Use of a consortium to provide continuity in physician training: the OU-COM experience.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to C T Meyer.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
In July 1995, the American Osteopathic Association (AOA) Board of Trustees passed new regulations for the accreditation of osteopathic graduate medical education (GME) programs by establishing the Osteopathic Postdoctoral Training Institutions (OPTI) system, to be implemented over 4 years. The resulting changes include requirements for college cosponsorship of GME programs and the establishment of standards for the minimum number of residency programs, interns, and residents. The OPTIs will be subject to AOA inspections at least every 5 years. Proponents of the OPTI system claim it will strengthen the profession by promoting educational collaboration, raising academic standards, and requiring appropriate resources to support osteopathic medical education. Opponents fear that it will be too resource intensive, create an additional layer of unnecessary bureaucracy, and have a negative impact on small colleges, hospitals, and states. Despite the controversy, a process for applying for OPTI status has been developed by the AOA, and a number of hospitals and colleges are already developing OPTIs. This article, the first in a two-part series, identifies issues and barriers to be considered in the formation of OPTIs and articulates principles underlying successful collaborations. In Part 2 these issues, principles, and barriers will be reinforced by describing the process used to form a large OPTI--the Ohio University College of Osteopathic Medicine (OU-COM) Centers for Osteopathic Regional Education (CORE) System.
In July 1995, the American Osteopathic Association (AOA) Board of Trustees passed new regulations regarding the accreditation of osteopathic graduate medical education (GME) by establishing the Osteopathic Postdoctoral Training Institutions (OPTI) system. This system must be phased in by July 1999. The principal changes resulting from the OPTI system include establishing requirements for college cosponsorship of GME programs and for the number of residency programs, interns, and residents to be trained by the OPTI. In essence, OPTI is an osteopathic acronym for consortium. Each OPTI must include at least one college of osteopathic medicine (COM) and one AOA-accredited hospital. The OPTIs will be subject to interval AOA inspections and will be required to demonstrate a governing system, mission statement, organizational structure, and the presence of faculty development programs. The first article in this two-part series, published in the October JAOA, provided a general blueprint for OPTI building and presented both positive and negative issues germane to the formation of OPTIs. Part 2 reinforces the considerations outlined in Part 1 by describing the formation of a large OPTI--the Ohio University College of Osteopathic Medicine (OU-COM) Centers of Osteopathic Regional Education (CORE) system. Key features are described, including the mission statement, organizational structure, committee system, governance, GME programs, operations, and budget.
The authors developed statewide standards of excellence for ambulatory care training in an osteopathic medical consortium of family medicine residency programs. A total of 16 osteopathic family medicine residency programs joined with the Michigan State University-College of Osteopathic Medicine to form the Consortium for Osteopathic Graduate Medical Education Training (COGMET) Family Medicine Division. Standards were developed and implemented on a statewide basis for all member residency programs. Initial qualitative evaluations discovered minor as well as more substantive noncompliance after a 6-month trial. Results from longitudinal quantitative evaluations will determine the effectiveness of these standards.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
We report here a prospective study evaluating an alternative to the roentgenographic confirmation of "fine-bore" nasoenteral feeding tubes. Of 78 nasoenteral intubations in 46 patients using a Dobbhoff (Biosearch Medical Products) weighted enteral feeding tube, gastric aspirates were evaluated in 28. Auscultation was performed in all 78. Data was collected at initial placement prior to x-ray confirmation. Observers used color-coded pH paper to analyze gastric aspirate (pH < or = 4) and/or auscultation of the epigastrium to determine feeding tube position prior to x-rays. Auscultation alone was ineffective as a confirmatory test with only 6.3% specificity (p = 0.31). Aspiration to ascertain tube position was very accurate when pH < or = 4.0 (p = 0.0005) and when it was performed. A pH value of > 4 was not very helpful in predicting malposition (37%) especially when pH altering medications were used. Aspiration of contents was successful in 85% of patients. We conclude that when the pH of the nasogastric tube aspirate is < 4.0, x-ray films are not needed to prove the accuracy of tube placement. In other situations, a film is indicated since auscultation is inaccurate.
Physician workforce issues, particularly the generalist/specialist mix, surfaced as a major component of the healthcare reform debate in the last Congress. Both of the major bills before the Congress at the end of the session would have legislated reforms in graduate medical education designed to control the cost, mix, and supply of physician manpower. This article examines the graduate medical education reform measures proposed in the Gephardt (House) and Mitchell (Senate) bills and identifies elements of agreement. Discussion focuses on the potential for reforms that could be enacted in the new Congress, with a look at the implications for the osteopathic medical profession. A second article, to appear in next month's issue, will focus on recommendations for secondary reforms to prepare osteopathic medical institutions for the changing graduate medical education environment. Such a changing environment requires comprehensive reevaluation in all of the institutions of osteopathic medicine--the colleges, the hospitals, and the American Osteopathic Association.
Physician workforce issues in the healthcare reform debate have led to considerable agreement on the need to reform graduate medical education (GME) in order to control the cost, mix and supply of physician manpower. The osteopathic medical profession's infrastructure is ill-prepared to respond to many of the changes that policymakers are suggesting. In last month's issue, the author reviewed the Gephardt and Mitchell bills, which emerged during the last Congress, identified the reforms recommended for GME, and examined the elements of agreement between the bills. The position of osteopathic medicine vis-à-vis healthcare reform was explored and distinctions between the two bills were drawn. In this article, the author recommends comprehensive secondary reforms in the osteopathic medical profession's three institutions--its colleges, its hospitals, and its political organization, the American Osteopathic Association.
The recruitment and retention of osteopathic medical students by osteopathic medical institutions is arguably the most important priority facing the profession today. Residencies accredited by the Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education are now the major competitors for osteopathic medical students; osteopathic residency graduates are readily accepted at most hospitals; and osteopathic medical faculty are regularly appointed to university and government positions. As a result, many osteopathic medical institutions are having difficulty in filling their training programs and recruiting faculty and medical staff physicians. These recruitment problems can be resolved by the development of graduate medical education (GME) programs that are competitive with their allopathic GME counterparts, but hospitals and colleges must do so by developing a new approach to osteopathic GME. Osteopathic GME must sell academic quality by developing a university-like environment in the hospitals conducting training programs. Osteopathic training hospitals should consider requiring their directors of medical education to develop strategic plans for GME which result in the development of competitive programs.
During the past 40 years, the osteopathic medical profession has undergone a transformation from "osteopathy" to "osteopathic medicine." The former was characterized by manipulative treatment; the latter, by full-service healthcare. During this transformation, the profession has won acceptance from the government, the military, and MDs. These changes in status have resulted in new problems for the profession because DO graduates are increasingly turning toward allopathic programs for residency training. Thus, osteopathic medicine's primary care orientation is being replaced by an emphasis on specialty training. The authors propose that osteopathic medicine return to its original mission of primary care, abandon or restrict specialty training to those who have completed primary care residencies, and rethink its separate-but-equal posture. They also propose that osteopathic medicine establish lines of communication with allopathic medicine, the American Medical Association, and the government to facilitate the development of a rational national policy for primary care that considers the potential osteopathic medicine has to offer in meeting the nation's primary care needs.
During the last 30 years the osteopathic profession has undergone a remarkable transformation from osteopathy, characterized by manipulative therapy, to osteopathic medicine, characterized by full-service health care, and in the process it has won acceptance from the government, the military, and physicians. These changes in status have resulted in new problems for the profession, because D.O. graduates are turning increasingly toward M.D. programs for residency training, and osteopathic medicine's primary care orientation is being replaced by an emphasis on specialty training. The authors advocate that osteopathic medicine return to its original mission of primary care, abandon specialty training or restrict it to those who have completed primary care residencies, abolish its separate-but-equal posture, and establish lines of communication with allopathic medicine and the American Medical Association to facilitate the development of a rational national policy for primary care that considers the potential osteopathy has to offer in meeting the nation's primary care needs.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Osteopathic teaching hospitals are frequently criticized by house staff officers for not being sufficiently didactic or academically oriented. A model for providing academic training for students, interns, and residents as well as continuing medical education for attending staff physicians is described. This model may be administered by a department of medical education at community hospitals. Tax-deductible financial contributions from medical staff physicians and grants from pharmaceutical companies will be adequate to support this model. Benefits include enhancement of teaching rounds, increased medical staff support, improved compliance with CME requirements, and development of a useful recruitment tool.
The purposes of our study were to 1) identify the number of neoplastic lesions (adenomatous polyps and cancer) diagnosable by flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) in patients with symptoms of colorectal disease and 2) determine the age distribution of patients in whom neoplastic lesions are detected by FS. A total of 1015 patients, ages 20-89 years, underwent FS because of the following indications: rectal bleeding, occult blood loss, anemia, change in bowel habit, weight loss, and abdominal pain. FS examined a mean distance of 49 +/- 2 cm (SEM) in an average time of 11.5 min. A bowel preparation of 2 Fleet enemas was adequate in 95% of patients and the examination was well tolerated by all age groups. There were no complications encountered. Eight-five neoplastic lesions were identified in 78 patients. Fifty-four percent of all adenomatous polyps and 61% of the cancers were detected beyond 20 cm. Neoplastic lesions were identified in all adult decades studied, ranging from 3.2% of patients aged 20-40 years, 8.0% for patients between 40 and 60, and 10.1% from 60 to 80; with a peak yield of 11.2% in the 7th decade. Cancer was diagnosed only in patients more than 40 years; 3.3% of patients over 60 had carcinoma compared to 0.8% in patients less than 60. These data provide evidence for the value of FS as a safe initial diagnostic procedure to detect neoplastic lesions in symptomatic patients of all adult age groups.
We evaluated the esophageal acid infusion test (Bernstein test) in respect to the following questions: Does chest pain predictably disappear after cessation of acid infusion, and what is the relation between esophageal intraluminal pH and the degree of chest pain relief? Forty patients with subjective and objective evidence of gastroesophageal acid reflux, in whom esophageal acid infusion had reproduced substernal burning in a mean time of 3.1 minutes +/- 0.8 SE, graded pain relief after stopping acid infusion when saline was being infused. Complete pain relief occurred in 47.5% of patients over a 20-minute period. In six patients, esophageal pH was monitored for 30 minutes after administration of saline, antacid, placebo-antacid, and no treatment for a positive acid infusion test. Esophageal pH returned to normal (greater than 4.0) at the same rate (from 5.0 to 8.3 minutes) among patients in the four treatment groups, whereas chest pain continued and esophageal pH did not correlate with pain relief. The grading of pain relief was similar among the treatment groups, except at the 5-minute period when antacids resulted in significantly better relief than no treatment.
We have seen three patients with acute ulcerative colitis after hydrogen peroxide enemas. The colitis is probably the result of the explosive entrance of gas into the loose connective tissues of the mucosa and submucosa of the rectum and sigmoid. Fortunately, it is transitory in nature, but it should be distinguished from ulcerative, ischemic, or pseudomembranous colitis.