Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Cindy A Scherb

Publications and source records attributed to Cindy A Scherb.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Using the nursing interventions classification to describe the work of the nurse practitioner.

PURPOSE: To extend the specialty use research based on the Iowa Intervention Project using the Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC) and identify and the 20 most prevalent interventions described by practicing nurse practitioners (NPs). DATA SOURCES: A descriptive survey using a mailed questionnaire was sent to 1,190 NPs with prescriptive authority in Minnesota. Results are based on 414 (37%) useable responses. CONCLUSIONS: Of the 486 NIC interventions on the questionnaire, NPs reported using an average of 120 at least once per month. The 20 most frequently selected were reported by 71%-90% of respondents as being used at least once per month. Four core interventions (documentation, telephone consultation, teaching: prescribed medication, and emotional support) were common to NPs in all specialties. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Common medical coding does not reflect the nursing aspects of NP practice. As NPs attempt to define what is different about NP practice, the use of a standardized nursing language such as the NIC may facilitate this process. One clarification that needs to be made with regard to the NIC in future research with NPs is the distinction between prescribing and performing the interventions.

Humans↗

Perceptions and characteristics of registered nurses' involvement in decision making.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the level of actual and preferred decisional involvement and ascertain whether there is decisional dissonance among registered nurses (RNs). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A convenience sample of 196 RNs completed a demographic form and the Decisional Involvement Scale, a tool that measures actual and preferred decisional involvement for RNs in 6 categories: unit staffing, quality of professional practice, professional recruitment, unit governance and leadership, quality of support staff practice, and collaboration/liaison activities. From these data, the level of and difference between RN's actual and preferred decisional involvement was analyzed. In addition, the impact of level of education, years of experience, hours worked per pay period, and work setting on actual and preferred decisional involvement were measured. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: A statistically significant difference was found between RNs' actual and preferred decisional involvement, with RNs preferring more decisional involvement than they actually experienced. Work setting was the only variable to which a difference could be attributed. Further study is warranted to find causes of decisional dissonance and interventions that could help alleviate the problem and potentially increase job satisfaction.

Adult↗

Outcomes research: making a difference in practice.

The purpose of this pilot study was to determine whether a significant difference in outcome ratings exists from admission to discharge for selected populations. Two acute care sites that have standardized nursing languages in their computerized clinical documentation systems participated. These data are an important start in using patient outcomes to determine the effect of nursing interventions. These data clearly suggest that nursing care did make a difference in patient outcomes.

Adult↗