Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Tickle

Publications and source records attributed to C Tickle.

120 records · Page 7Linked to original sources

Survival of cells implanted in the embryonic chick limb bud: a difference between normal and malignant rat brain cells.

Cells from normal rat brain tissue did not survive and few cells could be found 1 d after grafting. In contrast, cells from a glioma and a carcinogen-treated rat brain survived well and many mitoses were observed. These malignant cells also invaded the limb. The behaviour of normal and malignant cells was followed at shorter times after grafting and some invasion by the normal cells was detected. The first signs of degeneration of normal cells were apparent around 7 h after grafting, and after this the grafts progressively deteriorated. These results support the ideal that the ability of cells to survive and grow in embryonic tissues is a characteristic of malignant cells. The findings are discussed in relation to mechanisms of tumour formation.

Animals↗

Infiltration and survival: the behaviour of normal, invasive cells implanted to the developing chick wing.

The invasiveness of mouse lymphocytes and thymocytes, rabbit peritoneal neutrophil granulocytes (PMNs), mouse peritoneal macrophages (both activated and non-activated) and pig endothelial cells was assayed by implanting these cells to the chick wing bud. Cells of each type moved into the wing mesenchyme, although activated macrophages invaded poorly. PMNs were the most invasive cells and had moved well into the limb after only a few hours. PMNs, lymphocytes and thymocytes were ingested by wing mesenchyme cells. Endothelial cells, however, ingested chick blood cells. The implanted cells showed differences in ability to survive in the limb: PMNs disappeared rapidly, lymphocytes and thymocytes sometimes persisted for 24 h, while grafts of macrophages and endothelial cells were present at 24 h. Mechanisms which might be involved in the invasiveness of these cells, and also in their different abilities to survive in the chick wing, are discussed with particular reference to the production of plasminogen activator.

Animals↗

The effect of cell killing by x-irradiation on pattern formation in the chick limb.

It has been suggested that positional information along the proximo-distal axis of the limb-bud is specified by time spent in the progress zone. Mesenchyme cells have been killed by X-irradiation, reducing the rate cells leave the zone. The time spent there by some cells is thus increased. When limbs, stage 18/19, stage 21, or tips of stage 24, are treated with increasing doses of X-irradiation, from 1000 rads to 2500 rads proximal structures are progressively lost, whereas distal ones--the digits--are relatively unaffected. There was no evidence for intercalation of missing parts. These effects are due to killing or damage of mesenchyme cells: the ectoderm is not affected at these doses. The results are consistent with a quantitative analysis based on the progress zone model, in which viable cells repopulate the progress zone and gradually restore it to normal as non-dividing cells are diluted out. It is suggested that any treatment causing damage to the mesenchyme at early stages will give similar results. The mesenchyme cells appear to be surprisingly resistant to radiation damage. The form of the limb-bud is not altered by damaging the mesenchyme. Differences in the development of structures at similar proximo-distal levels, following irradiation, is considered in terms of the requirement of a threshold number of cells.

Abnormalities, Radiation-Induced↗

Cell movement and the mechanism of invasiveness: a survey of the behaviour of some normal and malignant cells implanted into the developing chick wing bud.

A survey of the behaviour of a variety of normal and malignant tumours and cells has been carried out to gain insights into the mechanisms of tumour invasiveness. The tumours and cells were implanted into the developing chick wing bud, which is a loose mesenchyme bounded by ectoderm. The distribution of the grafted cells was examined histologically after one or two days. The special feature of this assay is that the behaviour of cells is tested in a 3-dimensional tissue. Cells from 3 different carcinomas, mouse lung tumour, rat bladder tumour and human breast tumour did not invade the mesenchyme, whereas trophoblast, sarcoma 180, cultured hamster fibroblasts (BHK, PyBHK, Nil 8, HSV Nil 8) and neuroblastoma cells did. Cells from embryonic pigmented retina and heart ventricle were non-invasive. These results suggest that cell movement may not be a common feature of all invasive tumours. The cells that did move into the mesenchyme appeared to do so by various mechanisms. Lack of contact inhibition of movement, although probably involved in the invasiveness of sarcoma 180 cells, does not appear to be necessary for invasion: cells that have been shown to exhibit contact inhibition of movement (BHK and PyBHK) also invade. Both normal and transformed cells (BHK and PyBHK; Nil 8 and HSV Nil 8) moved into the mesenchyme. Other invading cells, such as trophoblast, neuroblastoma and to a small extent, HSV Nil 8 cells, destroy the adjacent host tissue and this may be important in the invasiveness of these cells. The patterns of invasion and interactions with the host tissue were varied. Trophoblast and the fibroblasts were often elongated along the basement membrane at the ectoderm/mesenchyme border and also closely apposed to the endothelial linings of blood vessels. Sarcoma 180 and neuroblastoma cells clustered around nerves. The embryonic tissues and neuroblastoma cells were often associated with blood vessels. These results are discussed in relation to tumour invasion. A striking finding was that the carcinoma cells were frequently found positioned within the wing ectoderm on the basement membrane. This affinity of carcinoma cells for the epithelium rather than the mesenchyme leads to a reappraisal of the mechanisms involved in the invasiveness of carcinomas.

Animals↗

Mechanisms of invasiveness of epithelial tumours: ultrastructure of the interactions of carcinoma cells with embryonic mesenchyme and epithelium.

Three different kinds of carcinoma cell, human breast tumours, mouse lung tumour and rat bladder tumours have been implanted into the developing chick wing to assay their invasive behaviour. We found that the majority of the carcinoma cells did not invade the mesenchyme but were positioned in the ectoderm. We examined the ultrasturcture of the interaction of the carcinoma cells with both the ectoderm and the mesenchyme to see if there are any differences. We found no specialized adhesive junctions between carcinoma cells and mesenchyme cells. In contrast, the carcinoma cells seem to be adhesive to the ectoderm cells; desmosomes between the two have been found and also frequent parallel alignment of membranes over long distances. This difference between the interaction of the carcinoma cells with the mesenchyme and the ectoderm may explain why the carcinoma cells can penetrate into the ectoderm but rarely do so into the mesenchyme. The carcinoma cells formed a smooth border with the mesenchyme even in the absence of a basal lamina. These results are discussed in relation to the mechanisms of invasion of epithelial tumours in vivo. In particular, the relative importance of the basal lamina, and cell adhesion within the tumour, in limiting invasiveness are assessed.

Animals↗

Cell contacts and sorting out in vivo: the behaviour of some embryonic tissues implanted into the developing chick wing.

The interaction of cells from embryonic liver, neural retina and mesonephros with cells from limb-bud mesenchyme has been investigated in vivo by grafting these tissues into the developing chick wing-bud. The implanted cells were in all cases from quail tissue which can be recognized histologically. As embryonic liver and neural tube are tissues that sort externally to limb-bud mesenchyme in mixed aggregates, it would be expected, from a differential adhesiveness hypothesis, that heterotypic adhesions along the borders of graft and host would be favoured over cell-cell adhesions in the graft. No morphological signs of this were evident: rather the grafted cells maximized like-like contacts. The cells of the grafts, including those from control mesenchyme, did not invade into the wing. The results were the same irrespective of whether the graft was a fragment of tissue or a pellet of reaggregated cells. This supports the idea that cells within tissues are not actively moving around and also provides controls for assaying the invasiveness of other cell types, such as malignant cells into the wing.

Animals↗

Some clues as to the formation of protrusions by Fundulus deep cells.

One of the ways in which Fundulus deep cells move in vivo is by putting out long, fingerlike protrusions. This involves a change in the shape of the cell as a whole, with cytoplasmic flow, and is not just a local phenomenon. Moreover, particles on the cell surface move toward a protrusion as it is forming, suggesting surface flow. The role of surface flow is discussed both on a grown level and in respect to molecular fluidity. Long, stable protrusions can be pulled from cells by the application of negative pressure at a constant rate and these behave in a similar way to those formed during cell locomotion. Such long protrusions must be structured. The importance of contractile properties of the cytoplasm in the formation of protrusions was studied by treating cells with media that modify cellular contractility.

Animals↗

Positional signalling and specification of digits in chick limb morphogenesis.

The interpretation of positional information can provide the basis for pattern formation in limb morphogenesis. The gradient in positional information along the antero-posterior axis, which is specified with respect to a localised boundary region, can be modified by grafting this region to successive positions along the axis. The pattern of digits obtained is consistent with a model based on diffusion of a labile morphogen and is thus similar to models proposed for the development of pattern in invertebrates.

Animals↗

Limb regeneration.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Animals↗