Targeted enlargement of surveillance activities.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to C Ruef.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the molecular epidemiology and risk factors of predominant clones and sporadic strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Swiss hospitals and to compare them with European strains of epidemic clones. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One-year national survey of MRSA cases. Analysis of epidemiological and molecular typing data (PFGE) of MRSA strains. RESULTS: In 1997, 385 cases of MRSA were recorded in the five Swiss university hospitals and in 47 community hospitals. Half of the cases were found in Geneva hospitals where MRSA was already known to be endemic. Molecular typing of 288 isolates (one per case) showed that 186 (65%) belong to four predominant clones, three of which were mostly present in Geneva hospitals. In contrast, the fourth clone (85 cases) was found in 23 hospitals (in one to 16 cases per hospital). The remaining 35% of the strains were clustered into 62 pulsed field gel electrophoresis types. They accounted for one to five patients per hospital and were defined as sporadic. Multivariate analysis revealed no independent risk factors for harboring a predominant versus a sporadic strain, except that transfer from a foreign hospital increases the risk of harboring a sporadic strain (OR, 42; 95% CI, 5-360). CONCLUSION: While cases with predominant clones were due to the local spread of these clones, most sporadic cases appear to be due to the continuous introduction of new strains into the country. With the exception of a transfer from a hospital outside Switzerland, no difference in the clinical or epidemiological characteristics was observed between patients harboring a predominant clone and those with a sporadic strain.
AIMS: This study sought to determine the patient- and the therapy-related determinants of in-hospital costs for patients undergoing heart surgery at the University Hospital in Zurich. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all adult cardiac surgical patients from the canton St. Gallen who were covered by a fixed fee arrangement (29,500 Swiss francs (19,470 Euro)) and referred to our institution during 1998. A total of 201 patients (143 (71%) male) with basic insurance were hospitalized in 1998 under the fixed fee arrangement. The mean age of the patients was 61.4 years (95% confidence intervals (CI): 60; 63). With the help of univariate analysis, the following pre-operative characteristics were found to be significantly associated with cost: age (P<0.001), pre-operative cardiac diagnosis (coronary vs valvular heart disease) (P<0.001) and EuroSCORE (P<0.0001). A significant correlation was also found between intra-operative variables and costs (P<0.0001) as well as between postoperative variables and costs (P<0.0001). A linear regression model based on EuroSCORE, operation time and postoperative infection status is able to predict costs for patients (all P -values <0.0001, except for P<0.05 for operation time, R(2)=0.565). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that both pre-operative (patient related) and intra-operative (therapy- and patient-related) variables are predictors of costs in cardiac surgical patients.
The impact of teaching interventions and the availability of additional dispensers for alcoholic hand disinfection was measured during three study periods. A nursing care system of relevant nursing interventions was found to be a useful tool for the assessment of compliance with hand hygiene requirements if combined with an analysis of hand disinfectant use. This study shows that compliance with hand disinfection can be improved through targeted teaching and supportive structural improvements, and that this positive impact may persist even after targeted teaching activities have ended.
We describe an outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among injection drug users (IDUs). From August 1994 through December 1999, we registered 31 IDUs with MRSA infections (12 with soft-tissue infection, 7 with pneumonia [fatal in 1], 7 with endocarditis [fatal in 1], 2 with osteomyelitis, 2 with septic arthritis, and 1 with ulcerative tonsillitis), with a marked increase in the number of IDUs registered during 1998 and 1999. Of 31 patients, 15 (48%) were infected with human immunodeficiency virus. A point-prevalence study among IDUs who frequented outpatient facilities in Zurich revealed an MRSA carriage rate of 10.3% (range, 0%-28.6%) in various facilities. In all but 1 case, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis banding patterns of isolates obtained from these patients were indistinguishable from isolates of the initial 31 IDUs registered. Risk factors for MRSA carriage were disability and prior hospitalization in a hospice. In summary, MRSA became endemic in IDUs in Zurich as a result of the spread of a single clone. This clone caused major morbidity and was responsible for a lethal outcome in 2 cases.
The management of patients with community-acquired pneumonia confronts the practicing physician with the requirement to make two principal decisions. The first decision is on the site of treatment of this infection. The options are to either treat the patient as an outpatient or to hospitalize the patient. The second decision concerns the selection of an appropriate antimicrobial agent. Over the course of the last five years, a prediction rule was developed and validated in the U.S., which allows to accurately identify those patients that carry a low risk for the development of complications of their infections. Hence, these patients can safely be managed as outpatients. On the other hand, patients with high scores (risk classes III-V) should be hospitalized and at least initially managed as inpatients. The calculation of this score requires the collection of a substantial number of parameters. However, good clinical practice requires the evaluation of most of this parameters. Therefore, the additional work resulting from the calculation of this score is moderate and certainly justifiable. Details of the prediction rule according to Fine et al. are presented in this article. Several guidelines exist for the empiric antibiotic treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Some key recommendations are influenced by the aggravating problem of antibiotic resistance in the U.S. The situation in Switzerland differs from the American situation and therefore recommendations in this article reflect this difference. In daily clinical practice it is somewhat rare to know the microbiological etiology of the individual episode of community-acquired pneumonia with certainty. Therefore, antibiotic treatment is started empirically and also continued empirically in most cases.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: In 1998, an unexpected increase of group A streptococci (GAS) in blood cultures was observed at our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To determine whether they were from unrelated sporadic cases or attributable to a common source, all isolates were analyzed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and by automated ribotyping. RESULTS: Two clusters were found. All isolates, except one, of cluster 2 had been isolated from intravenous drug abusers. CONCLUSION: All patients were hospitalized either in different hospitals or at different times in the same hospitals indicating that the putative common source is to be found in the drug community rather than in a particular hospital.
Highly active antiretroviral therapy fails to reach its recommended goal of sustained suppression of viral replication in a substantial proportion of patients. We analyzed incidence and predictors of virologic failure of the first regimen of a triple-drug combination therapy, including a protease inhibitor and two nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), in 274 HIV-infected patients. Long-term virologic response to combination therapy including salvage regimens was assessed 2.5 years after treatment initiation. During an initial observation period of up to 1.8 years (median, 0.8 years) 152 patients (55%) experienced sustained suppression of HIV-1 RNA to <500 copies/ml. Failure to reduce viral load to <500 copies/ml within 6 months (initial failure) was observed in 51 patients (19%). Independent risk factors for initial failure included higher baseline viral load; addition of a protease inhibitor to an unchanged NRTI regimen; use of saquinavir hard-gel capsules; and longer duration of prior NRTI treatment. Within a median of 7 months viral load rebound above 500 copies/ml occurred in 71 of 223 patients (32%) whose viral load had initially decreased below this threshold. In proportional hazard analysis none of the potential risk factors was significantly associated with viral load rebound. However, in 40 patients (56%) with viral load rebound, incomplete adherence to therapy or treatment interruptions preceded the rebound. Virologic outcome after 2.5 years correlated with initial response to the first regimen: viral load was <500 copies/ml in 88, 55, and 21% of patients with sustained suppression, viral load rebound, and initial failure, respectively.
A one-week period-prevalence survey, aimed at assessing the scale of nosocomial infections, was conducted in May 1996 in medical, surgical, and intensive care wards of 4 Swiss university hospitals. Standard definitions by the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention were used except that asymptomatic bacteriuria was not classified as a nosocomial infection. A total of 176 nosocomial infections were found among 156 of the 1349 surveyed patients (prevalence 11.6%; interhospital range 9.8-13.5%). Surgical site infections were most prevalent (30% of all nosocomial infections), followed by urinary tract (22%), lower respiratory tract (15%), and bloodstream infections (13%). The most frequently isolated microorganisms were Enterobacteriaceae (n = 44; 28%), S. aureus (n = 20; 13%), Pseudomonas spp (n = 17; 11%), and Candida spp (n = 16; 10%). One third of all episodes of nosocomial infections were not microbiologically documented. The overall prevalence of nosocomial infections in surgical patients (n = 562) was 16.2% compared to 8.6% for non-surgical patients (prevalence ratio, 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI95], 1.4-2.5). In one centre, the in-hospital mortality of patients with nosocomial infections was 9.2% (10/109) compared to 3.9% (25/637) for patients without nosocomial infections (odds ratio, 2.47; CI95, 1.15-5.31). Infection rates were similar to those reported by two Swiss pilot studies from the early 1980s. This study offers a reliable measure of the prevalence of nosocomial infections in selected wards at 4 Swiss university hospitals and confirms the importance of nosocomial infections as a heavy burden on health services at the end of this century.