Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Celestia S Higano

Publications and source records attributed to Celestia S Higano.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2007

Variation in the definition of biochemical recurrence in patients treated for localized prostate cancer: the American Urological Association Prostate Guidelines for Localized Prostate Cancer Update Panel report and recommendations for a standard in the reporting of surgical outcomes.

PURPOSE: The American Urological Association Prostate Guideline Update Panel was charged with updating the Guidelines for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer. In assessing outcomes with treatment, it became apparent that a highly variable number of definitions exist with respect to biochemical recurrence. Herein, we review the variability in published definitions of biochemical recurrence and make recommendations directed toward improving this terminology by recommending a standard definition in patients treated with radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four PubMed literature searches were performed between May 2001 and April, 2004 and covered articles published from 1991 through early 2004. The search terms included the MeSH major headings of prostate cancer and prostatic neoplasm. All potentially relevant articles were retrieved and a more detailed screen for relevance was performed. An article was considered relevant if it reported treatment outcomes of patients with clinical T1 or T2N0M0 prostate cancer. Data extractors recorded the definition of biochemical recurrence and definitions were then collapsed into categories representing the same criteria. The results of biochemical failure were subcategorized by initial treatment. RESULTS: Of 13,800 citations, a total of 436 articles were selected. Among these, a total of 145 articles contained 53 different definitions of biochemical recurrence for those treated with radical prostatectomy. Of these, the most common definition (35) was a prostate specific antigen of >0.2 ng/mL or a slight variation thereof. In addition, a total of 208 articles reported 99 different definitions of biochemical failure among those treated with radiation therapy. Of these, the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition (70) and/or a variation thereof was the most commonly reported. In total, 166 different definitions of biochemical failure were identified. Following radical prostatectomy, the Panel recommends defining biochemical recurrence as an initial serum prostate specific antigen of > or =0.2 ng/mL, with a second confirmatory level of prostate specific antigen of >0.2 ng/mL. The Panel recommends the use of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology criteria for patients treated with radiation therapy and acknowledges that these criteria will soon be updated although not yet published. CONCLUSIONS: A high degree of variability in the definition of biochemical recurrence exists following treatment for localized prostate cancer. Strict definitions for biochemical recurrence are necessary to identify men at risk for disease progression and to allow meaningful comparisons among patients treated similarly. The Panel acknowledges the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology criteria and future modifications thereof for those receiving radiation therapy and recommends the newly developed American Urological Association criteria for those treated with radical prostatectomy. The purpose for the establishment of this standard is for data reporting purposes and for comparison of similarly treated patients. It is not intended to represent a threshold value for which to initiate treatment. The Panel acknowledges that the clinical decision to initiate treatment will be dependent on multiple factors including patient and physician interaction rather than a specific prostate specific antigen threshold value.

Humans↗
PubMed2006

Placebo-controlled phase III trial of immunologic therapy with sipuleucel-T (APC8015) in patients with metastatic, asymptomatic hormone refractory prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Sipuleucel-T (APC8015) is an investigational immunotherapy product designed to stimulate T-cell immunity against prostatic acid phosphatase. A phase III study was undertaken to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sipuleucel-T in a placebo-controlled study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 127 patients with asymptomatic metastatic hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive three infusions of sipuleucel-T (n = 82) or placebo (n = 45) every 2 weeks. On disease progression, placebo patients could receive APC8015F, a product made with frozen leukapheresis cells. RESULTS: Of the 127 patients, 115 patients had progressive disease at the time of data analysis, and all patients were followed for survival for 36 months. The median for time to disease progression (TTP) for sipuleucel-T was 11.7 weeks compared with 10.0 weeks for placebo (P = .052, log-rank; hazard ratio [HR], 1.45; 95%CI, 0.99 to 2.11). Median survival was 25.9 months for sipuleucel-T and 21.4 months for placebo (P = .01, log-rank; HR, 1.70; 95%CI, 1.13 to 2.56). Treatment remained a strong independent predictor of overall survival after adjusting for prognostic factors using a Cox multivariable regression model (P = .002, Wald test; HR, 2.12; 95%CI, 1.31 to 3.44). The median ratio of T-cell stimulation at 8 weeks to pretreatment was eight-fold higher in sipuleucel-T-treated patients (16.9 v 1.99; P < .001). Sipuleucel-T therapy was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: While the improvement in the primary end point TTP did not achieve statistical significance, this study suggests that sipuleucel-T may provide a survival advantage to asymptomatic HRPC patients. Supportive studies are underway.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Intermittent androgen deprivation: clinical experience and practical applications.

Prostate cancer is more frequently being diagnosed at an earlier age, men are dying of prostate cancer at an older age, and men are now treated with androgen deprivation for biochemical relapse. As a result, the amount of time that patients are potentially subjected to androgen deprivation is increasing. Intermittent androgen deprivation (IAD) has been investigated as a potential alternative to continuous androgen deprivation (CAD) in order to improve quality of life and potentially delay the progression to androgen independence. Along with the increased use of primary hormonal therapy in clinically localized prostate cancer, IAD may supplant the traditional surgical or radiotherapy options, specifically in men who have underlying co-morbidities and decreased life expectancy. There are ongoing multi-institutional, randomized trials that will lend insight into the utility, efficacy, and feasibility of IAD versus CAD. This article discusses the theoretical benefits and rationale of IAD and reviews the completed and on-going IAD trials. Finally, the controversies, practical applications, and future directions of IAD are addressed.

Androgen Antagonists↗
PubMed2006

The role of bisphosphonates in the treatment of prostate cancer: recommendations from an expert panel.

In this study, we provide consensus guidelines for the use of bisphosphonates in men with prostate cancer. To this end, an expert panel composed of urologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and endocrinologists met to review current clinical evidence for the use of bisphosphonates in patients with different stages of prostate cancer to derive consensus recommendations. Physicians should be proactive in monitoring bone loss in patients receiving long-term androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. Further study is needed before recommending the routine use of bisphosphonates in men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer. However, if a patient has clinically significant bone loss, use of a bisphosphonate to prevent further compromise of bone integrity should be strongly considered, regardless of hormonal and metastatic status. Bone scans are the preferred method for the identification of bone metastases. In patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer and bone metastases, zoledronic acid is the only bisphosphonate indicated for the prevention of skeletal complications. In conclusion, patients with prostate cancer are at high risk for skeletal morbidity. Bisphosphonates have been shown to prevent cancer treatment-induced bone loss in men receiving androgen-deprivation therapy as well as skeletal complications in men with bone metastases. However, further study of the use of bisphosphonates across the clinical spectrum of prostate cancer is needed.

Bone Density Conservation Agents↗
PubMed2005

Natural history of rising serum prostate-specific antigen in men with castrate nonmetastatic prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To describe the natural history of nonmetastatic prostate cancer and rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) despite androgen deprivation therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The 201 patients in this report were the placebo control group from an aborted randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effects of zoledronic acid on time to first bone metastasis in men with prostate cancer, no bone metastases, and rising PSA despite androgen deprivation therapy. Relationships between baseline covariates and clinical outcomes were assessed by Cox proportional hazard analyses. Covariates in the model were baseline PSA, Gleason sum, history of bilateral orchiectomies, regional lymph node metastases at diagnosis, prior prostatectomy, time from androgen deprivation therapy to random assignment, time from diagnosis to random assignment, and PSA velocity. RESULTS: At 2 years, 33% of patients had developed bone metastases. Median bone metastasis-free survival was 30 months. Median time to first bone metastases and overall survival were not reached. Baseline PSA level greater than 10 ng/mL (relative risk, 3.18; 95% CI, 1.74 to 5.80; P < .001) and PSA velocity (4.34 for each 0.01 increase in PSA velocity; 95% CI, 2.30 to 8.21; P < .001) independently predicted shorter time to first bone metastasis. Baseline PSA and PSA velocity also independently predicted overall survival and metastasis-free survival. Other covariates did not consistently predict clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: Men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer and rising PSA despite androgen deprivation therapy have a relatively indolent natural history. Baseline PSA and PSA velocity independently predict time to first bone metastasis and survival.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

A prospective analysis of the time to normalization of serum androgens following 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy in patients on a randomized phase III clinical trial using limited hormonal therapy.

PURPOSE: Patients with prostate cancer are treated with neoadjuvant, adjuvant and intermittent therapy with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRH-A). While these are largely successful in decreasing testosterone (T) and dihydroxytestosterone (DHT) to castrate levels, discontinuation of such therapy often results in continued suppression of androgens for variable periods of time. We present the largest published series of patients evaluating the timing of T and DHT increase after cessation of GnRH therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Serial T and DHT measurements were prospectively obtained every 3 months while on GnRH-A then monthly upon discontinuation of GnRH-A. Analysis of time from the second 3-month GnRH-A administration to T and DHT increase was undertaken. RESULTS: A total of 80 evaluable patients had a median time to T 50 ng/dl or greater of 12.9 weeks and a median time to T normalization (212 ng/dl or greater) of 16.6 weeks. Low baseline T was associated with a prolonged time to T 212 ng/dl or greater (p = 0.0086) and a similar trend was seen in patients older than 66 years (p = 0.08). There were 62 evaluable patients with a median of 14.9 weeks to DHT 150 pg/ml or greater. There was no association with Gleason score at diagnosis, on study prostate specific antigen, type of prior definitive therapy, or any prior hormonal therapy and time to increase in circulating androgens. CONCLUSIONS: After 6 months of GnRH-A therapy in these patients, DHT and T levels did not return to normal for a median of 14.9 and 16.6 weeks, respectively.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Current status of treatment for patients with metastatic prostate cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Men with advanced prostate cancer now have many treatment options which include first and second-line hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, (either directed external beam or systemic radio-istotope), and investigational agents on protocols. Additional adjunctive therapy with the bisphosphonate, zoledronic acid, to reduce skeletal complications should be considered. DISCUSSION: This review will discuss appropriate timing of many of these options and summarize the randomized trials demonstrating survival benefit for docetaxel and decreased skeletal morbidity for zoledronic acid. CONCLUSION: The clinical trials conducted to date do not address the question of when to give chemotherapy in the course of hormone refractory disease and the role of chemotherapy earlier in advanced disease remains to be defined. For the present, clinicians must consider many factors in determining what treatment is appropriate for the individual patient with advanced prostate cancer.

Androgen Antagonists↗
PubMed2004

Osteoporosis in men with prostate carcinoma receiving androgen-deprivation therapy: recommendations for diagnosis and therapies.

BACKGROUND: Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) is prescribed with increasing frequency for men with prostate carcinoma. There is growing concern about the effects of such therapy on the skeleton. In the current review, the authors addressed the current research, diagnostic methods, and treatment recommendations for bone loss and osteoporosis in men with prostate carcinoma who received ADT. METHODS: Data were obtained from electronic literature searches (for the years 1986 through 2002) and from abstracts and meeting proceedings. All randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials, retrospective studies, and cross-sectional studies of osteoporosis in men with prostate carcinoma who received ADT with or without other therapies were reviewed. RESULTS: The findings confirmed that ADT resulted in significant bone loss in men with prostate carcinoma. Bone mineral density (BMD) of the hip, as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), is considered the preferred site of assessment in older men. Spinal BMD is equally important, although careful interpretation of spinal DXA values is required, because of coexisting facet joint disease and extravertebral calcification. Osteoporosis is diagnosed when BMD is > 2.5 standard deviations below a reference mean. Men with prostate carcinoma who were treated with ADT had average BMD measurements below those of eugonadal men. Rates of bone loss ranged from 2% to 8% in the lumbar spine and from 1.8% to 6.5% in the femoral neck during the initial 12 months of continuous ADT. Retrospective data indicated an increased risk of fracture in men with prostate carcinoma who were treated with ADT. CONCLUSIONS: For men with prostate carcinoma who are at high risk for osteoporosis and fractures, clinical management should be dictated by the results of radiographic and DXA skeletal assessment.

Age Distribution↗
PubMed2004

Phase I study of weekly mitoxantrone and docetaxel before prostatectomy in patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose is to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of mitoxantrone and docetaxel administered weekly before prostatectomy in men with localized prostate cancer at high risk for recurrence. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Twenty-two patients were treated with four cycles of docetaxel 35 mg/m(2) and increasing doses of mitoxantrone starting at 2 mg/m(2) repeated weekly for 3 weeks of a 4-week cycle before prostatectomy. The MTD was defined as that dose at which fewer than one-third of patients experienced a DLT (>or=grade 4 hematological or >or=>grade 3 nonhematological toxicity). Changes in serum prostate-specific antigen and serum testosterone, and pathological outcome with surgery were secondary endpoints. RESULTS: The MTD for mitoxantrone in combination with this dose of docetaxel was 4 mg/m(2). Neutropenia was the DLT for the combination. Ten of 12 patients treated at the MTD completed the planned 16 weeks of chemotherapy, whereas 2 discontinued therapy early because of toxicity. The median reduction in PSA was 41% (range, 4-88%). Serum testosterone levels remained constant postchemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: In this patient population, the planned Phase II regimen is 4 mg/m(2) mitoxantrone and 35 mg/m(2) docetaxel weekly for 3 of every 4 weeks. Delivery of this regimen before prostatectomy is feasible with acceptable toxicity. Additional studies are needed to determine whether this combined modality approach will reduce cancer recurrence rates in this high-risk population. Because extent of disease and exposure to prior therapy may impact treatment tolerance these safety data may not be applicable to patients with advanced prostate cancer.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Safety and biological activity of repeated doses of recombinant human Flt3 ligand in patients with bone scan-negative hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, biological activity, and feasibility of repeated doses of the dendritic cell (DC)-stimulating agent Flt3 ligand (FL) in patients with bone scan-negative hormone-refractory prostate cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Thirty-one patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer who had elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and negative bone scans were enrolled. Six cycles (28 days each) were planned. In the first cycle, patients were randomized to FL or placebo. All patients received open-label FL during the next five courses. DC, anti-FL antibody, and PSA levels were measured every 15 days to assess biological activity. RESULTS: DCs increased markedly in FL-treated patients from precycle to day 15, and the increase was consistent in each cycle. Mean percentages of DCs in peripheral blood ranged from 1.4% to 1.9% precycle and from 10.1% to 13.9% on day 15, and after the first cycle, absolute counts on day 15 were approximately 29-fold higher than precycle levels. Natural killer cell counts (CD56(+)) were found to be elevated after cycle 1 (154% increase versus 2.8% decrease in placebo group at day 22). Twenty-two of 27 patients tested developed nonneutralizing anti-FL antibody. The most frequently experienced toxicity was injection site reaction, followed by asthenia, rash, and diarrhea. Although median PSA levels did not vary during any cycle, a significant slowing in velocity of PSA was observed while patients were on-study (relative velocity = 0.002) compared with prestudy PSA velocity (relative velocity = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: FL was well tolerated. FL consistently produced an increase in DC count without any evidence of decreasing response with continued exposure. The expansion of DCs and the slowing of PSA velocity after administration of FL suggest potential clinical applications in the immunotherapy of prostate cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Understanding treatments for bone loss and bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: a practical review and guide for the clinician.

Prostate cancer patients are at risk for developing bone loss and bone metastases. Clinicians prescribing ADT should appreciate the potential effects of ADT on BMD as well as the morbidity and mortality that can result from osteoporotic fractures. Measures to address the evaluation of patients and when to treat patients with significant bone loss have been discussed. Bisphosphonates effectively prevent loss of BMD in prostate cancer patients. Treatment of prostate cancer patients with established bone metastases with zoledronic acid should be considered strongly based on the results of the Saad study and other studies of patients with bone metastases with other malignancies. Zoledronic acid is approved by the US FDA for use in men with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer and in the European Union for any patient with bone metastases, including prostate cancer patients,because of the beneficial impact of zoledronic acid on skeletal-related events. There is no validated method to determine which patients might benefit most from bisphosphonate therapy in this setting. Many questions about the use of bisphosphonate therapy in men with prostate cancer must be addressed, both in terms of the use in bone loss and bone metastases. These questions include: What is the optimal timing of therapy? Which bisphosphonate is best? What is the best dose and dose schedule? Do bisphosphonates effectively decrease skeletal fracture rates in patients with osteoporosis? How long should patients receive therapy? Are bisphosphonate "holidays" warranted? What are the long-term skeletal and renal toxicities? Is there a role for sequencing bisphosphonate therapy either before or after chemotherapy? Is bisphosphonate therapy synergistic with certain chemotherapy or other bone-targeted therapies? Which patients are the most likely to benefit from bisphosphonate therapy? What are clinically significant endpoints of bisphosphonate trials in patients with metastatic disease? Does inhibiting bone turnover also inhibit formation of bone metastases? Preliminary work in these areas has been completed, but more questions than answers are available. Given the rising costs of health care, it is imperative that these questions be addressed to best use the health care dollar while offering high-risk patients the best available therapy. At present, no data suggest that bisphosphonates should be used routinely to prevent BMD loss in men with normal BMD or to prevent the development of bone metastases in men with biochemical relapse. Continuing trials may give us guidance in the future.

Age Distribution↗
PubMed2004

Metastases of prostate cancer express estrogen receptor-beta.

OBJECTIVES: To examine estrogen receptor-beta (ERbeta) expression in prostate cancer (CaP) metastases, thereby providing a basis for conducting estrogen therapy studies in patients with metastatic CaP. Advanced androgen-independent CaP is a serious health problem with no effective treatment at present. Estrogens have been reported to inhibit the growth of CaP cells in androgen-free environments. Recent reports have shown that the prostatic epithelium and primary CaP cells express ERbeta, with decreased expression of ERbeta accompanying CaP progression. It has been proposed that ERbeta may play a role in the growth regulation of prostate cells. The targeting of ERs by selective ER modulators might be an effective method of treating advanced CaP. METHODS: The anti-ERbeta antibody GC17 was used in immunohistochemistry to characterize the expression of ERbeta in CaP metastasis specimens (n = 60) obtained from 20 patients who had died of CaP. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate the association of ERbeta expression with clinical parameters, including prostate-specific antigen levels, radiotherapy, and estrogen exposure. RESULTS: Nuclear ERbeta staining was detected in all bone CaP metastases (33 of 33) and nonosseous CaP metastases (27 of 27). However, a large variability in the percentage of immunoreactive cells (5% to 100%) was found among patients, as well as among individual patient samples. A statistically significant negative association between nuclear ERbeta staining and estrogen exposure (P = 0.05) was detected. CONCLUSIONS: Our data have shown that ERbeta is expressed in CaP metastases, validating the initiation of studies to evaluate selective ER modulators for treatment of advanced CaP.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2003

Expression of the human cachexia-associated protein (HCAP) in prostate cancer and in a prostate cancer animal model of cachexia.

Prostate cancer (CaP) patients with disseminated disease often suffer from severe cachexia, which contributes to mortality in advanced cancer. Human cachexia-associated protein (HCAP) was recently identified from a breast cancer library based on the available 20-amino acid sequence of proteolysis-inducing factor (PIF), which is a highly active cachectic factor isolated from mouse colon adenocarcinoma MAC16. Herein, we investigated the expression of HCAP in CaP and its potential involvement in CaP-associated cachexia. HCAP mRNA was detected in CaP cell lines, in primary CaP tissues and in its osseous metastases. In situ hybridization showed HCAP mRNA to be localized only in the epithelial cells in CaP tissues, in the metastatic foci in bone, liver and lymph node, but not in the stromal cells or in normal prostate tissues. HCAP protein was detected in 9 of 14 CaP metastases but not in normal prostate tissues from cadaveric donors or patients with organ-confined tumors. Our Western blot analysis revealed that HCAP was present in 9 of 19 urine specimens from cachectic CaP patients but not in 19 urine samples of noncachectic patients. HCAP mRNA and protein were also detected in LuCaP 35 and PC-3M xenografts from our cachectic animal models. Our results demonstrated that human CaP cells express HCAP and the expression of HCAP is associated with the progression of CaP and the development of CaP cachexia.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Elevation of cytokine levels in cachectic patients with prostate carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 60-70% of patients with advanced prostate carcinoma (CaP) suffer from cachexia, one of the most devastating conditions associated with advanced malignant disease. The pathophysiology of cachexia is multifactorial, and several cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) and interleukin 1 (IL-1), IL-6, and IL-8, may be involved. The objective of the current study was to determine whether cachexia associated with advanced CaP is accompanied by increased serum levels of TNFalpha, IL-1beta, IL-6, and IL-8. METHODS: The levels of TNFalpha, IL-1beta, IL-6, IL-8, and prostate specific antigen (PSA) were examined in serum samples from normal donors (n = 10 donors), from patients with organ-confined CaP (n = 19 patients), from patients with advanced CaP without cachexia (n = 17 patients), and from patients with cachectic CaP (n = 26 patients). DPC Immulite and Abbott IMx Total-PSA assays were used to determine cytokine and PSA levels, respectively. RESULTS: Levels of TNFalpha, IL-6, and IL-8 were elevated significantly in the group of patients with advanced, cachectic CaP compared with patients who were without cachexia. In the cachectic patients, levels of TNFalpha were correlated positively with IL-8, and there was no correlation between PSA levels and any of the cytokine levels. IL-1beta levels were below the limit of detection in all samples. CONCLUSIONS: The current results show that levels of TNFalpha, IL-6, and IL-8 were increased in CaP patients with cachexia. Increased levels of these cytokines were not correlated with PSA levels, suggesting that they are regulated by a mechanism that is independent of PSA synthesis. Additional fundamental research is needed to determine the mechanisms involved and to identify potential therapeutic targets in patients with cachexia.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Phenotypic heterogeneity of end-stage prostate carcinoma metastatic to bone.

To better understand the clinical and pathologic features of end-stage, androgen-independent carcinoma of the prostate (CaP), we performed rapid autopsies on 14 men who died of progressive CaP and recorded relevant clinical data. The timing of tumor progression varied widely. The median time to androgen independence was 2 years (range, 4 months to 13.6 years). The median survival after androgen independence was 1 year (range, 1 month to 3.6 years). Because osseous metastases are prevalent in progressive CaP, up to 20 bone sites were systematically sampled in each patient. Bone metastases were widespread; tumor filled the marrow in an average of 14 bone sites. Tumor histology and expression of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and chromogranin A (CGA) were examined in all metastases and were compared with the primary tumor. Five histological patterns of metastatic tumor were observed: solid (10 patients), macroacinar (1 patient), microacinar (1 patient), clear cell (1 patient), and comedocarcinoma (1 patient). Gleason grade of the primary tumor did not predict the histological pattern of the metastases. Although >70% of tumor cells expressed PSA, the fraction of PSA-positive cells varied widely in separate metastases in some patients (standard deviation >25). Likewise, the fraction of neuroendocrine (NE) (CGA-positive) tumor cells in different metastases varied widely. For example, between 0 and 95% of tumor cells in different metastases in 1 patient had a NE phenotype. The present study highlights the heterogeneity--histologically and immunophenotypically--of metastatic CaP. Consequently, therapy directed to the phenotype of 1 metastasis may have no effect on other metastases in the same patient because of phenotypic heterogeneity.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2003

Side effects of androgen deprivation therapy: monitoring and minimizing toxicity.

The current trends in favor of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for nonmetastatic prostate cancer at the stage of biochemical recurrence or increasing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) raises the issue of exposing otherwise asymptomatic patients to potential side effects over the longer term. Some of these side effects can have deleterious effects on quality of life, and others may contribute to increased risks for serious health concerns associated with aging. Sexual side effects are the most well-recognized adverse effects from ADT and include loss of libido, erectile dysfunction (ED), and hot flashes. Loss of libido is distressing to many men, and they may not pursue treatments for ED. However, for those who do maintain sexual interest, various remedies are available. The incidence of hot flashes, which may not abate over the course of ADT, is close to 80%. Estrogens, progestin megestrol acetate, medroxyprogesterone acetate, venlafaxine, and cyproterone acetate have been shown to alleviate hot flashes and associated symptoms. Physiologic effects, including gynecomastia, changes in body composition (weight gain, reduced muscle mass, increase in body fat), and changes in lipids, are less commonly recognized as side effects of ADT. These may lead to an exacerbation of potentially more serious conditions, such as hypertension, diabetes, and coronary artery disease. Loss of bone mineral density, anemia, and hair changes also may occur. Additionally, both the diagnosis of prostate cancer and the hormonal therapy can cause psychological distress. These side effects need more systematic study in clinical trials. Physicians should be aware of far-reaching consequences of ADT and should incorporate strategies for preventing and managing toxicities into routine practice.

Androgen Antagonists↗
PubMed2003

Management of bone loss in men with prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Bone loss is increasingly recognized as a common occurrence in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer. Skeletal metabolism and osteoporosis in men, assessment of bone mineral density (BMD), effects of ADT on BMD, management strategies and potential therapies for osteopenia or osteoporosis in men with prostate cancer are reviewed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Relevant literature is reviewed concerning bone loss and osteoporosis in men with and without prostate cancer, techniques of assessing BMD, data on bone loss and fracture risk and management strategies. RESULTS: The incidence of osteoporotic fractures usually increases a decade later in men than in women. ADT causes significant loss of BMD, which may hasten the development of osteoporosis. Men who are treated with hormonal therapy for an increasing prostate specific antigen and who may live for many years should have baseline BMD assessments. Osteopenia or osteoporosis should be treated to minimize the risk of osteoporotic fracture. Treatment with zoledronic acid seems appropriate since it has been shown to increase BMD in men treated with ADT and to reduce the rate of skeletal related events in men with early hormone refractory prostate cancer with metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring BMD is warranted in men contemplating or receiving ADT but prophylactic therapy to prevent bone loss currently is not recommended. Men with evidence of significant bone loss who are receiving ADT should be treated. Zoledronic acid is a logical choice based on available data.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗