Phase III trial of Rapamune versus placebo in primary renal allograft recipients.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to C Ponticelli.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Strategies for treating IgA glomerulonephritis (IgAGN) are controversial, particularly with regards to the long-term results of kidney transplantation, including the risk of recurrence of IgAGN post-transplant and the impact of this recurrence on graft survival. METHODS: The outcomes of 106 adults transplanted because of a biopsy-proven IgAGN and of 212 patients without IgAGN transplanted during the same period were analyzed. To evaluate the risk of recurrence, patients with hematuria, proteinuria, or an increase in plasma creatinine were submitted to allograft biopsy. Factors influencing recurrence and the impact of recurrence on graft survival were analyzed. RESULTS: The ten-year patient (0.93 vs. 0.92) and graft survival (0.75 vs. 0.82) probabilities were not significantly different between IgAGN patients and controls. Only plasma creatinine and proteinuria at six months were associated with an increased relative risk (RR) of graft failure (RR 2.79 and 5.94, respectively). Histological recurrence of IgA glomerulonephritis was diagnosed in 37 patients. Younger age (RR 2.63), increased plasma creatinine (RR 2.39), and proteinuria (RR 6.02) at six months were associated with the risk of recurrence. If proteinuria and plasma creatinine at six months were considered in the Cox model, IgA recurrence per se was not associated with an increased risk of graft failure (P = 0.181). The main causes of graft failure were glomerulonephritis in patients with recurrence of IgAGN and chronic rejection in patients without recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The ten-year graft survival rate was similar in patients with IgAGN or other renal diseases. At least 35% IgAGN patients had biopsy-proven recurrence, and younger patients were more prone to the risk of recurrence. Recurrence did not affect the ten-year graft survival.
It is still uncertain which, if any, immunologic parameters may help diagnose a renal flare of lupus nephritis. Anti-C1q antibody (Ab) titers have been elevated in patients with lupus with renal involvement, but little information is available on whether the titers are different in quiescent and active phases of lupus nephritis. In this study, we compared anti-C1q Ab titers with other serological test results in 48 patients with biopsy-proven lupus nephritis to assess which parameter could offer the best reliability for differentiating between quiescent and active phases of lupus nephritis. Serum C3 and C4 levels, as well as anti-double-stranded DNA, antiendothelial cell, anti-C1q, and antiphospholipid Ab titers, were evaluated in patients with quiescent renal disease (38 samples) and those with clinical evidence of renal activity (23 samples). Only anti-C1q Ab titers correlated with active renal disease in both univariate (P < 0.0001) and multivariate analysis (P < 0.0001), with a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 92%. In six patients, immunologic parameters were measured serially. In all patients, the high anti-C1q Ab titers returned to normal values after treatment-induced remission. The other serological parameters did not show a significant association with renal disease activity. In patients with biopsy-proven lupus nephritis, anti-C1q Ab titers appear to be strongly related to renal disease activity. Their measurement may be useful for confirming the diagnosis of renal flares of lupus nephritis.
With the success of organ transplantation, liver disease has emerged as an important cause of morbidity and mortality of renal transplant (RT) recipients. Numerous studies performed during the 1990s have shown that hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the leading cause of chronic liver disease among RT recipients. The transmission of HCV by renal transplantation of a kidney from an HCV-infected organ donor has been shown unequivocally. Liver biopsy is essential in the evaluation of liver disease of RT recipients, and histological studies have shown that HCV-related liver disease after renal transplantation is progressive. The outcome of HCV-related liver disease is probably more aggressive in RT recipients than immunocompetent individuals. Various factors can affect the progression of HCV in the RT population: coinfection with hepatitis B virus, time of HCV acquisition, type of immunosuppressive treatment, and concomitant alcohol abuse. The role of virological features of HCV remains unclear. The natural history of HCV infection after renal transplantation is under evaluation; however, recent surveys with long follow-ups have documented adverse effects of HCV infection on patient and graft survival in RT recipients. Use of renal grafts from HCV-infected donors in recipients with HCV infection does not appear to result in a greater burden of liver disease, at least for a short period. The association between HCV and de novo or recurrent glomerulonephritis after RT has been hypothesized and is an area of avid research. Reported studies do not support interferon (IFN) treatment for RT recipients with chronic hepatitis C because of the frequent occurrence of graft failure, and information on the use of other types of IFN or combined therapy (IFN plus ribavirin or amantadine) is not yet available in the RT population.
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common in the dialysis population and patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) not requiring dialysis. HCV is the most important cause of chronic liver disease in dialysis patients; however, its role has been underestimated by the lower aminotransferase activity in the dialysis population. Aminotransferase activity in patients with CRF not requiring dialysis has not been adequately addressed to date. The aim of this study is to investigate whether serum aminotransferase levels in predialysis patients with CRF are less than those obtained in healthy individuals and dialysis patients. We also analyzed the potential association between serum aminotransferase activity and demographic, clinical, and biochemical parameters. Aspartate (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity was greater in antibody to hepatitis C (anti-HCV)-positive than anti-HCV-negative patients with CRF not requiring dialysis (AST, 32.3 +/- 19 versus 18.1 +/- 8 IU/L [P = 0.0001]; ALT, 32.9 +/- 28 versus 17.7 +/- 11 IU/L [P = 0.00001], respectively). Predialysis patients with CRF had lower AST and ALT activity in comparison to healthy individuals (AST, 19.7 +/- 11.2 versus 20.4 +/- 6.8 IU/L [P = 0.00001]; ALT, 19.5 +/- 15.1 versus 21.7 +/- 11.3 IU/L [P = 0.00001], respectively). The difference was much greater after correction for viral markers: AST and ALT levels in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative anti-HCV-negative predialysis patients with CRF were less than those in the healthy population (AST, 17.9 +/- 8 versus 20.4 +/- 6.8 IU/L [P = 0.00001]; ALT, 17.5 +/- 10 versus 21.7 +/- 11.3 IU/L [P = 0.00001], respectively). Comparison of AST and ALT activity between age-matched healthy and predialysis seronegative CRF groups showed lower AST and ALT values in the study population. HBsAg-negative anti-HCV-negative dialysis patients had lower AST and ALT activity than seronegative predialysis patients with CRF (AST, 16.6 +/- 11.6 versus 17.9 +/- 8 IU/L [P = 0.01]; ALT, 16.3 +/- 9.4 versus 17.5 +/- 10 [P = 0.041], respectively). Multivariate analysis in the predialysis CRF population showed an independent association between AST (P = 0.00001) and ALT (P = 0.00001) activity and anti-HCV positivity, and age was negatively linked to AST (P = 0.011) and ALT levels (P = 0.001). AST level was negatively related to serum creatinine level (P = 0.0001). In conclusion, HCV infection causes significant liver injury in predialysis patients with CRF. These patients have decreased aminotransferase activity compared with the general population. Dialysis patients show lower aminotransferase activity than predialysis patients with CRF. Because serum aminotransferase levels are commonly used to screen for liver disease in the dialysis and predialysis CRF population, recognition of liver damage may be hampered by the reduction in aminotransferase values in these patients. Studies aimed to clarify the pathogenesis of this phenomenon are in progress.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Several therapeutic approaches have been tried in patients with membranous nephropathy. Corticosteroids have been largely used, but a meta-analysis of the available controlled trials did not show any benefit of corticosteroids either in favouring remission of the nephrotic syndrome or in preventing renal dysfunction. Controversial results have been obtained with cytotoxic agents. Unfortunately, most of the available trials were small in size and had short-term follow-ups. Three controlled trials evaluated the role of a 6-month treatment with methylprednisolone and chlorambucil. The first trial showed that the 10-year renal survival rate was 92% in treated patients compared with 60% in untreated controls. A second trial compared the effects of methylprednisolone/chlorambucil with those of methylprednisolone alone. The combined treatment achieved remission of nephrotic syndrome in 64% of cases vs 38% in patients given steroids alone. A third trial showed equivalent results in patients randomized to be given methylprednisolone/chlorambucil or methylprednisolone/cyclophosphamide. A number of non-controlled studies and a randomized trial also showed the efficacy of cyclosporine in reducing proteinuria. In many but not all cases, proteinuria reappeared when cyclosporine was stopped. In conclusion, although the treatment of membranous nephropathy remains difficult, some therapeutical approaches have proved to favour remission and protect renal function
The prognosis of untreated patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis is poor, as the disease progress to end-stage renal disease in approximately 50--70% of nephrotic patients. Although focal segmental glomerulosclerosis was initially considered to be a steroid-resistant disease, several studies have shown a better responsiveness to more prolonged courses of steroids. For patients with steroid-resistant or -dependent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, cyclosporine A and cytotoxic agents have shown efficacy in clinical trials. Plasmapheresis or LDL-apheresis may represent a rescue treatment in patients who do not respond to other therapies. The role of other agents used in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, including azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, pefloxacin or vitamin E is still poorly defined.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Corticosteroids represent the first therapeutic approach for patients with focal and segmantal glomerulosclerosis. What to do in patients who do not respond to corticostetoids is still uncertain. Cytotoxic agents have been tried. The results are usually poor when these drugs are given for short periods but almost half of patients may enter remission ir treatment is prolonged. Some decrease in proteinuria may be obtained with mycophenolav, mofetil but the available reports are still scanty and the follow ups are short. Cyclosporine has been largely used both in controlled and non controlled trials with favorable results. However, being the drug nephrotoxic caution should be recommended with its use. Plasma-exchange and lipopheresis may attempted in resistant cases.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
An abnormal vascular status is present in the transplanted kidney. To define whether vascular factors might influence kidney function of the graft, the renal volume, blood flow and vascular resistance of a group of healthy subjects were compared with those of a group of well functioning renal transplants by color Doppler ultrasonography. Sixty healthy subjects and 75 well functioning cadaver renal transplant recipients were compared by color Doppler ultrasonography. Subsequently, 15 couples of donors and recipients of a living related renal graft were compared to observe the differences between the two organs of the same subject in a different environment. The variables studied were: the diameters and the volume of the kidney, renal blood flow and renal resistance index (RI). The group of cadaver renal transplant patients showed higher mean blood pressure (P = 0.009), higher serum creatinine levels (P = 0.0001) and lower endogenous creatinine clearance (P < 0.0001) than healthy controls. The length (P < 0.00001) and volume (P < 0.001) of the kidneys of cadaver transplanted patients were significantly greater than those of healthy subjects, while the length and volume of the living donors kidneys were identical to those of the recipients. RI, measured on renal vessels, showed lower values in healthy subjects and in kidney donors than in transplanted patients (P < 0.00001). Well functioning transplanted kidneys showed increased renal arterial RI. This non-immunologic factor did not appear to be detrimental with renal function in time, at least until 50 months after successful grafting.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A patient who had undergone a first cadaveric donor kidney transplantation for idiopathic focal segmental glomerular sclerosis (FSGS), had an immediate recurrence of a biopsy-proven FSGS that eventually led to graft failure within 5 years from transplantation. The patient underwent a second cadaveric transplantation 10 months later. An immediate recurrence of a biopsy-proven FSGS occurred that was treated with two protracted cycles of plasmapheresis of seven months each, with the addition of an ACE inhibitor from the beginning. A complete and stable remission of FSGS was observed, which continues after more than 6 years from the end of plasmapheresis. The recurrence of FSGS after a second transplantation has a poor prognosis, but prolonged plasmapheresis treatment, by removing circulating factors altering glomerular permselectivity, and the addition of ACE inhibitors, through their potential interference with TGF-beta, might be synergistic in obtaining permanent remission.
There is little information on the long-term outcome of patients initially assigned to cyclosporine (CsA) monotherapy and requiring the addition of steroid therapy during follow-up. The aim of this report is to describe our experience with 143 first renal transplant recipients (120 cadaver transplants, 23 living donor transplants) randomized to receive CsA monotherapy as a treatment arm of three consecutive controlled clinical trials. Median follow-up was 86 months. Thirty-four percent of the patients remained on the original CsA monotherapy, whereas the remaining 66% required the addition of steroid therapy. Cumulative patient and graft survivals at 11 years were 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83 to 0.95) and 0.62 (95% CI, 0.52 to 0.72), respectively. The 11-year graft survival for converted patients was 0.53 (95% CI, 0.39 to 0.67). Cumulative graft half-life was 19.9 +/- 3.47 (SE) years. According to the Cox model, variables at transplantation that correlated with a lower 11-year graft survival were yearly increases in age (relative risk [RR], 1. 04; P = 0.039), monthly increases in hemodialysis duration (RR, 1.01; P = 0.029), no blood transfusion before transplantation (RR, 1.99; P = 0.043), CsA administration in a double daily dose (RR, 2.35; P = 0.008), and a cadaver donor transplant (RR, 4.76; P = 0.039). Multivariate analysis of time-dependent variables showed that delayed graft function recovery (RR, 2.20; P = 0.019) and the need to add steroid and/or azathioprine therapy (RR, 5.28; P = 0.000) were also correlated with a lower graft survival. Patients who added steroid therapy developed infections (P < 0.001), cataracts (P < 0.001), cardiovascular complications (P = 0.004), and arterial hypertension (P = 0.024) more frequently than patients remaining on CsA monotherapy. Patients administered CsA in a single daily dose received significantly less CsA over the years (P = 0.0042) than patients administered CsA in two divided doses. They also showed a trend toward greater creatinine clearance levels, although not statistically significant. In conclusion, this analysis showed that in patients assigned to CsA therapy alone, good long-term patient and graft survival probabilities can be obtained. In approximately one third of the patients, the use of steroids could be avoided for up to 11 years, and these patients had a better long-term outcome than those who required the addition of steroid therapy. Finally, in patients administered CsA in a single daily dose, the possibility of reducing CsA dosage probably led to better intrarenal hemodynamics with improving creatinine clearances.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: Several experimental and clinical studies indicate that the renin system may play a pivotal role in progressing renal disease. The combination of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and an angiotensin receptor blocker could provide a higher degree of blockade of the renin-angiotensin system than either agent alone. Such enhanced suppression might be of benefit for patients exhibiting a progressive decline in renal function because of chronic renal disease. METHODS: A pilot multinational, multicentre, randomized, active-controlled, parallel group open-label study has been conducted in a group of patients with progressive chronic renal failure (creatinine clearance 20-45 ml/min) either with or without proteinuria and hypertension. The primary aim of the study was to investigate the safety and tolerability of the combination of valsartan and benazepril. Patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: group 1 received valsartan 160 mg once daily (n = 22); group 2 received valsartan 80 mg once daily plus benazepril 5 or 10 mg once daily (n = 42); group 3 received valsartan 160 mg once daily plus benazepril 5 or 10 mg once daily (n = 44). The study lasted for 5 weeks, and in groups 2 and 3 benazepril was added on top of valsartan after the first week of therapy with the angiotensin receptor blocker. RESULTS: Serum creatinine increased in all three groups (mean change within a group: 11 micromol/l in group 1, P= 0.045; 9 micromol/l in group 2, P= 0.030; 15 micromol/l in group 3, P= 0.0006). Serum potassium also increased in all three groups of patients (mean change within a group: 0.28 mmol/l in group 1, P= 0.28; 0.48 mmol/l in group 2, P= 0.0008; 0.36 mmol/l in group 3, P= 0.02). After 5 weeks of treatment, the largest decrease in blood pressure was observed in group 3 (the mean change from baseline in seated diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) and seated systolic blood pressure (SSBP), respectively, were: -2.0 and -11.5 mmHg in group 1; -7.6 and -15.4 mmHg in group 2; -12.6 and -21.6 mmHg in group 3). In addition, both combination treatments resulted in the reduction of proteinuria. The total number of patients with adverse experiences were 10 (45.5%), 14 (33.3%) and 11 (25%) in groups 1,2 and 3, respectively. In six patients (5.6%) therapy was discontinued as a result of adverse experiences. Only one patient in each of the combined therapy groups withdrew from the study because of hyperkalaemia and no patients were forced to withdraw because of an increase in serum creatinine, acute renal failure or hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that short-term combination of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and an angiotensin receptor blocker is safe and well tolerated in patients with moderate chronic renal failure.