Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Charles N Ellis

Publications and source records attributed to Charles N Ellis.

24 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Economic analysis in dermatology.

Cost-effectiveness studies are rising in importance as means for justifying expenditures on health interventions and as guides for making treatment and resource allocation decisions. However, the term "cost-effective" often is used erroneously, attributed to therapies that have not been subjected to rigorous cost analysis or comparison to an appropriate alternative. Health economic studies include cost-of-illness, cost-minimization, cost-effectiveness, cost-utility, and cost-benefit analyses. Each of these types of analyses differs in what it measures and under what circumstances its use is appropriate. This article describes the different types of economic studies, using examples to highlight their key features, and provides a summary of the key components of an economic analysis including perspective, cost and outcomes measurement, time horizon, cost-discounting, and sensitivity analysis.

Cost of Illness↗

Sulfasalazine for alopecia areata.

Sulfasalazine is used as a therapy for various autoimmune conditions, including psoriasis; its effectiveness is presumed to be the result of its immunomodulatory effects. We have treated patients with severe alopecia areata with sulfasalazine as part of our dermatology practice and have noticed cosmetically acceptable regrowth in 23% of patients in whom a response could be determined. In view of its good safety profile, sulfasalazine may be considered for systemic treatment of severe alopecia areata.

Adolescent↗

Cost of atopic dermatitis and eczema in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis/eczema (AD/E) is a common disease. Few studies have attempted to quantify the cost to third-party payers. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to identify the annual cost of medical services and prescription drugs for the treatment of AD/E to private insurance and Medicaid payers in the United States. METHODS: We used a retrospective study design employing claims data from 1997 and 1998 from a private insurer and a state Medicaid program to analyze costs incurred. Beneficiaries were considered to have AD/E if they had at least one claim in 1997 with a primary or secondary listing of 1 of 3 diagnosis codes: 691.8, other atopic dermatitis and related conditions; 692.9, contact dermatitis and other eczema when no cause is specified; or 373.3, noninfectious dermatoses of eyelid. Patients who did not meet the diagnosis criteria served as a control group in each payer for comparisons of expenditures with the AD/E group. RESULTS: Disease prevalence was 2.4% (private insurer) to 2.6% (Medicaid) of all eligible beneficiaries, and 3.5% to 4.1% of patients submitted at least one health care claim during the study period. Medicaid-insured patients used outpatient hospital visits and hospitalizations at a greater rate than did privately insured patients; neither used emergency departments extensively. The third-party payer cost of illness for AD/E ranged from $0.9 billion to $3.8 billion when projected across the total number of persons younger than 65 years insured by private insurers and Medicaid in the United States. More than one fourth of all health care costs for patients with AD/E may be attributed to AD/E and co-morbid conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Annual costs of AD/E are similar to those of other diseases such as emphysema, psoriasis, and epilepsy. Patients incur significant costs associated with AD/E and co-morbid conditions.

Cost of Illness↗

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study evaluating efficacy and tolerability of 2 courses of alefacept in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: In previous phase II studies, alefacept significantly improved psoriasis and was well tolerated. The clinical response to alefacept was durable. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to further evaluate efficacy and tolerability of alefacept in a phase III study of patients (n = 553) with chronic plaque psoriasis. METHODS: Two 12-week courses of once-weekly intravenous alefacept 7.5 mg or placebo were given in a randomized double-blind study; patients were followed up for 12 weeks after each course. RESULTS: During treatment and follow-up of course 1, a 75% or greater reduction in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) was achieved by 28% of alefacept-treated and 8% of placebo-treated patients (P <.001). Patients who received a single course of alefacept and achieved a 75% or greater reduction from baseline PASI during or after treatment, without the use of phototherapy or systemic therapies, maintained a 50% or greater reduction in PASI for a median duration of more than 7 months. Among patients who received 2 courses of alefacept, 40% and 71% of patients achieved a 75% or greater and 50% or greater reduction in PASI, respectively, during the study period. Alefacept was well tolerated over both courses. In course 1, the incidence of transient chills was higher in the alefacept group compared with the placebo group; more than 90% of cases occurred within 24 hours after the first few doses. CONCLUSION: Alefacept significantly improved psoriasis and produced durable clinical improvements among patients who responded. A second course of alefacept increased efficacy and was equally well tolerated.

Adolescent↗

Improvement in psoriasis with rosiglitazone in a diabetic and a nondiabetic patient.

The authors conducted a prospective, open-label, pilot trial of the effects of the antidiabetic thiazolidinedione (TZD) rosiglitazone in two patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Case 1: A lean, euglycemic 43-year-old nondiabetic man with a 2-year history of plaque psoriasis presented with lesions involving 10% of his body surface (Figures 1A, 1B, 1C). He had no other chronic or acute medical problems. He had previously been managed sporadically with topical triamcinolone acetonide, an intermediate-strength glucocorticoid, and was off antipsoriatic medication for 5 months. He was started on rosiglitazone p.o., 8 mg q.d. After 10 weeks on rosiglitazone, the lesions developed increased erythema, spreading, and shedding of scale (Figures 2A, 2B, 2C). After an additional 26 weeks, the lesions had largely disappeared (Figures 3A, 3B, 3C). The patient remained euglycemic throughout the study. His liver function enzymes (alanine transferase [ALT] and aspartate transferase [AST]) remained normal throughout the study: ALT, 23 IU/L; AST, 47 IU/L before treatment; ALT, 25 IU/L; AST, 33 IU/L after treatment. There were no adverse events. Case 2: An overweight 68-year-old woman (body mass index, 29 kg/m2; with a 12-year history of type 2 diabetes and 5-year history of psoriasis presented with generalized plaque psoriasis over 20% of her body, including two large, thick, silvery plaques with the texture of leather over the lower part of the back (Figure 4A). She was given rosiglitazone p.o., 4 mg b.i.d. for 24 weeks, which resulted in significant improvement in psoriasis (Figure 4B). After an additional 26 weeks on rosiglitazone, the plaques had cleared on her back (Figure 4C) and over her entire body, including scalp, ears, and posterior forearms (not shown). Her glycemic control improved (hemoglobin A1c decreased from 7.7% to 7.2%) and liver function remained normal throughout the study (ALT, 24 IU/L; AST, 14 IU/L before treatment; and ALT, 26 IU/L; AST, 15 IU/L after treatment). There were no adverse events.

Administration, Topical↗