Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C W Boone

Publications and source records attributed to C W Boone.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors as potential cancer chemopreventives.

Among the most important targets for chemopreventive intervention and drug development are deregulated signal transduction pathways, and protein tyrosine kinases are key components of these pathways. Loss of tyrosine kinase regulatory mechanisms has been implicated in neoplastic growth; indeed, many oncogenes code for either receptor or cellular tyrosine kinases. Because of its deregulation in many cancers (bladder, breast, cervix, colon, esophagus, head and neck, lung, and prostate), the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been selected as a potential target for chemoprevention. Because growth factor networks are redundant, selective inhibition of signaling pathways activated in precancerous and cancerous cells should be possible. Requirements for specific EGFR inhibitors include specificity for EGFR, high potency, activity in intact cells, and activity in vivo. Inhibition of autophosphorylation is preferred, because it should result in total blockade of the signaling pathway. Inhibitors that compete with substrate rather than at the ATP-binding site are also preferable, because they are not as likely to inhibit other ATP-using cellular enzymes. Several classes of specific EGFR inhibitors have been synthesized recently, including structures such as benzylidene malononitriles, dianilinophthalimides, quinazolines, pyrimidines, [(alkylamino)methyl]-acrylophenones, enollactones, dihydroxybenzylaminosalicylates, 2-thioindoles, aminoflavones, and tyrosine analogue-containing peptides. A possible testing strategy for the development of these and other EGFR inhibitors as chemopreventive agents includes the following steps: (a) determine EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitory activity in vitro; (b) evaluate EGFR specificity and selectivity (relative to other tyrosine kinases and other protein kinases); (c) determine inhibition of EGFR-mediated effects in intact cells; (d) determine inhibition of EGFR-mediated effects in vivo (e.g., in nude mouse tumor xenografts); and (e) determine chemopreventive efficacy in vivo (e.g., in the hamster buccal pouch or mouse or rat bladder).

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Strategies for identification and clinical evaluation of promising chemopreventive agents.

Strategies for chemopreventative drug development are based on the use of well-characterized agents, intermediate biomarkers correlating to cancer incidence, and suitable cohorts for efficacy studies. Since chemoprevention is applied over the long-term, chemopreventive drugs must have low toxicity. Strategies for enhancing chemopreventive drug efficacy and minimizing toxicity include combinations of drugs with complementary mechanisms and/or synergistic activity; coadministration of drugs to counter the toxicity of the chemopreventive agents; and pursuit of related compounds that retain efficacy with reduced side effects. Because of its slow development, cancer is not a feasible end point for clinical evaluation of chemoprevention, and so intermediate biomarkers that can serve as surrogate end points are crucial. Particularly important biomarkers are the morphometric and cytometric changes defining intraepithelial neoplasia (IEN). Cohorts for chemoprevention trials should have high incidences of the cancer or intermediate biomarker(s) under study within the trial duration.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Mechanistic considerations in the evaluation of chemopreventive data.

Possible chemopreventive mechanisms include carcinogen-blocking activities, antioxidant/anti-inflammatory activities and antiproliferation/antiprogression activities. Carcinogen-blocking activities encompass inhibition of carcinogen uptake, inhibition of carcinogen formation or activation, deactivation or detoxification of carcinogens, prevention of carcinogen binding to DNA, and enhancement of the level or fidelity of DNA repair. Antioxidant/anti-inflammatory activities include scavenging of reactive electrophiles and oxygen radicals, and inhibition of arachidonic acid metabolism. Antiproliferation/antiprogression activities comprise modulation of signal transduction, modulation of hormonal and growth factor activity, inhibition of aberrant oncogene activity, inhibition of polyamine metabolism, induction of terminal differentiation, restoration of immune responses, enhancement of intercellular communication, restoration of tumour suppressor function, induction of apoptosis, telomerase inhibition, correction of DNA methylation imbalances, inhibition of angiogenesis, inhibition of basement membrane degradation, and activation of antimetastasis genes. In evaluating the potential efficacy of chemopreventive agents several mechanistic parameters are weighed: (1) the number of chemoprevention-related pharmacological activities, (2) the impact of the agent on likely carcinogenesis pathways to the targeted cancer, (3) pharmacodynamics, and (4) specificity for chemopreventive activity compared with interference with normal cellular function. Mechanistic data are important throughout the development process for chemopreventive drugs, and they are particularly important in the earlier phases of identifying promising candidate agents and characterizing efficacy. In vitro mechanistic assays are a first step in evaluating chemopreventive potential. Mechanistic considerations are also useful in defining animal efficacy models and in interpreting the results of assays in these models. Mechanistic data are also applied in designing short-term Phase II clinical chemoprevention trials that use reductions in intermediate biomarkers of cancer rather than cancer incidence as end points. The basis for identifying and evaluating these biomarkers is in understanding carcinogenesis and chemopreventive mechanisms.

Anticarcinogenic Agents↗
PubMed1996

Risk biomarkers and current strategies for cancer chemoprevention.

Quantifiable, well-characterized cancer risk factors demonstrate the need for chemoprevention and define cohorts for chemopreventive intervention. For chemoprevention, the important cancer risk factors are those that can be measured quantitatively in the subject at risk. These factors, called risk biomarkers, can be used to identify cohorts for chemoprevention. Those modulated by chemopreventive agents may also be used as endpoints in chemoprevention studies. Generally, the risk biomarkers fit into categories based on those previously defined by Hulka: 1) carcinogen exposure, 2) carcinogen exposure/effect, 3) genetic predisposition, 4) intermediate biomarkers of cancer, and 5) previous cancers. Besides their use in characterizing cohorts for chemoprevention trials, some risk biomarkers can be modulated by chemopreventive agents. These biomarkers may be suitable surrogate endpoints for cancer incidence in chemoprevention intervention trials. The criteria for risk biomarkers defining cohorts and serving as endpoints are the same, except that those defining cohorts are not necessarily modulated by chemopreventive agents. A primary criterion is that the biomarkers fit expected biological mechanisms of early carcinogenesis-i.e., differential expression in normal and high-risk tissue, on or closely linked to the causal pathway for the cancer, and short latency compared with cancer. They must occur in sufficient number to allow their biological and statistical evaluation. Further, the biomarkers should be assayed reliably and quantitatively, measured easily, and correlated to cancer incidence. Particularly important for cancer risk screening in normal subjects is the ability to use noninvasive techniques that are highly specific, sensitive, and quantitative. Since carcinogenesis is a multipath process, single biomarkers are difficult to correlate to cancer, as they may appear on only one or a few of the many possible causal pathways. As shown in colorectal carcinogenesis, the risks associated with the presence of biomarkers may be additive or synergistic. That is, the accumulation of genetic lesions is the more important determinant of colorectal cancer compared with the presence of any single lesion. Thus, batteries of biomarker abnormalities, particularly those representing the range of carcinogenesis pathways, may prove more useful than single biomarkers both in characterizing cohorts at risk and defining modulatable risks. Risk biomarkers are already being integrated into many chemoprevention intervention trials. One example is the phase II trial of oltipraz inhibition of carcinogen-DNA adducts in a Chinese population exposed to aflatoxin B1. Also, urine samples from subjects in this trial will be screened for the effect of oltipraz on urinary mutagens. A second example is a chemoprevention protocol developed for patients at high risk for breast cancer; the cohort is defined both by hereditary risk and the presence of biomarker abnormalities. Modulation of the biomarker abnormalities is a proposed endpoint. Also, dysplastic lesions, such as prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, oral leukoplakia and colorectal adenomas, have been used to define high-risk cohorts and as potential modulatable surrogate endpoints in chemoprevention trials.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Detection of genomic alterations in human cervical cancer by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis.

Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis was used to comprehensively scan the whole genome of 6 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) lesions, 7 cervical squamous cell carcinomas, 1 cervical adenosquamous cell carcinoma, and 2 cervical adenocarcinomas for multiple genetic alterations, such as DNA amplification, chromosome deletion, loss of heterozygosity, and chromosome translocation, as compared with the paired normal tissues. DNA spot analysis of the genomic 2-dimensional gels was performed by a computer color overlay system and by spot recognition software allowing for objective spot comparison and quantitation. Nine spots were found to be amplified in the cervical carcinomas while two amplified spots were detected in the CIN III lesions. Fourteen DNA spots were either reduced in their intensity or absent in cervical carcinomas as compared to their normal paired tissues. Reduction of intensity in 6 spots was observed in the 5 CIN III lesions. These genetic alterations may represent changes in cancer genes that are associated with human cervical carcinogenesis. Further characterization of these alterations may be significant to the understanding of cervical tumorigenesis and to the development of biomarkers for clinical trials in cancer chemoprevention.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1996

DNA quantification in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia thick tissue sections by confocal laser scanning microscopy.

Image analysis of tissue biopsies for determination of DNA content as an early marker of neoplasia is hampered by the complexity of corrections necessary to dea with nuclear truncation and overlap in thin sections. The use of confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) for measurement of cellular DNA content on whole cells within thick tissue sections offers the advantage of preservation of cellular architecture, capacity for 3-dimensional analysis, and absence of sectioning artifacts. We have applied this technique to pararosaniline-Feulgen stained human cervical tissues graded from normal to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) III. For the purpose of comparison, 15 microns sections were stained and mapped so that the same cell population could be analyzed by both integrated optical density and fluorescence intensity. Distribution of DNA content from normal cervical epithelial cells 2-3 layers out from the basal cell layer measured by both methodologies showed a stable G0/G1 population with no observable S-phase or G2 cells. Cells measured from areas of increasing CIN grade showed progressively higher DNA content values that were not observable in normal tissue. Although these data are preliminary they suggest that CLSM can be used to identify aneuploid states within defined structural areas of pre-invasive neoplasia.

Coloring Agents↗
PubMed1995

Strategies for phase II cancer chemoprevention trials: cervix, endometrium, and ovary.

Well-designed and conducted Phase II clinical trials are very important to cancer chemoprevention drug development. Three critical aspects govern the design and conduct of these trials--well-characterized agents, suitable cohorts, and reliable biomarkers for measuring efficacy that can serve as surrogate endpoints for cancer incidence. Requirements for the agent are experimental or epidemiological data showing chemopreventive efficacy, safety on chronic administration, and a mechanistic rationale for the chemopreventive activity observed. Agents that meet these criteria for chemoprevention of cervical cancer include antiproliferative drugs (e.g., 2-difluoromethylornithine), retinoids, folic acid, antioxidant vitamins and other agents that prevent cellular oxidative damage. Because of the significant cervical cancer risk associated with human papilloma virus (HPV) infection, agents that interfere with the activity of HPV products may also prove to be effective chemopreventives. In endometrium, unopposed estrogen exposure has been associated with cancer incidence. Thus, pure antiestrogens and progestins may be chemopreventive in this tissue. Ovarian cancer risk is correlated to ovulation frequency; therefore, oral contraceptives are potentially chemopreventive in the ovary. Recent clinical observations also suggest that retinoids, particularly all-trans-N-4-hydroxyphenylretinamide, may be chemopreventive in this tissue. The cohort should be suitable for measuring the chemopreventive activity of the agent and the intermediate biomarkers chosen. In the cervix, patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and in endometrium, patients with atypical hyperplasia, fit these criteria. Defining a cohort for a Phase II trial in the ovary is more difficult. This tissue is less accessible for biopsy; consequently, the presence of precancerous lesions is more difficult to confirm. The criteria for biomarkers are that they fit expected biological mechanisms (i.e., differential expression in normal and high-risk tissue, on or closely linked to the causal pathway for the cancer, modulated by chemopreventive agents, and short latency compared with cancer), may be assayed reliably and quantitatively, measured easily, and correlate to decrease cancer incidence. They must occur in sufficient incidence to allow their biological and statistical evaluation relevant to cancer. Since carcinogenesis is a multipath process, single biomarkers are difficult to validate as surrogate endpoints, perhaps appearing on only one or a few of the many possible causal pathways. Panels of biomarkers, particularly those representing the range of carcinogenesis pathways, may prove more useful as surrogate endpoints. It is important to avoid solely on biomarkers that do not describe cancer but represent isolated events that may or may not be on the causal pathway or otherwise associated with carcinogenesis. These include markers of normal cellular processes that may be increased or expressed during carcinogenesis. Chemoprevention trials should be designed to evaluate fully the two or three biomarkers that appear to be the best models of the cancer. Additional biomarkers should be considered only if they can be analyzed efficiently and the sample size allows more important biomarkers to be evaluated completely. Two types of biomarkers that stand out regarding their high correlation to cancer and their ability to be quantified are measures of intraepithelial neoplasia and indicators of cellular proliferation. Measurements made by computer-assisted image analysis that are potentially useful as surrogate endpoint biomarkers include nuclear polymorphism comprising nuclear size, shape (roundness), and texture (DNA distribution patterns); nucleolar size and number of nucleoli/nuclei; DNA ploidy, and proliferation biomarkers such as S-phase fraction and PCNA...

Anticarcinogenic Agents↗
PubMed1994

Progress in cancer chemoprevention: perspectives on agent selection and short-term clinical intervention trials.

The basic cancer-related chemical and biological sciences, pathology, and epidemiology have contributed to the understanding that antimutagenesis and antiproliferation are the important general mechanisms of chemoprevention and to the development of antimutagenic and anti-proliferative agents as potential chemopreventive drugs. These disciplines have also provided the biochemical and histopathological bases for identifying intermediate biomarkers that can be used as surrogate end points for cancer incidence in clinical chemoprevention trials and for selecting cohorts for these trials. Particularly important as histological biomarkers of cancer are the cytonuclear morphological and densitometric changes that define intraepithelial neoplasia (IEN). IEN changes are on the causal pathway to cancer. They may serve as target lesions in Phase II chemoprevention trials and as standards against which other earlier cellular and molecular biomarkers can be evaluated. Strategies for the clinical evaluation of chemopreventive agents have been defined for seven targets--colorectal, prostate, lung, breast, bladder, oral, and cervical cancers. Cohorts have been identified for short-term Phase II trials that investigate the effects of chemopreventive agents on IEN and on earlier biomarkers. Patients with adenomas serve as a cohort for trials in colon. One cohort for Phase II trials in prostate is patients with early stage cancers scheduled for prostatectomy; another is patients with prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (without prostatic carcinoma). Patients treated for lung cancer are at high risk for bronchial dysplasia and second cancers; such patients are a cohort for Phase II trials in lung cancer. Presurgical breast cancer patients and patients with ductal or lobular carcinoma in situ are cohorts for studies in breast. Patients with superficial bladder cancers (Ta/T1 with or without carcinoma in situ) are cohorts for studies of chemoprevention in bladder, and patients with dysplastic oral leukoplakia are evaluated for chemoprevention of oral cancers. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia is a prototype IEN, and patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia are a cohort for studies of cervical cancer.

Adenoma↗
PubMed1994

Mechanistic considerations in chemopreventive drug development.

This overview of the potential mechanisms of chemopreventive activity will provide the conceptual groundwork for chemopreventive drug discovery, leading to structure-activity and mechanistic studies that identify and evaluate new agents. Possible mechanisms of chemopreventive activity with examples of promising agents include carcinogen blocking activities such as inhibition of carcinogen uptake (calcium), inhibition of formation or activation of carcinogen (arylalkyl isothiocyanates, DHEA, NSAIDs, polyphenols), deactivation or detoxification of carcinogen (oltipraz, other GSH-enhancing agents), preventing carcinogen binding to DNA (oltipraz, polyphenols), and enhancing the level or fidelity of DNA repair (NAC, protease inhibitors). Chemopreventive antioxidant activities include scavenging reactive electrophiles (GSH-enhancing agents), scavenging oxygen radicals (polyphenols, vitamin E), and inhibiting arachidonic acid metabolism (glycyrrhetinic acid, NAC, NSAIDs, polyphenols, tamoxifen). Antiproliferation/antiprogression activities include modulation of signal transduction (glycyrrhetinic acid, NSAIDs, polyphenols, retinoids, tamoxifen), modulation of hormonal and growth factor activity (NSAIDs, retinoids, tamoxifen), inhibition of aberrant oncogene activity (genistein, NSAIDs, monoterpenes), inhibition of polyamine metabolism (DFMO, retinoids, tamoxifen), induction of terminal differentiation (calcium, retinoids, vitamin D3), restoration of immune response (NSAIDs, selenium, vitamin E), enhancing intercellular communication (carotenoids, retinoids), restoration of tumor suppressor function, induction of programmed cell death (apoptosis) (butyric acid, genistein, retinoids, tamoxifen), correction of DNA methylation imbalances (folic acid), inhibition of angiogenesis (genistein, retinoids, tamoxifen), inhibition of basement membrane degradation (protease inhibitors), and activation of antimetastasis genes. A systematic drug development program for chemopreventive agents is only possible with continuing research into mechanisms of action and thoughtful application of the mechanisms to new drug design and discovery. One approach is to construct pharmacological activity profiles for promising agents. These profiles are compared among the promising agents and with untested compounds to identify similarities. Classical structure-activity studies are used to find optimal agents (high efficacy with low toxicity) based on good lead agents. Studies evaluating tissue-specific and pharmacokinetic parameters are very important. A final approach is design of mechanism-based assays and identification of mechanism-based intermediate biomarkers for evaluation of chemopreventive efficacy.

Animals↗
PubMed1994

Strategy and planning for chemopreventive drug development: clinical development plans. Chemoprevention Branch and Agent Development Committee. National Cancer Institute.

At the National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, the Chemoprevention Branch and Agent Development Committee develop strategies for efficiently identifying, procuring, and advancing the most promising drugs into clinical trials. Scientific expertise is applied at each phase of development to critically review the testing methods and results, and to establish and apply criteria for evaluating the agents for further development. The Clinical Development Plan, prepared by the Chemoprevention Branch and the Agent Development Committee, is a summary of the status of the agent regarding evidence for safety and chemopreventive efficacy in preclinical and clinical studies. It also contains the strategy for further development of the drug that addresses pharmacodynamics, drug effect measurements, intermediate biomarkers for monitoring efficacy, toxicity, supply and formulation, regulatory approval, and proposed clinical trials. Sixteen Clinical Development Plans are presented here: N-acetyl-l-cysteine (NAC), aspirin, calcium, beta-carotene, 2-difluoromethylornithine (DFMO), DHEA analog 8354, 18 beta-glycyrrhetinic acid, N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide (4-HPR), ibuprofen, oltipraz, piroxicam, Proscar, sulindac, tamoxifen, vitamin D3 and analogs, and vitamin E. The objective of publishing these plans is to stimulate interest and thinking among the scientific community on the prospects for developing chemopreventive drugs.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed1994

Chronic toxicity studies of the potential cancer preventive 2-(difluoromethyl)-dl-ornithine.

The synthetic compound 2-(difluoromethyl)-dl-ornithine irreversibly inhibits ornithine decarboxylase and reduces the intracellular levels of the polyamine cell cycle factors putrescine and spermidine. The drug has shown chemopreventive efficacy in numerous laboratory epithelial cancer models and is a prototype for antiproliferative agents. Chronic toxicity studies in rats and dogs were performed to characterize the toxicities of the compound at high dosages and to support its further development in clinical trials as a potential chemopreventive agent. Chronic administration (52 weeks) by gavage to Charles River CD rats at dosages of 400, 800, and 1600 mg/kg produced weight loss, increased platelets, alopecia and skin abrasions, dermatitis, liver necrosis, and gastric inflammation. The no-effect dose in this study was considered 400 mg/kg. Chronic administration by capsule to dogs at dosages of 50, 100, and 200 mg/kg produced conjunctivitis, hyperkeratosis and alopecia, and cystic intestinal crypts. A no-effect dose was not determined in this study. The toxicities demonstrated in these studies may be minimized at lower dosages and support the further development of this compound in chemopreventive clinical investigations.

Animals↗