Biomedical subjects

C Waydhas

Publications and source records attributed to C Waydhas.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed1998

High-dose antithrombin III treatment of severely injured patients: results of a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Antithrombin III (AT III) treatment has been shown to reduce disseminated intravascular coagulation and to inhibit thrombin, which plays a central role in the activation of platelets and other inflammatory systems in conditions with severe inflammation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of early and high-dose administration of AT III to patients with severe multiple injuries on the inflammatory response and outcome. METHODS: In a placebo-controlled, double-blind study, 40 consecutive patients with Injury Severity Scores of 29 or greater who met the inclusion criteria were randomized to receive either AT III or placebo within 360 minutes after trauma. Twenty patients were administered AT III for a period of 4 days, aiming to achieve AT III concentrations of 140% of normal. RESULTS: The AT III and placebo groups were comparable with respect to Injury Severity Score, age, incidence of blood pressure less than 80 mm Hg on admission, initial base deficit, and start of the test drug. The patients in the AT III group received a total of about 20,000 IU during the first 4 days. AT III levels of 130 to 140% could be achieved by this regimen, whereas in the control group the AT III concentration averaged about 70%. In the AT III group prothrombin tended to be elevated and prothrombin fragment F1+2 as well as thrombin-AT III complex tended to be lower on the first day. No differences between groups, however, could be observed with respect to partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, platelets, plasminogen activator inhibitor I, soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor II, neutrophil elastase, interleukin (IL)-1 receptor antagonist, IL-6, and IL-8. Mortality (15 vs. 5%), incidence of respiratory failure (55 vs. 55%), duration of mechanical ventilation (13 vs. 12 days), and length of stay in the surgical intensive care unit (19 vs. 21 days) were also similar in both treatment groups. The duration of organ failure, however, was shorter in the patients receiving AT III. CONCLUSION: The early and high-dose administration of AT III to patients with severe blunt trauma appears not to attenuate the posttraumatic inflammatory response or to significantly improve outcome.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

[Effect of kinetic therapy on the course of treatment of patients with post-traumatic lung failure].

This study was conducted to investigate the effects of intermittent prone positioning of patients with post-traumatic respiratory failure (paO2/FiO2 < 280 mm Hg) in comparison with conventional therapy in a supine position. Although the severity of injury of the prone-positioned patients was much higher (ISS 35.8 vs 24.5), the ventilation time (32 vs 31 days) and ICU stay (39 vs 36 days) were similar to patients treated in the supine position. Besides the beneficial effect of prone positioning on oxygenation, for the first time we have evidence that prone positioning improves the outcome of patients with post-traumatic respiratory failure.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

[Minimal invasive, percutaneous ventriculostomy in therapy of severe craniocerebral trauma].

From May 1996 until April 1997 percutaneous CT-controlled ventriculostomy (PCV) was performed in 19 patients with severe traumatic brain injury and no indication for decompressive craniotomy. There was a significant reduction in the duration of the procedure compared to burr-hole ventriculostomy with no complications. Because of further advantage of PCV CT-controlling is the possibility of puncturing even very narrow ventricles.

Brain Edema↗

PubMed1997

[Shock room diagnosis in polytrauma. Value of thoracic CT].

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate whether early thoracic computed tomography (TCT) is superior to routine chest X-ray (CXR) in the diagnostic work-up of blunt thoracic trauma and whether the additional information obtained influences subsequent decisions on therapy in the early management of severely injured patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective study of 103 consecutive patients with clinical or radiological signs of chest trauma (94 multiply injured patients with chest trauma, 9 patients with isolated chest trauma) who had an average ISS of 30 and an average AIS thorax of 3, initial CXR and TCT were compared after the first assessment in our emergency department (a level I trauma center). Mortality in this group was 10% (n = 10). RESULTS: In 67 patients (65%) TCT revealed major complications of chest trauma that had been missed on CXR: lung contusion (n = 33), pneumothorax (n = 27), residual pneumothorax after chest tube placement (n = 7), hemothorax ((n = 21), displaced chest tube (n = 5), diaphragmatic rupture (n = 2), myocardial rupture (n = 1); in 11 patients only minor additional pathologic findings (dystelectasis, small pleural effusion) were visualized on TCT; and in 14 patients CXR and TCT showed identical pathologic results. In 11 patients neither CXR nor TCT revealed pathologic findings. The TCT scan was significantly more effective than routine CXR in detecting lung contusions (P < 0.001), pneumothorax (P < 0.005) and hemothorax (P < 0.05). In 42 patients (41%) the additional TCT findings did affect, the therapy selected: chest tube placement or chest tube correction in mostly anteriorly located pneumothoraces or large hemothoraces (n = 31), influence on ventilation mode and respiratory care (n = 14), influence on the management of fracture stabilization (n = 12), laparotomy in cases of diaphragmatic lacerations (n = 2), bronchoscopy for atelectasis (n = 2), exclusion of aortic rupture (n = 2), endotracheal intubation (n = 1), pericardiocentesis (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: TCT is highly sensitive in detecting thoracic injuries after blunt chest trauma and is superior to routine CXR in visualizing lung contusions and pneumo- and hemothorax. Early TCT influences therapeutic management in a considerable subset of patients. We therefore recommend TCT in the primary diagnostic work-up of multiple injured patients with suspected chest trauma, because early and accurate diagnosis of all thoracic injuries along with acceptance of the implications for therapy may reduce complications and improve the outcome in polytraumatized patients with blunt chest trauma.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1997

[Quality management in early clinical multiple trauma care. Documentation of treatment and evaluation of critical care quality].

Quality management in early clinical care of patients with multiple injuries (description of actual process, identification of problems, implementation of quality improvement) is not possible without sufficient baseline data about the present situation of medical treatment. This study investigates whether the current documentation of treatment in the emergency room is appropriate to judge upon the quality of the process and to detect problems. In addition, a set of baseline data is presented. The performance in the treatment of 126 multiple injured patients was prospectively recorded from 1988 to 1993 and compared with an idealized process based upon an algorithm. The quality of present data recording was analysed, and criteria for judgement of quality of care were assessed. The algorithm was divided into 117 possible steps (one step consisting of a single decision criterion, the decision and the corresponding procedure). Per patient, only 61% +/- 12% of these steps were sufficiently documented to allow judgement. Using several criteria for assessment, the following baseline data could be observed (times shown refer to admission to the trauma room): (1) trauma room time of 129 +/- 55 min; (2) completion of basic radiological and sonographic diagnostics in 91% of patients; (3) first blood collection after 17 +/- 11 min; (4) cranial computerised tomography after 55 +/- 20 min; (5) missed injuries during the trauma room period in 32% of patients; (6) intubation after 20 +/- 19 min; (7) insertion of a chest tube after 30 +/- 17 min; (8) first blood transfusion in shock after 32 +/- 17 min; (9) transfused blood within the first hour of 4.2 +/- 2.8 units and within the second hour of 8.5 +/- 4.7 units; (10) emergency operations in shock after 98 +/- 55 min; (11) early operations after 156 +/- 69 min; (12) craniotomy after 124 +/- 37 min; (13) unplanned surgery within 24 hours after admission to the intensive care unit in 11% of patients. The study presented here supplies information on timing and other process data of the acute clinical care of seriously injured patients. In particular, the data represent indicators for the quality of emergency room management, which may be used as baseline to compose improvement measures of structure and process. The quality of data collection has to be improved for carrying out an exact analysis of the process.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1997

[Quality management in early clinical polytrauma management. II. Optimizing therapy by treatment guidelines].

To enhance the quality of treatment of patients with multiple injuries (blunt trauma), guidelines for the acute clinical management (trauma-algorithm) were implemented at our clinic in 1994. The impact of these guidelines was analysed, comparing two prospectively recorded collectives of polytraumatized patients 4/1988-12/1993 (A; n = 126) and 1/1994-6/1996 (B; n = 74). Nine specifically defined parameters were used to assess the therapeutic process of early clinical trauma management. All parameters showed an improvement after implementation of the algorithm (group B): (1) Complete radiological and sonographic basic diagnostics in 97% vs. 92% of patients; (2) time interval of 38 min vs. 55 min until cranial CT was done after severe head injury (GCS < 10); (3) reduction of delayed diagnosis of lesions to 5% vs. 24%; (4) duration of 16 min vs. 20 min until intubation; (5) period of 23 min to 30 min to pleural drainage; (6) duration of 18 min vs. 32 min until transfusion in shock; (7) period of 79 min vs. 98 min until emergency operation in shock; (8) duration of 95 min vs. 124 min until trepanation, and (9) operation rate within 24 h after admission to ICU in 3% vs. 12%. The lethality rates of each collective were assessed after subdivision in three groups (I-III) with middle (ISS: 18-24), high (ISS: 25-49) and extreme (ISS: 50-75) injury severity. In all groups of both collectives ISS values, age, initial loss of consciousness (GCS) and shock were comparable (except the higher injury severity of collective B in group I). In all groups a reduction of lethality could be shown for collective B: Group I, 0% vs. 20% (P < 0.05); group II, 8% vs. 24% (P < 0.05); and group III, 40% vs. 71%, not significant because of the small group in B (n = 5). The implementation of therapeutic management guidelines led to an improvement of both treatment processes and outcome. In order to regularly reassess validity and practicability of such guidelines as well as further enhance therapeutic quality, a continuous evaluation programme representing a quality management system should be inaugurated.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

[Algorithms in trauma management].

A well-controlled, meticulous process has a far higher probability of resulting in a high quality of medical care than improvization and unstructured creativity. Algorithms display decision-making treatment processes and problem-solving strategies by giving clearly defined and formalized guidelines. The flow chart for decision-making follows the yes/no dichotomy of binary logic. The systematic ordering of decision points and consequent actions is guided by medical priority and thus regulates the time-frame and sequence of each single step in a logical manner. With the help of clinical algorithms highly complex processes such as the management of the severely injured patient can be translated into a clearly structured, logical pathway. Clinical algorithms represent scientifically recognized treatment rules, indicate a solution for solving problems and help users to organize ideas and recognize connections. They delineate a consistent and valid guideline, while allowing deviations in proven exceptions. The use of algorithms allows a systematic search for errors in the process of quality management. In emergency situations they suggest a structured means of problem solving for the less experienced user. Algorithms are useful instruments in the teaching of medical decision-making.

Algorithms↗

PubMed1997

Indicators of the posttraumatic inflammatory response correlate with organ failure in patients with multiple injuries.

BACKGROUND: Most prognostic indices for severely injured patients are based on anatomical findings and the vital signs. The posttraumatic organ failure, however, is thought to be triggered by the initial inflammatory response. The objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation between the early activation of inflammation and the rate of organ failure and death. METHODS: Sixty-six patients with multiple injuries (Injury Severity Score > 18, age 18-70 years, admission within 6 hours after accident, survival > 48 hours) were included in this prospective study. During a 14-day observation period, serial blood samples were collected starting within 30 minutes after admission. Plasma levels of neutrophil elastase, lactate, antithrombin III, and interleukin-6 and -8 were determined. The clinical course and the degree of organ failure were recorded daily until death or transfer to a general ward. RESULTS: The 66 severely injured patients had a mean Injury Severity Score of 40 points. Eleven patients died from multiple organ failure (group 1), 38 subjects survived a single or multiple organ failure (group 2), and 17 patients had an uneventful recovery (group 3). The initial plasma concentrations for neutrophil elastase (650 vs. 355 ng/mL), lactate (5.0 vs. 3.1 mmol/L), antithrombin III (48 vs. 62% from normal), interleukin-6 (703 vs. 177 pg/mL), and interleukin-8 (1,101 vs. 301 pg/mL) were significantly different between groups 2 and 3 already in the initial posttraumatic period. Patients from group 1 presented with significantly higher levels of these parameters as early as 24 hours after trauma compared with group 2. Different patterns were identified with respect to early versus late posttraumatic organ failure. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that the degree of the initial inflammatory response corresponds with the development of posttraumatic organ failure. Besides anatomically and physiologically based trauma scores, these parameters might be used as indicators for the injury severity.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1997

Value of thoracic computed tomography in the first assessment of severely injured patients with blunt chest trauma: results of a prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate whether early thoracic computed tomography (TCT) is superior to routine chest x-ray (CXR) in the diagnostic work-up of blunt thoracic trauma and whether the additional information influences subsequent therapeutic decisions on the early management of severely injured patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective study of 103 consecutive patients with clinical or radiologic signs of chest trauma (94 multiple injured patients with chest trauma, nine patients with isolated chest trauma), an average Injury Severity Score of 30 and an average Abbreviated Injury Scale thorax score of 3, initial CXR and TCT were compared after initial assessment in our emergency department of a Level I trauma center. RESULTS: In 67 patients (65%) TCT detected major chest trauma complications that have been missed on CXR (lung contusion (n = 33), pneumothorax (n = 27), residual pneumothorax after chest tube placement (n = 7), hemothorax (n = 21), displaced chest tube (n = 5), diaphragmatic rupture (n = 2), myocardial rupture (n = 1)). In 11 patients only minor additional pathologic findings (dystelectasis, small pleural effusion) were visualized on TCT, and in 14 patients CXR and TCT showed the same pathologic results. Eleven patients underwent both CXR and TCT without pathologic fundings. The TCT scan was significantly more effective than routine CXR in detecting lung contusions (p < 0.001), pneumothorax (p < 0.005), and hemothorax (p < 0.05). In 42 patients (41%) the additional TCT findings resulted in a change of therapy: chest tube placement, chest tube correction of pneumothoraces or large hemothoraces (n = 31), change in mode of ventilation and respiratory care (n = 14), influence on the management of fracture stabilization (n = 12), laparotomy in cases of diaphragmatic lacerations (n = 2), bronchoscopy for atelectasis (n = 2), exclusion of aortic rupture (n = 2), endotracheal intubation (n = 1), and pericardiocentesis (n = 1). To evaluate the efficacy of all those therapeutic changes after TCT the rates of respiratory failure, adult respiratory distress syndrome, and mortality in the subgroup of patients with Abbreviated Injury Scale thorax score of > 2 were compared with a historical control group, consisting of 84 patients with multiple trauma and with blunt chest trauma Abbreviated Injury Scale thorax score of > 2, prospectively studied between 1986 and 1992. Age (38 vs. 39 years), average Injury Severity Score (33 vs. 38), and the rate of respiratory failure (36 vs. 56%) were not statistically different between the two groups, but the rates of adult respiratory distress syndrome (8 vs. 20%; p < 0.05) and mortality (10 vs. 21%; p < 0.05) were significantly reduced in the TCT group. CONCLUSIONS: TCT is highly sensitive in detecting thoracic injuries after blunt chest trauma and is superior to routine CXR in visualzing lung contusions, pneumothorax, and hemothorax. Early TCT influences therapeutic management in a significant number of patients. We therefore recommend TCT in the initial diagnostic work-up of patients with multiple injuries and with suspected chest trauma because early and exact diagnosis of all thoracic injuries along with sufficient therapeutic consequences may reduce complications and improve outcome of severely injured patients with blunt chest trauma.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1997

[Can diagnosis and subsequent trauma management of the multiple trauma patient with blunt thoracic trauma be improved by early computerized tomography of the thorax?].

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate, whether early thoracic computed tomography (TCT) is superior to routine chest x-ray (CXR) in the diagnostic work up of blunt thoracic trauma and whether these additional informations influence subsequent therapeutical decisions in the early management of severely injured patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective study of 103 consecutive patients with clinical or radiological signs of chest trauma (94 multiple injured patients with chest trauma, 9 patients with isolated chest trauma) with an average ISS of 30 and an average AIS thorax of 3 initial CXR and TCT were compared after first assessment in our emergency department of a level I trauma center. RESULTS: In 67 patients (65%) TCT detected major complications of chest trauma, that have been missed on CXR [lung contusion (n = 33), pneumothorax (n = 27), residual pneumothorax after chest tube placement (n = 7), hemothorax (n = 21), displaced chest tube (n = 5), diaphragmatic rupture (n = 2), myocardial rupture (n = 1)], in 11 patients only minor additional pathologic findings (dystelectasis, small pleural effusion) were visualized on TCT and in 14 patients CXR and TCT showed the same pathological results. 11 patients had both CXR and TCT without pathological findings. The TCT scan was significantly more effective than routine CXR in detecting lung contusions (p < 0.001), pneumothorax (p < 0.005) and hemothorax (p < 0.05). In 42 patients (41%) the additional TCT findings resulted in a change of therapy: chest tube placement or chest tube correction of pneumothoraces or large hemothoraces (n = 31), change in mode of ventilation and respiratory care (n = 14), influence on the management of fracture stabilization (n = 12), laparotomy in cases of diaphragmatic lacerations (n = 2), bronchoscopy for atelectasis (n = 2), exclusion of aortic rupture (n = 2), endotracheal intubation (n = 1), pericardiocentesis (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: TCT is highly sensitive in detecting thoracic injuries after blunt chest trauma and is superior to routine CXR in visualizing lung contusions, pneumo- and hemothorax. Early TCT influences therapeutic management in a considerable subset of patients. We therefore recommend TCT in the primary diagnostic work up of multiple injured patients with suspected chest trauma, because early and exact diagnosis of all thoracic injuries along with sufficient therapeutic consequences may reduce complications and improve outcome of severely injured patients with blunt chest trauma.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1997

[Evaluation and quality management in multiple trauma care].

In total quality management of polytraumatised patients, it is necessary to use analysis of structure, process and outcome quality to search for problem areas and improvement possibilities. The structure includes the attributes of material and human resources. The process denotes the real treatment course with the demand for treatment guidelines (algorithm) and an exact documentation of treatment. To prove the outcome quality, an internal and external judgement is possible. Our own results show that quality assessment, concerning the process as well as the internal and external quality outcome, brings a significant improvement to the care of polytrauma patients.

Algorithms↗

PubMed1997

[A time and priority-oriented algorithm].

Algorithms represent a graphical display of decision-making by giving clearly defined and formalized guidelines. The systematic order of decisions and consequent actions is guided by medical priority and regulates the time frame and sequence of each single step in a logical manner. With the help of clinical algorithms highly complex processes such as the management of the severely injured patient can be translated into a clearly structured, logical pathway. They delineate a consistent and valid guideline but require aberrations in proven exceptions. The use of algorithms allows a systematic search for errors in the process of quality management. In emergency situations they suggest a structured way of problem-solving to the less experienced user. Algorithms are useful instruments in teaching medical decision-making.

Algorithms↗

PubMed1997

[Shock room management in severe craniocerebral trauma].

Early clinical management of severe head injury should take place in an emergency resuscitation room and be conducted according to the guidelines of the treatment of severely injured patients with attention given to time. The first phase (with a maximum duration of 30 min) comprises physical examination, stabilisation of vital functions and basic technical diagnostics. With pulmonary and circulatory functions stabilized, the second phase begins with a craniol computed tomography examination followed by adequate therapeutic measures, including, if necessary, the CT-controlled implantation of an intracranial pressure catheter.

Brain Edema↗

PubMed1997

[The trauma register of the 'Polytrauma' Committee of the German Society of Trauma Surgery as the basis for quality management in the management of severely injured patients].

The data of 1037 severely injured patients (mean ISS = 20) from 15 clinics were centrally and prospectively collected in the Trauma Registry of the German Society of Trauma Surgery and analyzed anonymously. Significant differences in respect to the treatment criteria (i.e., duration of basic diagnostics in severe trauma) and quality of outcome (TRISS method and Z statistic) were revealed for some clinics. The feedback of their data offers the associated clinics the possibility of identification of treatment phases that are worth being optimized.

Germany↗

PubMed1996

[The injury pattern in polytrauma. Value of information regarding accident process in clinical acute management].

To investigate the correlation between the mechanism of an accident and the resulting injury pattern we reviewed the data of 195 prospectively documented multiply traumatized patients. Information on the accident was based on descriptions given by eye witnesses, police and the emergency medical staff. Only moderate to severe lesions (AIS > or = 3; Abbreviated Injury Scale Version 1990) of each body region were analyzed. The mean injury severity (ISS) for all these patients was 39.5 (18-75); the lethality was 34%. Different types of accidents led to various injury patterns. We found a high incidence of lesions of the head in frontal (F) motor vehicle crashes (MVC) nonbelted (76%), of the chest in lateral (L) MVCs (80%), of the abdomen in F MVCs belted and in LMVCs (60%), of the pelvis after suicidal fall (SF; 69%) and of the lower extremities in motorcycle accidents (90%), SFs (69%) and collisions with a train (67%). Severe lesions of the spine were frequently seen after accidental falls (41%), SFs (30%) and F MVCs belted (25%). There was a very substantial difference in the injury pattern after suicidal jump (26% head, 69% pelvis, 65% lower extremity lesions). and accidental fall (54% head, 19% pelvis, 23% lower extremity lesions). As a result of the correlation with specific injury patterns, the preceding mechanism of accident should be exactly documented and considered by the physician during the early phase of resuscitation.

Abbreviated Injury Scale↗

PubMed1996

Posttraumatic inflammatory response, secondary operations, and late multiple organ failure.

The objective of this study was to determine the role of surgical procedures as secondary inflammatory insults in the development of late multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in patients with multiple trauma and to evaluate both specific and nonspecific indicators of the inflammatory response in their ability to indicate the risk of severely injured patients to develop organ failure after secondary operations. In a prospective study of 106 severely injured patients (ISS 40.6) who underwent secondary operations (> 3 days after trauma), we compared the level of preoperative inflammation with the sequelae of surgical trauma. The interventions included facial reconstructions; osteosynthesis of the pelvic girdle, long bones, and spine; and others. Group 1 consisted of 40 patients (38%) who developed respiratory, renal, or hepatic failure, or combinations thereof, within 2 days after the operation or whose preexisting organ dysfunction worsened by more than 20% from baseline. The remaining 66 patients (62%) with an uneventful recovery formed group 2. The preoperative levels of neutrophil elastase (92.2 vs. 61.3 ng/dL), C-reactive protein (12.4 vs. 7.6 mg/dL), and platelet count (118,000 vs. 236,000/microL) were significantly more abnormal in the patients of group 1. PO2/FiO2 ratio was also somewhat lower in group 1 patients (305.5 vs. 351), whereas other parameters (e.g., blood pressure, heart rate, bilirubin, creatinine, urinary output, lactate, pH, and coagulation) did not allow preoperative differentiation between groups 1 and 2. An increased state of inflammation (neutrophil elastase > 85 ng/mL, C-reactive protein > 11 mg/dL, platelet count < 180,000/microL) predicted postoperative organ failure with an accuracy of 79% (sensitivity, 73%; specificity, 83%). We conclude that secondary operations may act as a second insult and may precipitate late multiple organ dysfunction syndrome if they are performed in patients with multiple trauma while they still have an increased level of posttraumatic inflammation. However, future investigations have to show whether postponing surgery until inflammation has subsided or the use of less invasive surgical techniques will decrease the rate of postoperative organ failure in the trauma patient.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

[Intramedullary nailing in multiple trauma].

The indication and best time for intramedullary nailing of long bones in the multiple trauma patient is still controversial. While in the Anglo-American literature primary intramedullary nailing is regarded as the method of choice, differentiated management is preferred in German-speaking countries on account of reports about the pathogenesis of trauma shock. On the one hand, it has been shown that severe thoracic injury greatly influences the course after multiple trauma and, in particular, its combination with femoral fracture represents an increased risk. On the other hand, every surgical intervention represents an additional trauma for the patient. Intramedullary reamed nailing of femur fractures represents considerable trauma, whereas unreamed intramedullary nailing of the femur or intramedullary stabilization of the tibia or humerus causes (in descending order) fewer changes. For early respiratory care (e.g., changing between the prone and supine position), however, primary stabilization of long bones is required. External fixation of the femur appears to be the method of choice for the severely injured patient. Definite fracture healing can be achieved by a change to intramedullary nailing in a secondary operation.

Bone Plates↗

PubMed1996

[Preclinical diagnosis and management in severe craniocerebral trauma].

Both prehospital and hospital management of patients with severe head injury has clearly improved in the last decades. There is a greater knowledge of how secondary brain injury is caused and how it can be prevented. Intracranial mechanisms (e.g. haematoma and elevated intracranial pressure and systemic mechanism (e.g. shock and hypoxaemia) are two of the major causes of secondary brain injury. Adequate prehospital evaluation and treatment determine the later outcome for the patient. The Glasgow Coma Scale has become the standard score for assessing the level of consciousness. Early prehospital treatment must prevent secondary brain damage through adequate oxygenation (intubation, ventilation) and a sufficient cerebral perfusion pressure (treatment of shock). The neck of the patient should be positioned straight and the upper part of the body should be elevated to about 30 degrees. The prophylactic use of steroids, mannitol or high dose barbiturates is not indicated. Aggressive hyperventilation (pCO2 < 30 mmHg), especially during the first few days after severe brain injury, should be avoided.

Brain Damage, Chronic↗