Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Olofsson

Publications and source records attributed to C Olofsson.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Pharmacokinetics and clinical effect during continuous epidural infusion with ropivacaine 2.5 mg/ml or bupivacaine 2.5 mg/ml for labour pain relief.

BACKGROUND: Ropivacaine has shown less systemic toxicity than bupivacaine, and comparatively low muscle-blocking properties could constitute another advantage when used epidurally for obstetric pain relief. We aimed primarily to compare maternal and foetal drug disposition following continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine or bupivacaine. METHODS: Twenty-four full-term, nulliparous women were randomized to continuous epidural infusion (10 ml/h) of ropivacaine 2.5 mg/ml or bupivacaine 2.5 mg/ml for labour pain relief in a double-blind, parallel-group design. Maternal blood samples were collected up to 24 h after the end of infusion as well as taken from the umbilical cord at the time of delivery. Sensory and motor block as well as analgesia were assessed. All the women were monitored by cardiotocography and neonatal assessment was performed. RESULTS: The sensory block was adequate for both drugs. Higher plasma levels (total and free) were seen with ropivacaine, although the infusion with bupivacaine continued on average for about 2 hours longer. However, the ratios between maternal and umbilical blood concentrations were similar for both drugs. Normal neonatal Apgar and neonatal adaptive capacity scores (NACS) were found in both groups. CONCLUSION: A continuous epidural infusion of 25 mg/h ropivacaine or bupivacaine both produced good labour pain relief. Higher total and free plasma concentrations were seen for ropivacaine. The ratios between maternal and umbilical plasma levels were similar for both drugs.

Adult↗

Increased cerebrospinal fluid concentration of aspartate but decreased concentration of nitric oxide breakdown products in women experiencing visceral pain during active labour.

The aim of the present study was to investigate some putative neurotransmitters involved in nociception and pain in parturients during active labour experiencing intense visceral pain. The concentration of the excitatory amino acid aspartate was significantly increased, and there was a tendency for an increase in glutamate, in lumbar cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of parturients in active vaginal labour compared with control patients without pain subjected to elective caesarean section. The CSF concentration of the nitric oxide breakdown product nitrate was significantly decreased in parturients compared with control patients and healthy volunteers. No significant differences in the concentrations of substance P, substance P-endopeptidase or met-enkephalin were detected between parturients and controls. Our data suggest a paradoxical negative relationship between CSF concentrations of excitatory amino acids and nitric oxide in labour pain. The mechanisms behind this finding is unclear at present.

Adult↗

Anesthetic quality during cesarean section following subarachnoid or epidural administration of bupivacaine with or without fentanyl.

BACKGROUND: It is often assumed that subarachnoid administration of local anesthetics produces a more profound blockade than epidural anesthesia. Furthermore, the addition of fentanyl has been reported to increase preferentially intraoperative analgesia. In the present study we set out to study these two issues in a randomized and controlled study with respect to perceived pain and discomfort during surgery and postoperative pain. METHODS: In the present study, 100 parturients subjected to elective cesarean section, 34 nullipara and 66 multipara, received one out of four combinations of the local anesthetic bupivacaine and the opioid fentanyl; group A--bupivacaine 12.5 mg + 10 micrograms fentanyl subarachnoidally, group B--bupivacaine 12.5 mg + saline subarachnoidally, group C--bupivacaine 100 mg + 100 micrograms fentanyl epidurally, group D--bupivacaine 100 mg + saline epidurally; N = 25 in each group. Pain intensity and discomfort during surgery was assessed with a visual analogue scale (VAS). Postoperative pain intensity and need for analgesics postoperatively, ketobemidone, was registered for 24 h following surgery. RESULTS: Intraoperative pain intensity and discomfort did not differ significantly between parturients in any of the four groups Postoperative pain was significantly more intense in parturients receiving local anesthetics subarachnoidally as compared to the epidural groups during the first 6-h period. This difference was also reflected in a significantly increased consumption of analgesics during this period. No significant differences between the groups were observed with regard to hemodynamics (blood pressure), respiration (oxygen saturation) or other effects such as nausea or itching. All neonates had normal Apgar and neonatal adaptive capacity scores (NACS). CONCLUSION: We conclude that subarachnoidal (12.5 mg) and epidural (100 mg) injections with bupivacaine both produced adequate anesthetic quality in women undergoing elective cesarean section. The addition of fentanyl (10 micrograms subarachnoidally or 100 micrograms epidurally) did not significantly improve the quality of these already profound blockades.

Adult↗

Ropivacaine 7.5 mg/ml for elective caesarean section. A clinical and pharmacokinetic comparison of 150 mg and 187.5 mg.

BACKGROUND: The new, long-acting local anaesthetic ropivacaine has shown less systemic toxicity than bupivacaine and a concentration of 7.5 mg/ml can therefore be used for epidural anaesthesia in Caesarean section. The present pilot study was undertaken to find indications for an optimal dosage by comparing the clinical effects, quality of anaesthesia and pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine 150 mg (lower dose = LD) vs 187.5 mg (higher dose = HD) for women undergoing elective Caesarean section under epidural anaesthesia. METHODS: Sixteen full-term women scheduled for elective Caesarean section in two equal-sized consecutive groups received 20 or 25 ml ropivacaine epidurally in this non-randomised, open study. Study parameters included sensory and motor blockade, circulatory response, intraoperative pain and discomfort, neonatal evaluation and pharmacokinetic determinations. RESULTS: Block height varied between T5 and T2 in the LD group, whereas the HD group produced 4 unnecessarily high blocks (C8 in 3 women and C7 in 1 woman). Surgical anaesthesia was excellent in both groups. Circulatory stability was pronounced in the LD group (no ephedrine given), while 4 women required ephedrine in the HD group. Neonatal outcome as judged by Apgar scores; umbilical blood gas determinations and NACS scores were excellent in both groups. The plasma concentration-time profiles indicated linearity in the concentration range studied, with similar clearance values to those reported previously. Placental drug equilibrium was rapid; however, the foetal drug exposure depended on intrauterine exposure time. CONCLUSIONS: 20-25 ml ropivacaine 7.5 mg/ml produced very satisfactory conditions for elective Caesarean section under epidural anaesthesia. In this small population, 150 mg ropivacaine seemed optimal, while 187.5 mg produced unnecessarily extended block height in 50% of the women.

Adult↗

Analgesic efficacy of intravenous morphine in labour pain: a reappraisal.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the dose-related analgesic effect of intravenous (i.v.) morphine during spontaneous term first stage labour. This was an open study in 17 parturients who requested analgesia for severe labour pain. All women were given morphine i.v. in repeated doses of 0.05 mg/kg following every third contraction until a final dose of 0.20 mg/kg was reached. The decrease in overall pain intensity, from median visual analogue scale (VAS) 85 (range 52-100) to median VAS 70 (range 46-99), was clinically insignificant. The number of women experiencing back pain, however, decreased significantly following morphine. The most striking effect of morphine (7.2-18 mg) was pronounced sedation. No adverse reactions related to morphine were noted in the neonates. We conclude that i.v. morphine does not significantly reduce overall labour pain intensity. Thus, if a real analgesic effect is desired, systemically given morphine seems inappropriate and other techniques should be used.

Journal Article↗

Lack of analgesic effect of systemically administered morphine or pethidine on labour pain.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the true analgesic effect of morphine and pethidine on labour pain. DESIGN: The analgesic and sedative effects of intravenous morphine or pethidine and their effect on anxiety were compared in a prospective, double-blind, randomised dose-response study. SETTING: A Stockholm teaching hospital obstetric unit. PARTICIPANTS: Ten healthy nulliparous parturients in active labour were included in each group. RESULTS: Even after repeated doses (up to 0.15 mg/kg body weight morphine and up to 1.5 mg/kg body weight pethidine) the findings were uniform, with very high pain scores maintained in each group as assessed with visual analogue scale. The parturients were all significantly sedated and several fell asleep but were awakened by pain during contractions. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that labour pain is not sensitive to systemically administered morphine or pethidine. These drugs only cause heavy sedation. It therefore seems unethical and medically incorrect to meet parturients' requests for pain relief by giving them sedation. Considering the well documented negative effects on newborn infants we also believe systemic pethidine should be avoided in labour.

Adult↗

Peripartum cardiomyopathy--three cases.

Three cases of peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) are presented, each illustrating a clinically important aspect of the disorder. One patient survived despite extreme haemodynamic deterioration, one died suddenly 2 months post partum although clinically recovered, and one died during a subsequent pregnancy. The cases demonstrate the severity and the unpredictable course of PPCM, which remains a challenge both to scientists and to clinicians.

Adult↗