Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Caroline C Friedel

Publications and source records attributed to Caroline C Friedel.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Inferring topology from clustering coefficients in protein-protein interaction networks.

BACKGROUND: Although protein-protein interaction networks determined with high-throughput methods are incomplete, they are commonly used to infer the topology of the complete interactome. These partial networks often show a scale-free behavior with only a few proteins having many and the majority having only a few connections. Recently, the possibility was suggested that this scale-free nature may not actually reflect the topology of the complete interactome but could also be due to the error proneness and incompleteness of large-scale experiments. RESULTS: In this paper, we investigate the effect of limited sampling on average clustering coefficients and how this can help to more confidently exclude possible topology models for the complete interactome. Both analytical and simulation results for different network topologies indicate that partial sampling alone lowers the clustering coefficient of all networks tremendously. Furthermore, we extend the original sampling model by also including spurious interactions via a preferential attachment process. Simulations of this extended model show that the effect of wrong interactions on clustering coefficients depends strongly on the skewness of the original topology and on the degree of randomness of clustering coefficients in the corresponding networks. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the complete interactome is either highly skewed such as e.g. in scale-free networks or is at least highly clustered. Although the correct topology of the interactome may not be inferred beyond any reasonable doubt from the interaction networks available, a number of topologies can nevertheless be excluded with high confidence.

Cluster Analysis↗

Reliable gene signatures for microarray classification: assessment of stability and performance.

MOTIVATION: Two important questions for the analysis of gene expression measurements from different sample classes are (1) how to classify samples and (2) how to identify meaningful gene signatures (ranked gene lists) exhibiting the differences between classes and sample subsets. Solutions to both questions have immediate biological and biomedical applications. To achieve optimal classification performance, a suitable combination of classifier and gene selection method needs to be specifically selected for a given dataset. The selected gene signatures can be unstable and the resulting classification accuracy unreliable, particularly when considering different subsets of samples. Both unstable gene signatures and overestimated classification accuracy can impair biological conclusions. METHODS: We address these two issues by repeatedly evaluating the classification performance of all models, i.e. pairwise combinations of various gene selection and classification methods, for random subsets of arrays (sampling). A model score is used to select the most appropriate model for the given dataset. Consensus gene signatures are constructed by extracting those genes frequently selected over many samplings. Sampling additionally permits measurement of the stability of the classification performance for each model, which serves as a measure of model reliability. RESULTS: We analyzed a large gene expression dataset with 78 measurements of four different cartilage sample classes. Classifiers trained on subsets of measurements frequently produce models with highly variable performance. Our approach provides reliable classification performance estimates via sampling. In addition to reliable classification performance, we determined stable consensus signatures (i.e. gene lists) for sample classes. Manual literature screening showed that these genes are highly relevant to our gene expression experiment with osteoarthritic cartilage. We compared our approach to others based on a publicly available dataset on breast cancer. AVAILABILITY: R package at http://www.bio.ifi.lmu.de/~davis/edaprakt

Algorithms↗

Support vector machines for separation of mixed plant-pathogen EST collections based on codon usage.

MOTIVATION: Discovery of host and pathogen genes expressed at the plant-pathogen interface often requires the construction of mixed libraries that contain sequences from both genomes. Sequence identification requires high-throughput and reliable classification of genome origin. When using single-pass cDNA sequences difficulties arise from the short sequence length, the lack of sufficient taxonomically relevant sequence data in public databases and ambiguous sequence homology between plant and pathogen genes. RESULTS: A novel method is described, which is independent of the availability of homologous genes and relies on subtle differences in codon usage between plant and fungal genes. We used support vector machines (SVMs) to identify the probable origin of sequences. SVMs were compared to several other machine learning techniques and to a probabilistic algorithm (PF-IND) for expressed sequence tag (EST) classification also based on codon bias differences. Our software (Eclat) has achieved a classification accuracy of 93.1% on a test set of 3217 EST sequences from Hordeum vulgare and Blumeria graminis, which is a significant improvement compared to PF-IND (prediction accuracy of 81.2% on the same test set). EST sequences with at least 50 nt of coding sequence can be classified using Eclat with high confidence. Eclat allows training of classifiers for any host-pathogen combination for which there are sufficient classified training sequences. AVAILABILITY: Eclat is freely available on the Internet (http://mips.gsf.de/proj/est) or on request as a standalone version. CONTACT: friedel@informatik.uni-muenchen.de.

Algorithms↗