Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Christian Füllgrabe

Publications and source records attributed to Christian Füllgrabe.

9 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Masking release for consonant features in temporally fluctuating background noise.

Consonant identification was measured for normal-hearing listeners using Vowel-Consonant-Vowel stimuli that were either unprocessed or spectrally degraded to force listeners to use temporal-envelope cues. Stimuli were embedded in a steady state or fluctuating noise masker and presented at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio. Fluctuations in the maskers were obtained by applying sinusoidal modulation to: (i) the amplitude of the noise (1st-order SAM masker) or (ii) the modulation depth of a 1st-order SAM noise (2nd-order SAM masker). The frequencies of the amplitude variation fm and the depth variation f'm were systematically varied. Consistent with previous studies, identification scores obtained with unprocessed speech were highest in an 8-Hz, 1st-order SAM masker. Reception of voicing and manner also peaked around fm=8 Hz, while the reception of place of articulation was maximal at a higher frequency (fm=32 Hz). When 2nd-order SAM maskers were used, identification scores and received information for each consonant feature were found to be independent of f'm. They decreased progressively with increasing carrier modulation frequency fm, and ranged between those obtained with the steady state and the 1st-order SAM maskers. Finally, the results obtained with spectrally degraded speech were similar across all types of maskers, although an 8% improvement in the reception of voicing was observed for modulated maskers with fm < 64 Hz compared to the steady-state masker. These data provide additional evidence that listeners take advantage of temporal minima in fluctuating background noises, and suggest that: (i) minima of different durations are required for an optimal reception of the three consonant features and (ii) complex (i.e., 2nd-order) envelope fluctuations in background noise do not degrade speech identification by interfering with speech-envelope processing.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Modulation masking produced by second-order modulators.

Recent studies suggest that an auditory nonlinearity converts second-order sinusoidal amplitude modulation (SAM) (i.e., modulation of SAM depth) into a first-order SAM component, which contributes to the perception of second-order SAM. However, conversion may also occur in other ways such as cochlear filtering. The present experiments explored the source of the first-order SAM component by investigating the ability to detect a 5-Hz, first-order SAM probe in the presence of a second-order SAM masker beating at the probe frequency. Detection performance was measured as a function of masker-carrier modulation frequency, phase relationship between the probe and masker modulator, and probe modulation depth. In experiment 1, the carrier was a 5-kHz sinusoid presented either alone or within a notched-noise masker in order to restrict off-frequency listening. In experiment 2, the carrier was a white noise. The data obtained in both carrier conditions are consistent with the existence of a modulation distortion component. However, the phase yielding poorest detection performance varied across experimental conditions between 0 degrees and 180 degrees, confirming that, in addition to nonlinear mechanisms, cochlear filtering and off-frequency listening play a role in second-order SAM perception. The estimated magnitude of the modulation distortion component ranges from 5%-12%.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Perception of the envelope-beat frequency of inharmonic complex temporal envelopes.

Listeners can hear slow sinusoidal variations in the depth of sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) stimuli. Here, the SAM stimulus of frequency f(m) acts as the carrier, and the slow variation in depth of frequency f'm (referred to as "second-order" amplitude modulation) corresponds to a beat in the temporal envelope. Recent studies have suggested that second-order amplitude modulation perception is based on a modulation-distortion component or the "venelope" (the Hilbert envelope of the ac-coupled Hilbert envelope), both occurring at the envelope-beat frequency f'm. This was tested by transposing to the modulation domain the matching paradigm used by Schouten et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 34, 1418-1424 (1962)]. Listeners estimated the envelope-beat frequency evoked by a 5-Hz, second-order SAM white noise with f(m) either an integer multiple of f'm or shifted in frequency to make the complex envelope inharmonic. The results indicate that the perception of the envelope-beat frequency was affected by these shifts when f(m) < or = 20 Hz. This suggests that, at least at low modulation frequencies, the perceived envelope beat is not determined by a modulation-distortion or venelope component, but rather relies on the time intervals between the main peaks of the first-order envelope.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed2004

Detection of 1st- and 2nd-order temporal-envelope cues in a patient with left superior cortical damage.

This psychophysical study explores the extent to which the auditory cortex is necessary for various aspects of temporal-envelope perception, that is, perception of the slow temporal modulations in amplitude known to be crucial for sound identification. The ability to detect 1st- and 2nd-order sinusoidal amplitude modulation (AM) is evaluated in a single patient showing left-hemisphere damage encroaching the primary and secondary auditory cortices. Here, 1st- and 2nd-order AM refer to (1) sinusoidal variation in the amplitude of a 2 kHz pure tone, and (2) sinusoidal variation in the depth of a 64 Hz AM applied to the 2 kHz pure tone, respectively. The results replicate previous findings by showing that damage to the left auditory cortex results in a selective deficit in auditory sensitivity to the lowest 1St-order AM (i.e., 1st-order AM frequencies < 16 Hz). Moreover, a dissociation is apparent between the ability to detect 1st- and 2nd-order temporal-envelope cues. The patient shows poorer than normal ability to detect 2nd-order AM at low frequencies ranging from 4-23 Hz, but normal ability to detect the high (64 Hz) 1st-order AM carrying these 2nd-order modulations. This result indicates that damage to the left primary and secondary auditory cortices affects the ability to detect temporal variations in the local properties of sounds(such as AM depth). It is also consistent with the idea that, as in vision, central nonlinear mechanisms are involved in the computation of such local (or 2nd-order) temporal properties.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed2004

Effects of amplitude compression on first- and second-order modulation detection thresholds in cochlear implant listeners.

The aim of this study was to examine the effects of instantaneous non-linear amplitude mapping on the detection of single-component and multicomponent temporal envelopes. To address this issue, first- and second-order amplitude modulation detection thresholds were measured in four cochlear implant users with the intervention of the compression device of the implant processor. The compression device is set to produce either a strongly or a weakly logarithmic mapping of stimulus amplitude to electrical amplitude. 'First-order' modulation detection thresholds indicate the ability of listeners to detect sinusoidal amplitude modulation (SAM) applied to a white noise carrier; they are measured as a function of the rate of that modulation, fm. 'Second-order' modulation detection thresholds indicate the ability to detect sinusoidal modulation applied to the depth of a sinusoidally amplitude-modulated signal (here, a 16-Hz sinusoidally amplitude-modulated white noise); they are measured as a function of the rate of the modulation applied to the modulation depth (referred to as fm'). In each task, stimuli are transformed by the implant processor and are presented through one electrode at approximately the same level. The results show that, in cochlear implant listeners, both first- and second-order modulation detection thresholds measured at the lower rates (< or =7 Hz) decrease slightly by about 3-6dB when the stronger compression is used. No effect of compression is observed at higher rates. These results suggest that instantaneous logarithmic amplitude mapping has beneficial- but limited-effects on the detection of single-component and multicomponent temporal envelopes. These results are discussed in light of current models of temporal envelope processing.

Auditory Threshold↗
PubMed2003

Effect of cochlear damage on the detection of complex temporal envelopes.

Recent studies have demonstrated that the detection of complex temporal envelopes relies - at least partially - on the perception of a distortion component generated by a peripheral (cochlear) and/or central (post-cochlear) non-linearity. In the present study, first- and second-order amplitude modulation (AM) detection thresholds were obtained in normally hearing (NH) and hearing-impaired (HI) listeners using a 2-kHz pure-tone carrier. In both groups of listeners, first-order AM detection thresholds were measured for AM rates fm ranging between 4 and 87 Hz, and second-order AM detection thresholds were measured for second-order AM rates fm' ranging between 4 and 23 Hz, using a fixed first-order 'carrier' AM rate fm of 64 Hz. When the sound pressure level was adjusted in order to yield equal detectability in both groups for the 64-Hz first-order carrier modulation, (i) first-order AM detection thresholds for the HI listeners were normal at fm=87 Hz, and better-than-normal at fm=4 and 16 Hz, and (ii) second-order AM detection thresholds were identical at all modulation rates in NH and HI listeners. Similar results were obtained when the audibility of the 2-kHz pure-tone carrier was equated for both groups, i.e. when listeners were tested at the same sensation level. These results demonstrate clearly that cochlear damage has no effect on the detection of complex temporal envelopes, and indicate that the distortion component must be generated by a more central non-linearity than cochlear compression, transduction, or short-term adaptation.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed2002

Temporal envelope perception in dyslexic children.

Speech intelligibility depends heavily on the accurate perception of auditory temporal envelope cues, that is the slower amplitude modulations present in the speech waveform. In a previous study, McAnally and Stein demonstrated that dyslexics may show impaired audibility (i.e. detectability) of these envelope cues. In the present psychophysical study, the ability to process temporal envelope cues was further investigated in dyslexic children by measuring detection thresholds of sinusoidal amplitude-modulation (SAM) and discrimination thresholds of SAM depth and SAM rate. Each threshold was measured at slow and fast SAM rates of 4 and 128 Hz, respectively. Overall, SAM thresholds were higher in dyslexics than in controls at both rates. The strongest deficit was observed at 4 Hz in the SAM detection task, but a deficit was also apparent at 128 Hz in the SAM discrimination tasks. Therefore, these results reveal that, in addition to reduced audibility of slow and fast envelope cues, some dyslexic children show poor encoding fidelity for these cues (as measured by the discrimination tasks). Overall, these findings are consistent with Tallal's hypothesis according to which the speech and reading deficits in some dyslexics may be caused by impaired temporal processes.

Acoustic Stimulation↗