Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Wolpert

Publications and source records attributed to C Wolpert.

50 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Prospective evaluation of the quality and long-term stability of atrial signals in non-thoracotomy defibrillation electrodes: comparison of four different endocardial electrograms.

UNLABELLED: Documentation of atrial signals in stored endocardial electrograms of modern implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) is a useful tool to classify the underlying arrhythmia leading to device therapy. Newest generations of ICD provide near- and far-field electrograms derived between various endocardial electrodes. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the quality and long-term stability of atrial signals in different far-field configurations including the active can housing. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 300 real-time endocardial electrogram recordings in 60 consecutive patients with a modern ICD in subpectoral position were analysed at the time of implant, pre-hospital discharge, 1, 3 and 12 months follow-up. Four different configurations were evaluated: right ventricular coil to can housing, can housing to pace/sense ring, right ventricular coil to pace/sense tip, and pace/sense tip to pace/sense ring. The best visibility of p-waves at an ECG-resolution of 0.5 mV/mm was seen in the can to coil configuration (77% of the patients). In the can to pace/sense ring electrogram p-waves could be observed in 58% of the patients. No p-waves were visible to pace/sense tip to pace/sense ring. At a resolution of 1.0 mV/mm p-waves were only visible in 10% of all patients exclusively in the can housing to right ventricular coil configuration. The results were stable (100% of the patients) over a follow-up of one year. CONCLUSIONS: Endocardial far-field electrograms, derived from the can housing and the right ventricular coil provide a p-wave visibility in 77% of the patients and demonstrate a long-term stability over at least one year, provided that the ECG-resolution is set at 0.5 mV/mm. Since the electrogram resolution of stored electrograms depends on the EGM-range, and the ECG-resolution at an EGM-range of 15 mV would be 1 mV/mm, the EGM-range is recommended to be programmed to 7.5 mV to ensure an ECG-resolution of at least 0.5 mV/mm for stored electrograms.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1998

Case report: inappropriate discharge of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator caused by the combined count criterion.

We describe a rare case of an inappropriate defibrillator discharge during a sinus tachycardia with single fast sensed beats fulfilling the ventricular fibrillation rate criterion, activating the "combined count criterion," although the prevalent sinus tachycardia was inside a ventricular tachycardia rate zone, programmed to monitor only mode. The "combined count criterion" is a safety feature that ensures defibrillation therapy in case of a tachyarrhythmia inside the ventricular tachycardia detection zone, that is temporarily crossing the ventricular fibrillation detection rate. This case reports shows that there is a low but unpredictable risk of device therapy even in a zone programmed to monitor only mode. This phenomenon should be considered when a monitor only zone is installed for revelation of slower tachyarrhythmias.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Electrical proarrhythmia: induction of inappropriate atrial therapies due to far-field R wave oversensing in a new dual chamber defibrillator.

This case report describes delivery of atrial therapies during a sinus tachycardia in a new dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator inappropriately caused by far-field oversensing of ventricular beats in the atrial channel. Upon classification of the PR interval pattern, the rate criterion for an atrial tachycardia was fulfilled, and the device initiated high-frequency burst pacing as the first stage of programmed tiered atrial therapies. Atrial fibrillation subsequently was induced by high-frequency burst pacing, and eventually a programmed 10-J shock was delivered for successful termination of atrial fibrillation. The phenomenon of far-field oversensing of ventricular beats could be repeatedly observed during exercise testing and abolished by decreasing the atrial sensitivity.

Defibrillators, Implantable↗
PubMed1998

A new classification algorithm for discrimination of ventricular from supraventricular tachycardia in a dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

INTRODUCTION: The high incidence of inappropriate therapies due to supraventricular tachycardia remains a major unsolved problem of implantable cardioverter defibrillators. We report a new detection formula for discrimination of ventricular tachycardia from supraventricular tachycardia in a patient with a dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator and a new atrioventricular classification algorithm. METHODS AND RESULTS: The enhanced detection algorithm performs a stepwise arrhythmia analysis. The rhythm is first classified on the basis of cycle length. Each episode is then classified as supraventricular or ventricular on the basis of atrioventricular association, stability of circle length, and origin of acceleration. Sophisticated diagnostic information is provided by atrioventricular markers and electrogram recordings. Successful discrimination of two spontaneous episodes of ventricular tachycardia and supraventricular tachycardia is demonstrated. CONCLUSION: This new dual chamber detection algorithm may significantly improve the specificity of tachyarrhythmia detection without sacrificing sensitivity, thereby reducing the number of spurious shocks in patients with recurrent supraventricular tachycardias. Further studies are needed to assess the sensitivity and specificity of this detection algorithm.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1998

Radiofrequency ablation of atrial flutter.

Atrial flutter can be understood as atrial tachycardia due to a single intra-atrial macroreentrant circuit that is determined by fixed or functional boundaries. In various types of atrial flutter, radiofrequency ablation has become an established curative therapy. During the course of an ablation procedure, five steps can be distinguished: (1) determination of the reentrant circuit; (2) identification of the boundaries; (3) proof of the participation of an isthmus between the boundaries in the reentrant circuit; (4) connection of the barriers by a linear lesion; and (5) proof that the line of block is complete. After establishing these five steps, the acute and long-term results of atrial flutter ablation are comparable to those of other supraventricular tachycardias. In this review, we discuss these principles of atrial flutter ablation with an emphasis on typical atrial flutter.

Atrial Flutter↗
PubMed1998

Specific considerations with the automatic implantable atrial defibrillator.

INTRODUCTION: Internal atrial defibrillation has been evaluated as an alternative approach to the external technique for more than two decades. Previous studies in animals and humans have shown that internal atrial defibrillation is feasible with relatively low energies. The promising results achieved with internal atrial defibrillation have facilitated the development of an implantable atrial defibrillator (IAD). METHODS AND RESULTS: For any new therapy, it is imperative to demonstrate safety, efficacy, tolerability with improvement in quality of life, and cost-effectiveness compared with therapeutic options already available. Maintenance of sinus rhythm or prolonged duration in arrhythmia-free intervals should be demonstrated clearly with an IAD. Initial clinical experience with the Metrix system indicates stable atrial defibrillation thresholds, appropriate R wave synchronization markers, no shock-induced ventricular proarrhythmia, and excellent detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) with a specificity of 100%. Ventricular proarrhythmia has not been reported for correctly R wave synchronized low-energy shocks when closely coupled to RR intervals, and long-short cycles are avoided. CONCLUSION: Preliminary experience with the Metrix system suggests that the IAD may offer a therapeutic alternative for a subgroup of patients with drug-refractory, symptomatic, long-lasting, and infrequent episodes of AF. Further efforts must be undertaken to reduce the patient discomfort associated with internal atrial defibrillation in an attempt to make this new therapy acceptable to a larger patient population with AF.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1997

Left atrial chamber and appendage function after internal atrial defibrillation: a prospective and serial transesophageal echocardiographic study.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this prospective study was to assess left atrial chamber and appendage function after internal atrial defibrillation of atrial fibrillation and to evaluate the time course of recovery. BACKGROUND: External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation may result in left atrial appendage dysfunction ("stunning") and may promote thrombus formation. In contrast to external cardioversion, internal atrial defibrillation utilizes lower energies; however, it is unknown whether the use of lower energies may avoid stunning of the left atrial appendage. METHODS: Transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography were performed in 20 patients 24 h before and 1 and 7 days after internal atrial defibrillation to assess both left atrial chamber and appendage function. Transthoracic echocardiography was again performed 28 days after internal atrial defibrillation to assess left atrial function. The incidence and degree of spontaneous echo contrast accumulation (range 1+ to 4+) was noted, and peak emptying velocities of the left atrial appendage were measured before and after internal atrial defibrillation. To determine left atrial mechanical function, peak A wave velocities were obtained from transmitral flow velocity profiles. RESULTS: Sinus rhythm was restored in all patients. The mean +/- SD peak A wave velocities increased gradually after cardioversion, from 0.47 +/- 0.16 m/s at 24 h to 0.61 +/- 0.13 m/s after 7 days (p < 0.05) and 0.63 +/- 0.13 m/s after 4 weeks. Peak emptying velocities of the left atrial appendage were 0.37 +/- 0.16 m/s before internal atrial defibrillation, decreased significantly after internal atrial defibrillation to 0.23 +/- 0.1 m/s at 24 h (p < 0.01) and then recovered to 0.49 +/- 0.23 m/s (p < 0.01) after 7 days. The corresponding values for the degree of spontaneous echo contrast were 1.2 +/- 1.2 before internal atrial defibrillation versus 2.0 +/- 1.0 (p < 0.01) and 1.1 +/- 1.3 (p < 0.01) 1 and 7 days after cardioversion, respectively. One patient developed a new thrombus in the left atrial appendage, and another had a thromboembolic event after internal atrial defibrillation. CONCLUSIONS: Internal atrial defibrillation causes depressed left atrial chamber and appendage function and may result in the subacute accumulation of spontaneous echo contrast and development of new thrombi after cardioversion. These findings have important clinical implications for anticoagulation therapy before and after low energy internal atrial defibrillation in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed1996

[Clinical experiences with pectoral defibrillator implantation].

UNLABELLED: The pectoral approach to implantation of cardioverter/defibrillators has the aim to further simplify the implantation of transvenous defibrillation systems. The PCD 7219 D/C is a device of the fourth generation which makes the pectoral implantation feasible due to a weight of 132 g, a size of 89 x 64 x 18 mm, a volume of 83 cm3 and a surface of 108 cm2. The use of the "active-can"-system (PCD 7219 C) requires the implantation of only one right ventricular lead. The PCD 7219 D/C was implanted in 75 patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias, the follow-up period was 12 +/- 4 (1-24) months. Subpectoral implantation was feasible in 59 patients (79%), in 55 with a left pectoral, in 4 with a right pectoral approach due to previous left-sided operation or thrombosis of the left subclavian vein. Male sex (p < 0.005), body weight (p < 0.005) and body surface (p < 0.05) were predictors of pectoral implantation. In the 45 patients (60%) with a unipolar defibrillation system ("active can") the defibrillation threshold was significantly lower compared to those with a dual lead system (9.9 +/- 6.5, 2.5-24 Joule vs. 19 +/- 4.5, 6-24 Joule p < 0.0001). In one patient with pectoral and in one patient with abdominal implantation a dislodgement of the right ventricular lead was diagnosed and an operative revision was indicated. CONCLUSION: The down-sized implantable cardioverter/defibrillator PCD 7219 D/C makes the pectoral implantation feasible in the majority of patients. The use of the "active-can"-system requires the implantation of only one right ventricular lead with significantly lower defibrillation thresholds.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Mutation analysis of the TSC2 gene in an African-American family.

Tuberous sclerosis complex is an autosomal dominant disorder with loci on chromosome 9q34 (TSC1) and chromosome 16p13.3 (TSC2). The TSC2 gene has been isolated. To date, only a small number of intragenic deletional and point mutations have been detected, almost exclusively in sporadic (no family history) cases. With the exception of a single parent/offspring pair, there have been no published reports of mutations in extended multigenerational chromosome 16-linked TSC2 families. For our TSC studies we ascertained and sampled a four-generation African-American TSC family that shows a high likelihood for linkage to chromosome 16 (z=1.53). Using single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis we identified a 4590/4591delC mutation in exon 34. The 4590/4591delC causes a frameshift mutation resulting in the creation of a premature stop codon. In addition, we have detected a 542del4 polymorphism in the two partially overlapping polyadenylation signals in exon 40 that segregates in the family. The polymorphism has been detected in six of 72 African-American control chromosomes examined, and has not been detected in 80 Caucasian control chromosomes examined.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1995

Incidence of ICD lead related complications during long-term follow-up: comparison of epicardial and endocardial electrode systems.

UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term stability of epicardial and endocardial lead systems for third-generation cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) and to assess the usefulness of diagnostic tools. One hundred forty patients with 61 epicardial (43.6%) and 79 nonthoracotomy systems (56.4%) were followed for 25 +/- 19 months. A total of 18 (12.9%) lead related complications were documented. Complications of epicardial systems were detected in 10 patients (16.4%) during a follow-up time of 36 +/- 8 months: crinkling of patch electrodes in 6 patients (9.8%), insulation breakage of sensing electrodes in 2 patients (3.3%), and adapter defect in 2 patients (3.3%). Eight of the patients (10.1%) with transvenous-subcutaneous systems had lead related complications during a 13 +/- 6 months follow-up: fracture of the subcutaneous patch lead in 2 patients (2.5%), dislodgement of the right ventricular lead in 2 patients (2.5%), dislodgement of the superior vena cava lead in 2 patients (2.5%), insulation breakage of sensing electrodes in 1 patient (1.3%), and connector defect in 1 patient (1.3%). There was no significant difference in the incidence of lead related complications between epicardial and endocardial systems (P > 0.05). Fractures, dislodgements, and crinklings were documented within the first 8 +/- 5 months by regular chest X ray. Defects of insulation, adapter, or connector were detected 22 +/- 10 months after implantation and were associated with delivery of multiple inappropriate ICD therapies. An operative lead revision was indicated for 4 epicardial (6.6%) and 6 endocardial (7.6%) lead systems. CONCLUSIONS: Endocardial lead systems offer a similar long-term stability as compared to epicardial lead systems. Chest X ray is the most useful tool to detect lead fracture, dislodgment, and patch crinkling. Marker recordings or real-time electrograms have not been helpful in this series to identify patients with suspected lead defects prior to the experience of inappropriate ICD discharges.

Alloys↗
PubMed1994

Clinical efficacy of shock waveforms and lead configurations for defibrillation.

A randomized, prospective comparison of the defibrillation efficacy of various shock waveforms and nonthoracotomy lead configurations was performed in five distinct patient groups undergoing implantation of a cardioverter defibrillator. In the first group using a bidirectional lead configuration, there was no significant difference in the mean defibrillation threshold (DFT) between simultaneous and sequential monophasic shocks (17.8 +/- 5.8 joules versus 17.3 +/- 2.7 joules). In the second group using a bidirectional lead configuration, the mean DFT was 21.9 +/- 7.3 joules with monophasic shocks and 14.9 +/- 5.0 joules with biphasic shocks (p < 0.001). In the third group using a unidirectional lead configuration, the mean DFT was significantly higher (p < 0.001) with monophasic shocks (22.1 +/- 4.2 joules) compared with biphasic shocks (15.0 +/- 5.4 joules). In the fourth group, an intraindividual comparison with monophasic shock waveforms showed no significant differences in DFT using either a bidirectional (21.3 +/- 5.8 joules) or a unidirectional (21.7 +/- 2.6 joules) lead configuration. In the fifth group, a simplified unipolar transvenous defibrillation lead system ("active can") demonstrated significant lower DFTs (9.7 +/- 3.8 joules) compared with a standardized unidirectional lead configuration (18.0 +/- 6.8 joules). It is concluded that: (1) there seems to be no significant difference in the DFT between simultaneous and sequential monophasic shocks; (2) biphasic waveforms require significantly less energy for defibrillation than their corresponding monophasic waveforms; and (3) the unipolar single-electrode defibrillation system is easy to implant and provides DFTs at energies comparable with epicardial lead systems.

Adolescent↗