Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C S Pao

Publications and source records attributed to C S Pao.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2004

Airway resistance by the interrupter technique: which algorithm for measuring pressure?

Airway resistance using the interrupter technique (Rint) can be measured using commercial devices which employ different algorithms for estimating pressure change. We aim to describe differences in Rint due to algorithm. We compared Rint and change in Rint after bronchodilator, using four algorithms to estimate pressure change following interruption: 1) two-point back-extrapolation to interruption from points 70 msec and 30 msec from interruption, and similarly 2) to 15 msec from interruption, 3) at two-thirds from interruption, and 4) near end-interruption. Flow was measured immediately before interruption. Our subjects were 39 asymptomatic children 2-5 years old with previous intermittent wheeze. Rint differed significantly with algorithm. Geometric mean Rint (95% confidence interval (CI)) for algorithms 1-4 were 1.21 kPa x l(-1) x sec (1.18-1.24 kPa x l(-1) x sec), 1.31 kPa x l(-1) x sec (1.28-1.34 kPa x l(-1) x sec), 1.57 kPa x l(-1) x sec (1.54-1.61 kPa x l(-1) x sec) and 1.71 kPa x l(-1) x sec (1.67-1.75 kPa x l(-1) x sec), respectively. Measurement of change in R(int) following bronchodilator (BDR) did not differ on average with algorithm. Geometric means (95% CI) for BDR measurements for algorithms 1-4 were 29.9% (26.0-34.0%), 30.4% (26.4-34.5%), 32.9% (28.8-37.1%), and 31.7% (27.6-35.8%), respectively. However, measurement of change in individuals could differ by up to 40%, depending on algorithm. In conclusion, there are significant differences in Rint, depending on algorithm used to estimate pressure change. Measurement of change in Rint is unaffected on average, although in individuals there could be significant differences. Each laboratory should state its method and use the same algorithm for longitudinal and group data.

Airway Resistance↗
PubMed2003

Repeatability of airway resistance measurements made using the interrupter technique.

BACKGROUND: To be able to interpret any measurement, its repeatability should be known. This study reports the repeatability of airway resistance measurements using the interrupter technique (Rint) in children with and without respiratory symptoms. METHODS: Children aged 2-10 years who were healthy, had persistent isolated cough, or who had previous wheeze were studied. On the same occasion, three Rint measurements were made 15 minutes apart, before and after placebo and salbutamol given in random order. Results from those given placebo first were analysed for within-occasion repeatability. Between-occasion repeatability measurements were made 2-20 weeks apart (median 3 weeks). RESULTS: For 85 pairs of measurements before and after placebo the limits of agreement were 20% expected resistance and were unaffected by age or health status. The change in resistance following bronchodilator in one of 18 healthy children, 12 of 28 with cough, and 22 of 39 with wheeze exceeded this threshold. For between-occasion measurements the limits of agreement were 32% in 72 healthy subjects, 49% in 57 with cough, and 53% in 95 with previous wheeze. CONCLUSION: The measurement of airways resistance by the interrupter technique is clinically meaningful when change following an intervention such as the administration of bronchodilator is greater than its within-occasion repeatability. Between-occasion repeatability is too poor to judge change confidently.

Airway Resistance↗
PubMed2002

Airway resistance measured by the interrupter technique: normative data for 2-10 year olds of three ethnicities.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The measurement of airway resistance using the interrupter technique (R(int)) is feasible in preschool children and other subjects unable to undertake spirometry. This makes it potentially useful for the measurement of lung function in these groups. Commercial devices use different algorithms to measure pressure and flow from which R(int) is derived. This study provides normative values for British children using devices from a single manufacturer. METHODS: R(int) was measured in 236 healthy children of three ethnic groups (Afro-Caribbean and black African, Bangladeshi, and white British) aged 2-10 years using Micro Medical devices. Software in the devices calculated R(int) from pressure measured by the two point, back extrapolation method from the pressure transient during valve closure, with flow measured just before valve closure. RESULTS: R(int) is related to both age and height, but when age is allowed for there is not a significant relation with height. Neither gender nor any of the ethnicities studied was significantly related to R(int). DISCUSSION: These measurements in healthy children using this technique may be used as reference data for similar populations.

Aging↗
PubMed2001

Lung function tests for pre-school children.

There are a few devices for measuring lung function in pre-school children. Neither the interrupter technique nor the forced oscillation techniques have been standardised. We highlight some of the issues around the measurement of airway resistance using the interrupter technique and emphasise that, as with other lung function measurements, operators should have a proper understanding of the methods before they can be applied. Both methods for measuring airway resistance have potential for clinical and research application.

Airway Resistance↗