Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Whitworth

Publications and source records attributed to C Whitworth.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Time response of carboplatin-induced hearing loss in rat.

Carboplatin is currently being used as an anticancer drug against human cancers. However, high dose of carboplatin chemotherapy resulted in hearing loss in cancer patients. We have shown that carboplatin-induced hearing loss was related to dose-dependent oxidative injury to the cochlea in rat model. However, the time response of ototoxic dose of carboplatin on hearing loss and oxidative injury to cochlea has not been explored. The aim of the study was to evaluate the time response of carboplatin-induced hearing loss and oxidative injury to the cochlea of the rat. Male Wistar rats were divided into two groups of 30 animals each and treated as follows: (1) control (normal saline, i.p.) and (2) carboplatin (256 mg/kg, a single i.p. bolus injection). Auditory brain-evoked responses (ABRs) were recorded before and 1-5 days after treatments. The animals (n = 6) from each group were sacrificed on day 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 and cochleae were isolated and analyzed. Carboplatin significantly elevated the hearing thresholds to clicks and to 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32 kHz tone burst stimuli only 3-5 days post-treatment. Carboplatin significantly increased nitric oxide (NO), malondialdehyde (MDA) levels and manganese superoxide dismutase (Mn-SOD) activity in the cochlea 4-5 and 3-5 days post-treatment, respectively, indicating enhanced influx of free radicals and oxidative injury to the cochlea. Carboplatin significantly depressed the reduced to oxidized glutathione (GSH/GSSG) ratio, antioxidant enzyme activities such as copper/zinc-superoxide dismutase (CuZn-SOD), catalase (CAT), and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) as well as enzyme protein expressions in the cochlea 3-5 days after treatment. The data suggest that carboplatin-induced hearing loss involves oxidative injury to the cochlea of the rat in a time-dependent manner.

Animals↗

Fatal calcific uraemic arteriolopathy (CUA): a case report and review of the literature.

Calciphylaxis, now better known as Calcific uraemic arteriolopathy (CUA), is an uncommon condition characterised by small vessel calcification and occlusion with resultant painful violaceous skin lesions that typically ulcerate to form non-healing gangrenous ulcers. The syndrome is usually found in patients with renal failure. In this report we describe a 61 year old lady who developed lower limb ulceration secondary to calciphylaxis and discuss the current treatment options for this serious condition.

Calcinosis↗

Dose response of carboplatin-induced hearing loss in rats: antioxidant defense system.

Carboplatin, a platinum-containing anticancer drug, is currently being used against a variety of cancers. However, a single high dose of carboplatin is ototoxic in cancer patients. This is the first study to show carboplatin-induced hearing loss in a rat model. Male Wistar rats were divided into five groups and treated as follows: (1) control (saline, intraperitoneally (i.p.)); (2) carboplatin (64 mg/kg, i.p.); (3) carboplatin (128 mg/kg i.p.); (4) carboplatin (192 mg/kg, i.p.) and (5) carboplatin (256 mg/kg, i.p.). Animals in all groups were sedated with ketamine/xylazine and auditory brain-evoked responses (ABRs) were recorded before and 4 days after treatments. The animals were sacrificed on the fourth day and cochleae were harvested and analyzed. Carboplatin dose-dependently decreased body weight. However, at higher doses of carboplatin (192 and 256 mg/kg), there was a significant elevation of hearing threshold shifts at clicks, 4, 8, 16 and 32 kHz tone burst stimuli. The higher doses of carboplatin (192 and 256 mg/kg) significantly increased cochlear lipid peroxidation (132 and 146% of control) and depleted cochlear glutathione levels (66 and 63% of control), respectively. The antioxidant enzyme activities such as superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione peroxidase, glutathione reductase, and glutathione-S-transferase (GST) depressed significantly at higher doses of carboplatin. The data suggest that higher doses of carboplatin (above 128 mg/kg) induce hearing loss as evidenced by significant changes in ABRs, lipid peroxidation and antioxidants in the cochlea of rats.

Animals↗

Carboplatin-induced oxidative stress in rat cochlea.

Carboplatin is currently being used in the clinic against a variety of human cancers. However, high dose carboplatin chemotherapy resulted in ototoxicity in cancer patients. This is the first study to show carboplatin-induced oxidative stress response in the cochlea of rat. Male Wistar rats were divided into two groups of six animals each and treated as follows: (1) control (normal saline, i.p.) and (2) carboplatin (256 mg/kg, i.p.). Animals in both groups were sedated with ketamine/xylazine and auditory brainstem-evoked responses were recorded before and 4 days after treatments. The animals were sacrificed on the fourth day and cochleae were harvested and analyzed. A significant elevation of the hearing threshold shifts was noted at clicks, 8, 16, and 32 kHz tone burst stimuli following carboplatin administration. Carboplatin significantly increased nitric oxide and malondialdehyde levels, xanthine oxidase and manganese-superoxide dismutase activities in the cochlea indicating enhanced flux of free radicals. Cochlear glutathione levels, antioxidant enzyme activities such as copper zinc-superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione peroxidase, glutathione reductase and glutathione S-transferase and enzyme protein levels were significantly depleted 4 days after carboplatin treatment. The data suggest that carboplatin induced free radical generation and antioxidant depletion, and caused oxidative injury in the cochleae of rats.

Animals↗

Effect of cisplatin on the expression of glutathione-S-transferase in the cochlea of the rat.

Glutathione-S-transferase (GST) has been found to conjugate glutathione (GSH) to diverse electrophiles and play a major role in the detoxification of alkylating and platinating agents. However, there is little information regarding the pattern of GST expression in the cochlea. Although cisplatin is ototoxic, its effect on GST in the cochlea is unknown. In the present study we investigated the pattern of GST expression in control and cisplatin-treated cochleas by using the laboratory rat as animal model. Sixteen mature rats were randomly assigned to control or cisplatin groups. After treatment, cochleas were procured and tissues stained by immunohistochemical methods to detect the presence of GST. Optical density measurements were determined to gauge intensity of GST immunostaining. Strong positive GST immunostaining was demonstrated in all cochleas, with the most intense staining found in the spiral ligament and the least in Reissner's membrane. Mean optic density scores were lower for cisplatin-treated cochleas than for control cochleas in all areas analyzed. These findings showed that GST is expressed throughout the rat cochlea, with cisplatin treatment causing its decreased expression.

Animals↗

Dose-dependent protection by lipoic acid against cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in rats: antioxidant defense system.

This study was designed to investigate the role of graded doses of lipoic acid pretreatment against cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity. Male Wistar rats were divided into six groups and treated as follows: 1) vehicle (saline) control; 2) cisplatin (16 mg/kg, intraperitoneally); 3) lipoic acid (100 mg/kg, intraperitoneally); 4) cisplatin plus lipoic acid (25 mg/kg); 5) cisplatin plus lipoic acid (50 mg/kg) and 6) cisplatin plus lipoic acid (100 mg/kg). Rats were sacrificed three days after treatment, and plasma as well as kidneys were isolated and analyzed. Plasma creatinine increased (677% of control) following cisplatin administration alone which was decreased by lipoic acid in a dose-dependent manner. Cisplatin-treated rats showed a depletion of renal glutathione (GSH), increased oxidized GSH and decreased GSH/GSH oxidized ratio (62%, 166% and 62% of control), respectively which were restored with lipoic acid pretreatment. Renal superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione peroxidase (GSH peroxidase) and glutathione reductase activities decreased (62%, 75%, 62% and 80% of control), respectively, and malondialdehyde content increased (204% of control) following cisplatin administration, which were restored with increasing doses of lipoic acid. The renal platinum concentration increased following cisplatin administration, which was possibly decreased by chelation with lipoic acid. The data suggest that the graded doses of lipoic acid effectively prevented a decrease in renal antioxidant defense system and prevented an increase in lipid peroxidation, platinum content and plasma creatinine concentrations in a dose-dependent manner.

Animals↗

Effect of protective agents against cisplatin ototoxicity.

HYPOTHESIS: The goals of this investigation were to compare the efficacy of three protective agents against cisplatin-induced elevation of auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds and to examine whether these protective agents prevent cisplatin-induced alterations of the antioxidant defense system in the cochlea of the rat. BACKGROUND: Cisplatin is an ototoxic antitumor agent. Previous animal studies have shown that cisplatin administration causes an elevation of ABR thresholds. These auditory changes are accompanied by alterations in the concentration of glutathione and the antioxidant enzymes in the cochlea. The authors' previous work has indicated that the protective agent diethyldithiocarbamate (DDTC) prevents decrease in glutathione (GSH), alteration of antioxidant enzyme activity, and disruption of cochlear function with cisplatin administration. METHODS: Wistar rats were sedated and underwent pretreatment ABR testing using clicks and tone burst stimuli at 8, 16, and 32 kHz. Control rats received saline by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection. Positive control rats were administered cisplatin 16 mg/kg i.p. Three groups of rats received protective agents in combination with cisplatin. The DDTC-protected rats were given 600 mg/kg of DDTC subcutaneously 1 hour after cisplatin. Animals protected by 4-methylthiobenzoic acid (MTBA) were given 250 mg/kg of this agent i.p. 30 minutes before cisplatin. Animals protected with ebselen were given 16 mg/kg i.p. one hour before cisplatin. The ABR thresholds were recorded 72 hours after cisplatin administration in all groups. Cochleas were removed, and extracts of the tissues were analyzed for GSH, activities of antioxidant enzymes (superoxide dismutase [SOD], catalase, glutathione peroxidase, and glutathione reductase) and malondialdehyde (MDA) (as an index of lipid peroxidation). RESULTS: Cisplatin-treated rats had significant ABR threshold shifts, ranging from 27 to 40 dB. Rats administered each of the three protective agents in combination with cisplatin had ABR threshold shifts of <10 dB. The cochleae of rats administered cisplatin alone had nearly a 50% depletion of glutathione and about a 50% reduction in the activities of SOD, glutathione peroxidase, and glutathione reductase, while catalase activity was reduced to 70% of control values. These changes were accompanied by a reciprocal elevation of MDA of 165%. These changes, namely, the depletion of GSH and antioxidant enzyme activity and the elevation of MDA in the cochlea, were largely attenuated by the administration of the protective agents tested. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that cisplatin ototoxicity is related to lipid peroxidation and that the use of protective agents prevents hearing loss and lipid peroxidation by sparing the antioxidant system in the cochlea. These results suggest the possibility that the clinical use of protective agents could effectively reduce or prevent damage to the inner ear of patients receiving cisplatin chemotherapy, provided that the antitumor effect is not altered.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

Dose dependent protection by lipoic acid against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in rats: antioxidant defense system.

This study investigated the alterations that occur in auditory brainstem-evoked responses (ABRs) concurrent with changes in cochlear concentrations of glutathione (GSH), lipid peroxidation, and antioxidant enzyme activity in cisplatin-induced ototoxicity and in dose-dependent otoprotection by an antioxidant lipoate. Male Wistar rats were divided into different groups and were treated as follows, with: (1) vehicle (saline) control; (2) cisplatin (16 mg/kg, i.p.); (3) lipoate (100 mg/kg, i.p.) plus saline; (4) cisplatin plus lipoate (25 mg/kg); (5) cisplatin plus lipoate (50 mg/kg), and (6) cisplatin plus lipoate (100 mg/kg). Post-treatment ABRs were evaluated after three days, the rats were sacrificed, and cochleae were harvested and analyzed. The cisplatin-injected rats showed ABR threshold elevations above the pre-treatment thresholds. Rats treated with lipoate plus cisplatin did not show significant elevation of hearing thresholds. Cisplatin administration resulted in a depletion of cochlear GSH concentration (69% of control), whereas, cisplatin-plus-lipoate treatment increased GSH concentration close to control value. Cisplatin-treated rats showed a decrease in cochlear superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), and glutathione reductase (GR) activities (57, 78, 59, and 58% of control, respectively), and an increase in malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration (196% of control). Cochlear SOD, CAT, GSH-Px, and GR activities and MDA concentrations were restored in the rats injected with cisplatin plus graded doses of lipoate than those with cisplatin alone. It is concluded that cisplatin-induced ototoxicity is related to impairment of the cochlear antioxidant defense system, and the dose-dependent otoprotection conferred by an antioxidant lipoate against cisplatin ototoxicity is associated with sparing of the cochlear antioxidant defense system.

Animals↗

Application of antioxidants and other agents to prevent cisplatin ototoxicity.

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: To review the recent data from experiments performed in this laboratory to test the hypothesis that cisplatin ototoxicity is related to depletion of glutathione and antioxidant enzymes in the cochlea and that the use of antioxidants or protective agents would protect the cochlea against cisplatin damage and prevent hearing loss. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS: Data were reviewed from experiments performed in this laboratory. Control rats were treated intraperitoneally with cisplatin 16 mg/kg. Experimental rats were given cisplatin in combination with one of the following protective agents: diethyldithiocarbamate, 4-methylthiobenzoic acid, ebselen, or lipoic acid. Animals in each group underwent auditory brainstem response (ABR) threshold testing before and 3 days after treatment. Cochleae were removed after final ABR testing and analyzed for glutathione and activities of the enzymes superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione peroxidase, glutathione reductase, and malondialdehyde. RESULTS: Rats in the control group receiving cisplatin were found to have significant ABR threshold shifts. This was accompanied by a reduction of glutathione and the activity of antioxidant enzymes (superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase, catalase, and glutathione reductase) and an elevation of malondialdehyde. Experimental animals had preservation of ABR thresholds and levels of glutathione, antioxidant enzyme activity, and malondialdehyde that were similar to untreated animals. CONCLUSION: Cisplatin ototoxicity appears to be initiated by fee-radical production, which causes depletion of glutathione and antioxidant enzymes in the cochlea, and lipid peroxidation, manifested by an increase in malondialdehyde. These effects were blocked by each of a series of antioxidant compounds given in combination with cisplatin. A mechanism for cisplatin ototoxicity is elaborated with a proposed plan of chemoprevention using agents with different mechanisms of action. These substances could be used alone or in combination to reduce the severity of cisplatin ototoxicity in patients.

Animals↗

Protection by ebselen against cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity: antioxidant system.

This study was designed to investigate the cisplatin-induced alteration in renal antioxidant system and the nephroprotection with ebselen. Male Wistar rats were injected with (1) vehicle control; (2) cisplatin; (3) ebselen; and (4) cisplatin plus ebselen. Rats were sacrificed three days post-treatment and plasma as well as kidney were isolated and analyzed. Plasma creatinine increased 598% following cisplatin administration alone which decreased by 158% with ebselen pretreatment. Cisplatin-treated rats showed a depletion of renal glutathione (GSH) levels (52% of control), while cisplatin plus ebselen injected rats had GSH values close to the controls. Antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activities decreased 38, 75 and 62% of control, respectively, and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels increased 174% of control following cisplatin administration, which were restored to control levels after ebselen treatment. The renal platinum level did not significantly change with ebselen pretreatment. This study suggests that the protection offered by ebselen against cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity is partly related to the sparing of antioxidant system.

Animals↗

Quantification of furosemide from serum and tissues using high-performance liquid chromatography.

Since pharmacokinetics may play a significant role in furosemide (FSM) developmental ototoxicity, we developed an assay for the extraction and quantification of FSM in tissue and fluid from neonatal and adult rats. Rats from post-natal day (PND) 10, 30 and 50, were given an intravenous dose of FSM (35 mg/kg). Blood and tissues were analyzed by HPLC. FSM in serum, perilymph and liver was elevated in PND ten rats as was the body burden of FSM. Renal concentrations were higher in older rats. Altered clearance of FSM in developing rats may result in higher concentrations in the cochlea and ototoxicity.

Animals↗

Expression and function of adenosine receptors in the chinchilla cochlea.

Previous studies indicate the presence of adenosine receptors in the cochlear tissues obtained from different animals. This study was initiated to determine the subtypes of adenosine receptor (AR) present in the chinchilla cochlea and to assess their function. Radioligand binding studies demonstrate the presence of both the A1AR and A3AR in membranes prepared from the cochlea, using the radioligands [3H]DPCPX and [125I]APNEA. Estimates of the number (Bmax) of A1AR and A1AR plus A3AR by saturation curves were 118 +/- 13 and 417 +/- 120 fmol/mg, respectively, with the respective equilibrium dissociation constants (Kd) averaging 2.7 +/- 0.2 and 26.3 +/- 13.8 nM. No significant number of A2aAR were detected using [3H]CGS21680. The nonhydrolyzable adenosine analog R-phenylisopropyladenosine (R-PIA, 1 microM) elicited a small but significant degree of inhibition of forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity (10.4 +/- 2.5%) in cochlear membrane preparations, which was insensitive to blockade by theophylline (100 microM). Furthermore, R-PIA elicited an increase in inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate production in dissociated cell preparations obtained from the cochlea. No significant effect of R-PIA was observed on auditory measures such as auditory brainstem evoked response, cochlear action potential and endocochlear potential following round window application. However, round window application of R-PIA elicited significant increases in the activities of antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase and significantly reduced the levels of malondialdehyde, a marker of lipid peroxidation. These results suggest a potential cytoprotective role of adenosine in the cochlea against oxidative damage.

Adenosine↗

Up-regulation of adenosine receptors in the cochlea by cisplatin.

In a previous study, we have demonstrated the presence of two adenosine receptor (AR) subtypes, namely A1 and A3AR, in the chinchilla cochlea. One or both of these receptors couple to activation of antioxidant enzymes, with resulting decreases in lipid peroxidation. The chemotherapeutic agent, cisplatin, was shown to produce ototoxicity within a few days of administration presumably by generating reactive oxygen species (ROS) and thereby increasing lipid peroxidation. In this study, we focused on whether lipid peroxidation induces hearing loss by assessing the cochlear antioxidant defense system over a shorter time period (24 h) following cisplatin administration. Cisplatin was administered to anesthetized chinchillas by round window membrane application and hearing loss was determined by compound action potential (CAP) and endocochlear potential (EP) 24 and 72 h post-treatment. Elevations in CAP thresholds in response to click and to 2, 4, 8 and 16 kHz tones and decreases in EP were obtained within 24 h of cisplatin treatment. These changes persisted for at least up to 72 h. Measurements of antioxidant enzymes indicate no change in the activities of superoxide dismutase, catalase or glutathione peroxidase, either 24 or 72 h following cisplatin treatment. The levels of malondialdehyde obtained at these time points were equivalent to those obtained from the controls. Furthermore, no difference in cochlear morphology was detectable by scanning electron microscopy at the basal, middle or apical turns of the cochlea within 24 h. By 72 h, however, losses in both inner and outer hair cells were observed in the basal and middle turns of the cochlea. A major finding of this study is that exposure to cisplatin led to a 5-fold up-regulation of [125I]N6-2-[4-amino-3-phenyl]ethyladenosine binding in the cochlea within 24 h, reflecting increases in expression of AR(s) in this tissue. These data indicate a dissociation between cisplatin acute (within 24 h) ototoxicity and lipid peroxidation. Furthermore, up-regulation of AR(s) may represent a rapid compensatory mechanism by the cochlea to counter the toxic effects of increased ROS generated by cisplatin.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Protection by 4-methylthiobenzoic acid against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity: antioxidant system.

This study was undertaken in order to determine the changes in auditory brainstem-evoked responses relationship with the changes in the levels of GSH, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant enzymes activity in cisplatin-induced ototoxicity and otoprotection by 4-methylthiobenzoic acid (MTBA). Male Wistar rats in different groups were treated as follows: 1) saline control; 2) cisplatin (16 mg/kg, intraperitoneally); 3) MTBA (250 mg/kg, intraperitoneally), and 4) cisplatin plus MTBA. Post-treatment auditory brainstem-evoked responses were performed after three days and the rats were sacrificed and cochleae harvested. The cochleae were analyzed for glutathione (GSH), antioxidant enzyme activity, and malondialdehyde levels. The cisplatin injected rats showed a threshold elevation of 31.9 +/- 16.0 dB above the pretreatment thresholds using click stimulus. Rats treated with MTBA plus cisplatin did not show significant elevation of hearing threshold. Cisplatin plus MTBA administration showed a higher levels of cochlear GSH (5.59 +/- 0.35 nmoles/mg protein) compared to cisplatin alone (4.46 +/- 0.13 nmoles/mg protein). Cisplatin treated rats showed a decrease in superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione peroxidase (GSH-peroxidase), and glutathione reductase (GSH-reductase) activities (57%, 83%, 78% and 58% of control). Cochlear superoxide dismutase, catalase and GSH-reductase activities and MDA levels were restored in the rats injected with cisplatin plus MTBA, compared to cisplatin alone. It is concluded that the protection conferred by MTBA against cisplatin ototoxicity is associated with sparing of the cochlear antioxidant system.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

4-methylthiobenzoic acid protection against cisplatin nephrotoxicity: antioxidant system.

This study investigates the changes in renal antioxidant system after cisplatin administration and the nephroprotection with 4-methylthiobenzoic acid (MTBA). Male Wistar rats were injected with (1) vehicle control, (2) cisplatin, (3) MTBA, and (4) cisplatin plus MTBA. Rats were euthenized 3 days post-treatment and kidney was isolated and analyzed for platinum concentration, malondialdehyde (MDA), glutathione (GSH and GSSG), superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px). Plasma creatinine increased 508% following cisplatin administration alone, which decreased to 189% with MTBA. Cisplatin-treated rats showed a depletion of renal GSH levels (53%), while cisplatin plus MTBA-injected rats had GSH values close to those of the controls. SOD, CAT, and GSH-Px activities decreased 36, 29, and 38%, respectively, and MDA levels increased 212% following cisplatin administration, which were restored to control levels after MTBA treatment. The renal platinum level depleted significantly with MTBA treatment. The data suggest that cisplatin nephrotoxicity is mediated by depletion in GSH concentration and by impaired activities of SOD, CAT, and GSH-Px, increased lipid peroxidation, and plasma creatinine levels. The protection offered by MTBA against cisplatin nephrotoxicity is related to the reduction in plasma creatinine levels, prevention of GSH depletion and lipid peroxidation, and restoring antioxidant enzyme activity in the kidneys of rats.

Animals↗

Cochlear effects of indacrinone are not altered by penicillin.

Indacrinone is a loop diuretic structurally related to ethacrynic acid. Indacrinone is a racemic mixture. Previous studies have shown that the (-) enantiomer caused reduction of endocochlear potential (EP) and elevation of compound action potential (CAP) threshold (Rybak and Whitworth, 1987a). It has been demonstrated that organic acids such as penicillin, probenecid and sodium salicylate prevent the reduction of EP normally observed after furosemide administration (Rybak et al., 1992a). The present study was designed to determine whether penicillin pretreatment could prevent changes in EP and CAP threshold in (-)-indacrinone treated chinchillas. Adult chinchillas were anesthetized with ketamine and pentobarbital. A microelectrode was advanced into the scala media using the round window approach, and CAP responses to clicks were measured. One group was treated with (-)-indacrinone 100 mg/kg via the jugular vein. A second group of animals received penicillin 50 mg/kg i.v. thirty minutes before (-)-indacrinone. The mean EP change in the indacrinone-treated animals was 38.38 +/- 19.32 millivolts (mv). The reduction of EP in the group receiving penicillin was 24.43 +/- 20.74 mv (P > 0.09). The mean CAP threshold changes in animals receiving indacrinone was 20 +/- 14.14 dB whereas those pretreated with penicillin showed a threshold shift of 21.43 +/- 20.35 dB (P > 0.05). These findings are consistent with previous studies which showed that the effect of ethacrynic acid on the EP and CAP was not changed by the pretreatment with penicillin (Rybak et al., 1990).

Action Potentials↗