Biomedical subjects

Carl F Driscoll

Publications and source records attributed to Carl F Driscoll.

17 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Ceramic implant abutments: cutting efficiency and resultant surface finish by diamond rotary cutting instruments.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: There is no information regarding the cutting efficiency and the surface finish produced on ceramic implant abutments when using diamond rotary cutting instruments (DRCIs). PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine which DRCIs are the most efficient in cutting aluminum oxide and zirconium oxide implant abutments and to evaluate which DRCIs create the prepared ceramic abutment with the least surface roughness. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cutting regimen with a high-speed handpiece, 25 mL/min water spray and a 102.1-g load at the DRCI/ceramic interface was used to section the 4 x 4-mm edge of blocks of aluminum oxide (CerAdapt and Ceramic Esthetic Abutment) and zirconium oxide (Esthetic Zirconium Abutment (Nobel Biocare NB) and ZiReal Post (3i)) provided by the manufacturers. Two different brands of zirconium oxide were tested. Eight DRCIs of different types (Brasseler 2856, 5856, and 6856, Premier 770, TS2000, and Axis 856TSC, 856SC, and 856C) were tested to section each ceramic material 6 times, using a new block and a new DRCI for each test. The surface roughness (Ra value) was measured using a surface profilometer both parallel and perpendicular to the cut surface. Cutting efficiency was measured 3 times for change in weight/length of time (g/sec). The data were analyzed with a 1-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests (alpha=.05). RESULTS: For the 3i zirconium oxide, 2 types of DRCIs (Axis 856 TSC and Brasseler 2856) produced a significantly smoother (P<.001 and P<.0001, respectively) surface finish on the shank and tip but not on the start and end. For the NB zirconium oxide, only the Axis 856C consistently produced a significantly smoother (P<.01, P<.0001 and P<.0001, respectively) surface finish on the start, shank, and tip. There was no significant difference in surface roughness of the NB aluminum oxide with use of any of the DRCIs. The Premier 770 was significantly more efficient (P<.0001 for 150 seconds and P<.001 for 300 seconds) in cutting the 3i zirconium oxide. The Premier 770 was significantly more efficient (P<.0001) in cutting the NB zirconium oxide at 150 seconds. The Premier TS2000 was significantly more efficient (P<.0001) at 300 seconds. The Axis 856 TSC was significantly more efficient (P<.0001 for 150 seconds and P<.001 for 300 seconds) in cutting the NB aluminum oxide. CONCLUSION: For a smoother surface finish, Axis 856C should be used for the NB zirconium oxide abutment, and either Axis 856TSC or Brasseler 2856 should be used for the 3i zirconium oxide abutment. To complete gross reduction on the NB and 3i zirconium oxide abutments, Premier 770 and TS2000 were found to perform the best. Gross reduction on the aluminum oxide ceramic abutment from NB was most efficiently performed by Axis 856TSC.

Aluminum Oxide↗

PubMed2005

Comparison of two luting agents used for the retention of cast dowel and cores.

PURPOSE: The first purpose of this study was to compare the retentive values of zinc phosphate and Panavia F resin cements when used for luting cast dowel and cores. The second purpose was to determine whether the use of a lubricant when making the resin pattern for a custom dowel and core would have an effect on the final retention of dowels cemented with either zinc phosphate or Panavia F cements. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixty-three caries-free extracted single-rooted human teeth were randomly divided into three groups of 21. Root canal preparations were standardized for all 63 teeth. Clinical protocols for fabricating and cementing dowel and core restorations were examined, comparing zinc phosphate and Panavia F resin cements. Direct dowel patterns were fabricated using the Para Post system and cast in a noble metal alloy. Group I dowel spaces were lubricated with GC lubricant prior to dowel pattern fabrication and cleaned with Cavidry solvent before cementing the cast dowel and core with zinc phosphate cement. Group II dowel spaces were rinsed with water only prior to dowel pattern fabrication. The dowels and cores in this group were cemented with Panavia F resin cement. Group III dowel spaces were lubricated with GC lubricant prior to dowel pattern fabrication; the dowel spaces were cleaned with Cavidry solvent before the cast dowel and cores were cemented with Panavia F cement. The tensile force necessary to remove the cast dowel and cores was determined using a universal testing machine. Results were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test. RESULTS: The dowels and cores in Group I had significantly higher retentive values than either of the two Panavia F groups (p< or = 0.001). No difference in retentive values (p > 0.05) was found between dowels luted with either of the lubricating agents in the Panavia F groups. CONCLUSIONS: Zinc phosphate cement had higher retentive values when cementing cast dowel and cores than Panavia F. The type of lubricant used for the resin dowel fabrication (water or GC lubricant that was removed with a solvent) had no effect on the retention of cast dowels cemented with Panavia F.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed2004

Single maxillary complete denture.

The single maxillary denture is a complex prosthesis that requires a complete understanding of the basics of denture occlusion. Theilemann's formula must be applied to each individual patient, and appropriate treatment must be taken to assure complete balance in all excursive movements. The basic principles of retention, stability, and support should not to be taken for granted, and steps must be completed so that all components are working in harmony for success of the maxillary denture. Treatment of various patients has been illustrated to allow the reader to comprehend better the modalities that can be employed for preparing the oral environment before denture insertion thereby ensuring better success in treating these classes of patients.

Dental Occlusion, Balanced↗

PubMed2004

Fabrication of a closed hollow obturator.

This article describes a technique for fabricating a closed hollow bulb obturator. It allows for control of the bulb's wall thickness and weight while not requiring any additional materials or time-consuming steps to the conventional processing procedures.

Acetates↗

PubMed2004

An in vitro evaluation of the reliability and validity of an electronic pantograph by testing with five different articulators.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The degree of reliability and validity of a new electronic pantographic instrument, the Cadiax Compact, has not been established. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the electronic pantograph in calculating condylar settings for 5 different articulators (Denar D5A, Denar Mark II, Whip Mix 8500, Hanau Modular, and Panadent PCH). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Pantograph sensors were mounted to each articulator with custom-made mounting devices. Border movements were made on each articulator with known condylar settings to produce readings at 3-, 5-, and 10-mm condylotrack distances. The condylar settings investigated included horizontal condylar inclination (HCI), immediate mandibular lateral translation (IMLT), progressive mandibular lateral translation (PMLT), top wall, and rear wall. Reliability was assessed by the relative size of standard deviations. Validity was tested with 1-way analysis of variance and the Tukey HSD Test (alpha=.05). RESULTS: The reliability readings for the condylar settings at the 10-mm condylotrack distance, for the most part, were more consistent than those at the 5-mm distance, which, in turn, were more consistent than those at the 3-mm distance. When there were exceptions to this trend, the differences in standard deviations were very small (0.006 mm for IMLT, 0.03 and 0.12 degrees for HCI). When comparing validity between the condylotrack distances, the smallest deviations, in general, were found at the 10-mm distance, the next smallest at the 5-mm distance, and the largest, at the 3-mm distance for HCI. For PMLT, in general, the 10-mm and 5-mm deviations were smaller than the 3-mm deviation. For IMLT, there was no significant difference between the 3-, 5-, and 10-mm deviations. In analyzing validity between the articulators, the smallest deviations from the preset values, in general, were found with the Denar Mark II. CONCLUSION: The standard deviations for assessing reliability and the mean deviations for assessing validity were both relatively small in comparison to the average values of the condylar determinants. Therefore, the electronic pantograph was determined to be both reliable and valid.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed2004

Effect of fluoride and 10% carbamide peroxide on the surface roughness of low-fusing and ultra low-fusing porcelain.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The effect of repeated applications of fluoride solutions and 10% carbamide peroxide on the surface roughness of newer dental porcelains is not completely known. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the surface roughness of 3 different porcelains when exposed to 2 fluoride solutions, a 10% solution of carbamide peroxide, and distilled water. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty discs (10-mm diameter, 2 mm thick) were made of each of the following porcelains: feldspathic porcelain (Ceramco II), low-fusing porcelain (Finesse), and an aluminous porcelain (All-Ceram). Each disc was abraded with a medium-grit diamond bur and auto-glazed. One side of each disc was abraded with a diamond bur and polished using a porcelain polishing kit to simulate a chairside adjustment and polishing. The discs (10 specimens/group) were immersed in 1.23% APF, 0.4% stannous fluoride, 10% carbamide peroxide, and distilled water for 50 seconds (control). The discs in the 10% carbamide peroxide solution were immersed for 48 hours. The surface of each disc was evaluated with surface profilometry (0.1 mm/s speed, 600-microm range). The data were analyzed by factorial analysis of variance and a Tukey multiple comparison test, (alpha=.05). RESULTS: The data showed that the acidulated phosphate fluoride etched the auto-glazed surface of all 3 porcelains. For Finesse specimens, the mean Ra values for the auto-glazed surface were significantly higher than that of the control after immersion in 1.23% APF (mean Ra 0.3 +/- 0.06 microm, P<.031). All-Ceram auto-glazed surface specimens had a significantly higher mean Ra value when immersed in the 3 solutions than the control (1.23% APF, 0.4% stannous fluoride, and 10% carbamide peroxide, 0.245 +/- 0.115 microm, 0.22 +/- 0.104 microm, 0.22 +/- 0.04 microm, respectively; P<.002). Ceramco II specimens were affected by all 3 solutions, with the auto-glazed surface having higher Ra values (1.23% APF, 0.4% stannous fluoride, and 10% carbamide peroxide, with mean Ra values of 0.35 +/- 0.1 microm, 0.26 +/- 0.08 microm, and 0.24 +/-.0.05 microm, respectively, P=.001). Immersion in the 3 solutions had no effect on the polished surfaces of all-ceramic specimens tested. CONCLUSION: Prior to the use of fluoride and 10% carbamide peroxide, dentists should ascertain the type of porcelain restoration present to prevent a roughened surface from occurring.

Acidulated Phosphate Fluoride↗

PubMed2004

Comparison of three systems for the polishing of an ultra-low fusing dental porcelain.

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: With the introduction of newer dental porcelains, there exists the need to evaluate different porcelain polishing systems available on the market. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the surface roughness produced by 3 different porcelain polishing systems on an ultra-low fusing porcelain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-three ultra-low fusing porcelain (Finesse) discs (10 x 2 mm) were fabricated and randomly divided into 3 groups (n=21). Both sides of each disc were abraded with a medium-grit diamond bur. One side was autoglazed and was considered a control. The other side was polished until the surface appeared shiny to the naked eye using 1 of 3 porcelain polishing kits (Axis Dental, Jelenko, and Brasseler systems). The surface of each disc was evaluated quantitatively with surface profilometry and qualitatively using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). A mean roughness profile (Ra) value was determined for each side of each specimen to describe the overall roughness of the surface. The Ra mean difference for each specimen was determined by subtracting the mean experimental readings (polished surface) from the mean control readings (glazed surface) and was used for the statistical analysis. The data were analyzed using analysis of variance followed by a Tukey multiple comparison test (alpha=.05). Representative specimens from each group were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: The Axis porcelain polishing system produced a smoother surface than the Brasseler or Jelenko systems (0.586 +/- 0.256, 0.306 +/- 0.238, and 0.277 +/- 0.230, respectively). No significant difference was found between the Jelenko and Brasseler porcelain polishing kits (F=10.6, P <.001). The images obtained through SEM were evaluated and found to be consistent with the profilometer readings. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, all 3 porcelain polishing systems produced a surface smoother than the autoglazed surface of Finesse. The Axis system provided a significantly smoother surface compared to the Brasseler and Jelenko polishing systems.

Air Abrasion, Dental↗

PubMed2004

Effects of varied dimensions of surgical guides on implant angulations.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Fabrication of a proper surgical guide is critical for success of implant restorations. The effects of the dimensional factors of the surgical guide on implant placement have not been studied. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of varied dimensions (diameter, length, and distance between the underside of the surgical guide and the implant recipient site) of a surgical guide on the accuracy of implant angulation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this in vitro study, 240 implant recipient sites were randomly prepared using varied dimensions of a surgical guide. The varied dimensions of the surgical guide's channel and distance were: channel diameter (2, 3, 4, or 5 mm), channel length (6 or 9 mm), and distance between the underside of the surgical guide and the simulated implant recipient site (2 or 4 mm). From these varying dimensions and distances, 16 combinations of dimensions and distances were tested. For each combination, 15 simulated implant recipient site (SIRS) specimens were prepared. The deviated angulation (DA) from the midpoint of the top surface of the 1- x 1-inch simulated implant recipient site (each simulated implant recipient acrylic block contained 5 SIRS of 1 x 1 inch), in the right-to-left (DA(RL)) and front-to-back (DA(FB)) directions, were measured in degrees using a protractor. The data was analyzed using factorial analysis of variance and Tukey's HSD test (alpha=.05). RESULTS: The DA(RL) , in degrees, at a channel length of 9.0 mm (2.33 +/- 1.27) was significantly smaller than at a channel length of 6.0 mm (3.0 +/- 1.42, P =.0001). The DA(RL) , in degrees, at a distance of 4.0 mm (2.13 +/- 1.16) was significantly smaller than at a distance of 2.0 mm (3.16 +/- 1.39, P =.0001). Also, a significant interaction for DA(RL) was found between diameter and distance ( P <.05). For DA(FB) , the varying diameters ( P <.05), lengths ( P =.0001), and distances ( P =.0001) showed significant differences. The DA(FB) at a channel length of 9.0 mm (2.56 degrees +/- 1.51) was significantly smaller than that at 6.0 mm (3.82 degrees +/- 1.87). Significant interactions found for DA(FB) were: diameter by length ( P =.0001), diameter by distance (F=4.547, P =.004), and length by distance (F=11.512, P =.001). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, the results suggest channel length as the primary controlling factor in minimizing deviated angulations.

Acrylic Resins↗

PubMed2004

Light transmission through all-ceramic dental materials: a pilot study.

UNLABELLED: Statement of problem Light transmission through veneers affects the degree of polymerization of light-polymerized resin luting agents. PURPOSE: Light transmission through different all-ceramic veneers when irradiated by 3 types of light-polymerization units was measured to evaluate the degree of polymerization. Material and methods The power outputs from a conventional halogen (3M Unitek), a plasma arc (Apollo 95E), and a high-intensity halogen (Kreativ Kuring Light Model 2000) light were measured by a radiometer. The light intensity (mW/cm(2) ) from these units was also measured after transmission through 0.25-, 0.40-, and 0.60-mm-thick Procera copings and through 1-mm-thick disks of feldspathic porcelain (Ceramco II), aluminous porcelain (Vitadur Alpha), and a castable pressed ceramic (IPS Empress). Two disks of each material were fabricated by a commercial laboratory in accordance with the manufacturers' recommendations. The light transmissions through these materials were compared with those through Procera-aluminous porcelain combinations. These disks were fabricated by applying appropriate thicknesses of aluminous porcelain (AllCeram). Light intensities were subjected to ANOVA and post hoc Scheffé tests at a priori alpha=.05. RESULTS: Intensities of light from 3 polymerization units, conventional halogen light, high-intensity halogen light, and plasma arc, were 660, 1050, and 2475 mW/cm,(2) respectively, and these together with the ceramic veneer thickness dictated the light transmission through veneers. Mean values (+/-SD) of light transmission through Procera copings for thicknesses of 0.25, 0.40 and 0.60 mm, respectively, were as follows: Apollo plasma arc (1083 +/- 117, 843 +/- 59, and 593 +/- 132); Kreativ high-intensity halogen (425 +/- 41, 345 +/- 74, and 256 +/- 79); 3M Unitek halogen (270 +/- 102, 230 +/- 48, and 180 +/- 113). Comparable transmissions occurred with the other ceramics. Only the plasma arc and the high-intensity halogen polymerization units emitted light of sufficient energy to effect polymerization of a resin luting agent (P=.045). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, the intensity of light transmitted through ceramic veneers was dictated by the polymerization unit and the type and thickness of the ceramic. With conventional halogen polymerization units, there may be insufficient light transmission through thicker veneers or all-ceramic crowns for adequate light polymerization.

Aluminum Oxide↗

PubMed2004

Fabrication of a custom eyelid implant prosthesis: a clinical report.

Patients with lagophthalmos are often treated with a stock gold weight that has been implanted in the upper eyelid. This relatively simple surgical technique does not, however, always produce the desired result. This article describes a technique for the fabrication of a custom eyelid implant prosthesis for patients who present with a non-functioning and unaesthetic eyelid implant.

Blepharoplasty↗

PubMed2004

Mechanical failure of an implant-retained bar: a clinical report.

This clinical report describes the mechanical failure of an implant-retained bar where the bar fractured midway between two implants. The location of the fracture is not typical for implant-retained bars. Possible causes of the fracture are discussed. The prosthodontic treatment provided to manage the mechanical failure and prevent it from recurring is also discussed.

Dental Implants↗

PubMed2003

A new removable implant analog.

A new implant analog system that improves the efficiency of the implant restoration's fabrication process is described. This 2-piece analog contains an outer plastic sleeve that is retained within the stone cast. The inner portion, a metal analog, can be easily removed and replaced within the plastic sleeve. Because the metal analog is removable, the time-consuming process of screwing and unscrewing the prosthesis- or abutment-retaining screws during laboratory procedures can be minimized. The prosthesis can remain secured to the analog during waxing, metal finishing, and porcelain buildup, yet is easily removed from the cast for inspection.

Crowns↗

PubMed2003

The effect of a denture adhesive on the colonization of Candida species in vivo.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a single denture adhesive on oral quantities of Candida species in vivo by determination of absolute and proportional counts of Candida species on dentures and in saliva of individuals who used this denture adhesive for a period of 14 days. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Samples were collected from saliva and maxillary dentures of 12 patients who wore existing dentures without adhesives for 2 weeks, then wore dentures with adhesive (Poly Grip Free; Glaxo Smith Kline, U.K.) for 2 weeks. Periodically, maxillary dentures were sampled by adding saline to the intaglio surface, dispersing by sonication and removing aliquots for culturing. These aliquots and saliva were diluted and plated in duplicate on bismuth sulfite, glycerine, and glucose yeast agar (Biggy) for recovery of Candida and on trypticase soy agar for total viable counts (TVC) of the microbiota. After 72 hours of incubation at 37 degrees C in air with 10% CO(2), colony-forming units were enumerated. In each individual, absolute counts of Candida and TVC, and proportional counts of Candida relative to TVC were compared and statistically evaluated during the periods of no adhesive use (control) and adhesive use (test). RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the test and control periods for recovery of total Candida or TVC in saliva or on dentures, or the percent of Candida relative to TVC in saliva or on dentures. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, the data suggested that the denture adhesive tested did not significantly alter the denture microbiota during the 14-day trial period.

Adhesives↗

PubMed2002

Pressure generated on a simulated oral analog by impression materials in custom trays of different designs.

PURPOSE: To measure the pressure exerted by maxillary edentulous impressions composed of 3 commonly used impression materials using four different impression tray configurations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was performed using an oral analog that simulated an edentulous maxillary arch. Three pressure transducers were imbedded in the oral analog, 1 in the mid-palate area and the other 2 in the right and left ridge (maxillary first premolar areas). Custom trays of 4 different configurations were fabricated. The 3 impression materials tested were irreversible hydrocolloid, light-body and medium-body vinyl polysiloxane, and polysulfide. A total of 128 impressions were made. The custom tray and the oral analog were mounted using a reline jig. A Satec universal testing machine was used to apply a constant pressure of 2 kg/cm(2) over a period of 5 minutes on the loaded custom tray. The pressure was recorded every 10 seconds. Factorial analysis of variance and Tukey's multiple comparison test were used to analyze the results. RESULTS: A significant difference in the pressure produced using different impression materials was found (p < or =0.001). Irreversible hydrocolloid and medium-body vinyl polysiloxane produced a significantly higher pressure than light-body vinyl polysiloxane and polysulfide impression materials. The presence of holes and/or relief did not significantly alter the magnitude of pressure. CONCLUSION: All impression materials produced pressure during maxillary edentulous impression making. Tray modification was not important in changing the amount of pressure produced. The impression materials used had more effect on the pressure produced during impression making on the simulated oral analog.

Alginates↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Pressure generated on a simulated mandibular oral analog by impression materials in custom trays of different design.

PURPOSE: The purpose was to measure the pressure exerted under a simulated mandibular edentulous impression at different locations using commonly used impression materials and four impression tray configurations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was performed using an oral analog that simulated an edentulous mandibular arch. Three pressure transducers were embedded in the oral analog-one pressure transducer in the anterior ridge area, and the other two in the right and left buccal shelves. Four configurations of custom trays were fabricated: trays with no relief, with and without holes; and trays with relief, with and without holes. The impression materials tested were light body polysulfide, light body vinyl polysiloxane, medium body vinyl polysiloxane, and irreversible hydrocolloid. The custom tray and the oral analog were mounted using a reline jig, and a Satec universal testing machine was used to apply a constant pressure of 1 kg/cm(2) over a period of 5 minutes on the loaded custom tray. Eighty impressions for the 16 groups (n = 5) were made, and pressures were recorded every 10 seconds. Factorial ANOVA and Tukey Multiple Comparison Test were used to analyze the results (p < 0.05). RESULTS: A significant difference was found in the pressure produced using different impression materials. Irreversible hydrocolloid and medium body vinyl polysiloxane produced significantly higher pressure than light body polysulfide and light body vinyl polysiloxane impression materials. The presence of holes and/or relief significantly altered the magnitude of pressure produced by irreversible hydrocolloid and medium body vinyl polysiloxane but not light body polysulfide and light body vinyl polysiloxane. CONCLUSION: All impression materials produced pressure during simulated mandibular edentulous impression making. For making mandibular edentulous impressions, low-viscosity impression materials-light body polysulfide and light body vinyl polysiloxane-are recommended. Tray modification was not important in changing the amount of pressure produced for the low-viscosity impression materials.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Rehabilitation of a spark erosion prosthesis: a clinical report.

When complex prostheses are fabricated, it is expected that at some point maintenance will be necessary. This clinical report documents a 10-year-old maxillary spark erosion prosthesis that had been repaired many times, was discolored, and exhibited significant signs of wear. The metal superstructure was intact; therefore, only the acrylic resin base and teeth needed to be replaced. To reduce both cost and time without the prosthesis for the patient, the rehabilitation was completed within 24 hours.

Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Surface roughness of denture base acrylic resins after processing and after polishing.

PURPOSE: Circumstances exist in which the need to adjust denture base acrylic resins is necessary. This process obviously alters the surface of the polished denture base. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of three chairside polishing kits and conventional polishing on four denture acrylic resins. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four 30 x 30 x 2 mm acrylic resin specimens were fabricated with each of four acrylic resins: autopolymerizing, heat processed, injection molded, and microwaveable. One side was polished conventionally with pumice and polishing compound. The other side was polished with one of three chairside polishing kits: Axis, Brasseler, and Shofu. Each side was evaluated by a Dektak 8 Programmable Stylus Profiler to determine the surface roughness (Ra). RESULTS: One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that: (1) There was no significant difference in the time it took to polish the specimens with the chairside polishing kits (F=2.118, p=0.14). (2) There was a significant difference in surface roughness between the acrylic resins before any polishing, with the injection-molded and heat-processed being less rough than the autopolymerizing (F=4.588, p=0.005). (3) There was a significant difference in surface roughness between the acrylic resins when conventionally polished, with the injection-molded and microwavable being less rough than the autopolymerizing (F=4.503, p=0.005). Factorial ANOVA revealed that: (1) There was no significant difference in the surface roughness among the chairside polishing kits (F=1.209, p=0.30). (2) There was a significant difference between the acrylic resins, with the heat-processed, injection-molded, and microwaveable being significantly less rough than the autopolymerizing (F=6.610, p=0.0001). (3) There was no significant interaction between the acrylic resins and the chairside polishing kit in the amount of surface roughness (F=1.728, p=0.12). An independent t-test revealed that conventional polishing was significantly smoother than polishing with the chairside polishing kits (t=3.847, p=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that time was not a factor in using any of the chairside polishing kits. It is recommended that conventional polishing be used after adjustments to the cameo surface of denture acrylic resin.

Acrylic Resins↗