[Problems posed by genetic diseases: trisomy 21].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Catherine Turleau.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Intrachromosomal insertions are uncommon rearrangements, in which a chromosomal segment is intercalated into another part of the same chromosome. The insertion may occur in the same arm (paracentric) or in the other arm (pericentric). The cytogenetic recognition of these structurally rearranged chromosomes can be difficult, and intrachromosomal insertions can be easily mistaken for inversions. We describe a case of a familial pericentric insertion of chromosome 20, initially misdiagnosed as a pericentric inversion in the healthy carrier and then reinterpreted as insertion in an abnormal child with a recombinant chromosome. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) allowed us to confirm the mechanism of recombinant formation and to locate the three breakpoints precisely. Our cytogenetically unbalanced epileptic patient carried a 20q deletion and 20p duplication, and the genes, CHRNA4 and KCNQ2 that have been implicated in autosomal dominant epilepsy, were deleted. The haplo-insufficiency of these two genes may contribute to the cause of epilepsy in patients with ring chromosome 20.
Kabuki syndrome (KS) is a rare MCA/MR syndrome with an estimated frequency of 1/32 000 in Japan. This syndrome is characterized by postnatal growth retardation, distinctive facial features, dermatoglyphic anomalies, skeletal dysplasia, and mental retardation. The molecular basis of KS remains unknown. Recently, Milunsky and Huang reported on six unrelated patients with a clinical diagnosis of KS and an 8p22-8p23.1 duplication using comparative genomic hybridization and BAC-FISH studies. Also, they suggested that a paracentric inversion may contribute to the occurrence of KS. In the present study, 24 patients with a clinical diagnosis of KS based on Niikawa-Kuroki criteria have been collected. They were tested for the presence of an 8p duplication using the same clones as described by Milunsky and Huang. Our results do not confirm the previously described association between KS and an 8p22-8p23.1 duplication.
We report on two patients, a boy and a girl, with an additional Xq28 chromosome segment translocated onto the long arm of an autosome. The karyotypes were 46,XY,der(10)t(X;10)(q28;qter) and 46,XX,der(4)t(X;4)(q28;q34), respectively. In both cases, the de novo cryptic unbalanced X-autosome translocation resulted in a Xq28 chromosome functional disomy. To our knowledge, at least 17 patients with a distal Xq chromosome functional disomy have been described in the literature. This is the third report of a girl with an unbalanced translocation yielding such a disomy. When the clinical features of both patients are compared to those observed in patients reported in the literature, a distinct phenotype emerges including severe mental retardation, facial dysmorphic features with a wide face, a small mouth and a thin pointed nose, major axial hypotonia, severe feeding problems and proneness to infections. A clinically oriented FISH study using subtelomeric probes is necessary to detect such a cryptic rearrangement.
Novel methods allowing to analyze the human genome make it possible to assess old questions such as the molecular basis of structural chromosome anomalies and the diathesis to aneuploidy. The architecture of the human genome as unravelled by the human genome sequencing project allows to explain the recurrence of microdeletions and microduplications caused by a non allelic homologous recombination involving segmental duplications created during the evolution of primates. This structural feature of the human genome is associated with a novel class of genetic diseases called genomic disorders as opposed to genetic diseases due to gene mutations. The study of the parental and cellular origin of aneuploidy shed new light on the different mechanisms controlling meiosis in man and woman. In addition it contributes to define the role of maternal age and genetic recombination on the behavior of chromosomes during meiosis. These new data greatly contribute to our understanding of human chromosomal diseases.
Overgrowth is rarely associated with chromosomal imbalances. Here, we report on a male foetus presenting with overgrowth and additional material on the short arm of one of the chromosome 15 in 12% of lymphocytes and 50% of amniotic cells. Parents' karyotypes were normal, indicating a de novo origin for this unbalanced rearrangement. Complementary studies using cytogenetic and FISH studies showed that this additional material resulted in a 15q25-qter trisomy and confirmed the presence of three copies of the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R) gene, included in the trisomic region. Autopsy performed after termination of pregnancy revealed isolated overgrowth and absence of visceral malformations. The possible mechanisms and origins for the formation of this mosaic pure trisomy are complex. The present observation emphasises the hypothesis that the overgrowth phenotype, frequently reported in patients with trisomy including the 15q26 region, might be causally related to a dosage effect of the IGF1R gene, as well as the importance of chromosome analysis in patients with overgrowth. It also confirms that the overgrowth is of prenatal onset in those observations.
In a search for potential infertility loci, which might be revealed by clustering of chromosomal breakpoints, we compiled 464 infertile males with a balanced rearrangement from Mendelian Cytogenetics Network database (MCNdb) and compared their karyotypes with those of a Danish nation-wide cohort. We excluded Robertsonian translocations, rearrangements involving sex chromosomes and common variants. We identified 10 autosomal bands, five of which were on chromosome 1, with a large excess of breakpoints in the infertility group. Some of these could potentially harbour a male-specific infertility locus. However, a general excess of breakpoints almost everywhere on chromosome 1 was observed among the infertile males: 26.5 versus 14.5% in the cohort. This excess was observed both for translocation and inversion carriers, especially pericentric inversions, both for published and unpublished cases, and was significantly associated with azoospermia. The largest number of breakpoints was reported in 1q21; FISH mapping of four of these breakpoints revealed that they did not involve the same region at the molecular level. We suggest that chromosome 1 harbours a critical domain whose integrity is essential for male fertility.
Overgrowth is rarely associated with chromosomal imbalances. Here we report on four children from two unrelated families presenting with overgrowth and a terminal duplication of the long arm of chromosome 15 diagnosed using cytogenetic and FISH studies. In both cases, chromosome analysis of the parents showed a balanced translocation involving 15q26.1-qter. Molecular and cytogenetic studies showed three copies of the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R) gene. This finding suggests that overgrowth observed in our patients might be causally related to a dosage effect of the IGF1R gene, in contrast to severe growth retardation observed in patients with terminal deletion of 15q. The present observation emphasises the importance of chromosome analysis in patients with overgrowth and mental retardation. Moreover, it further delineates a specific phenotype related to trisomy 15q26.1-qter with macrosomia at birth, overgrowth, macrocephaly and mild developmental delay being the major clinical features.
Using array CGH it is possible to detect very small genetic imbalances anywhere in the genome. Its usefulness has been well documented in cancer and more recently in constitutional disorders. In particular it has been used to detect interstitial and subtelomeric submicroscopic imbalances, to characterize their size at the molecular level and to define the breakpoints of chromosomal translocation. Here, we review the various applications of array CGH in constitutional cytogenetics. This technology remains expensive and the existence of numerous sequence polymorphisms makes its interpretation difficult. The challenge today is to transfer this technology in the clinical setting.