baseline Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow. Diabetics underwent primary PCI less often (88% vs 91%, p = 0.01). During the index hospitalization, diabetics were more likely to die (4.6% vs 2.6%, p = 0.005). During 6-month follow-up, diabetics had higher incidences of death (8.1% vs 4.2%, p <0.0001) and MACEs (18% vs 14%, p = 0.036). In multivariate analysis, diabetes was independently associated with 6-month mortality (hazard ratio 1.53, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 2.26, p = 0.03), but not with in-hospital mortality or 6-month MACEs. We conclude that diabetics with AMI have less favorable baseline characteristics and are less likely to undergo primary PCI than nondiabetics. Despite excellent angiographic results, diabetics had significantly worse 6-month mortality.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

Effects of prior beta-blocker therapy on clinical outcomes after primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

We hypothesized that pretreatment with beta blockers may improve clinical outcomes after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. We pooled clinical, angiographic, and outcomes data on 2,537 patients enrolled in the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI), PAMI-2, and Stent PAMI trials. We classified patients into a beta group (n = 1,132) if they received beta-blocker therapy before primary angioplasty or a no-beta group (n = 1,405) if they did not. We evaluated procedural complications and in-hospital and 1-year outcomes (death and major adverse cardiac events [death, reinfarction, target vessel revascularization, or stroke]) between groups. Beta patients were younger, had higher systolic blood pressure and heart rate, and were more likely to be in Killip class I at admission. They had lower left ventricular ejection fraction, greater door-to-balloon time, greater likelihood of having a left anterior descending artery culprit lesion, but a similar incidence of Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 3 flow after angioplasty (92.6% vs 92.7%, p = 0.91). The beta group had less procedural complications (23% vs 34%, p <0.0001) and a lower incidence of death (1.8% vs 3.7%, p = 0.0035) and major adverse cardiac events (5.5% vs 7.8%, p = 0.027) during hospitalization. At 1 year, mortality remained lower in beta patients (4.9% vs 6.7%, log-rank p = 0.055). After adjustment for baseline differences, beta patients had significantly lower in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 0.41; 95% confidence interval 0.20 to 0.84; p <0.0148) and nonsignificantly lower 1-year mortality (odds ratio 0.72; 95% confidence interval 0.47 to 1.08; p = 0.11). Thus, pretreatment with beta blockers has an independent beneficial effect on short-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

PubMed2002

Comparison of effectiveness of primary angioplasty for proximal versus distal right coronary artery culprit lesion during acute myocardial infarction.

From the cohort of 4,023 patients enrolled in the Primary Angioplasty for Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) trials, we pooled clinical, angiographic, and outcomes data on 1,521 patients with culprit lesions in the right coronary artery (RCA). We compared angiographic results, procedural complications, and in-hospital and 1-year clinical outcomes between patients with proximal RCA (n = 572) versus nonproximal RCA culprit lesions (n = 949). Patients with proximal RCA culprit lesions were older, had lower systolic blood pressure, greater diameter stenosis, and were less likely to have Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 2 or 3 flow (19% vs 31%; p <0.0001) before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). After PCI, the incidence of TIMI 3 flow (94% vs 93%) was similar between groups. Patients with proximal RCA lesions were more likely to have bradyarrhythmias (30% vs 23%, p = 0.016) and require an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP; 4.6% vs 2%, p = 0.034) during PCI. In-hospital complications, including mortality (2.3% vs 2.2%) and reinfarction (1.4% vs 1.1%), and the 1-year incidence of death, reinfarction, ischemia driven target vessel revascularization, and major adverse cardiovascular events were similar between groups. After adjustment for baseline differences, proximal RCA location of the culprit lesion was independently associated with greater IABP use (odds ratio 2.41, 95% confidence interval 1.04 to 5.58) but not with bradyarrhythmias during PCI. Thus, in patients with acute myocardial infarction referred for primary angioplasty, proximal RCA location of the culprit lesion is associated with excellent clinical outcomes that are similar to nonproximal RCA lesions.

Aged↗

PubMed2002

Low-molecular-weight heparin therapy for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes and during percutaneous coronary intervention: an expert consensus.

BACKGROUND: Therapy with either low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists is of benefit to patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACSs). However, algorithms that define how LMWH may be used in patients, proceeding from medical management to intervention and in conjunction with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, are lacking. The objectives of this task force were to formulate recommendations based on all available data for the use of LMWH, both with and without GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists, and to provide seamless integration of care during the transition from medical to interventional management. METHODS AND RESULTS: An international task force of 14 cardiologists with extensive experience in clinical trials was convened in New York in February 2001 to address issues related to the use of LMWH in patients with non-ST-elevation ACS. Evidence from randomized trials, observational studies, and other reports was discussed, and consensus recommendations were formulated. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial evidence exists that patients receiving LMWH for an ACS can safely undergo cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention. Concerns regarding the transition of these patients from the medical service to the cardiac catheterization laboratory should therefore not impede the upstream use of LMWH. Furthermore, LMWH and GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists can be used safely in combination, with no apparent increase in the risk of major bleeding. Consensus algorithms for therapy are presented.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2002

Vascular access.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Catheterization↗