Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Chandra P Belani

Publications and source records attributed to Chandra P Belani.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2007

Recent advances in targeted therapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is characterized by wide molecular heterogeneity. In recent years, novel agents that target specific, aberrant molecular pathways in NSCLC have been under rigorous evaluation. Erlotinib, an inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase, improves survival for advanced NSCLC patients who progressed following one or two prior chemotherapy regimens. Novel molecular predictive markers, such as EGFR mutations and gene amplification, are at present under evaluation to select patients for therapy with erlotinib. Another area of progress is the recent demonstration that bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody against the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), extended survival when administered in combination with chemotherapy for patients with non-squamous NSCLC. Promising anticancer activity has also been noted with agents that inhibit the VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase in patients with advanced NSCLC. Inhibitors of the proteosomal complex, histone deacetylase, mammalian target of rapamycin pathway, and other growth factor receptor-mediated signaling are under investigation for treatment of NSCLC. These developments have paved the way for a new era of tailor-made therapies based on clinical or molecular/genetic profiles in the treatment of NSCLC. This article reviews the recent advances in targeted therapy of advanced NSCLC.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Radiosurgery for the treatment of spinal lung metastases.

BACKGROUND: Spinal metastases are a common source of pain as well as neurologic deficit in patients with lung cancer. Metastases from lung cancer traditionally have been believed to be relatively responsive to radiation therapy. However, conventional external beam radiotherapy lacks the precision to allow delivery of large single-fraction doses of radiation and simultaneously limit the dose to radiosensitive structures such as the spinal cord. The current study evaluated the efficacy of single-fraction radiosurgery for the treatment of spinal lung cancer metastases. METHODS: In the current prospective cohort evaluation, 87 lung cancer metastases to the spine in 77 patients were treated with a single-fraction radiosurgery technique with a follow-up period of 6 to 40 months (median, 12 months). The indication for radiosurgery treatment was pain in 73 cases, as a primary treatment modality in 7 cases, for radiographic tumor progression in 4 cases, and for progressive neurologic deficit in 3 cases. RESULTS: Tumor volume ranged from 0.2 to 264 cm(3) (mean, 25.7 cm(3)). The maximum tumor dose was maintained at 15 to 25 grays (Gy) (mean, 20 Gy; median, 20 Gy). No radiation-induced toxicity occurred during the follow-up period. Long-term axial and radicular pain improvement occurred in 65 of 73 patients (89%) who were treated primarily for pain. Long-term radiographic tumor control was observed in all patients who underwent radiosurgery as their primary treatment modality or for radiographic tumor progression. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal radiosurgery was found to be feasible, safe, and clinically effective for the treatment of spinal metastases from lung cancer. The results of the current study indicate the potential of radiosurgery in the treatment of patients with spinal lung metastases, especially those with solitary sites of spine involvement, to improve long-term palliation.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Single-arm, open label study of pemetrexed plus cisplatin in chemotherapy naïve patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: outcomes of an expanded access program.

BACKGROUND: An expanded access program (EAP) provided patient access to pemetrexed prior to its commercial availability. The current report consists of US patients in the EAP who had chemotherapy naïve pleural mesothelioma. METHODS: Eligible patients had a histologic or cytologic diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma that was not amenable to curative treatment with surgery. Study treatment consisted of pemetrexed 500mg/m(2) in combination with cisplatin 75mg/m(2) once every 21 days. Vitamin B12, folic acid, and dexamethasone were administered as prophylaxis. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported by investigators and compiled in a pharmacovigilance database for all patients enrolled in the EAP. RESULTS: Of 1056 patients receiving at least one dose of pemetrexed in the EAP, 728 had chemotherapy naïve pleural mesothelioma. Median age of this group was 70 years (range 23-89 years) and 84% were male. Among 615 patients, overall response rate was 20.5%, including 12 complete responses (2.0%) and 114 partial responses (18.5%). An additional 290 patients (47.2%) had stable disease. Median survival for all 728 patients was 10.8 months (95% CI=9.8, 12.3; 60.3% censorship) and 1 year survival was 45.4%. The most commonly reported SAEs in the overall EAP irrespective of causality were dehydration (7.2%), nausea (5.2%), vomiting (4.9%), dyspnea (3.8%), and pulmonary embolism (2.4%). CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort, 67.7% of patients treated with first-line chemotherapy experienced a response or stable disease. Survival time and toxicity from this EAP were promising for this difficult-to-treat disease.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Women and lung cancer: epidemiology, tumor biology, and emerging trends in clinical research.

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in both men and women. Environmental carcinogens, particularly tobacco smoke, play a dominant role in the development of lung cancer, although 10-15% of all patients diagnosed are non-smokers. In addition, emerging data demonstrate sex-specific differences in lung cancer susceptibility and prognosis. This implies that the development of lung cancer is modulated by complex interactions between genetic, hormonal, behavioral, and environmental factors. A better understanding of the differences between men and women and their impact on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of lung cancer requires continued basic and clinical research. Recent data on the epidemiological aspects of lung cancer in women, lung tumor biology, and emerging trends in clinical research were presented at a thought leaders' roundtable hosted by the Society for Women's Health Research. The panel concluded that as the patient population in lung cancer is changing from mostly male smokers to include women and non-smokers, an urgent need exists to increase awareness and research funding to improve lung cancer care, particularly in women. To further improve survival in this disease, both clinical characteristics and tumor biology should be considered in the development of new treatment options.

Female↗
PubMed2006

Efficacy and safety of gefitinib in chemonaive patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated in an Expanded Access Program.

Chemotherapy (CT) is recommended in numerous clinical guidelines for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and offers improved survival over best supportive care. However, many patients with advanced NSCLC never receive CT because of advanced age, poor performance status, comorbidities, or patient refusal. The epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib has shown antitumor activity and a favorable toxicity profile in pretreated patients with recurrent advanced NSCLC and was made available in a worldwide Expanded Access Program (EAP) to >37,000 patients who did not respond to standard treatment or were ineligible for or refused CT. A retrospective chart review of 1671 consecutive patients enrolled at 11 sites in the US arm of the EAP identified 198 patients with advanced NSCLC who had not received previous CT. All patients were treated with gefitinib 250 mg/d until treatment failure or toxicity occurred. Patients were treated for a mean of 4.7 months. The most common adverse events were diarrhea (31.3%) and rash (31.3%). Complete and partial response rates were 0.7 and 5.6%, respectively, and 40.6% had stable disease. Median survival was 6 months, and estimated 1-year survival was 29.7%. The majority of patients did not receive subsequent CT.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Effect of chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer on patients' quality of life. A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) do not have curative treatment options; therefore, treatments should prolong survival and improve quality of life (QoL). We compared the effect on QoL of two docetaxel-platinum regimens with vinorelbine-cisplatin. METHODS: QoL was assessed by the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) and the general EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D) in 926 chemotherapy-naïve patients with stages IIIB to IV NSCLC. Patients were randomly assigned to receive: docetaxel 75 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2, every 3 weeks (DC); docetaxel 75 mg/m2 and carboplatin 6 mg/ml min, every 3 weeks (DCb); or vinorelbine 25 mg/m2/week plus cisplatin 100 mg/m2, every 4 weeks (VC). RESULTS: Overall, patients treated with either docetaxel-containing regimen had better QoL than VC-treated patients (LCSS global item "QoL today": P=0.064 for DC and P=0.016 for DCb versus VC; EQ-5D global item "health state today": P=0.016 for DC and P<0.001 for DCb versus VC). DC-treated patients experienced improved pain relief compared with VC (P=0.033), whereas pain relief with DCb and VC was similar. Patients treated with either docetaxel regimen had more favorable changes in performance status (P=0.065 for DC and P<0.001 for DCb versus VC) and mean weight loss (0.06 kg, gain of 0.08 kg, and 2.27 kg for DC, DCb, and VC, respectively; P<0.001 for both DC versus VC and DCb versus VC). CONCLUSION: The TAX 326 study shows that docetaxel-platinum regimens relieve symptoms and improve QoL in patients with advanced NSCLC. DCb and DC were superior to VC in all QoL outcomes assessed except for the difference between DC and VC in LCSS "QoL today", which was not significant.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2005

Elderly subgroup analysis of a randomized phase III study of docetaxel plus platinum combinations versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin for first-line treatment of advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (TAX 326).

BACKGROUND: Controversy continues over whether elderly patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) should receive platinum-based chemotherapy. TAX 326 reported improved survival with docetaxel-cisplatin (DC) versus vinorelbine-cisplatin (VC) for advanced NSCLC. DC and docetaxel-carboplatin (DCb) were better tolerated than VC. We analyzed the efficacy and toxicity in patients ages < 65 and > or = 65 years. METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive, TNM Stage IIIB-IV NSCLC patients were randomized to DC (docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2), d1 q3w), DCb (docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) and carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve 6 mg/mL.min, d1 q3w), or VC (vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2), d1, 8, 15, and 22 and cisplatin 100 mg/m(2), d1 q4w). RESULTS: Of 1218 patients, 401 were age > or = 65 years (149/118/134 DC/DCb/VC arms). In the elderly, median survival was 12.6 versus 9.9 months, 1-year survival was 52% versus 41%, 2-year survival was 24% versus 17% for DC versus VC, respectively. DCb survival results were similar to those for VC: median, 9.0 months; 1-year, 38%; 2-year, 19%. Survival outcomes were similar between elderly and younger patients across treatment arms. Compared with younger patients, elderly patients reported moderately higher incidences of NCI CTC (version 1.0) Grade 3-4 asthenia, infection, and pulmonary toxicities across treatment arms, and diarrhea and sensory neurotoxicity for cisplatin-containing arms. Most hematologic toxicities occurred with similar incidences between elderly and younger patients, although neutropenia was slightly increased in elderly patients. CONCLUSION: First-line docetaxel-cisplatin chemotherapy showed similar activity in elderly and younger patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC; elderly patients tolerated docetaxel-platinum well despite experiencing slightly more toxicity than younger patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the novel redox-active agent, motexafin gadolinium, with concurrent radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic or biliary cancers.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of the novel anticancer agent, motexafin gadolinium (MGd), administered concurrently with radiation therapy (RT) in patients with locally advanced pancreatic or biliary tumors. The pharmacokinetics of MGd were also evaluated. METHODS: Cohorts of three to six patients were treated with escalating doses of MGd, administered three times per week for a total of 16 doses concurrent with RT. The dose of RT was fixed at 5,040 cGy, and given in 28 fractions, from Monday to Friday of every week. Plasma MGd concentrations were measured by high performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Eight patients were treated at dose level 1 (2.9 mg/kg), with one DLT (grade 3 fever). Three patients were treated at dose level 2 (3.6 mg/kg), and two DLTs were noted. One DLT was grade 3 nausea and vomiting (N/V), and the other was grade 3 skin toxicity. The most common toxicity was N/V. There were no objective responses. The median survival was 6 months. The MGd plasma concentration versus time profile in each patient was best fit by a two-compartment, open, linear model. There was minimal accumulation of MGd in plasma with the three-times/week dosing schedule. Simulation of the time course of MGd in the peripheral compartment indicated that maximal MGd concentrations of 1-2 micromol/kg occurred between 4 and 6 h after MGd infusion. CONCLUSION: Dose level 1 (2.9 mg/kg of MGd) is the recommended dose for combination with (RT) in phase II studies for locally advanced pancreatic and biliary cancers. Patient tolerance might be improved by modification of the RT schedule and antiemetic prophylaxis.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Combined chemoradiotherapy regimens of paclitaxel and carboplatin for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase II locally advanced multi-modality protocol.

PURPOSE: This phase II noncomparative randomized trial was conducted to determine the optimal sequencing and integration of paclitaxel/carboplatin with standard daily thoracic radiation therapy (TRT), in patients with locally advanced unresected stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Survival data were compared with historical standard sequential chemoradiotherapy data from the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with unresected stages IIIA and IIIB NSCLC, with Karnofsky performance status > or = 70% and weight loss < or = 10%, received two cycles of induction paclitaxel (200 mg/m2)/carboplatin (area under the plasma concentration time curve [AUC] = 6) followed by TRT 63.0 Gy (arm 1, sequential) or two cycles of induction paclitaxel (200 mg/m2)/carboplatin (AUC = 6) followed by weekly paclitaxel (45 mg/m2)/carboplatin (AUC = 2) with concurrent TRT 63.0 Gy (arm 2, induction/concurrent), or weekly paclitaxel (45 mg/m2)/carboplatin (AUC = 2)/TRT (63.0 Gy) followed by two cycles of paclitaxel (200 mg/m2)/carboplatin (AUC = 6; arm 3, concurrent/consolidation). RESULTS: With a median follow-up time of 39.6 months, median overall survival was 13.0, 12.7, and 16.3 months for arms 1, 2, and 3, respectively. During induction chemotherapy, grade 3/4 granulocytopenia occurred in 32% and 38% of patients on study arms 1 and 2, respectively. The most common locoregional grade 3/4 toxicity during and after TRT was esophagitis, which was more pronounced with the administration of concurrent chemoradiotherapy on study arms 2 and 3 (19% and 28%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Concurrent weekly paclitaxel, carboplatin, and TRT followed by consolidation seems to be associated with the best outcome, although this schedule was associated with greater toxicity.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Phase I pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic study of 17-(allylamino)-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17AAG, NSC 330507), a novel inhibitor of heat shock protein 90, in patients with refractory advanced cancers.

PURPOSE: 17-(Allylamino)-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17AAG), a benzoquinone antibiotic, down-regulates oncoproteins by binding specifically to heat shock protein 90 (HSP90). We did a phase I study of 17AAG to establish the dose-limiting toxicity and maximum tolerated dose and to characterize 17AAG pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Escalating doses of 17AAG were given i.v. over 1 or 2 hours on a weekly x 3 schedule every 4 weeks to cohorts of three to six patients. Plasma pharmacokinetics of 17AAG and 17-(amino)-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17AG) were assessed by high-performance liquid chromatography. Expression of HSP70 and HSP90 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells was measured by Western blot. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were enrolled to 11 dose levels between 10 and 395 mg/m2. The maximum tolerated dose was 295 mg/m2. Dose-limiting toxicity occurred in both patients (grade 3 pancreatitis and grade 3 fatigue) treated with 395 mg/m2. Common drug-related toxicities (grade 1 and 2) were fatigue, anorexia, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. Reversible elevations of liver enzymes occurred in 29.5% of patients. Hematologic toxicity was minimal. No objective responses were observed. 17AAG pharmacokinetics was linear. Peak plasma concentration and area under the curve of 17AG, the active major metabolite of 17AAG, increased with 17AAG dose, but the relationships were more variable than with 17AAG. 17AAG and 17AG in plasma were >90% protein bound. There were no consistent changes in peripheral blood mononuclear cell HSP90 or HSP70 content. CONCLUSIONS: 17AAG doses between 10 and 295 mg/m2 are well tolerated. 17AAG pharmacokinetics is linear. Peripheral blood mononuclear cell HSP90 and HSP70 are uninformative pharmacodynamic markers. The dose recommended for future studies is 295 mg/m2 weekly x 3, repeated every 4 weeks.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Phase III study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG 2597): induction chemotherapy followed by either standard thoracic radiotherapy or hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy for patients with unresectable stage IIIA and B non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To compare once-daily radiation therapy (qdRT) with hyperfractionated accelerated radiation therapy (HART) after two cycles of induction chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were treatment naive, and had stage IIIA and B unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0/1, and normal organ function. Induction chemotherapy consisted of two cycles of carboplatin area under time-concentration curve 6 mg/mL . min plus paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 on day 1. RT consisted of arm 1 (qdRT), 64 Gy (2 Gy/d), versus arm 2 (HART), 57.6 Gy (1.5 Gy tid for 2.5 weeks). A total of 388 patients were needed to detect a 50% increase in median survival from 14 months of qdRT to 21 months of HART; accrual was not achieved and the study closed prematurely. RESULTS: Of 141 patients enrolled, 83% were randomly assigned after chemotherapy to qdRT (n = 59) or HART (n = 60). Median survival was 20.3 and 14.9 months for HART and qdRT, respectively (P = .28). Overall response was 25% and 22% for HART and qdRT, respectively (P = .69). Two- and 3-year survival was 44% and 34% for HART, and 24% and 14% for qdRT, respectively. Grade > or = 3 toxicities included esophagitis in 14 v nine patients, and pneumonitis in 0 v 6 patients for HART and qdRT, respectively. Any subsequent trials of the HART regimen must address the issues that led to early closure, including slow accrual, logistics of HART, mucosal toxicity, and the fact that concurrent chemoradiotherapy now seems more effective than sequential treatment. CONCLUSION: After two cycles of induction chemotherapy with carboplatin-paclitaxel, HART is feasible with an acceptable toxicity profile. Although statistical significance was not achieved and the study closed early, there was a positive statistical trend suggesting a survival advantage with the HART regimen.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Clinically meaningful improvement in symptoms and quality of life for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer receiving gefitinib in a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE Evaluation of disease-related symptom improvement rate by the Lung Cancer Subscale (LCS) of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) questionnaire was a coprimary end point of the pivotal phase II trial of gefitinib (Iressa; AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE) conducted in the United States. This report includes the results of analyses exploring the relationship between weekly LCS scores and radiographic response and survival, as well as detailed protocol-specified analysis of symptom and quality-of-life data. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this trial, 216 symptomatic patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had at least two prior chemotherapy regimens received gefitinib 250 or 500 mg/d. Disease-related symptoms were assessed weekly and quality of life was assessed monthly by LCS and FACT-L, respectively. Results Symptom improvement was rapid and correlated with tumor response and survival. At the recommended gefitinib dose of 250 mg/d, median overall survival times were 13.6 and 4.6 months for patients with and without symptom improvement, respectively, and 9.7 months for patients with symptom improvement without tumor response. Among patients with stable disease or disease progression, those with symptom improvement had significantly better overall survival than those without improvement. At 250 mg/d, 30% of patients showed a quality-of-life improvement that was correlated with tumor response. CONCLUSION This triadic analysis of response, survival, and symptom data supports the hypothesis that tumor response and symptom response are related and that each predicts survival. Among these NSCLC patients treated with gefitinib, symptom improvement was complementary to and, for most patients, preceded evidence of radiographic regression.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2005

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

The 5-year survival rates for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) ranges from 9% to 61% following resection, depending on clinical stage; survival rates post-surgery (pathologic stage) range from 25% to 67%. Most stage I and II patients eventually experience recurrent disease: two thirds occur systemically, one third locally. Surgical resection remains the standard of care in early stage NSCLC, although the role of surgery in stage IIIA [N 2 ] disease is controversial. Despite resection, the vast majority of lung cancer patients will experience recurrent and/or metastatic disease; therefore, supplementing surgery with adjuvant therapy is a rational treatment strategy. Recent data indicate that adjuvant chemotherapy should now be considered the standard of care for the treatment of patients with completely resected early stage NSCLC, with the single exception of patients with stage IA disease, where the prognosis is relatively favorable and there is currently no evidence supporting the efficacy of adjuvant therapy. While recent data from trials of adjuvant chemotherapy have shown promising results, no study has yet compared the utility of adjuvant versus neoadjuvant, or induction, chemotherapy. From the current data, more than 90% of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy undergo the planned surgical resection. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may also downstage the disease before surgery and decrease perioperative tumor seeding, and molecularly targeted approaches with neoadjuvant therapy appear promising.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2005

Molecularly-targeted therapies for non-small cell lung cancer.

Targeting cell-signalling pathways that confer survival advantage to cancer cells has become a major focus of investigation for the treatment of various malignancies. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a disease with wide molecular heterogeneity, has become a main testing ground for the evaluation of various targeted agents. Inhibition of the epidermal growth factor pathway with erlotinib results in improved survival and symptom control for patients with advanced NSCLC who progressed following one or two prior chemotherapy regimens. Gefitinib, the first epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor to be approved by the FDA, failed to demonstrate survival advantage over placebo in a large Phase III trial for patients with advanced NSCLC. The results of this study have raised several important clinical and biological issues that may be relevant for the development of other targeted agents. Recent identification of mutations in the ATP-binding pocket of the EGFR is the first step towards proper patient selection for therapy with an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor. In addition, predictive potential has also been seen with EGFR gene amplification. It is unclear whether monoclonal antibodies against the EGFR may be active independent of the EGFR mutation, as the site of action is different from tyrosine kinase inhibitors. A recent randomised clinical trial that combined the antiangiogenic agent bevacizumab with chemotherapy has demonstrated survival advantage over chemotherapy alone for certain subsets of patients with advanced NSCLC. The exciting results of this study represent an important advance in the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Docetaxel in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Based on the survival benefit demonstrated in large randomized clinical trials, docetaxel is approved for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in both the first- and second-line settings. The efficacy of docetaxel in combination with cisplatin is equivalent to some, and superior to other, platinum-based doublets for first-line management of NSCLC, and has a manageable toxicity profile. Carboplatin-based regimens and nonplatinum combinations with docetaxel also have proven efficacy in first-line therapy of patients with advanced NSCLC. Combinations of docetaxel with various novel targeted agents have produced encouraging data in Phase II studies. This article reviews recent studies of docetaxel as a single agent and in combination regimens with cytotoxic and more recent targeted agents in the management of advanced NSCLC.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗
PubMed2005

Optimizing first-line treatment options for patients with advanced NSCLC.

The median survival time for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains poor, despite years of research into new chemotherapy combinations. Platinum-based chemotherapy has long been the standard of care for the initial treatment of advanced NSCLC. While no one particular platinum-based chemotherapy regimen is definitely superior to the others (as demonstrated in the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group's E1594 trial), three randomized phase III trials (the Southwest Oncology Group 9509, Italian Lung Cancer Project, and TAX326 trials) have recently demonstrated that taxane-platinum doublets are better tolerated than a combination of vinorelbine and cisplatin (VC). Moreover, a combination of docetaxel and cisplatin produced superior survival and quality of life than VC in the TAX326 study. Nonplatinum combinations, such as a taxane-gemcitabine doublet, appear promising and better tolerated than their platinum-based comparators in other studies. Efforts to evaluate chemotherapy specifically in elderly patients and in those with poor performance status (PS) have increased. Single-agent chemotherapy has been safely administered to these populations, but platinum-based doublet therapy may also be feasible in both elderly patients and patients with PS scores of 2. The addition of the monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor, bevacizumab, to standard chemotherapy for patients with non-squamous cell advanced NSCLC significantly extended median survival in the E4599 randomized trial. Each incremental advance demonstrates that progress can be made in first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2005

Open-label study of pemetrexed alone or in combination with cisplatin for the treatment of patients with peritoneal mesothelioma: outcomes of an expanded access program.

BACKGROUND: To date, few large studies have been reported of patients with peritoneal mesothelioma, and treatment of this disease has been largely extrapolated from the treatment of pleural disease. Hence, it was considered important to study and report on this specific patient population. Before the regulatory approval of pemetrexed, an expanded access program (EAP) provided access to eligible patients with malignant pleural or peritoneal mesothelioma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 alone or in combination with cisplatin 75 mg/m2 once every 21 days for > or = 6 cycles. All patients received folic acid, vitamin B12, and steroid prophylaxis. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were compiled in a pharmacovigilance database, which included all patients in the EAP with pleural or peritoneal mesothelioma. From June 12, 2002 to February 18, 2004, 1056 patients with malignant mesothelioma were enrolled and received > or = 1 dose of treatment at 462 sites in the United States. Of these patients, 98 (9.3%) had peritoneal mesothelioma (57 previously treated, 38 chemotherapy-naive, and 3 with missing data). RESULTS: Response data were available for 73 patients (43 previously treated, 28 chemotherapy-naive, and 2 not classified), indicating response rates of 23.3% for previously treated patients (0 complete responses [CRs], 10 partial responses [PRs], 21 cases of stable disease [SDs], 12 cases of progressive disease [PDs]) and 25% for chemotherapy-naive patients (3 CRs, 4 PRs, 12 SDs, and 9 PDs). Median survival was 13.1 months for previously treated patients and has not been reached for chemotherapy-naive patients. The most commonly reported SAEs for the total EAP were dehydration (7.2%), nausea (5.2%), and vomiting (4.9%). CONCLUSION: Pemetrexed with or without cisplatin had a favorable safety profile, and the disease control rate (CR + PR + SD) of 71.2% in the subset of patients with peritoneal mesothelioma indicated activity in this patient population.

Adult↗