Biomedical subjects
Charles F Von Gunten
Publications and source records attributed to Charles F Von Gunten.
Residents from five training programs report improvements in knowledge, attitudes and skills after a rotation with a hospice program.
BACKGROUND: The faculty of the Center for Palliative Studies teach residents from 5 different primary care residency training programs who rotate at San Diego Hospice: 3 in Internal Medicine, 2 in Family Medicine. Residents participate in the care of patients in the inpatient care setting and make joint home visits with physicians and other team members. A series of 4 lectures on end-of-life care is given on Tuesday mornings: management of pain, other symptoms, interdisciplinary roles of chaplains, social workers, nurses, and grief/bereavement are discussed. In addition, there is a Tuesday noon conference that follows a journal club format. Because of scheduling, residents from some programs are not able to attend all lectures and conferences. METHODS: A 27-item self-assessment evaluation tool was developed for administration to residents before and after their experience. A total of 65 evaluations for residents rotating in academic year 1997-98 and 1998-1999 were collated and analyzed. RESULTS: When evaluated as a whole, residents noted significant improvements in their ability to assess and treat symptoms, to tell patient/family about the dying process and to care for dying patients at home (range in improvement from 26% to 67%, p < 0.05 using paired t-test). About half of the residents perceived that the content was not available elsewhere in their training. CONCLUSION: We conclude that a single hospice rotation can effectively contribute to resident education in multiple programs.
Ensuring competency in end-of-life care: controlling symptoms.
BACKGROUND: Palliative medicine is assuming an increasingly important role in patient care. The Education for Physicians in End-of-life Care (EPEC) Project is an ambitious program to increase core palliative care skills for all physicians. It is not intended to transmit specialty level competencies in palliative care. METHOD: The EPEC Curriculum was developed to be a comprehensive syllabus including trainer notes, multiple approaches to teaching the material, slides, and videos of clinical encounters to trigger discussion are provided. The content was developed through a combination of expert opinion, participant feedback and selected literature review. Content development was guided by the goal of teaching core competencies not included in the training of generalist and non-palliative medicine specialist physicians. RESULTS: Whole patient assessment forms the basis for good symptom control. Approaches to the medical management of pain, depression, anxiety, breathlessness (dyspnea), nausea/vomiting, constipation, fatigue/weakness and the symptoms common during the last hours of life are described. CONCLUSION: While some physicians will have specialist palliative care services upon which to call, most in the world will need to provide the initial approaches to symptom control at the end-of-life.
Treatment of dyspnea in cancer patients.
Dyspnea is defined as a sensation of difficult or uncomfortable breathing. The symptom is highly prevalent among cancer patients with and without direct lung involvement. The gold standard of assessment is based on patient self-report. Objective measures such as respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and arterial blood gas measurements frequently do not correlate with the subjective experience of dyspnea. Consistent with patient goals and the disease context, treatment should be directed at removing the underlying cause when possible. Fast, safe, and effective symptomatic relief of dyspnea is possible whether or not identifiable reversible causes exist. In fact, relieving symptoms can be considered in conjunction with treating specific reversible causes. Opioids are the first-line therapy for relief of dyspnea symptoms. When prescribed appropriately, respiratory depression is not a significant concern. In the rare cases in which opioids are unable to control dyspnea, sedation is an effective, ethical, and legal option.