Biomedical subjects

Carlo Di Mario

Publications and source records attributed to Carlo Di Mario.

63 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

PubMed2002

Covered stent to exclude intravascular thrombus.

PURPOSE: To describe the utility of stent-graft implantation to avoid distal embolization from a large thrombus-containing lesion. CASE REPORT: A 67-year-old man was evaluated for recent onset of disabling left leg claudication. Angiography disclosed a mobile lobular mass occluding the left common iliac artery; irregular staining suggested an atherothrombotic lesion. Through a percutaneous ipsilateral access and an 8-F sheath, a balloon-expandable Jostent peripheral stent-graft was positioned with the distal edge immediately proximal to the internal iliac artery ostium. A prominent "waist" at the center of the balloon confirmed entrapment of the thrombotic mass. Completion angiography showed an optimal result with no residual stenosis or evidence of distal embolization. At 6-month follow-up, the patient was asymptomatic with angiographically documented luminal patency and no evidence of in-stent stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Stent-graft implantation appears a viable treatment alternative for thrombus-containing lesions, particularly when the thrombotic material is localized or is in a large vessel.

Aged↗

PubMed2002

Elective stenting in small coronary arteries: results of the Italian prospective multicenter registry MICROSCOPE.

BACKGROUND: The role of stent implantation in small coronary arteries is still controversial. The MICROSCOPE study (Ministenting in small coronary arteries, a prospective evaluation) is a multicenter registry addressed to prospectively evaluate the immediate and mid-term clinical and angiographic results of elective stenting of lesions located in coronary arteries with an angiographic reference diameter < or = 2.75 mm. METHODS: A total of 146 patients (160 lesions) were included in the study. The percentage of complex lesions (B2 and C lesions) was 49.3%. The clinical indications for stent implantation were: stable angina (55.0%), unstable angina (24.6%), and clinical evidence of myocardial ischemia in asymptomatic patients (20.4%); 60% of patients had multivessel disease. Stent deployment could be performed in 96.2% of lesions. The baseline reference diameter was 2.12 +/- 0.36 mm. In all cases the Ministent (Cordis, a J&J Company, Miami, FL, USA), specifically designed for small coronary arteries, was employed. The stent was pre-mounted on low profile balloons available in three different diameters (2.25, 2.50 and 2.75 mm) and three different lengths (11, 15 e 26 mm). RESULTS: The primary endpoint of successful stent-assisted angioplasty in all study vessels without major adverse cardiac events was achieved in 95.8% of the patients. The minimal lumen diameter increased from 0.64 +/- 0.24 to 2.02 +/- 0.43 mm and the dimensions of the stenosis (expressed as a percentage of the diameter of the coronary vessel) decreased from 68.6 +/- 10.8 to 16.2 +/- 10.7% (< 30% standard deviation in all cases). After the procedure all the patients received double antiplatelet therapy for 4 weeks. Post-procedural complications were limited to 2 patients (1.3%) who had a non-Q wave myocardial infarction at 6 months of follow-up; 13 patients (11%) required target lesion revascularization. No patient died following the procedure. Angiographic control was performed in 44% of lesions. The minimal lumen diameter decreased to 1.12 +/- 0.47 mm and the percent stenosis increased to 45.9 +/- 23.2%. The incidence of binary restenosis (stenosis > or = 50%) was 41%. CONCLUSIONS: Elective stenting of small coronary arteries with the Ministent can be safely performed and is associated with a low incidence of acute or subacute stent thrombosis. The mid-term results indicate a high rate of angiographic restenosis but a low need of target vessel revascularization. These data suggest that stenting cannot be considered the treatment of choice for unselected lesions located in coronary arteries with a small reference diameter, but represents a safe solution if unsatisfactory results are obtained with balloon angioplasty alone.

Aged↗

PubMed2001

Provisional stenting in small vessels.

Based on the currently available data, the strategy of routine stent placement in unselected lesions located in small coronary arteries provides good immediate results but is still associated with a high incidence of in-stent restenosis. Randomized trials comparing elective stenting with balloon angioplasty have not provided the demonstration that routine stenting is the best strategy for percutaneous intervention in coronary arteries with a reference diameter smaller than 2.75-3.0 mm. This paper describes the rationale for provisional stenting in this clinical setting and reviews the role of quantitative coronary angiography, intracoronary ultrasound and intracoronary Doppler measurements in the identification of lesions that would benefit from adjunctive stent placement after balloon angioplasty and in guiding stent implantation.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2001

An introduction to provisional stenting.

Provisional or conditional stenting should be defined as the use of stents limited to those conditions and cases in which the operator, despite an aggressive balloon angioplasty technique with large balloons and high pressure, has been unable to obtain a result that ensures optimal chances of early and late patency. The paramount issue is how to discriminate the patients with optimal results after balloon angioplasty for whom additional stent implantation is unlikely to improve or may even worsen long-term outcome. The better results of elective stent implantation in the OPUS study suggest that visual assessment of the PTCA result is not sufficient to detect lesions with suboptimal lumen gain after PTCA. The addition of physiologic parameters (Doppler flow velocity measurements, fractional flow reserve) has improved the results of the provisional stent group, with the best outcome observed when complex lesions and multivessel treatment were included in these studies (FROST, DESTINI). Intravascular ultrasound, although more expensive and time-consuming, has the additional advantage to guide the dilatation strategy.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2000

Subclavian artery stenting: Immediate and mid term clinical follow-up results.

BACKGROUND: Intravascular stents are increasingly being used to treat subclavian artery obstructive disease. This study aimed to assess the immediate and mid-term clinical outcome of subclavian artery stenting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Total occlusion of the subclavian artery was seen in 7 (28%) out of the 25 consecutive patients treated for subclavican artery stenosis. Mean lesion length was 14 +/- 4.3 mm. The mean preprocedure diameter stenosis was reduced from 83.2 +/- 14.9% to 9.6 +/- 5.4% postprocedure. Procedural success was achieved in all patients. Clinical follow-up was obtained in all patients. The initial success was maintained at follow-up (mean = 12 +/- 4 months) in 24 (96%) patients. Recurrence of symptoms occurred in 1 (4%) patient who had an angiographically documented restenosis four months after the procedure. It was successfully redilated. CONCLUSION: Stenting for subclavian artery obstructive disease is safe, technically feasible and has favorable clinical outcomes. It may be considered as the therapy of choice for subclavian artery obstructive disease.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2000

Recanalization of chronic total coronary occlusions: the impact of a new specific guidewire on primary success rate.

BACKGROUND: Although chronic total occlusions are encountered frequently in patients with coronary artery disease, an effective strategy to deal with them has yet to be devised. Various new guidewires have been designed in an attempt to negotiate chronic occlusions successfully. The authors have analysed the impact of the Athlete guidewire on procedural success in this lesion subset. METHODS: Sixty-two consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous intervention for chronic total occlusions over a two-year period were retrospectively studied. For the initial attempt, conventional guidewires were used. In case of failure, further attempts were made using the Athlete guidewire. Procedural success rates with the use of conventional and Athlete guidewires were assessed. RESULTS: Failure of the first attempt with the conventional guidewire occurred in 32 (51.6%) patients and success was achieved in 30 (48.4%) patients. In the former patients, a second attempt was made using the Athlete guidewire to cross the occlusion. The second attempt was successful in 20 patients (60%) in whom the first attempt was unsuccessful, while in the remaining 12 (40%) patients the occlusion could not be crossed even during the second attempt and the procedure was then terminated. Following the use of the Athlete guidewire, the success rate increased to 62% (p < 0.001). No complication occurred during the first attempt, while one patient had a coronary perforation using the Athlete guidewire, which was managed successfully without the need for bypass surgery. CONCLUSION: The use of the Athlete guidewire is feasible and safe, and enhances the chances of successfully treating chronic total occlusions during percutaneous coronary revascularization procedures.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2000

Coronary stenting using a 6 F. diagnostic catheter: a report of two cases.

Standard guiding catheters for coronary interventions may not selectively engage the coronary ostium despite a successful cannulation with a diagnostic catheter of the same curve. This discrepancy is explained by a slight difference in shape between the two catheters (shorter tip of the guiding, absence of tip tapering, etc.). The authors report on the use of 6 F. coronary diagnostic catheters as guiding catheters for coronary angioplasty and stent implantation in two patients with critical stenoses: in the right coronary artery distal to a right internal mammary artery anastomosis in one and in the ostial right coronary artery in the other. In both cases, the use of diagnostic catheters was the key to success despite the vessel orifice being unfavourable for the use of different types of guiding catheters.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1998

Coronary stent implantation throughout technical evolution: immediate and follow-up results.

Coronary stenting (stent implantation) has evolved over the last 5 years with changes in stent design, stent material and the implantation technique. The use of high-pressure balloon inflation (HP), intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and appropriate antiplatelet therapy have contributed to the abolishment of the need for subsequent anticoagulation, allowing extended stent applications. We compared results in three groups of patients having stent implantation throughout the period of evolution: group A: no IVUS, no HP, with subsequent anticoagulation treatment (n 3 434); group B: no IVUS, yes HP, without subsequent anticoagulation treatment (n 3 192); and group C: yes IVUS, yes HP, without subsequent anticoagulation treatment (n 3 588). The primary success rates were comparable in all groups. There was a clear change in indications for stenting in groups B and C compared with group A (elective stenting: group A 3 32%; group B 3 66%; group C 3 69%; P < 0.0001), in reference vessel size (group A 3 3.22 3 0.37 mm; group B 3 2.92 3 0.56 mm; group C 3 2.98 3 0.57 mm; P < 0.0001), and for presence of type B2 and C lesions (group A 3 57%; group B 3 72%; group C 3 74%; P < 0.001). The complication rate significantly decreased in group C (group A 3 3.6%; group B 3 4.1%; group C 3 1.2%; P < 0.001) and the mean patient hospital stay decreased to 2 days in groups B and C due to the abolition of the need for anticoagulant treatment. The angiographic restenosis rate increased in groups B and C (group A 3 20%; group B 3 34%; group C 3 32%; P < 0.001). The need for a repeat procedure increased as stenting of more complex lesions and smaller vessels was attempted: target lesion revascularization (TLR) was performed in 16% of patients in group A (73/434), in 18% of group B (35/192) and in 22% of group C (129/588) (P 3 0.04 for A versus C). Major cardiac events (MACE) occurred in 142 patients in group A (33%), 60 patients in group B (31%) and in 181 patients in group C (30%). The evolving technique of coronary stenting has expanded the spectrum of indications and range of coronary vessels attempted, and decreased the complication rates and hospital stay. However, in less-favorable subsets, additional improvements are needed to affect the long-term outcome.

Journal Article↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Beta-radiation therapy for long lesions in native coronary vessels: a matched comparison between de novo and in-stent restenotic lesions.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate effectiveness and to compare clinical outcome of intracoronary beta-radiation to treat long lesions (>20 mm) in patients with de novo stenosis vs. patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR). METHODS: A matched comparison of 44 patients with 63 de novo lesions and 48 patients with 63 ISR lesions (>20 mm) treated with intracoronary beta-radiation was performed. RESULTS: Stents were implanted in 65.1% of de novo and 19% of ISR lesions (P=.001). Radiation doses delivered were 17.2+/-3.0 vs. 20.3+/-3.0 Gy at 2 mm from the source center for de novo and ISR lesions. There was no difference in the incidence of in-hospital events. Clinical follow-up at 16.4+/-6.7 months showed no difference in major adverse cardiac events (MACE) between de novo and ISR patients (27.3% vs. 25%, P=.8). Late total occlusions (LTOs) occurred in eight patients (four in each group) treated with stents at the time of radiation and after discontinuation of ticlopidine. By multivariate analysis, stent implantation was the only predictor of late occlusions (OR 8.25, 95% CI 1.73-38.46, P<.008). Restenosis rates were similar for de novo and ISR lesions (29.3% vs. 23.2%, P=.46), as well as target lesion revascularization (TLR) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) rates (22.7% vs. 22.9% and 29.5% vs. 29.2%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Intracoronary beta-radiation gives comparable results when used to treat de novo or ISR lesions provided new stent implantation can be avoided. Long-term combined antiplatelet therapy is mandatory for patients who receive new stents at the time of radiation treatment.

Adult↗