Not-for-profit hospitals will seek to retain exemption for unrelated business income.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to C Tokarski.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Unconvinced that science could police itself against research misconduct, the federal government in 1989 created an Office of Scientific Integrity (OSI) within the National Institutes of Health. Since then, OSI has launched high-profile investigations into big-name scientists using a method that researchers say violates their due process of law and destroys reputations. Changes are in the offing, but are they enough to protect the integrity of government-funded research and scientists' right to due process?
The November 5 special election in Pennsylvania pitting appointed Senator Harris Wofford against former U.S. Attorney General Richard Thornburgh was a turning point in the national debate over health reform. Under the glare of media spotlights, Wofford mounted a come-from-behind victory over the heavily favored Thornburgh by trumpeting "national health insurance." Since Wofford's victory, President Bush has rethought his previous indifference to health reform and promised to announce a comprehensive plan in January, more than a year ahead of schedule.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Democratic presidential candidate Bill Clinton has put comprehensive reform of the U.S. health system near the top of his agenda, vowing to put a plan before Congress within the first 100 days of his administration. And, working with a Democrat-controlled Congress weary of health policy gridlock, Clinton might have the leeway he needs to push major reform ahead. But the candidate's track record in Arkansas suggests the five-term governor is more comfortable forging consensus instead of leaping into the unknown.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.