Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Christopher D Hillyer

Publications and source records attributed to Christopher D Hillyer.

22 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Bacterial contamination of blood components: risks, strategies, and regulation: joint ASH and AABB educational session in transfusion medicine.

Bacterial contamination of transfusion products, especially platelets, is a longstanding problem that has been partially controlled through modern phlebotomy practices, refrigeration of red cells, freezing of plasma and improved materials for transfusion product collection and storage. Bacterial contamination of platelet products has been acknowledged as the most frequent infectious risk from transfusion occurring in approximately 1 of 2000-3000 whole-blood derived, random donor platelets, and apheresis-derived, single donor platelets. In the US, bacterial contamination is considered the second most common cause of death overall from transfusion (after clerical errors) with mortality rates ranging from 1:20000 to 1:85000 donor exposures. Estimates of severe morbidity and mortality range from 100 to 150 transfused individuals each year. Concern over the magnitude and clinical relevance of this issue culminated in an open letter calling for the "blood collection community to immediately initiate a program for detecting the presence of bacteria in units of platelets." Thereafter, the American Association of Blood Banks (AABB) proposed new standards to help mitigate transfusion of units that were contaminated with bacteria. Adopted with a final implementation date of March 1, 2004, the AABB Standard reads "The blood bank or transfusion service shall have methods to limit and detect bacterial contamination in all platelet components." This Joint ASH and AABB Educational Session reviews the risks, testing strategies, and regulatory approaches regarding bacterial contamination of blood components to aid in preparing practitioners of hematology and transfusion medicine in understanding the background and clinical relevance of this clinically important issue and in considering the approaches currently available for its mitigation, as well as their implementation. In this chapter, Drs. Hillyer and Josephson review the background and significance of bacterial contamination, as well as address the definitions, conceptions and limitations of the terms risk, safe and safety. They then describe current transfusion risks including non-infectious serious hazards of transfusion, and current and emerging viral risks. In the body of the text, Dr. Blajchman reviews the prevalence of bacterial contamination in cellular blood components in detail with current references to a variety of important studies. He then describes the signs and symptoms of transfusion-associated sepsis and the sources of the bacterial contamination for cellular blood products including donor bacteremia, and contamination during whole blood collection and of the collection pack. This is followed by strategies to decrease the transfusion-associated morbidity/mortality risk of contaminated cellular blood products including improving donor skin disinfection, removal of first aliquot of donor blood, pre-transfusion detection of bacteria, reducing recipient exposure, and pathogen reduction/inactivation. In the final sections, Drs. Vostal, Epstein and Goodman describe the regulations and regulatory approaches critical to the appropriate implementation of a bacterial contamination screening and limitation program including their and/or the FDA's input on prevention of bacterial contamination, bacterial proliferation, and detection of bacteria in transfusion products. This is followed by a discussion of sampling strategy for detection of bacteria in a transfusion product, as well as the current approval process for bacterial detection devices, trials recommended under "actual clinical use" conditions, pathogen reduction technologies, and bacterial detection and the extension of platelet storage.

Bacterial Infections↗

Granulocyte transfusion: revisited.

Neutrophils are the immune system's main cellular defense against bacterial and fungal infections. Transfusion of granulocytes has been considered a therapeutic modality for severe bacterial and fungal infections in patients with prolonged neutropenia and with functional neutrophil disorders. Good theoretic and experimental evidence demonstrating granulocyte transfusion efficacy exists in preventing and treating severe infection. However, clinical evidence has been more difficult to interpret, with efficacy equivocal in many studies and further trials hindered by limitations in collecting adequate doses of leukocytes from healthy steroid-mobilized donors. The development and use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to stimulate normal donors has generated renewed interest in granulocyte transfusions. In clinical studies, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor has markedly enhanced the yield of leukocytes collected from normal donors, which may improve clinical outcomes in patients with severe infections and neutropenia who receive granulocyte transfusions. Preliminary clinical evidence, when correct granulocyte dose per patient body weight is optimized, suggests efficacy. However, well-designed randomized clinical trials are necessary to definitively establish granulocyte transfusions as a viable therapeutic modality in the treatment of severe bacterial and fungal infections in patients with functional neutrophil disorders or neutropenia.

Blood Donors↗

Blood donors and factors impacting the blood donation decision.

The aging of the US population and the evidence that only about 5% of individuals in the United States donate blood each year raise concerns about the assurance of an adequate, safe supply of blood in the future. Blood donation decision making has been investigated worldwide for decades to understand the process better to increase donation efficiency, safety, retention, collection numbers, and diversity of the donor pool. This review focuses on the characteristics of allogeneic blood donors, the motivational sources in donor decision making, and the research concepts and techniques used to examine these factors. Some historic studies considered pivotal, as well as more recent surveys, may not be pertinent to or representative of the current national donor pool. Interpretation of data related to donor characteristics should examine whether demographics mirror the donor pool to assist in targeted recruitment or if targeted recruitment actually leads to the reported demographics. Few recent studies of donor motivation have been published. Modern sources of positive and negative motivation are worth exploring through scientifically sound investigations involving representative cohorts using multifactorial approaches. Strategies that focus on retaining return donors and transforming first-time donors into repeaters would be beneficial. Investigations are needed also to assess research questions and to develop well-designed interventions to test hypotheses and to produce generalizable findings applicable to future donor decision making.

Blood Donors↗

Donor lymphocyte infusion therapy.

Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI), which is therapy typically used after stem cell transplant, is a relatively new therapeutic intervention. It has been used in a number of hematopoietic malignancies, for some solid tumor malignancies, for its viral modulation effects, and as a prophylactic approach in the prevention of recurrent disease. The efficacy of this therapy is most evident in patients who have chronic myelogenous leukemia. However, studies of other diseases have been less forthcoming in showing clear benefit. Even in patient groups in which disease remission has been attributed to DLI, the risks of the treatment, namely graft-versus-host disease, may invalidate its use. This article summarizes a number of key studies addressing its usefulness in a number of disease states, risks of therapy, and strategies to ameliorate those risks while preserving benefit. It also examines tools that have been developed to more accurately describe survival benefits attributable to DLI.

Graft vs Host Disease↗