Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Charles S Fuchs

Publications and source records attributed to Charles S Fuchs.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

A phase II study of docetaxel in patients with metastatic carcinoid tumors.

UNLABELLED: Twenty-one patients with metastatic carcinoid tumors were treated with docetaxel. Although the treatment was well tolerated, no objective radiologic responses were observed. Novel, more effective agents are needed for this disease. BACKGROUND: Traditional combination chemotherapy regimens containing streptozocin, doxorubicin, and 5-fluorouracil have yielded disappointing results in patients with metastatic carcinoid tumors. The lack of efficacy of these combinations, together with their toxicity, has led to efforts to investigate therapeutic agents that are potentially more active and tolerable. We, therefore, assessed the efficacy of docetaxel in the treatment of patients with metastatic carcinoid tumors. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with metastatic carcinoid tumors were treated with docetaxel, administered at a dose of 75 mg/m2 every three weeks. Patients were followed for evidence of toxicity, response, and survival. RESULTS: Docetaxel was well tolerated in this patient population. However, no objective radiologic responses were noted in any of the 21 patients. Of the 13 patients who were evaluable for biochemical responses to therapy, four (31%) experienced decreases in 24-hour urinary 5-hydroxyindole acetic acid (5HIAA) excretion of greater than 50%. The clinical course of the patients enrolled in this study was marked by a high incidence of radiologically stable disease (81%), a median progression-free survival time of 10 months, and a median overall survival time of 24 months. CONCLUSION: Although treatment with docetaxel results in biochemical responses in patients with metastatic carcinoid tumors, the lack of more significant antitumor activity demonstrates the need for novel, more effective agents in this disease.

Adult↗

Lack of efficacy of streptozocin and doxorubicin in patients with advanced pancreatic endocrine tumors.

BACKGROUND: The combination of streptozocin and doxorubicin has been considered the standard palliative chemotherapy regimen in patients with advanced pancreatic endocrine tumors (PETs). However, a recent review failed to confirm high antitumor activity in patients with advanced PETs. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 16 consecutive patients who received streptozocin and doxorubicin for advanced PETs at Dana Farber/Partners Cancer Care institutions. Baseline patient characteristics, radiographic response to therapy, treatment-related toxicity, progression-free and overall survival were analyzed. RESULTS: One patient demonstrated an objective partial response to therapy (objective response rate [ORR], 6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0-18%). Six patients achieved stable disease (38%; 95% CI, 14-62%) and 9 patients demonstrated disease progression on initial restaging (56%; 95% CI, 33-77%). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.9 months (95% CI, 2.8-8.8) and 20.2 months (95% CI, 9.7-37.4), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective cohort, the combination of streptozocin and doxorubicin failed to demonstrate substantial antitumor activity in patients with advanced PET. Our findings underscore the need for new therapeutic options in this patient population.

Adult↗

Glycemic index, glycemic load, and carbohydrate intake in relation to risk of distal colorectal adenoma in women.

Case-control studies and a cohort study have shown inconsistent associations between a high glycemic index or a high glycemic load and risk of colorectal cancer. These dietary variables have not been examined in relation to risk of colorectal adenoma. We thus examined the associations between dietary glycemic index, glycemic load, and carbohydrate intake with risk of adenoma of the distal colon or rectum among 34,428 US women who were initially free of cancer or polyps, who completed a semi-quantitative food-frequency questionnaire in 1980, and who underwent endoscopy from 1980 through 1998. 1,715 adenoma cases (704 large adenomas, 894 small adenomas, 1,277 distal colon adenomas, and 504 rectal adenomas) were documented during 18 years of follow-up. Dietary glycemic index, glycemic load, and carbohydrate intake were not related to risk of total colorectal adenoma after adjustment for age and established risk factors [relative risk (RR) for extreme quintiles of glycemic index = 1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94-1.32, P for trend = 0.66; RR for glycemic load = 0.92, 95% CI 0.76-1.11, P for trend = 0.63; RR for carbohydrate intake = 0.90, 95% CI 0.73-1.11, P for trend = 0.64]. In addition, no significant associations were found for large or small adenoma, distal colon or rectal adenoma, or across strata of body mass index. Our findings do not support the hypothesis that a high glycemic index diet, a high glycemic load diet, or high carbohydrate intake overall are associated with risk of colorectal adenoma.

Adenomatous Polyps↗

Plasma vitamin D metabolites and risk of colorectal cancer in women.

OBJECTIVE: Experimental evidence suggests that 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D and its precursor, 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], may aid in the prevention of colorectal cancer. We therefore examined risk in relation to plasma concentrations of these vitamin D metabolites. METHODS: In a nested case-control study among women in the Nurses' Health Study, we identified 193 colorectal cancer cases, ages 46 to 78 years, diagnosed up to 11 years after blood collection. Two controls were matched per case on year of birth and month of blood draw. Odds ratios (OR) for risk of colorectal cancer were calculated using conditional logistic regression adjusted for body mass index, physical activity, smoking, family history, use of hormone replacement therapy, aspirin use, and dietary intakes. RESULTS: We found a significant inverse linear association between plasma 25(OH)D and risk of colorectal cancer (P = 0.02). Among women in the highest quintile, the OR (95% confidence interval) was 0.53 (0.27-1.04). This inverse association remained strong when limited to women > or =60 years at blood collection (P = 0.006) but was not apparent among the younger women (P = 0.70). Benefit from higher 25(OH)D concentrations was observed for cancers at the distal colon and rectum (P = 0.02) but was not evident for those at the proximal colon (P = 0.81). In contrast to 25(OH)D, we did not observe an association between 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D and colorectal cancer, although risk was elevated among the women in the highest quintile if they were also in the lower half of the 25(OH)D distribution (OR, 2.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-6.11). CONCLUSION: From these results and supporting evidence from previous studies, we conclude that higher plasma levels of 25(OH)D are associated with a lower risk of colorectal cancer in older women, particularly for cancers at the distal colon and rectum.

Adult↗

Polymorphism in the thymidylate synthase promoter enhancer region and risk of colorectal adenomas.

Thymidylate synthase (TS), a key one-carbon metabolizing gene, encodes an enzyme that converts dUMP to dTMP, the rate-limiting nucleotide in DNA synthesis. We recently reported that a promoter polymorphism in TS modified the risk of colorectal cancer as well as the survival rate after the disease. To explore whether TS may play an important role in colorectal carcinogenesis early in the multistaged pathogenic pathway, we investigated the relation between the TS promoter polymorphism and risk of colorectal adenoma in a nested case-control study within the prospective Health Professionals Follow-up Study. We ascertained the TS genotype from 373 incident colorectal adenoma cases and 720 control subjects. Although there was no overall association between the TS promoter polymorphism and adenoma risk, we observed a significant TS-alcohol interaction (P for interaction = 0.009); relative to low alcohol consumers with the 2R/2R genotype, those with high alcohol consumption (>30 g/d) were not at elevated risk if they had the 2R/2R genotype [relative risk (RR), 0.80; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.34-1.90], but were at higher risk if they had the 2R/3R genotype (RR, 1.70; 95% CI, 0.87-3.31), and at the highest risk (RR, 3.16; 95% CI, 1.50-6.63) if they had the 3R/3R genotype. In addition, a significant interaction was observed between the TS promoter polymorphism and the 677C > T polymorphism of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR; P for interaction = 0.007). These findings lend additional support that one-carbon metabolism is an important process in pathogenesis of colorectal cancer.

Adenoma↗

Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors and colorectal cancer.

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) plays an important role in cell growth, differentiation, and survival. Targeting EGFR in patients with colorectal cancer has become an important therapeutic tool. Recently, a monoclonal antibody against the extracellular domain of the receptor (cetuximab [Erbitux]) has been approved for the treatment of patients with EGFR-positive metastatic disease refractory to irinotecan (Camptosar)-based therapy. The role of other targeted agents against EGFR, including other monoclonal antibodies as well as inhibitors of the intracellular tyrosine kinase domain, will also be discussed.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

A randomized controlled trial of fluorouracil plus leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin combinations in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Three agents with differing mechanisms of action are available for treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin. In this study, we compared the activity and toxicity of three different two-drug combinations in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who had not been treated previously for advanced disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were concurrently randomly assigned to receive irinotecan and bolus fluorouracil plus leucovorin (IFL, control combination), oxaliplatin and infused fluorouracil plus leucovorin (FOLFOX), or irinotecan and oxaliplatin (IROX). The primary end point was time to progression, with secondary end points of response rate, survival time, and toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 795 patients were randomly assigned between May 1999 and April 2001. A median time to progression of 8.7 months, response rate of 45%, and median survival time of 19.5 months were observed for FOLFOX. These results were significantly superior to those observed for IFL for all end points (6.9 months, 31%, and 15.0 months, respectively) or for IROX (6.5 months, 35%, and 17.4 months, respectively) for time to progression and response. The FOLFOX regimen had significantly lower rates of severe nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, febrile neutropenia, and dehydration. Sensory neuropathy and neutropenia were more common with the regimens containing oxaliplatin. CONCLUSION: The FOLFOX regimen of oxaliplatin and infused fluorouracil plus leucovorin was active and comparatively safe. It should be considered as a standard therapy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Association of hospital procedure volume and outcomes in patients with colon cancer at high risk for recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Studies that use registry data have demonstrated superior long-term overall survival after curative surgical resection of colon cancer at hospitals where the volume of such surgeries is high. However, because such administrative data lack information on cancer recurrence, the true nature of this relation remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether hospital procedure volume predicts long-term outcomes of colon cancer surgery. DESIGN: Nested cohort study within a randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Intergroup 0089 national adjuvant colon cancer study conducted between 1988 and 1992. PATIENTS: 3161 patients with high-risk stage II and stage III colon cancer. MEASUREMENTS: Overall survival and recurrence-free survival, by hospital procedure volume as defined by Medicare claims data. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 9.4 years, 5-year overall survival significantly differed across tertiles of hospital procedure volume (63.8% for patients who had resection at low-volume hospitals compared with 67.3% at high-volume hospitals; P = 0.04). After adjustment for other predictors of colon cancer outcome, the hazard ratio for overall mortality in patients treated at low-volume centers was 1.16 (95% CI, 1.03 to 1.32). However, the risk for cancer recurrence was not associated with hospital procedure volume. Five-year recurrence-free survival was 63.9% for patients who had resection at low-volume hospitals compared with 63.0% at high-volume hospitals (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.03 [CI, 0.89 to 1.18]). These findings did not materially change after stratification by other potential demographic and clinical predictors of outcome. CONCLUSIONS: According to prospectively recorded data from a large clinical trial, patients whose colon cancer was resected at low-volume hospitals experienced a higher risk for long-term mortality; however, this increased mortality was not attributable to differences in colon cancer recurrences.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Influence of body mass index on outcomes and treatment-related toxicity in patients with colon carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a risk factor for the development of colon carcinoma. The influence of body mass index (BMI) on long-term outcomes and treatment-related toxicity in patients with colon carcinoma has not been well characterized. METHODS: This cohort study was conducted within a large, randomized adjuvant chemotherapy trial of 3759 men and women with high-risk, Stage II and Stage III colon carcinoma who were treated between 1988 and 1992 throughout the United States. With a median follow-up of 9.4 years, the authors examined the influence of BMI on disease recurrence, overall survival, and treatment-related toxicity. RESULTS: Compared with women of normal weight (BMI, 21.0-24.9 kg/m(2)), obese women with colon carcinoma (BMI > or = 30.0 kg/m(2)) experienced significantly worse overall mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.34; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.07-1.67) and a nonsignificant increase in the risk of disease recurrence (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.98-1.59). The influence of BMI among women was not related to any differences in chemotherapy dose-intensity across categories of BMI. In contrast, BMI was not related significantly to long-term outcomes among male patients in this cohort. Among all study participants, obese patients had significantly lower rates of Grade 3-4 leukopenia and lower rates of any Grade > or = 3 toxicity compared with patients of normal weight. CONCLUSIONS: Among women with Stage II-III colon carcinoma, obesity was associated with a significant increase in overall mortality as well as a borderline significant increase in disease recurrence. Nonetheless, obesity was not associated with any increase in chemotherapy-related toxicity.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

Dietary meat, dairy products, fat, and cholesterol and pancreatic cancer risk in a prospective study.

Case-control studies suggest that meat and cholesterol intakes may be related to elevated risks of pancreatic cancer. Few prospective studies have examined associations between diet and pancreatic cancer, although in one recent study saturated fat consumption was related to higher risk. In a cohort of US women, the authors confirmed 178 pancreatic cancer cases over 18 years of follow-up. A mailed 61-item food frequency questionnaire was self-administered at baseline, and health and lifestyle variables were updated biennially. Analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards models to adjust for potential confounders. Intakes of total fat, different types of fats, and cholesterol were not associated with pancreatic cancer risk. Similarly, total meat, red meat, and dairy products were not related to risk. Individual food items contributing to intakes of total meat and dairy products, as well as fish and eggs, did not reveal any specific association. Updating dietary exposures by using questionnaires from 1980, 1984, 1986, and 1990 produced similar findings. The authors' data do not support previous findings that meat or saturated fat intakes are related to pancreatic cancer risk. Future prospective studies should examine the influence of cooking practices as well as other dietary habits on the risk of pancreatic cancer.

Adult↗

Night-shift work and risk of colorectal cancer in the nurses' health study.

Exposure to light at night suppresses the physiologic production of melatonin, a hormone that has antiproliferative effects on intestinal cancers. Although observational studies have associated night-shift work with an increased risk of breast cancer, the effect of night-shift work on the risk of other cancers is not known. We prospectively examined the relationship between working rotating night shifts and the risk of colorectal cancers among female participants in the Nurses' Health Study. We documented 602 incident cases of colorectal cancer among 78 586 women who were followed up from 1988 through 1998. Compared with women who never worked rotating night shifts, women who worked 1-14 years or 15 years or more on rotating night shifts had multivariate relative risks of colorectal cancer of 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.84 to 1.19) and 1.35 (95% CI = 1.03 to 1.77), respectively (P(trend) =.04). These data suggest that working a rotating night shift at least three nights per month for 15 or more years may increase the risk of colorectal cancer in women.

Adult↗

Relation of hospital volume to colostomy rates and survival for patients with rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative mortality after some types of cancer surgery is inversely related to the number of operations performed at a hospital (i.e., hospital volume). This study assessed the association of hospital volume with colostomy rates and survival for patients with rectal cancer in a large representative cohort identified from the California Cancer Registry. METHODS: We identified 7257 patients diagnosed from January 1, 1994, through December 31, 1997, with stage I-III rectal cancer who underwent surgical resection. Registry data were linked to hospital discharge abstracts and ZIP-code-level data from the 1990 U.S. Census. Associations of hospital volume with permanent colostomy and 30-day mortality were assessed with the Mantel-Haenszel trend test and logistic regression. Overall survival was examined with the Kaplan-Meier method and a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. Multivariable analyses adjusted for demographic and clinical variables and patient clustering within hospitals. All tests of statistical significance were two-sided. RESULTS: In unadjusted analyses across decreasing quartiles of hospital volume, we observed statistically significant increases in colostomy rates (29.5%, 31.8%, 35.2%, and 36.6%; P<.001) and in 30-day postoperative mortality (1.6%, 1.6%, 2.9%, and 4.8%; P<.001) and a decrease in 2-year survival (83.7%, 83.2%, 80.9%, and 76.6%; P<.001). The adjusted risks of permanent colostomy (odds ratio [OR] = 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.10 to 1.70), 30-day mortality (OR = 2.64, 95% CI = 1.41 to 4.93), and 2-year mortality (hazard ratio = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.15 to 1.44) were greater for patients at hospitals in the lowest volume quartile than for patients at hospitals in the highest volume quartile. Stratification by tumor stage and comorbidity index did not appreciably affect the results. Adjusted colostomy rates varied statistically significantly (P<.001) among individual hospitals independent of volume. CONCLUSIONS: Rectal cancer patients who underwent surgery at high-volume hospitals were less likely to have a permanent colostomy and had better survival rates than those treated in low-volume hospitals. Identifying processes of care that contribute to these differences may improve patients' outcomes in all hospitals.

Adult↗

Use of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for colorectal cancer in a population-based cohort.

PURPOSE: Randomized trials have demonstrated that adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival for patients with stage III colon cancer and that chemotherapy combined with radiation therapy improves survival for patients with stage II or III rectal cancer. This population-based study was designed to assess use of these treatments in clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From the California Cancer Registry, we identified all patients diagnosed during 1996 to 1997 with stage III colon cancer (n = 1,422) and stage II or III rectal cancer (n = 534) in 22 northern California counties. To supplement registry data on adjuvant therapies and ascertain reasons they were not used, we surveyed physicians or reviewed office records for 1,449 patients (74%). RESULTS: Chemotherapy rates varied widely by age from 88% (age < 55 years) to 11% (age >or= 85 years), and radiation therapy varied similarly. Adjusting for demographic, clinical, and hospital characteristics, chemotherapy was used less often among older and unmarried patients, and radiation therapy was used less often among older patients, black patients, and those initially treated in low-volume hospitals. Adjusted rates of chemotherapy varied significantly (P <.01) among individual hospitals: 79% and 51%, respectively, at one SD above and below average (67%). Physicians' reasons for not providing adjuvant therapy included patient refusal (30% for chemotherapy, 22% for radiation therapy), comorbid illness (22% and 14%, respectively), or lack of clinical indication (22% and 45%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Use of adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer varies substantially by age, race, marital status, hospital volume, and individual hospital, indicating opportunities to improve care. With enhanced data on adjuvant therapies, population-based registries could become a valuable resource for monitoring the quality of cancer care.

Adolescent↗

Phase III comparison of two irinotecan dosing regimens in second-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Randomized trials in fluorouracil (FU)-refractory colorectal cancer demonstrate significant survival advantages for patients receiving irinotecan. We prospectively compared the efficacy and tolerability of two irinotecan regimens (once a week for 4 weeks followed by a 2-week rest period [weekly] v once every 3 weeks) in such patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter, open-label, phase III study randomly assigned patients in a 1:2 ratio to irinotecan given either weekly (125 mg/m(2)) or once every 3 weeks (350 mg/m(2), or 300 mg/m(2) in patients who were >/= 70 years of age, who had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status equal to 2, or who had prior pelvic irradiation). RESULTS: With median follow-up of 15.8 months, there was no significant difference in 1-year survival (46% v 41%, respectively; P =.42), median survival (9.9 v 9.9 months, respectively; P =.43), or median time to progression (4.0 v 3.0 months, respectively; P =.54) between the two regimens. Grade 3/4 diarrhea occurred in 36% of patients treated weekly and in 19% of those treated once every 3 weeks (P =.002). Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 29% of patients treated weekly and 34% of those treated once every 3 weeks (P =.35). Treatment-related mortality occurred in five patients (5.3%) receiving irinotecan weekly and three patients (1.6%) given therapy once every 3 weeks (P =.12). Global quality of life was not statistically different between treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Irinotecan schedules of weekly and of once every 3 weeks demonstrated similar efficacy and quality of life in patients with FU-refractory, metastatic colorectal cancer. The regimen of once every 3 weeks was associated with a significantly lower incidence of severe diarrhea.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Impact of diabetes mellitus on outcomes in patients with colon cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the influence of diabetes mellitus on long-term outcomes and treatment-related toxicity among patients with curatively resected colon cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was a cohort study within a large, randomized adjuvant chemotherapy trial of 3,759 patients with high-risk stage II and stage III colon cancer treated between 1988 and 1992 throughout the United States. In the cohort, 287 patients were identified as having diabetes mellitus. With a median follow-up of 9.4 years, we analyzed differences in overall survival (OS) and colon cancer recurrence as well as treatment-related toxicity between patients with diabetes and those without diabetes. RESULTS: At 5 years, patients with diabetes mellitus, compared with patients without diabetes, experienced a significantly worse disease-free survival (DFS; 48% diabetics v 59% nondiabetics; P <.0001), OS (57% v 66%; P <.0001), and recurrence-free survival (RFS; 56% v 64%, P =.012). Median survival was 6.0 years and 11.3 years for diabetics and nondiabetics, respectively. Compared with patients without a history of diabetes, those with diabetes had a 42% increased risk of death from any cause (P <.0001) and 21% increased risk for recurrence (P =.05) after adjustment for other predictors of colon cancer outcome. Treatment-related toxicities were similar between the two groups, although patients with diabetes experienced an increase in treatment-related diarrhea. CONCLUSION: Patients with diabetes mellitus and high-risk stage II and stage III colon cancer experienced a significantly higher rate of overall mortality and cancer recurrence, even after adjustment for other predictors of colon cancer outcome. These results underscore the need for further research to understand the mechanism that underlies this relation.

Aged↗

A Phase I study of 9-nitrocamptothecin given concurrently with capecitabine in patients with refractory, metastatic solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: 9-Nitrocamptothecin (9-NC) is an orally available camptothecin analog with antineoplastic activity that results from the inhibition of DNA topoisomerase I. Previous studies have suggested that it has significant clinical efficacy. The primary toxicities of 9-NC include gastrointestinal upset, cystitis, and myelosuppression at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 1.5 mg/m(2) per day. Capecitabine is a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil that is approved for use in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma and colorectal carcinoma, and it offers the convenience of oral administration. This trial examined the combination of these two oral agents in patients with metastatic solid tumors. METHODS: Capecitabine was administered twice daily at a total daily dose of 1300 mg/m(2) per day for 14 days followed by a 1-week break. 9-NC was taken daily 5 days per week for 2 weeks in a dose-escalation scheme. The starting dose was 0.5 mg/m(2) per day, and cohorts of 3 patients were enrolled until the dose level reached 1.25 mg/m(2) per day. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were evaluable for toxicity and response, and nausea and emesis were the dose-limiting toxicities. Despite antiemetic prophylaxis with 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 antagonists, 2 of 3 patients at the 1.0 mg/m(2) per day dose level had Grade 2-3 nausea; while at the MTD of 0.75 mg/m(2) per day, 3 of 14 patients had Grade > or = 2 nausea. The incidence of hand-foot syndrome, stomatitis, diarrhea, and myelosuppression did not exceed that expected with capecitabine alone, suggesting that 9-NC does not exacerbate these side effects. No objective responses were seen. Stable disease was observed in 9 patients (43%) with a median duration of 11 weeks, including 3 patients with responses that lasted from 20 weeks to 40 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of 9-NC and capecitabine with the current schedule was limited in dose by nausea and had minimal clinical efficacy in a group of patients with refractory solid tumors.

Administration, Oral↗

The experience with oxaliplatin in the treatment of upper gastrointestinal carcinomas.

The treatment for advanced gastroesophageal tumors is still largely based on 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin combinations, and the treatment for advanced pancreatic tumors principally relies on gemcitabine. The need for more active agents is evident in light of the poor outcomes for patients with these tumors. Oxaliplatin is an important chemotherapeutic agent currently being investigated in the treatment of gastrointestinal carcinomas. This diaminocyclohexane-platinum compound has significant differences from cisplatin and carboplatin with respect to its activity and toxicity. It appears to have activity in tumors believed to be marginally sensitive to the other platinum agents, and it is neither ototoxic nor nephrotoxic. The main side effect of oxaliplatin is a sensory neuropathy exacerbated by cold exposure. After extensive clinical development, oxaliplatin has become an important option in the treatment of colorectal cancer. Its role in the treatment of upper gastrointestinal cancers is less well established, but is the focus of intense investigation. Much of what we currently know is based on small phase I and II studies, but knowledge is rapidly accumulating. The fact that cisplatin remains an important drug in the treatment of several upper gastrointestinal cancers raises the hope that oxaliplatin will contribute significantly to the treatment of those malignancies as well. Larger randomized phase III trials are being designed and conducted to fully define the role of oxaliplatin in the treatment of upper gastrointestinal tumors in the relatively near future.

Antineoplastic Agents↗