Biomedical subjects

Chen-Shou Chui

Publications and source records attributed to Chen-Shou Chui.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2007

Reduced-order parameter optimization for simplifying prostate IMRT planning.

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has become an effective tool for cancer treatment with radiation. However, even expert radiation planners still need to spend a substantial amount of time manually adjusting IMRT optimization parameters such as dose limits and costlet weights in order to obtain a clinically acceptable plan. In this paper, we describe two main advances that simplify the parameter adjustment process for five-field prostate IMRT planning. First, we report the results of a sensitivity analysis that quantifies the effect of each hand-tunable parameter of the IMRT cost function on each clinical objective and the overall quality of the resulting plan. Second, we show that a recursive random search over the six most sensitive parameters as an outer loop in IMRT planning can quickly and automatically determine parameters for the cost function that lead to a plan meeting the clinical requirements. Our experiments on a ten-patient dataset show that for 70% of the cases, we can automatically determine a plan in 10 min (on the average) that is either clinically acceptable or requires only minor adjustment by the planner. The outer-loop optimization can be easily integrated into a traditional IMRT planning system.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2007

Room scatter factor modelling and measurement error analysis of 192Ir HDR calibration by a Farmer chamber.

We introduce an empirical formula to directly calculate the room scatter factor in the calibration of (192)Ir HDR using a Farmer chamber. Compared to the data of Selvam et al (2001 Phys. Med. Biol. 46 2299), our formula is accurate to within 0.3%. Our method saves time because the room scatter can be obtained in one calculation rather than being deduced through a series of setups of different source-chamber distances. It could also be cost effective because a calibration jig might be no longer necessary. We only need to position the applicator and chamber at a fixed space in air and measure its distance. We also analysed the effects of two possible errors arising from ignoring the room scatter and the measurement error of the source-chamber distance. We recommend that the source-chamber distance should be at least 10 cm.

Biophysical Phenomena↗

PubMed2006

Learning the relationship between patient geometry and beam intensity in breast intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has become an effective tool for cancer treatment with radiation. However, even expert radiation planners still need to spend a substantial amount of time adjusting IMRT optimization parameters in order to get a clinically acceptable plan. We demonstrate that the relationship between patient geometry and radiation intensity distributions can be automatically inferred using a variety of machine learning techniques in the case of two-field breast IMRT. Our experiments show that given a small number of human-expert-generated clinically acceptable plans, the machine learning predictions produce equally acceptable plans in a matter of seconds. The machine learning approach has the potential for greater benefits in sites where the IMRT planning process is more challenging or tedious.

Artificial Intelligence↗

PubMed2005

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy technique for three-field breast treatment.

PURPOSE: To develop a simplified intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) algorithm for three-field breast treatment using a single isocenter setup. The algorithm aims to deliver a uniform dose throughout the breast volume. Special attention was paid to the highly divergent nature of the beam configuration. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Computed tomography (CT) image setup of the patient was acquired. On each CT slice, the computer automatically generated lines parallel to the posterior edge of the tangent field. The mid-point of each line segment that intersected the breast was determined and the dose from an open field calculated. The intensity of the divergent pencil beam corresponding to the mid-point was set to be inversely proportional to the open field dose to the mid-point. Forward dose calculation was then performed using this intensity distribution. RESULTS: A total of 15 breast cancer patients undergoing three-field IMRT who underwent planning and treatment with this algorithm were included in this study. Compared with standard wedged pair tangents, the IMRT plan produced statistically significant better dose distributions in terms of target coverage and target dose uniformity, as well as reduced dose to the contralateral breast and reduced hot spots to the ipsilateral lung. CONCLUSION: Since March 2004, the new IMRT algorithm has been used for planning and treatment of > 20 patients undergoing three-field treatment, as well as >200 patients undergoing regular two-field tangent treatment, all with excellent dose distributions throughout the breast volume.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2005

Methodology for biologically-based treatment planning for combined low-dose-rate (permanent implant) and high-dose-rate (fractionated) treatment of prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The combination of permanent low-dose-rate interstitial implantation (LDR-BRT) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) has been used in the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. While a high radiation dose is delivered to the prostate in this setting, the actual biologic dose equivalence compared to monotherapy is not commonly invoked. We describe methodology for obtaining the fused dosimetry of this combined treatment and assigning a dose equivalence which in turn can be used to develop desired normal tissue and target constraints for biologic-based treatment planning. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients treated with this regimen initially receive an I-125 implant prescribed to 110 Gy followed, 2 months later, by 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions using intensity-modulated external beam radiotherapy. Ab initio methodology is described, using clinically derived biologic parameters (alpha, beta, potential doubling time for prostate cancer cells [T(pot)], cell loss factor), for calculating tumor control probability isoeffective doses for the combined LDR and conventional fraction EBRT treatment regimen. As no such formalism exists for assessing rectal or urethral toxicity, we make use of semi-empirical expressions proposed for describing urethral and rectal complication probabilities for specific treatment situations (LDR and fractionation, respectively) and utilize the notion of isoeffective dose to extend these results to combined LDR-EBRT regimens. RESULTS: The application to treatment planning of the methodology described in this study is illustrated with real-patient data. We evaluate the effect of changing LDR and EBRT prescription doses (in a manner that remains isoeffective with 81 Gy EBRT alone or with 144 Gy LDR monotherapy) on rectal and urethral complication probabilities, and suggest that it should be possible to improve the therapeutic ratio by exploiting joint LDR-EBRT planning. CONCLUSIONS: We describe new methodology for biologically based treatment planning for patients who receive combined low-dose-rate brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Using relevant mathematical tools, we demonstrate the feasibility of fusing dose distributions from each treatment for this combined regimen, which can then be expressed as isoeffective dose distributions. Based on this information, dose constraints for the rectum and urethra are described which could be used for planning such combination regimens.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2005

Comparison of end normal inspiration and expiration for gated intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) of lung cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Gated delivery of radiation during part of the respiration cycle may improve the treatment of lung cancer with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). In terms of the respiration phase for gated treatment, normal end-expiration (EE) is more stable but normal end-inspiration (EI) increases lung volume. We compare the relative merit of using EI and EE in gated IMRT for sparing normal lung tissue. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten patients received EI and EE respiration-triggered CT scans in the treatment position. An IMRT plan for a prescription dose of 70 Gy was generated for each patient and at each respiration phase. The optimization constraints included target dose uniformity, less than 35% of the total lung receiving 20 Gy or more and maximum cord dose <or=45 Gy. We compared planning target volume (PTV) coverage, mean lung dose, percentage of total lung receiving 20 Gy or more (V(20)) and lung normal tissue complication probability (NTCP). RESULTS: For 9 of the 10 patients, cord and lung doses were acceptable and PTV coverage was similar for EE and EI, with lung sparing was equal to or slightly better at EI than at EE. For the 10th patient, lung sparing at EI was significantly better. Patient averaged mean lung dose was 15.4 Gy (range: 7.1-20.4) at EI and 16.3 Gy (range: 6.9-21.9) at EE. The average V(20) was 23.8% (range: 13-36.4) at EI and 25.3% (range: 13-37.3) at EE. The average NTCP at EI was 8 versus 12% at EE. CONCLUSIONS: Dosimetric indices of lung protection for IMRT plans at EI are better than at EE. For 9 out of the 10 patients in our study, this difference is small. Thus other factors such as reproducibility, reliability and duty cycle at normal end expiration may be more critical for selecting treatment breathing phase.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy as the boost or salvage treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: the appropriate parameters in the inverse planning and the effect of patient's anatomic factors on the planning results.

The current study demonstrates that the large increase in normal tissue penalty often degrades target dose uniformity without a concomitant large improvement in normal tissue dose, especially in anatomically unfavorable patients. The excessively large normal tissue penalties do not improve treatment plans for patients having unfavorable geometry.

Carcinoma↗

PubMed2005

A new method of incorporating systematic uncertainties in intensity-modulated radiotherapy optimization.

Uncertainties in tumor position during intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plan optimization are usually accounted for by adding margins to a clinical target volume (CTV), or additionally, to organs at risk (OAR). The former approach usually favors target coverage over OAR protection, whereas the latter does not account for correlation in target and OAR movement. We investigate a new approach to incorporate systematic errors in tumor and organ position. The method models a distribution of systematic errors due to setup error and organ motion with displaced replicas of volumes of interest, each representing the patient geometry for a possible systematic error, and maximizes a score function that counts the number of replicas meeting dose or biological constraints for both CTV and OAR. Dose constraints are implemented by logistic functions of Niemierko's generalized model of equivalent uniform dose (EUD). The method is applied to prostate and nasopharynx IMRT plans, in which CTV and OAR each consists of five replicas, one representing no error (the position in the planning CT) and the other four discrete systematic setup displacements in one dimension with equal probability. The resulting IMRT plans are compared with those from two other EUD-based optimizations: a standard planning target volume (PTV) approach consisting of a single replica of each OAR in the planned position and a single PTV encompassing all CTV replicas, and a PTV-PRV approach consisting of a single PTV and a single planning risk volume (PRV) for each OAR encompassing all replicas. When systematic error is present, multiple-replica optimization provides better critical organ protection while maintaining similar target coverage compared with the PTV approach, and provides better CTV-to-OAR therapeutic ratio compared with the PTV-PRV instances where there is substantial PTV-PRV overlap. The method can be used for other systematic errors due to organ motion and deformation.

Body Burden↗

PubMed2003

Comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy planning for glioblastoma multiforme.

This study was designed to assess the feasibility and potential benefit of using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) planning for patients newly diagnosed with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Five consecutive patients with confirmed histopathologically GBM were entered into the study. These patients were planned and treated with 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) using our standard plan of 3 noncoplanar wedged fields. They were then replanned with the IMRT method that included a simultaneous boost to the gross tumor volume (GTV). The dose distributions and dose-volume histograms (DHVs) for the planning treatment volume (PTV), GTV, and the relevant critical structures, as obtained with 3DCRT and IMRT, respectively, were compared. In both the 3DCRT and IMRT plans, 59.4 Gy was delivered to the GTV plus a margin of 2.5 cm, with doses to critical structures below the tolerance threshold. However, with the simultaneous boost in IMRT, a higher tumor dose of approximately 70 Gy could be delivered to the GTV, while still maintaining the uninvolved brain at dose levels of the 3DCRT technique. In addition, our experience indicated that IMRT planning is less labor intensive and time consuming than 3DCRT planning. Our study shows that IMRT planning is feasible and efficient for radiotherapy of GBM. In particular, IMRT can deliver a simultaneous boost to the GTV while better sparing the normal brain and other critical structures.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Technological advances in external-beam radiation therapy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer.

The relative inability of conventional radiotherapy to control localized prostate cancer results from resistance of subpopulations of tumor clonogens to dose levels of 65 to 70 Gy, the maximum feasible with traditional two-dimensional (2D) treatment planning and delivery techniques. Several technological advances have enhanced the precision and improved the outcome of external-beam radiotherapy. The three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) approach has permitted significant increases in the tumor dose to levels beyond those feasible with conventional techniques. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), an advanced form of conformal radiotherapy, has resulted in reduced rectal toxicity, permitting tumor dose escalation to previously unattainable levels with a concomitant improvement in local tumor control and disease-free survival. The combination of androgen deprivation and conventional-dose radiotherapy, tested mainly in patients with locally advanced disease, has also produced significant outcome improvements. Whether androgen deprivation will preclude the need for dose escalation or whether high-dose radiotherapy will obviate the need for androgen deprivation remains unknown. In some patients, both approaches may be necessary to maximize the probability of cure. In view of the favorable benefit-risk ratio of high-dose IMRT, the design of clinical trials to resolve these critical questions is essential.

Actuarial Analysis↗

PubMed2003

The effects of intra-fraction organ motion on the delivery of intensity-modulated field with a multileaf collimator.

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy can be conveniently delivered with a multileaf collimator. With this method, the entire field is not delivered at once, but rather it is composed of many subfields defined by the leaf positions as a function of beam on time. At any given instant, only these subfields are delivered. During treatment, if the organ moves, part of the volume may move in or out of these subfields. Due to this interplay between organ motion and leaf motion the delivered dose may be different from what was planned. In this work, we present a method that calculates the effects of organ motion on delivered dose. The direction of organ motion may be parallel or perpendicular to the leaf motion, and the effect can be calculated for a single fraction or for multiple fractions. Three breast patients and four lung patients were included in this study,with the amplitude of the organ motion varying from +/- 3.5 mm to +/- 10 mm, and the period varying from 4 to 8 seconds. Calculations were made for these patients with and without organ motion, and results were examined in terms of isodose distribution and dose volume histograms. Each calculation was repeated ten times in order to estimate the statistical uncertainties. For selected patients, calculations were also made with conventional treatment technique. The effects of organ motion on conventional techniques were compared relative to that on IMRT techniques. For breast treatment, the effect of organ motion primarily broadened the penumbra at the posterior field edge. The dose in the rest of the treatment volume was not significantly affected. For lung treatment, the effect also broadened the penumbra and degraded the coverage of the planning target volume (PTV). However, the coverage of the clinical target volume (CTV) was not much affected, provided the PTV margin was adequate. The same effects were observed for both IMRT and conventional treatment techniques. For the IMRT technique, the standard deviations of ten samples of a 30-fraction calculation were very small for all patients, implying that over a typical treatment course of 30 fractions, the delivered dose was very close to the expected value. Hence, under typical clinical conditions, the effect of organ motion on delivered dose can be calculated without considering the interplay between the organ motion and the leaf motion. It can be calculated as the weighted average of the dose distribution without organ motion with the distribution of organ motion. Since the effects of organ motion on dose were comparable for both IMRT and conventional techniques, the PTV margin should remain the same for both techniques.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2003

Differences in electron beam dosimetry using two commercial ionization chambers and the TG-21 protocol: another reason to switch to TG-51.

Two of the most popular dosimetry systems used for calibration of megavoltage photon and electron beams in radiation therapy are (i) cylindrical Farmer-type chambers in liquid water and (ii) Holt Memorial parallel-plate chambers in clear polystyrene. Since implementation of the AAPM TG-21 calibration protocol, the Radiological Physics Center (which uses the Farmer in-water system) has compared machine calibrations on two occasions with those of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (which uses the Holt in-polystyrene system). Two years post publication of the TG-51 protocol, 70% of the clinics monitored by the RPC still use TG-21. Seventeen photon beams from cobalt-60 to 18 MV and 31 electron beams from 6 to 20 MeV were compared using the TG-21 protocol. These data represent the most comprehensive comparison of the two most popular systems in use. Based on the average percent difference, the two systems yielded the same absorbed dose to water at the reference point in phantom to within 1.5% for both modalities. No energy dependence was evident in the results; however, a systematic average percent difference between photons and electrons was seen, with the Farmer in-water system consistently predicting a dose 1.3% lower for electrons than the Holt in-polystyrene system. For photons both systems predicted the same dose to within 0.3% on average. When a physicist converts from TG-21 to TG-51, these data may be of assistance in explaining unexpected changes in output that are different from previously published values. Implementation of the TG-51 protocol should eliminate any of the observed differences in electron beam dosimetry between the two dosimetry systems because the Holt system cannot be used with TG-51.

Calibration↗

PubMed2002

Evaluation of concave dose distributions created using an inverse planning system.

PURPOSE: To evaluate and develop optimum inverse treatment planning strategies for the treatment of concave targets adjacent to normal tissue structures. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Optimized dose distributions were designed using an idealized geometry consisting of a cylindrical phantom with a concave kidney-shaped target (PTV) and cylindrical normal tissues (NT) placed 5-13 mm from the target. Targets with radii of curvature from 1 to 2.75 cm were paired with normal tissues with radii between 0.5 and 2.25 cm. The target was constrained to a prescription dose of 100% and minimum and maximum doses of 95% and 105% with relative penalties of 25. Maximum dose constraint parameters for the NT varied from 10% to 70% with penalties from 10 to 1000. Plans were evaluated using the PTV uniformity index (PTV D(max)/PTV D(95)) and maximum normal tissue doses (NT D(max)/PTV D(95)). RESULTS: In nearly all situations, the achievable PTV uniformity index and the maximum NT dose exceeded the corresponding constraints. This was particularly true for small PTV-NT separations (5-8 mm) or strict NT dose constraints (10%-30%), where the achievable doses differed from the requested by 30% or more. The same constraint parameters applied to different PTV-NT separations yielded different dose distributions. For most geometries, a range of constraints could be identified that would lead to acceptable plans. The optimization results were fairly independent of beam energy and radius of curvature, but improved as the number of beams increased, particularly for small PTV-NT separations or strict dose constraints. CONCLUSION: Optimized dose distributions are strongly affected by both the constraint parameters and target-normal tissue geometry. Standard site-specific constraint templates can serve as a starting point for optimization, but the final constraints must be determined iteratively for individual patients. A strategy whereby NT constraints and penalties are modified until the highest acceptable PTV uniformity index is achieved is discussed. This strategy can be used, in simple patient geometries, to ensure the lowest possible normal tissue dose. Strategies for setting the optimum dose constraints and penalties may vary for different optimization algorithms and objective functions. Increasing the number of beams can significantly improve normal tissue dose and target uniformity in situations where the PTV-NT separation is small or the normal tissue dose limits are severe. Setting unrealistically severe constraints in such situations often results in dose distributions that are inferior to plans achieved with more lenient constraints.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2002

Evaluation of deep inspiration breath-hold lung treatment plans with Monte Carlo dose calculation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate dosimetry of deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) relative to free breathing (FB) for three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy of lung cancer with 6-MV photons and Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculations. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Static three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, 6-MV plans, based on DIBH and FB CT images for five non-small-cell lung cancer patients, were generated on a clinical treatment planning system with equivalent path length tissue inhomogeneity correction. Margins of gross to planning target volume were not reduced for DIBH plans. Cord and lung toxicity determined the maximum treatment dose for each plan. Dose distributions were recalculated for the same beams with an MC dose calculation algorithm and electron density distributions derived from the CT images. RESULTS: MC calculations showed decreased target coverage relative to treatment-planning system predictions. Lateral disequilibrium caused more degradation of target coverage for DIBH than for FB (approximately 4% worse than expected for FB vs. 8% for DIBH). However, with DIBH higher treatment doses could be delivered without violating normal tissue constraints, resulting in higher total doses to gross target volume and to >99% of planning target volume. CONCLUSIONS: If DIBH enables prescription dose increases exceeding 10%, MC calculations indicate that, despite lateral disequilibrium, higher doses will be delivered to medium-to-large, partly mediastinal gross target volumes, providing that 6-MV photons are used and margins are not reduced.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for boost or salvage treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To compare intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and conventional three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) for the boost treatment of new-onset nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) or the salvage treatment of locally recurrent NPC. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between January 14 and February 23, 2000, 5-field 3D-CRT treatment plans were generated for 14 consecutive NPC patients using the ADAC Pinnacle planning system in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. The planning data of these patients were later transferred to Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, where new IMRT plans, also using 5-7 radiation fields were created for each patient using an inverse treatment planning system. The IMRT and 3D-CRT plans were compared for all 14 patients. The relationship between the anatomic shapes and locations of targets and the results of different plans were studied. RESULTS: Target doses were more homogeneous in IMRT plans. The average maximal brainstem dose (D(05), the dose received by 5% of the brainstem volume) decreased from 30.9% of the prescription dose with 3D-CRT to 15.3% and 14.7% with 5- and 7-field IMRT, respectively (p = 0.004 and 0.003, respectively, compared with 3D-CRT, paired Student's t test). Five anatomic factors were found that predicted greater benefits with IMRT. These factors were (1) vertical length of target >7 cm, (2) minimal distance between target and brainstem <0.1 cm, (3) maximal AP overlap of target and brainstem >0.6 cm, (4) maximal AP overlap of target and spinal cord >1 cm, and (5) vertical overlap of target and eyes >0 cm. For the 7 patients with at least 1 of these 5 anatomic factors, the benefits achieved by IMRT planning would have been greater than the benefits for the other 7 patients (p = 0.005, Fisher's exact test). CONCLUSION: For boost or salvage treatment of NPC, lower normal tissue doses and more homogeneous target doses were achieved with IMRT plans. For NPC patients with at least 1 of the 5 anatomic factors, IMRT is highly recommended.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2002

A simplified intensity modulated radiation therapy technique for the breast.

A simplified intensity modulated radiation therapy (sIMRT) technique for the breast is presented. The technique aims to produce a uniform dose distribution in the entire breast volume. Using the standard tangential beam arrangement, we first determine for each pencil beam the midpoint of the segment that intersects the treatment volume. The dose to the midpoint from the open field is then calculated. The intensity of the pencil beam is determined as proportional to the inverse of the open field dose. With this intensity modulated beam, the dose delivered to the midpoint of each pencil beam segment that intersects the treatment volume is now equalized. The dose distribution in the entire treatment volume is nearly as uniform as can be achieved under the given beam arrangement. Fifteen left breast patients were planned with the sIMRT technique. For comparison, the same group of patients was also planned with the standard wedged pair technique and the full-fledged volume-based IMRT (vIMRT) technique. Both the sIMRT and the vIMRT techniques achieved more homogeneous dose in the treatment volume than the standard plan. Doses to the heart, the ipsilateral lung, and the contralateral breast were also reduced. The planning time and the treatment time for the sIMRT technique were comparable to that of the standard technique, and significantly less than that required by the vIMRT technique. The sIMRT technique is practical for large-scale implementation in a busy clinic without requiring significant increase of resources.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Monte Carlo evaluation of 6 MV intensity modulated radiotherapy plans for head and neck and lung treatments.

Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) beams may have strong fluence variations and are advantageous at disease sites such as lung and head and neck (H&N), where neighboring tissues have very different electron densities. We use Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculations to evaluate the dosimetric effects of these inhomogeneities for 10 clinical IMRT treatment plans for five lung patients and four H&N patients. All beams are 6 MV photons. "Standard plans" were first produced on a clinical treatment planning system which optimizes beam intensity distributions to meet dose and dose-volume constraints and calculates dose using a measurement-based pencil-beam algorithm with an equivalent pathlength inhomogeneity correction. Patient anatomy and electron densities were obtained from patient-specific CT images. The dose distribution of each beam was recalculated with the MC method, using the same CT images, beam geometry, beam weighting and optimized fluence intensity distributions as the corresponding standard plan. For the lung cases, the MC calculated dose distributions are characterized by reduced penetrations and increased penumbra due to larger secondary electron range in the low-density media, which is not accurately accounted for in the pencil beam algorithm. For the lung cases, the PTV was underdosed; except for one dose-volume index, underdose was less than 10%. Individual H&N fields are affected to different degrees by tissue inhomogeneities, depending on specific anatomy, especially the size and location of air cavities in relation to the beam orientation and field size. For four H&N plans, PTV coverage changed by less than 2%; for the fifth, there was less than 10% difference between the standard and the MC plans. Critical normal tissue DVHs (cord, lung, brainstem) are changed by <10% at the high dose end and mean lung doses are changed by <6%.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2002

Dosimetric advantage of using 6 MV over 15 MV photons in conformal therapy of lung cancer: Monte Carlo studies in patient geometries.

Many lung cancer patients who undergo radiation therapy are treated with higher energy photons (15-18 MV) to obtain deeper penetration and better dose uniformity. However, the longer range of the higher energy recoil electrons in the low-density medium may cause lateral electronic disequilibrium and degrade the target coverage. To compare the dose homogeneity achieved with lower versus higher energy photon beams, we performed a dosimetric study of 6 and 15 MV three-dimensional (3D) conformal treatment plans for lung cancer using an accurate, patient-specific dose-calculation method based on a Monte Carlo technique. A 6 and 15 MV 3D conformal treatment plan was generated for each of two patients with target volumes exceeding 200 cm(3) on an in-house treatment planning system in routine clinical use. Each plan employed four conformally shaped photon beams. Each dose distribution was recalculated with the Monte Carlo method, utilizing the same beam geometry and patient-specific computed tomography (CT) images. Treatment plans using the two energies were compared in terms of their isodose distributions and dose-volume histograms (DVHs). The 15 MV dose distributions and DVHs generated by the clinical treatment planning calculations were as good as, or slightly better than, those generated for 6 MV beams. However, the Monte Carlo dose calculation predicted increased penumbra width with increased photon energy resulting in decreased lateral dose homogeneity for the 15 MV plans. Monte Carlo calculations showed that all target coverage indicators were significantly worse for 15 MV than for 6 MV; particularly the portion of the planning target volume (PTV) receiving at least 95% of the prescription dose (V(95)) dropped dramatically for the 15 MV plan in comparison to the 6 MV. Spinal cord and lung doses were clinically equivalent for the two energies. In treatment planning of tumors that abut lung tissue, lower energy (6 MV) photon beams should be preferred over higher energies (15-18 MV) because of the significant loss of lateral dose equilibrium for high-energy beams in the low-density medium. Any gains in radial dose uniformity across steep density gradients for higher energy beams must be weighed carefully against the lateral beam degradation due to penumbra widening.

Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation↗