Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Carol P Vojir

Publications and source records attributed to Carol P Vojir.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

Nursing home resident barriers to effective pain management: why nursing home residents may not seek pain medication.

OBJECTIVES: Multiple barriers to effective pain management are present in the nursing home setting. The purpose of this analysis was to determine the extent to which residents in pain declined to request pain medication from the staff, and the reasons provided by the residents to explain this behavior. DESIGN: Every 3 months, a 20% sample of residents in 12 nursing homes was administered a short pain interview, then observed for pain indicators. Medical records were reviewed at the same time for documentation about pain and its treatment. All residents were asked if they had pain (or a similar word) now or in the past 24 hours. They were also asked if they had pain but did not request pain medication. If affirmative, the resident was asked to provide up to three reasons for not requesting medication. SETTING: The study was conducted in 12 Colorado nursing homes, located in both urban and rural settings. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2033 nursing home residents completed pain interviews and/or were observed for pain indicators by trained research assistants. These interviews took place before, during, and after implementation of an intervention to improve pain practices. MEASUREMENTS: A cognitive organizing structure was used to categorize resident responses into a coherent classification. Individual responses were assigned by team members to the appropriate category using a consensus process. The final classification scheme consisted of 10 categories of reasons why residents do not request pain medication. RESULTS: More than one-half of residents (59.5%) reporting pain in the past 24 hours did not request medication for that pain. Subjects in pain were most likely to state medication concerns or stoicism as the reasons for not requesting pain medication. Concerns about staff reactions to a request or perceptions that the staff was too busy were also mentioned frequently by the residents. Subgroup analyses suggested that residents in pain but not requesting pain medication were significantly more likely to be in rural rather than urban nursing homes (67.9% vs. 52.9%, P < or = .01), and white as compared to nonwhite ethnicity (60.6% vs. 52.1%, P < or = .05). They also tended to be older on average (80.4 +/- 12.1 years vs. 77.9 +/- 12.7 years, P < or = .01) than residents who did request pain medication. Finally, residents in pain but not requesting pain medication were significantly more likely to report having both continuous (c) and intermittent (i) pain (71.8% [c + i] vs. 61% [c] or 56.5% [i], P < or = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Interventions to reduce pain in nursing home residents need to be responsive to the concerns of the residents. It must be acknowledged that resident preferences and beliefs may lead to declined pain interventions regardless of the staff's motivation to make the resident more comfortable. Staff nurses also need to make a more concerted effort to systematically assess pain and offer pain medication to residents rather than rely on resident requests.

Journal Article↗

Changes in clinician ability to assess risk and help patients determine the need for hiv testing: a comparison of three teaching methods.

An estimated one of four people with HIV in the United States do not know they have the infection. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention encourages HIV testing in clinical settings, but there is evidence that this is not done on a regular basis. The purposes of this study were to (a) compare two less traditional teaching methods with a classroom method to determine whether the less traditional methods resulted in greater improvement of clinician knowledge, skill, and willingness to perform HIV risk assessment as the basis for recommending HIV testing; and (b) find out whether there were significant differences in convenience, cost, learner preference, or learner acceptance that would make one method more desirable than the others. Findings from participants in the standardized patient interaction with facilitator feedback (FB) and the case-based self-study module (SSM) were not different from those of participants in the interactive classroom education method (CL). Generally, there were positive changes in knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors over time. Participants preferred standardized patient interaction (FB) and interactive classes (CL) to self-study modules (SSM).

Female↗

Improving nursing home staff knowledge and attitudes about pain.

PURPOSE: Effective pain management remains a serious problem in the nursing home setting. Barriers to achieving optimal pain practices include staff knowledge deficits, biases, and attitudes that influence assessment and management of the residents' pain. DESIGN AND METHODS: Twelve nursing homes participated in this intervention study: six treatment homes and six control homes, divided evenly between urban and rural locations. Three hundred licensed and unlicensed nursing home staff members completed written knowledge and attitude surveys at baseline, and 378 staff members completed the surveys after intervention implementation. RESULTS: Baseline results revealed notable knowledge deficits in the areas of pharmacology, drug addiction and dependence, side effect management, and nonpharmacologic management-strategy effectiveness. Significant differences were noted by job title (registered nurse/licensed practical nurse/certified nursing assistant). Case studies displayed a knowledge application problem, with nurses often filtering resident pain reports through observed resident behaviors. The intervention led to significant improvement in knowledge scores in some, but not all, the treatment homes. Perceived barriers to effective pain management showed a significant decline across all study nursing homes. IMPLICATIONS: Knowledge deficits related to pain management persist in nursing homes. An interactive multifaceted educational program was only partially successful in improving knowledge across settings and job categories. Attitudes and beliefs appear more difficult to change, whereas environmental and contextual factors appeared to be reducing perceived barriers to effective pain management across all participating nursing homes.

Adult↗

Physiologic correlates of comfort in healthy children.

Pain assessment is particularly challenging when children are unable or unwilling to provide a self-report. Although clinicians frequently use vital signs as an adjunct to pain assessment, little evidence exists to support this practice. The purpose of this study was to explore the ability of selected physiologic variables (peripheral skin temperature, heart rate, skin conductance activity [SCA], respiratory rate, electromyogram [EMG] of the frontalis and right forearm muscles, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure [BP]) to detect changes in children's autonomic arousal from baseline. A one-group, repeated measures, randomized crossover design guided the study. Chosen from a convenience sample, 100 healthy children (ages 8-17 years) served as their own controls while undergoing two levels of intervention: cold pressor pain and guided imagery. Although most physiologic responses showed changes in the expected direction, EMG, SCA, and heart rate decreased slightly during cold pressor. Few significant intercorrelations were demonstrated among the physiologic variables. SCA, forehead EMG, respiratory rate, systolic and diastolic BP detected significant changes in arousal across measures. Notably, heart rate failed to detect changes for any of the measures. Results emphasize the need for caution in interpreting heart rate as an index of comfort. Further research is needed to examine the effects of clinical pain on physiologic indices and to further examine age and sex influences. To be relevant for assessment of acute established pain, physiologic variables must also be tested for their sensitivity beyond the immediate period of autonomic arousal.

Adolescent↗

Outcomes of therapeutic massage for hospitalized cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To examine the effects of therapeutic massage on perception of pain, subjective sleep quality, symptom distress, and anxiety in patients hospitalized for treatment of cancer. ORGANIZING CONSTRUCT: Rogers' Science of Unitary Human Beings and Watson's theory of human caring. METHODS: Quasiexperimental. The sample consisted of 41 patients admitted to the oncology unit at a large urban medical center in the United States for chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Twenty participants received therapeutic massage and 21 received the control therapy, nurse interaction. The outcome variables were measured on admission and at the end of 1 week via the following instruments: a Numerical Rating Scale for pain intensity and Likert-type scale for distress from pain; The Verran Snyder-Halpern Sleep Scale, McCorkle and Young's Symptom Distress Scale, and the Speilberger State Anxiety Inventory. ANOVA and t tests were used to analyze between and within group differences in mean scores and main effects on outcome variables. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: Mean scores for pain, sleep quality, symptom distress, and anxiety improved from baseline for the subjects who received therapeutic massage; only anxiety improved from baseline for participants in the comparison group. Statistically significant interactions were found for pain, symptom distress, and sleep. Sleep improved only slightly for the participants receiving massage, but it deteriorated significantly for those in the control group. The findings support the potential for massage as a nursing therapeutic for cancer patients receiving chemotherapy or radiation therapy.

Analysis of Variance↗

Nursing home resident barriers to effective pain management: why nursing home residents may not seek pain medication.

OBJECTIVES: Multiple barriers to effective pain management are present in the nursing home setting. The purpose of this analysis was to determine the extent to which residents in pain declined to request pain medication from the staff, and the reasons provided by the residents to explain this behavior. DESIGN: Every 3 months, a 20% sample of residents in 12 nursing homes was administered a short pain interview, then observed for pain indicators. Medical records were reviewed at the same time for documentation about pain and its treatment. All residents were asked if they had pain (or a similar word) now or in the past 24 hours. They were also asked if they had pain but did not request pain medication. If affirmative, the resident was asked to provide up to three reasons for not requesting medication. SETTING: The study was conducted in 12 Colorado nursing homes, located in both urban and rural settings. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2033 nursing home residents completed pain interviews and/or were observed for pain indicators by trained research assistants. These interviews took place before, during, and after implementation of an intervention to improve pain practices. MEASUREMENTS: A cognitive organizing structure was used to categorize resident responses into a coherent classification. Individual responses were assigned by team members to the appropriate category using a consensus process. The final classification scheme consisted of 10 categories of reasons why residents do not request pain medication. RESULTS: More than one-half of residents (59.5%) reporting pain in the past 24 hours did not request medication for that pain. Subjects in pain were most likely to state medication concerns or stoicism as the reasons for not requesting pain medication. Concerns about staff reactions to a request or perceptions that the staff was too busy were also mentioned frequently by the residents. Subgroup analyses suggested that residents in pain but not requesting pain medication were significantly more likely to be in rural rather than urban nursing homes (67.9% vs. 52.9%, P < or = .01), and white as compared to nonwhite ethnicity (60.6% vs. 52.1%, P < or = .05). They also tended to be older on average (80.4 +/- 12.1 years vs. 77.9 +/- 12.7 years, P < or = .01) than residents who did request pain medication. Finally, residents in pain but not requesting pain medication were significantly more likely to report having both continuous (c) and intermittent (i) pain (71.8% [c + i] vs. 61% [c] or 56.5% [i], P < or = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Interventions to reduce pain in nursing home residents need to be responsive to the concerns of the residents. It must be acknowledged that resident preferences and beliefs may lead to declined pain interventions regardless of the staff's motivation to make the resident more comfortable. Staff nurses also need to make a more concerted effort to systematically assess pain and offer pain medication to residents rather than rely on resident requests.

Aged↗