Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Christopher D Jenkins

Publications and source records attributed to Christopher D Jenkins.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Plasmacytoid dendritic cells do not migrate in intestinal or hepatic lymph.

Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) recognize pathogen-associated molecules, particularly viral, and represent an important mechanism in innate defense. They may however, also have roles in steady-state tolerogenic responses at mucosal sites. pDCs can be isolated from blood, mucosa, and lymph nodes (LNs). Although pDCs can express peripherally derived Ags in LNs and at mucosal sites, it is not clear whether pDCs actually migrate from the periphery in lymph or whether LN pDCs acquire Ags by other mechanisms. To determine whether pDCs migrate in lymph, intestine or liver-draining LNs were removed and thoracic duct leukocytes (TDLs) were collected. TDLs expressing MHC-II and CD45R, but not TCRalphabeta or CD45RA, were then analyzed. These enriched TDLs neither transcribe type I IFNs nor secrete inflammatory cytokines in response to viral stimuli in vitro or after a TLR7/8 stimulus in vivo. In addition, these TDLs do not express CD5, CD90, CD200, or Siglec-H, but do express Ig, and therefore represent B cells, despite their lack of CD45RA expression. Intestinal and hepatic lymph are hence devoid of bona fide pDCs under both steady-state conditions and after TLR7/8 stimulation. This shows that any role for pDCs in Ag-specific T cell activation or tolerance must differ from the roles of classical dendritic cells, because it cannot result from peripheral Ag capture, followed by migration of pDCs via lymph to the LN.

Animals↗

Regulation of intestinal dendritic cell migration and activation by plasmacytoid dendritic cells, TNF-alpha and type 1 IFNs after feeding a TLR7/8 ligand.

Dendritic cells (DCs) migrating via lymph are the primary influence regulating naive T cell differentiation, be it active immunity or tolerance. How DCs achieve this regulation in vivo is poorly understood. Intestinal DCs are in direct contact with harmless or pathogenic luminal contents, but may also be influenced by signals from epithelial cells, macrophages, or other resident or immigrant cells. To understand the role of TLR7 and TLR8 in regulating intestinal DC function, we fed a TLR7/8 ligand (resiquimod (R-848)) to rats and mice and examined DC in pseudoafferent lymph (rat) and mesenteric lymph nodes (MLNs). Oral R-848 induced a 20- to 30-fold increase in DC output from the intestine within 10 h due to a virtually total release of lamina propria DCs. This resulted in an accumulation of DCs in the MLNs that in mice was completely TNF-alpha dependent. Surprisingly, intestinal lymph DCs (iL-DCs) released by R-848 did not up-regulate CD86, but did up-regulate CD25. In contrast, MLN-DCs from R-848-stimulated rats and mice expressed high levels of CD86. This DC activation in MLNs was dependent on type 1 IFNs. The major source of these rapidly released cytokines is plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs) and not classical DCs, because depletion of pDCs significantly reduces the R-848-stimulated increase in serum cytokine levels as well as the accumulation and activation of DCs in MLNs. These experiments show that TLR-mediated regulation of iL-DC functions in vivo is complex and does not depend only on direct iL-DC stimulation, but can be regulated by pDCs.

Animal Feed↗

Relationships between distinct blood monocyte subsets and migrating intestinal lymph dendritic cells in vivo under steady-state conditions.

The origins of dendritic cells (DCs) are poorly understood. In inflammation, DCs can arise from blood monocytes (M(O)s), but their steady-state origin may differ, as shown for Langerhans cells. Two main subsets of M(O)s, defined by expression of different chemokine receptors, CCR2 and CX(3)CR1, have been described in mice and humans. Recent studies have identified the inflammatory function of CCR2(high)CX(3)CR1(low) M(O)s but have not defined unambiguously the origin and fate of CCR2(low)CX(3)CR1(high) cells. In this study, we show that rat M(O)s can also be divided into CCR2(high)CX(3)CR1(low)(CD43(low)) and CCR2(low)CX(3)CR1(high)(CD43(high)) subsets with distinct migratory properties in vivo. Using whole body perfusion to obtain M(O)s, including the marginating pool, we show by adoptive transfer that CD43(low) M(O)s can differentiate into CD43(high) M(O)s in blood without cell division. By adoptive transfer of blood M(O)s followed by collection of pseudoafferent lymph, we show for the first time that a small proportion of intestinal lymph DCs are derived from CCR2(low)CX(3)CR1(high)(CD43(high)) blood M(O)s in vivo under steady-state conditions. This study confirms one of the possible origins of CCR2(low)CX(3)CR1(high) blood M(O)s and indicate that they may contribute to migratory intestinal DCs in vivo in the absence of inflammatory stimuli.

Animals↗

A distinct subset of intestinal dendritic cells responds selectively to oral TLR7/8 stimulation.

The intestinal innate immune system continually interacts with commensal bacteria, thus oral vaccines should induce extra/alternative activation of DC, potentially through TLR. To examine this we collected intestinal lymph DC (iL-DC) under steady-state conditions and after feeding resiquimod (R-848), a synthetic TLR7/8 ligand, which we showed induces complete emptying of gut DC into lymph. iL-DC are heterogeneous with subset-specific functions. In this study we determined the kinetics of iL-DC subset release, activation and cytokine secretion induced by R-848. We show that L-DC comprise three distinct subsets (CD172ahigh, CD172aint and CD172alow) present with similar frequencies in intestinal but not hepatic lymph. No iL-DC express TLR7 mRNA, and only CD172a+ iL-DC express TLR8. However, after oral R-848 administration, output of all three subsets increases dramatically. CD172ahigh DC release precedes that of CD172alow DC, and the increased frequency of CD25high iL-DC is restricted to the two CD172a+ subsets. After feeding R-848 only CD172ahigh iL-DC secrete IL-6 and IL-12p40. However, CD172aint and CD172ahigh DC secrete similar but markedly lower amounts when stimulated in vitro. These results highlight the importance of in vivo approaches to assess adjuvant effects on DC and give novel insights into the subset-specific effects of an oral TLR ligand on intestinal DC.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

Intestinal dendritic cell subsets: differential effects of systemic TLR4 stimulation on migratory fate and activation in vivo.

Dendritic cells (DC) present peripheral Ags to T cells in lymph nodes, but also influence their differentiation (tolerance/immunity, Th1/Th2). To investigate how peripheral conditions affect DC properties and might subsequently regulate T cell differentiation, we examined the effects of a potent DC-activating, TLR-4-mediated stimulus, LPS, on rat intestinal and hepatic DC in vivo. Steady-state rat intestinal and hepatic lymph DC are alpha(E2) integrin(high) (CD103) and include two subsets, signal regulatory protein alpha (SIRPalpha)(hi/low), probably representing murine CD8alphaalpha(-/+) DC. Steady-state lamina propria DC are immature; surface MHC class II(low), but steady-state lymph DC are semimature, MHC class II(high), but CD80/86(low). Intravenous LPS induced rapid lamina propria DC emigration and increased lymph DC traffic without altering SIRPalpha(high)/SIRPalpha(low) proportions. CD80/86 expression on lymph or mesenteric node DC was not up-regulated after i.v. LPS. In contrast, i.v. LPS stimulated marked CD80/86 up-regulation on splenic DC. CD80/86 expression on intestinal lymph DC, however, was increased after in vitro culture with TNF-alpha or GM-CSF, but not with up to 5 mug/ml LPS. Steady-state SIRPalpha(low) DC localized to T cell areas of mesenteric nodes, spleen, and Peyer's patch, whereas SIRPalpha(high) DC were excluded from these areas. Intravenous LPS stimulated rapid and abundant SIRPalpha(high) DC accumulation in T cell areas of mesenteric nodes and spleen. In striking contrast, i.v. LPS had no effect on DC numbers or distribution in Peyer's patches. Our results suggest that any explanation of switching between tolerance and immunity as well as involving changes in DC activation status must also take into account differential migration of DC subsets.

Animals↗