Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C-M Samama

Publications and source records attributed to C-M Samama.

12 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

[Coronary stents and anaesthesia: it is time to have national data].

We report 13 cases of coronary stent patients, undergoing a non cardiac surgery. Despite an heterogenous perioperative management of antiplatelet agents, none of these patients developed any significant complications. Recently, several case reports of postoperative drug eluting stent thrombosis have been reported. However, the actual incidence of this dramatic event is not known. This confirms the need to perform prospective studies or registries of patients with coronary stents undergoing non cardiac surgery, in order to propose evidence-based recommendations on perioperative antiplatelet management in such patients.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

[Anaesthetic preoperative assessment of chronic medications and herbal medicine use: a multicenter survey].

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to quantify the use of chronic medication and herbal remedies in the presurgical population. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective multicenter survey. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult patients presenting for anaesthesia were directly asked if they were currently using chronic medication or herbal remedies. RESULTS: Among 1057 patients (age 54+/-17 yrs, woman 54%, ASA 2 [1-4], 74%) were taking one or more chronic medication. The most commonly used treatments were, in descending order angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin-II receptor blockers (15%), beta blockers (11%) and platelet inhibitors (10%). Also, 9% were taking one or more of the following herbal remedies known to interact with the perioperative period: valeriane, ginseng, ginkgo, St John's wort, echinacea and ephedra. Women and patients aged 40-70 yr were most likely to be taking a herbal product (p<0.001 and p<0.01 respectively). CONCLUSION: Chronic medication and herbal remedies are common in patients presenting for anaesthesia. Because of the potential interactions between anaesthetic drugs or techniques and such medication it is important for anaesthetists to be aware of their use.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2006

Recombinant activated factor VII efficacy and safety in a model of bleeding and thrombosis in hypothermic rabbits: a blind study.

BACKGROUND: Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) is increasingly used to secure hemostasis in hemorrhagic situations in trauma and surgical patients. Hypothermia is often observed in these clinical settings. OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy and safety of rFVIIa in hypothermia in a rabbit model of bleeding and thrombosis. METHODS: Sixty-nine rabbits were anesthetized, ventilated and monitored for blood pressure, temperature and carotid flow. The Folts model was used: a stenosis (75%) and an injury were carried out on the carotid artery, inducing thrombosis. Blood flow decreased as thrombus size increased until the pressure gradient was such that the thrombus was released and local arterial blood flow was suddenly restored. This is known as a cyclic flow reduction (CFR). After counting baseline CFRs during a 20-min period (P1), rabbits were randomized blindly to one of four groups: normothermic (NT) placebo or rFVIIa (150 microg kg(-1)), hypothermic (HT) (34 degrees C) placebo or rFVIIa. Then CFRs were recorded over a second period (P2). At the end of the experiment, a hepato-splenic section was performed and the amount of blood loss was recorded. After each period, the following were measured: ear immersion bleeding time (BT), hemoglobin, platelet count, prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and fibrinogen. RESULTS: Hypothermia increased BT and blood loss. These effects were reversed by rFVIIa. In NT rabbits, rFVIIa shortened BT but did not reduce blood loss. rFVIIa-treated rabbits bled similarly regardless of temperature. The incidence of CFRs was higher in treated than placebo animals regardless of temperature. rFVIIa decreased PT and aPTT without modifying platelet count or fibrinogen level. CONCLUSION: Hemostatic efficacy of rFVIIa was maintained in hypothermia. However, the number of CFRs was higher in the rFVIIa-treated group than in the placebo groups, whether for NT or HT rabbits.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

A randomized study comparing the efficacy and safety of nadroparin 2850 IU (0.3 mL) vs. enoxaparin 4000 IU (40 mg) in the prevention of venous thromboembolism after colorectal surgery for cancer.

BACKGROUND: The optimal thromboprophylactic dosage regimen of low-molecular-weight heparins in high-risk general surgery remains debatable. OBJECTIVES: We performed a randomized, double-blind study to compare the efficacy and safety of nadroparin 2850 IU (0.3 mL) and enoxaparin 4000 IU (40 mg) in the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after colorectal surgery for cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing resection of colorectal adenocarcinoma were randomized to receive once daily either 2850 IU nadroparin or 4000 IU enoxaparin s.c. for 9 +/- 2 days. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) detected by bilateral venography or documented symptomatic DVT or pulmonary embolism up to day 12. The main safety outcome was major bleeding. A blinded independent committee adjudicated all outcomes. RESULTS: Out of 1288 patients analyzed, efficacy was evaluable in 950 (73.8%) patients. The VTE rate was 15.9% (74/464) in nadroparin-treated patients and 12.6% (61/486) in enoxaparin-treated patients, a relative risk of 1.27 (95% confidence interval; CI: 0.93-1.74) that did not met the criterion for non-inferiority of nadroparin. The rate of proximal DVT was comparable in the two groups (3.2% vs. 2.9%, respectively), but that of symptomatic VTE was lower in nadroparin-treated patients (0.2% vs. 1.4%). There was significantly (P = 0.012) less major bleeding in nadroparin- than in enoxaparin-treated patients (7.3% vs. 11.5%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Compared with those receiving enoxaparin 4000 IU, patients treated with nadroparin 2850 IU showed a higher incidence of asymptomatic distal DVT, but a lower incidence of symptomatic VTE. Nadroparin treatment was safer in terms of bleeding risk.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

[Prevention of venous thromboembolism in surgery and obstetrics].

The French Society of anaesthesiology and intensive care has chosen a high level methodology to issue professional Recommendations on perioperative and obstetrical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. In addition with a short review on mechanical and pharmacological prophylaxis, all surgical and obstetrical settings have been studied. The initiation and duration of prophylaxis have been particularly debated in close relation with the level of surgical risk. A large group of experts has been involved in this process. More than 150 other experts have participated in the reading process. Didactic tables have been added to help the prescription.

Delivery, Obstetric↗
PubMed2003

[Direct and indirect effects of epoietin alpha in an experimental model of thrombosis and bleeding in the rabbit].

OBJECTIVES: To study direct and indirect effects of EPO on haemostasis. STUDY DESIGN: Experimental, randomised. ANIMALS: Forty-eight New Zealand rabbits. METHOD: Animals were anaesthetised, ventilated and monitored continuously for blood pressure, heart rate, body temperature, and carotid blood flow variations and were randomised into four groups: control, EPO bolus 2400 IU kg(-1), fractionated EPO (one injection a week of 600 IU kg(-1) for 4 weeks), homologous red blood cell transfusion to reach the Ht level of the fractionated EPO group. A compression injury and a 75% stenosis of the carotid artery triggered a series of cyclic flow reductions (CFRs). CFRs were observed for a 20 min period in each group. Ear immersion bleeding time (BT) and hepato-splenic bleeding were performed at the end of the experiment. Biology was performed at the end of the thrombosis period: blood cells count, Hte, activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen, arachidonic-induced platelet aggregation, EPO dosages. RESULTS: No significant increase in thrombosis (CFRs) in the two EPO groups and in the transfused group. Increase in Hte in the fractionated EPO group versus control. Group EPO bolus: decrease in BT and hepato-splenic bleeding versus control; decrease in hepato-splenic bleeding versus fractionated EPO group, increase in platelet aggregation velocity versus control. CONCLUSION: EPO did not increase the thrombotic risk in this rabbit model. EPO bolus decreased BT and hepato-splenic bleeding.

Animals↗