Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Q Doe

Publications and source records attributed to C Q Doe.

17 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1993

Identification and cell lineage of individual neural precursors in the Drosophila CNS.

The Drosophila CNS is complex enough to serve as a model for many of the molecular, cellular and developmental functions of the vertebrate CNS, yet simple enough for single-cell analysis. Recent advances have provided molecular markers that allow most Drosophila CNS precursors to be uniquely identified, as well as methods for determining the complete cell lineage of each precursor. A detailed understanding of wild-type neurogenesis, combined with existing molecular genetic techniques, should provide insight into the fundamental mechanisms that generate neuronal and glial diversity.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Molecular markers for identified neuroblasts and ganglion mother cells in the Drosophila central nervous system.

The first step in generating cellular diversity in the Drosophila central nervous system is the formation of a segmentally reiterated array of neural precursor cells, called neuroblasts. Subsequently, each neuroblast goes through an invariant cell lineage to generate neurons and/or glia. Using molecular lineage markers, I show that (1) each neuroblast forms at a stereotyped time and position; (2) the neuroblast pattern is indistinguishable between thoracic and abdominal segments; (3) the development of individual neuroblasts can be followed throughout early neurogenesis; (4) gene expression in a neuroblast can be reproducibly modulated during its cell lineage; (5) identified ganglion mother cells form at stereotyped times and positions; and (6) the cell lineage of four well-characterized neurons can be traced back to two identified neuroblasts. These results set the stage for investigating neuroblast specification and the mechanisms controlling neuroblast cell lineages.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

ming is expressed in neuroblast sublineages and regulates gene expression in the Drosophila central nervous system.

Cell diversity in the Drosophila central nervous system (CNS) is primarily generated by the invariant lineage of neural precursors called neuroblasts. We used an enhancer trap screen to identify the ming gene, which is transiently expressed in a subset of neuroblasts at reproducible points in their cell lineage (i.e. in neuroblast 'sublineages'), suggesting that neuroblast identity can be altered during its cell lineage. ming encodes a predicted zinc finger protein and loss of ming function results in precise alterations in CNS gene expression, defects in axonogenesis and embryonic lethality. We propose that ming controls cell fate within neuroblast cell lineages.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1991

The prospero gene specifies cell fates in the Drosophila central nervous system.

The molecular mechanisms used to generate neuronal diversity are largely unknown. To identify genes controlling cell fate in the Drosophila central nervous system, we screened for mutations that alter expression of homeobox genes in the developing central nervous system (indicating changes in cell fates). We also screened "enhancer trap" lines to identify genes expressed in neuronal stem cells (neuroblasts). The prospero gene was discovered in both screens. prospero is expressed in a subset of neuroblasts, sensory neuron precursors, and identified glial precursors. It is not expressed in neurons. Neuroblasts lacking prospero function generate abnormal cell lineages, producing incorrectly specified progeny that differentiate into neurons showing axon pathfinding defects. prospero is therefore a novel type of gene expressed in neuroblasts and known to specify neuronal fate.

Animals↗
PubMed1991

The prospero gene encodes a divergent homeodomain protein that controls neuronal identity in Drosophila.

The Drosophila central nervous system (CNS) develops from a population of stem cells called neuroblasts; each neuroblast goes through an invariant cell lineage to produce a characteristic family of neurons or glia. We are interested in the molecular mechanisms controlling neuroblast cell lineage. Recently we identified the prospero (pros) gene, which is expressed in embryonic neuroblasts. Loss of pros function results in aberrant expression of the homeobox genes fushi tarazu, even-skipped and engrailed in a subset of neuroblast progeny, suggesting that pros plays an early and fundamental role in the specification of neuronal fate (Doe et al. 1991). Here we show that the pros gene encodes a highly divergent homeodomain. The homeodomain contains several of the most conserved amino acids characteristic of known homeodomains, yet it is considerably less basic than previously identified homeodomains. These data are consistent with a model in which pros controls neuroblast cell lineages by regulating gene expression.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1990

The origins of cell diversity in the insect central nervous system.

There are thousands of unique neurons and many types of glia in the insect central nervous system. How is this cell diversity generated? Neurogenesis begins with the delamination and enlargement of individual cells of the ventral ectoderm to form a stereotyped array of neuroblasts. Every neuroblast divides asymmetrically to generate a chain of approximately 10 smaller progeny, each of which produces a pair of neurons. Ablation, transplantation and in vitro culture experiments illuminate the role of cell interactions and cell lineage during neurogenesis, and genetic approaches in Drosophila are beginning to provide insight into the molecular mechanisms controlling these events.

Animals↗
PubMed1988

Control of neuronal fate by the Drosophila segmentation gene even-skipped.

The central nervous system (CNS) contains a remarkable diversity of cell types. The molecular basis for generating this neuronal diversity is poorly understood. Much is known, however, about the regulatory genes which control segmentation and segment identity during early Drosophila embryogenesis. Interestingly, most of the segmentation and homoeotic genes in Drosophila, as well as many of their vertebrate homologues, are expressed during the development of the nervous system (for example, ref. 3). Are these genes involved in specifying the identity of individual neurons during neurogenesis, just as they specify the identity of cells during segmentation? We previously described the CNS expression of the segmentation gene fushi tarazu (ftz) and showed that ftz CNS expression is involved in the determination of an identified neuron. Here we show that another segmentation gene, even-skipped (eve), is expressed in a different but overlapping subset of neurons. Temperature-sensitive inactivation of the eve protein during neurogenesis alters the fate of two of these neurons. Our results indicate that the nuclear protein products of the eve and ftz segmentation genes are components of the mechanism controlling cell fate during neuronal development.

Animals↗
PubMed1988

Expression and function of the segmentation gene fushi tarazu during Drosophila neurogenesis.

Segmentation genes control cell identities during early pattern formation in Drosophila. One of these genes, fushi tarazu (ftz), is now shown also to control cell fate during neurogenesis. Early in development, ftz is expressed in a striped pattern at the blastoderm stage. Later, it is transiently expressed in a specific subset of neuronal precursor cells, neurons (such as aCC, pCC, RP1, and RP2), and glia in the developing central nervous system (CNS). The function of ftz in the CNS was determined by creating ftz mutant embryos that express ftz in the blastoderm stripes but not in the CNS. In the absence of ftz CNS expression, some neurons appear normal (for example, the aCC, pCC, and RP1), whereas the RP2 neuron extends its growth cone along an abnormal pathway, mimicking its sibling (RP1), suggesting a transformation in neuronal identity.

Animals↗
PubMed1986

Guidance of neuronal growth cones in the grasshopper embryo. IV. Temporal delay experiments.

In the previous 3 papers, we demonstrated that neuronal growth cones display selective affinities for both specific axonal and glial pathways in the grasshopper embryo; for example, the pCC growth cone selectively recognizes the MP1/dMP2 axons, while the aCC growth cone selectively recognizes the U axons and a specific glial cell (the segment boundary cell). We were interested in further testing the temporal specificity of these affinities. To address this issue, we performed specific temporal transplant experiments by using a laser microbeam in ovo to ablate the neuronal precursor cell, neuroblast (NB) 1-1, that generates the aCC and pCC neurons. Neighboring ectodermal cells regulate and replace the ablated NB 1-1; the new NB 1-1 then generates the aCC and pCC neurons with a temporal delay of 10-20 hr (2-4% of development), depending upon the experimental paradigm. The results of these temporal delay experiments further demonstrate the selective affinities of the aCC and pCC growth cones for specific axonal and glial surfaces and confirm that these specificities are absolute and not hierarchical. Furthermore, they suggest that precise timing is not important; both the pCC and aCC growth cones are able to selectively recognize their appropriate axonal and glial pathways after delays of 10-20 hr despite being confronted with the surfaces of many additional axons and pathways.

Animals↗
PubMed1985

From epithelium to neuroblasts to neurons: the role of cell interactions and cell lineage during insect neurogenesis.

The grasshopper central nervous system is composed of a brain and a chain of segmental ganglia. Each hemiganglion contains about 1000 neurons, most of which can be individually identified by their unique morphology and synaptic connectivity. Shortly after gastrulation the ventral ectoderm becomes a neurogenic region. In each hemisegment, ca. 150 neurogenic ectodermal cells (nECs) give rise to a stereotyped pattern of 30 identified neuroblasts (NBs, neuronal stem cells); the remaining nECs become various non-neuronal cells or die. The 30 NBs then give rise to about 1000 neurons as each NB initiates an invariant lineage, generating a stereotyped chain of ganglion mother cells (GMCs), each of which in turn divides once to generate two identified neurons. We have used a laser microbeam or microelectrode to ablate individual cells in ovo and in vitro at various stages of embryogenesis to study how neuronal diversity and specificity are generated during development. Our results suggest that cell interactions between ca. 150 equivalent nECs allow 30 cells to enlarge into NBs, the dominant fate in a hierarchy; the NBs inhibit adjacent nECs and thus cause them to differentiate into various non-neuronal cells; each NB is assigned its unique identity according to its position of enlargement within the neurogenic epithelium; each NB then generates its characteristic chain of GMCs by an invariant cell lineage; and each GMC generates a pair of equivalent progeny, the fate of each individual neuron being determined by both its GMC of origin and interactions with its sibling.

Cell Communication↗
PubMed1985

Early events in insect neurogenesis. I. Development and segmental differences in the pattern of neuronal precursor cells.

The earliest events in the development of the central nervous system in insect embryos involve the differentiation of a stereotyped pattern of individually identified neuronal precursor cells, called neuroblasts (NBs), each of which generates a stereotyped family of neuronal progeny. After gastrulation, the midventral region of the ectoderm becomes a neuroepithelium; it is from this sheet of seemingly uniform ectodermal cells that certain cells enlarge to become NBs while the rest of the cells either die or acquire other nonneuronal phenotypes. Here we focus on three aspects of neurogenesis. First, we examine the morphological changes associated with the differentiation of neuronal precursor cells and nonneuronal support cells. The differentiation of each cell type is reflected by its morphology; moreover, the identity of individual cells of certain cell types (e.g., a particular NB) is reflected by their position within the neuroepithelium. Second, we show that there is a characteristic temporal sequence of differentiation in the stereotyped pattern of NBs. Third, we show that this stereotyped pattern of NBs varies in a segment-specific way by the addition or deletion of particular neuronal precursor cells. These studies on the events of early neurogenesis set the stage for the experimental manipulations described in the following paper (C. Q. Doe and C.S. Goodman, 1985, Dev. Biol. 110, 206-219).

Abdomen↗
PubMed1985

Early events in insect neurogenesis. II. The role of cell interactions and cell lineage in the determination of neuronal precursor cells.

The insect central nervous system (CNS) is composed of a brain and a chain of segmental ganglia; each hemiganglion contains about 1000 individually identifiable neurons. How is the enormous neuronal diversity and specificity generated? Neurons of a hemiganglion largely arise during embryogenesis from a stereotyped pattern of individually identified neuronal precursor cells, called neuroblasts (NBs). The transition from ectoderm to individual neurons thus involves two major steps: first, an undifferentiated ectodermal cell sheet produces the stereotyped pattern of 30 NBs per hemisegment; second, each of these NBs contributes a specific family of neuronal progeny to the developing CNS. We have used a laser microbeam to ablate individual cells in the grasshopper embryo in order to study the initial events of neuronal determination. In particular, how does a layer of apparently equivalent ectodermal cells produce a highly stereotyped pattern of unique NBs? Our results suggest the following mechanism for NB determination. (1) Cell interactions between the approximately 150 equivalent ectodermal cells of a hemisegment allow 30 cells to enlarge into NBs. (2) As these young NBs enlarge they inhibit adjacent ectodermal cells from becoming NBs; the adjacent cells then either differentiate into nonneuronal support cells or die. (3) Each NB is assigned a unique identity due to its position of enlargement within the neuroepithelium. (4) The NB then generates its characteristic family of neurons by an invariant cell lineage. Development of the insect CNS depends on cell interactions and positional cues to create a pattern of NBs, and then on cell lineage to restrict the fate of the NB progeny.

Animals↗
PubMed1984

Cell recognition during neuronal development.

Insect embryos, with their relatively simple nervous systems, provide a model system with which to study the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying cell recognition during neuronal development. Such an approach can take advantage of the accessible cells of the grasshopper embryo and the accessible genes of Drosophila. The growth cones of identified neurons express selective affinities for specific axonal surfaces; such specificities give rise to the stereotyped patterns of selective fasciculation common to both species. These and other results suggest that early in development cell lineage and cell interactions lead to the differential expression of cell recognition molecules on the surfaces of small subsets of embryonic neurons whose axons selectively fasciculate with one another. Monoclonal antibodies reveal surface molecules in the Drosophila embryo whose expression correlates with this prediction. It should now be possible to isolate the genes encoding these potential cell recognition molecules and to test their function through the use of molecular genetic approaches in Drosophila.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Cell determination and regulation during development of neuroblasts and neurones in grasshopper embryo.

The embryonic development of the central nervous system (CNS) involves the generation of an enormous diversity of cellular types arranged and interconnected in a remarkably precise pattern. In each hemisegment of the grasshopper embryo, the ectoderm generates a stereotyped pattern of 30 neuronal precursor cells, called neuroblasts (Fig. 1). Each of these stem cells makes a stereotyped contribution of 6-100 progeny to the approximately 1,000 different neurones, each cell identifiable according to its unique morphology, physiology and biochemistry. What are the contributions of cell interactions and cell lineage to the generation of this diversity and specificity of identified neurones in the grasshopper CNS? Here we report on cell ablations with a laser microbeam at different stages of development. Our results suggest the importance of cell-cell interactions in the determination of ectodermal cells to become identified neuroblasts. However, once a neuroblast begins to divide, then cell lineage appears to play an important role in the determination of its stereotyped family of neuronal progeny. Furthermore, cell-specific interactions continue to play an important role as neurones, according to their mitotic ancestry, recognize and interact with other differentiating neurones in their environment.

Animals↗