Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C T Scialfa

Publications and source records attributed to C T Scialfa.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Visual search for traffic signs: the effects of clutter, luminance, and aging.

Latency and eye movement measures were used to examine the effects of aging, clutter, and luminance on visual search for traffic signs embedded in digitized images of driving scenes. Initially 14 older and 14 younger observers classified daytime and nighttime traffic scenes as containing low or high amounts of clutter. Next, an independent sample of 14 younger and 14 older participants searched for traffic signs contained within these scenes. Errors were more common among the elderly. Search efficiency declined with increased clutter and with aging. However, relative to the young, older adults did not suffer disproportionately as a result of increased clutter. The methods developed might be profitably employed to assess sign conspicuity and sign acquisition during driving.

Accidents, Traffic↗
PubMed2000

Aging and the development of automaticity in conjunction search.

In two experiments, younger and older observers carried out feature searches for targets defined by their luminance contrast and orientation. Additionally, they received consistent-mapping (CM) training in luminance contrast by orientation conjunction search, followed by a brief exposure to conjunction search under reversal conditions. In Experiment 1, display size effects on reaction time suggested that both younger and older observers were conducting a parallel search in all conditions and showed equivalent disruption at reversal. Experiment 2 was a substantive replication of the first using more difficult conjunction search displays. In addition to latency, we measured the number, duration, and feature-based selectivity of fixations made during conjunction search. Display size effects were larger than in Experiment 2 and were of equivalent magnitude in younger and older people. There were no age differences in improvement in conjunction search and minimal age differences in disruption following reversal. Both age groups demonstrated early in training that they could select items possessing target features (i.e., the color white), and both age groups demonstrated that they could not completely reverse this selectivity when these features no longer defined the target. These experiments have several implications for models of visual attention and age differences therein.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Age differences in saccadic averaging.

Younger and older adults were asked to saccade to an orientation-defined target that was presented alone, with a more central distractor, or with a more peripheral distractor. Both age groups exhibited saccadic averaging that was more pronounced in the central distractor condition, wherein older adults had the larger effect. These results are relevant to questions of oculomotor control and also have implications for the study of age differences in other visually guided behaviors.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Response times and eye movements in feature and conjunction search as a function of target eccentricity.

In four experiments, saccadic eye movements, reaction times (RTs), and accuracy were measured as observers searched for feature or conjunction targets presented at several eccentricities. A conjunction search deficit, evidenced by a large eccentricity effect on RTs, accuracy, and number of saccades, was seen in Experiments 1A and 1B. Experiment 2 indicated that, when saccades were precluded, there was an even larger eccentricity effect for conjunction search targets. In Experiment 3, practice in a conjunction search task allowed both RT and number of saccades to become independent of eccentricity. Additionally, there was evidence of feature-based selectivity in that observers were more likely to fixate distractors that had the same contrast as the target. Results are consistent with the view that the oculomotor and attentional systems are functionally linked and provide constraints for models of visual attention and search.

Attention↗
PubMed1995

Texture segmentation as a function of eccentricity, spatial frequency and target size.

Two experiments examined the role of fundamental spatial frequency, target area and retinal eccentricity in texture segmentation. In Experiment 1, a backward-masked target comprising lines oriented orthogonally to the surround was briefly presented at the fovea, and at eccentricities ranging from 2.55 to 7.63 deg. Reaction time and accuracy were better when targets were presented at non-foveal locations. In Experiment 2, eccentricity effects were examined when both spatial frequency and target area were varied. Accuracy was highest and RT fastest at near-peripheral, not foveal locations. The eccentricity corresponding to optimal performance was related inversely to spatial frequency. Results suggest that the near periphery is more adept than the fovea at the early processing which underlies rapid texture segmentation.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Preferential processing of target features in texture segmentation.

In five experiments, observers were required to detect a texture target and/or identify the orientation of elements composing target and nontarget regions. They were significantly worse at discerning the orientation of nontarget regions than at detecting target presence (Experiment 1). On the other hand, accuracy of identifying target orientation was found to be near 100% (Experiment 2). When observers were required only to identify surround orientation (Experiment 3), accuracy was diminished on target-present trials relative to that on target-absent trials. The superiority of target processing and the interference produced by target presence on surround processing were demonstrated in unpracticed observers (Experiment 4). In Experiment 5, it was found that information regarding target presence is available before information regarding feature values of the target. These findings are consistent with a model of visual attention and search that incorporates a fast generalized difference operator and a slower feature comparison process.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Age differences in same-different judgments as a function of multidimensional similarity.

Age deficits in visual search often are attributed to difficulties in comparing display items to target representations. In the presence-absence search paradigm, however, these comparisons are frequently confounded with age differences in the latency and velocity of saccadic eye movements, reductions in the useful field of view (FOV), and retention of information concerning previously searched locations. To circumvent these shortcomings, 20 young and 20 older adults were compared in the speed of their same-different judgments of two perifoveal stimuli. The two stimuli were either identical or varied along one or more of the dimensions of size, shape, and color. In both age groups, RT for correct "different" judgments increased with stimulus similarity, an effect which was more pronounced in the elderly subjects. Results suggest that age differences in free search are due, in part, to an age-related decline in the speed of evaluating object congruence.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

Age differences in the useful field of view: an eye movement analysis.

Age differences in the useful field of view (UFOV) were examined by asking younger (mean age = 24 years) and older (mean age = 64 years) observers to search for two oriented line targets. These targets were presented at eccentricities ranging from 4 degrees to 14 degrees, and were embedded in either no distractors, homogeneous distractors, or heterogeneous distractors. Eye movements were recorded, along with reaction time (RT) and accuracy. The eye movement data indicated that older observers had more difficulty locating peripheral targets, particularly when they were embedded in heterogeneous distractors. Furthermore, the greater effects of eccentricity and distractor type found in the RT's of older adults were eliminated when age differences in saccade number were partialled out. These findings suggest that age differences in search are largely attributable to factors other than selective attention.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Age differences in dynamic contrast thresholds.

Contrast thresholds for sinusoidal gratings of 1.5-18 cpd were measured in young (M = 24 years) and older adults (M = 69 years). Thresholds were determined for stationary gratings, and for gratings that traveled along a circular path at 5, 10, and 15 deg/sec. For static gratings, age differences in thresholds were greater for intermediate and higher spatial frequencies. Grating motion increased thresholds for all observers, but older adults exhibited threshold increases at lower target velocities than the young. Age differences in velocity effects were generally greater at intermediate and higher spatial frequencies. Results are discussed in relation to age changes in temporal resolution and smooth pursuit gain.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Age differences in estimating vehicle velocity.

Automobile accidents among older adults may be related to difficulties in judging the speed of other vehicles. To examine this possibility, 3 groups of observers in the young adult, middle-aged, and older adult age ranges were asked to estimate the velocity of an isolated automobile traveling at 15-50 mph (24-80 kph). Across all age groups, perceived and actual velocity were related by a power function with an exponent of 1.36. Age was significantly and positively correlated with intercepts, but negatively correlated with exponents; that is, older observers showed less sensitivity to changes in actual velocity. Results bear on the issues of ontogenetic changes in accident involvement and sensitivity to motion.

Acceleration↗
PubMed1991

Reliability of the Vistech Contrast Test System in a life-span adult sample.

To assess the reliability of the Vistech Contrast Test System (VCTS), contrast sensitivity functions (CSF's) were estimated using all forms of the VCTS in 92 subjects aged 20 to 73 years, who were refracted for the test distance. Over a 3-month period, nine estimates at each spatial frequency and an equivalent number of acuity measures were obtained. The contrast sensitivity of older adults was lower than that of the younger adults, particularly at higher spatial frequencies. Practice effects which varied as a function of spatial frequency were also observed. Reliabilities for single-form estimates of contrast sensitivity (CS) were frequency-dependent, and ranged from 0.41 to 0.65. Three-form average estimates of CS yielded reliabilities ranging from 0.62 to 0.77. Consistent with the assertion that low VCTS reliabilities are due, in part, to measurement error, the reliabilities for acuity were uniformly higher than for the VCTS. Results are discussed in relation to clinical use of the VCTS across the life-span.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Bandwidth of the contrast sensitivity function as an index of spatial vision with application to refraction.

The contrast sensitivity function (CSF), although containing more information than traditional measures of acuity, has found difficulty gaining clinical acceptance. The hesitancy of clinicians to adopt the CSF stems, in part, from the fact that it is not as readily interpreted as is acuity. In order to facilitate such interpretation, five indices of spatial vision which are derivable from the CSF were examined in a sample of 287 persons aged 5 to 85 years. All indices were found to be both age-sensitive and strongly related to each other, but bandwidth of the CSF was chosen as a practical index for clinical settings. In a second study, acuity and CSF bandwidth were measured under 0 to +/- 1 D optical blur. It was found that the correction providing best acuity also maximized CSF bandwidth, and that bandwidth was more sensitive to optical blur than was acuity. Results support the assertion that CSF bandwidth is a readily interpreted index of spatial vision that can be measured efficiently within the context of clinical refraction.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

Age differences in peripheral refractive error.

Refractive error was measured at 0 degrees to 40 degrees temporal to fixation in 10 young adults (M age = 26 years) and 10 older adults (M age = 63 years). Older adults exhibited a greater amount of sphere (i.e., overall) error, but no more so in the periphery than in the fovea. Although age differences were small, younger adults were found to exhibit more peripheral astigmatism than the older adults. Discrepancies between obtained results and those of Millodot (1985) may be attributed to the relationship between peripheral astigmatism and presenting refractive status. Alternatively, a two-mechanism model of age-related change in lens curvature is capable of accounting for across-study outcome differences. Recommendations are made concerning optimal viewing conditions for the study of age differences in visual perceptual processes.

Adult↗
PubMed1988

Effects of noise type and retinal eccentricity on age differences in identification and localization.

Twenty young (M = 24 yrs), and 20 older adults (M = 62 yrs) identified and localized two target letters presented nonfoveally in each of three noise conditions. Targets were presented in isolation, embedded in featurally similar distractors, or embedded in distractors that were featurally similar to the alternate response. Older adults were generally slower to identify targets, particularly in multi-element arrays. Age differences favoring the elderly were found in target-similar identification accuracy, but the young identified targets more accurately in alternate-similar noise. Localization errors were greater among the elderly, who exhibited a bias to localize targets to central array positions. Age differences in noise effects are explained as resulting from ontogenic change in the duration of temporal integration required to encode arrays to the level of a primary detection response (Estes, 1982). The model's predictions were given small-scale validation when visibility was decreased in young adults who then produced performance profiles similar to the elderly.

Adult↗
PubMed1988

Age differences in Vistech near contrast sensitivity.

Contrast sensitivity was measured at near using the Vistech 6000 Contrast Test System (VCTS) in 287 persons aged 4 to 87 years. Obtained data compared well with those previously reported for the Vistech charts. Results indicate an age-related loss in sensitivity to intermediate and higher spatial frequencies. This is consistent with the age trends observed using other methods for measuring contrast sensitivity functions (CSFs). However, the Vistech charts yield contrast sensitivity values which are lower than those obtained previously with the Nicolet system. These between-method differences are greatest at lower spatial frequencies, and are attributed to the small number of grating cycles in the Vistech charts. The data are used to develop provisional age norms for the Vistech charts which allow the assessment of an individual's performance relative to their age cohort. Recommendations for use and future development of the Vistech charts are also given.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1987

Age differences in target identification as a function of retinal location and noise level: examination of the useful field of view.

Foveal and peripheral target detection were compared in young adults (M age = 22 years) and older adults (M age = 66 years) who were optically corrected for the viewing distance. In a two-alternative, forced-choice task, target letters were presented at 0 degree to 10.5 degrees from fixation. Targets were presented alone, flanked on each side by one noise element (i.e., nontarget letter), or embedded in a horizontal row of 19 noise elements. An Age X Noise Level X Location interaction was obtained, wherein age differences were largest for peripheral targets presented in noise. Slope analyses of latency data showed that the performance of young adults in the high-noise condition was most similar to that of older adults in the low-noise condition. At the functional level, results indicated that aging is associated with a restricted useful field of view. In addition, the data suggest that age differences in search can be described by a model in which older adults take smaller perceptual samples from the visual scene and scan these samples more slowly than do the young adults.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

Problems with step-wise regression in research on aging and recommended alternatives.

The use of step-wise regression techniques in aging research brings with it certain interpretative difficulties. Both geometric and algebraic approaches are used to demonstrate that although step-wise procedures pose little difficulty if predictors are orthogonal, these same procedures, when used with correlated predictors, can lead to poor tests of the predictor regression weights. Techniques that are useful in the detection of multicollinearity are discussed. Principal components regression, ridge regression, and hierarchical regression are evaluated as potential techniques for assessing the relative importance of predictors when these variables are correlated, as is common in aging research. Hierarchical regression is the most recommended technique in that it is theory-driven rather than dependent on empirical relations that may be sample-specific and unstable.

Aging↗