Low back pain: Time to get off the treadmill.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Exercise Therapy↗
Biomedical subjects
C Manniche
Publications and source records attributed to C Manniche.
[Status of the MTV working group "Back pain"].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Back Pain↗
["Back pain" and radiologists].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Back Pain↗
Intensive dynamic training for females with chronic neck/shoulder pain. A randomized controlled trial.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical effectiveness of an intensive three-month training programme with a less intensive programme on females suffering from chronic neck/shoulder pain. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective observer-blinded clinical trial including 12-month pretreatment follow-up. SETTING: Patients were referred to the Departments of Rheumatology and Physical Medicine at Hvidovre Hospital by their general practitioners. Training was undertaken at a satellite clinic for physiotherapy of Hvidovre Hospital. SUBJECTS: Female patients aged 18-65 years suffering from chronic neck/shoulder pain for a minimum of six months. INTERVENTION: Patients were examined by a physician in order to exclude serious diseases. They were then randomized to either an intensive neck/shoulder training programme or a programme of lesser intensity but of similar duration. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Scales measuring pain and activities of daily living (ADL) were used, and strength and endurance measurements of the cervical and shoulder muscles were carried out at baseline and completion of the study. Follow-up measurements were carried out by postal questionnaire at 6 and 12 months after inclusion, and included pain, ADL and treatment satisfaction measurements. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients were included in the trial, of whom 27 (69%) completed the intensive programme and 25 (61%) the lighter programme. Forty-one (>80%) completed the follow-up questionnaires. The patients in the two groups did not differ with regard to age, pain, ADL scores and physical measurements prior to training. Patients in both groups that completed the trial demonstrated statistically significant improvements in nearly all of the outcome measurements at completion. ADL scores maintained statistical significance at 12 months in both groups, but pain scores were only significantly improved in the intensive group at 12 months follow-up. There was no statistically significant difference between groups regarding pain or ADL, but overall 50% of all patients showed improvement. CONCLUSIONS: The type of low-tech dynamic training used in either of our two programmes resulted in both subjective and objective improvements in patients suffering from chronic neck/shoulder pain, but there were no statistically significant differences in outcome between the two approaches. The subjective improvements were maintained throughout the follow-up period.
Activities of Daily Living↗
[Back pain--from the viewpoint of medical technology. Danish National Board of Health].
The appearance of various consensus reports, guidelines, Cochrane Centers, and other evidence-based medicine initiatives during the past decade has resulted in marked improvement in the rational utilisation of available knowledge of attitudes toward the issue of low back pain (LBP). Moreover, owing to the ready access to updated data bases, this knowledge has been disseminated with incredible speed. In the spring of 1995, the Danish National Board of Health in Denmark convinced a multidisciplinary team of back specialists to tailor data available in the international reports for Danish needs. The article outlines the findings of this team, the major recommendations being that providing information is preferable to treatment, that patients should be encouraged to remain active, that physical exercise should be kept up except during the acute phases, that most episodes of LBP are to be considered life events rather than automatic reasons to seek treatment, and that passive treatment should be minimised, though manipulation may be helpful in the short term.
Evidence-Based Medicine↗
The Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale: a study of reliability and validity.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a newly developed disability scale for patients with neck pain demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity. METHODS: Testing was conducted using three different samples of patients with neck pain (n = 162). Test-retest reliability of the scale was carried out on the same day with one sample (n = 39), and between-day reliability was carried out with another (n = 21). Differential item functioning with regard to the influence of gender and age was carried out with these two patient groups, as was construct validity. Responsiveness was measured using patients participating in a clinical trial involving patients with chronic neck pain (n = 102). Additionally, scale scores were compared with a wide range of physical measurements using the patients in the clinical trial. RESULTS: Short-term, between-day and postal questionnaire reliability coefficients were all extremely high. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for internal consistency was 0.9 for the entire scale, and the coefficients for individual items were all greater than 0.88. Disability scale scores correlated strongly to pain scores as well as to doctor and patient global assessments, indicating good construct validity. Relative changes in disability scores demonstrated a moderately strong correlation to changes in pain scores after treatment. Scale scores correlated weakly to all physical measurements. CONCLUSIONS: The disability scale demonstrated excellent practicality and reliability. The scale accurately reflects patient perceptions regarding functional status and pain as well as doctor's global assessment and is responsive to change over long periods of time. We feel that this scale can be a valuable tool for the assessment of patients in future clinical trials and quality of care studies.
Adult↗
[Lumbar disk prolapse surgery with or without free fat transplantation. A prospective triple-blind randomized study].
The aim of this prospective triple-blind randomized study was to determine if a free fat transplant used in operation in lumbar disc herniation could reduce the degree of intraspinal scar tissue and to evaluate whether the scar tissue could lead to symptoms. Ninety-nine patients were subsequently examined after median 376 days. The clinical outcome was scored using the Low Back Pain Rating Scale. Enhanced CT-scanning was assessed regarding the degree of scar tissue and survival of the fat transplant. There was no difference in the clinical outcome between the two groups. Significantly fewer had dural scarring in the group who had a free fat transplantation, but there was no difference regarding the degree of radicular scarring. The transplant was shown on CT-scan at the follow-up examination in 66% of the patients who had a fat transplantation. Free fat transplantation can reduce the degree of dural scar tissue after operation for lumbal disc herniation, but does not result in a clinically better outcome.
Adipose Tissue↗
First-time operation for lumbar disc herniation with or without free fat transplantation. Prospective triple-blind randomized study with reference to clinical factors and enhanced computed tomographic scan 1 year after operation.
STUDY DESIGN: This prospective triple-blind randomized study of 99 patients concerned the use of free fat transplantation for operation for lumbar disc herniation. OBJECTIVE: To subsequently examine the patients after median 376 days who were subjected to enhanced computed tomographic scan. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In studies on experiments with animals, the degree of intraspinal scar tissue has shown to be reduced in connection with free fat transplantation. Scar tissue is seen frequently after operation for lumbar disc herniation, but it is uncertain whether the scar tissue can lead to symptoms. METHODS: The clinical outcome was scored using the Low Back Pain Rating Scale. Enhanced computed tomographic scan was assessed regarding the degree of scar tissue and survival of fat transplant. RESULTS: There was no different in the clinical outcome between the two groups. Significantly fewer patients had dural scarring in the group who had a fat transplantation, but there was no difference regarding the degree of radicular scarring. The transplant was shown on computed tomographic scan at the follow-up examination in 66% of the patients who had a fat transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Free fat transplantation can reduced the degree of dural scar tissue after operation for lumbar disc herniation but does not result in a clinically better outcome.
Adipose Tissue↗
Clinical benefit of intensive dynamic exercises for low back pain.
Over the years there has been an apparent contradiction between the widely utilized treatment of low back pain through exercise, and the often apparently disappointing results reported in the scientific literature. Recently published studies have shown that the most important factor regarding the training effects of chronic low back patients is the administration of a high training stimulus (number of repetitions of the exercise, exercise resistance, and the total number of sessions). This would explain why several of the previously published studies regarding training show insignificant results. Simply stated, in many low-dosage or short-time studies, the positive effects of training have not had adequate opportunity to take hold in the chronic low back pain patient. The patient group which has been operated on for disc prolapse often exhibits considerable functional deteriorations post-operatively. Rehabilitation studies have shown that many of these patients also benefit from post-operative rehabilitation including high dosage exercise programs. Exercise programs are generally free of side-effects.
Exercise Therapy↗
The value of exercise therapy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Exercise Therapy↗
Assessment and exercise in low back pain. With special reference to the management of pain and disability following first time lumbar disc surgery.
Eight articles including 555 low back pain patients have been published. They included the following topics: 1) A ratio interval rating scale (Low Back Pain Rating Scale (RS)) was introduced. The possibility of registering the actual status in low back pain patients including; Back Pain, Sciatica, Functional Disability and Physical Impairment was studied. Methods of evaluating index-scales developed in the field of psychometry were applied in the validation process of RS. RS was found to be both valid and user friendly. 2) Using Low Back Pain Rating Scale the general outcome following first-time lumbar disc surgery was analysed through a survey. The results showed that more than half of the patients still suffered from considerable Back Pain, Sciatica, and Functional Disabilities. Approximately 25% of the patients risked reduced work capabilities, and many receive pensions. 3) By means of a comprehensive statistical analysis of 18 studied preoperative demographic and physical findings, sex, hypoalgesia, smoking and Finneson-index were found to have prognostic value. 4) Attempts at influencing the results obtained from lumbar disc surgery have been tested in 3 randomized trials, including back training and peroperative glucocorticoid administration. 5) Three randomized trials including patients suffering from chronic low back pain (with or without previous lumbar disc surgery) attempted to convey which elements of a training programme provide patients with the greatest effect and the least risk of side-effects. It was concluded that Low Back Pain Rating Scale is a useable assessment instrument in both clinical trials and as a daily quality control instrument of back patients. There is a need of increased patient scrutiny in patient selection prior to lumbar disc surgery. Postoperative rehabilitation should include intensive back training, which has been shown to be of value in behavioural support and restoration of functional deficits. This has resulted in increased work capacities for disc operated patients. The exercise programmes are generally free of side-effects. As regards chronic back pain patients with or without previous lumbar surgery, high dosage exercises with training periods lasting at least 12 to 16 sessions are of crucial importance for success. Exercises should be dynamic and full-range, and carried out following the adage "Don't let the pain be your guide.
Exercise Therapy↗
[Lumbar disk prolapse--back training soon after surgery].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Exercise Therapy↗
[Intensive back exercises 5 weeks after surgery of lumbar disk prolapse. A prospective, randomized multicenter trial with a historical control group].
An intensive, dynamic rehabilitation program applied to patients who had undergone first time lumbar discectomy was evaluated in a multicentre, clinical trial. Ninety-six patients between 18 and 70 years of age who had been operated within the period September 1989 to May 1990 at the Department of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen County Hospital, Glostrup were consecutively randomized into one of two rehabilitation programs: a) traditional mild, general mobility-improving exercises within pain limits; or b) intensive dynamic back extension and abdominal exercises without low back pain being the limiting factor. Both groups underwent 14 hours of treatment over a period of six weeks, starting five weeks after surgery. Seventy-six patients operated within the period January 1989 to September 1989 formed the historical control group. The results at follow-up at 26 weeks favoured intensive exercises with regard to the patients disability-index and working capabilities. The results are statistically significant. After one year a trend favouring intensive exercises can be observed. No differences in pain or objective measurements were found. A rehabilitation program using intensive exercises without back pain being the limiting factor appears to give the patients increased behavioural support, resulting in improvements in work capacity and reduction in patients' self-rated disability.
Adolescent↗
[Postoperative rehabilitation of patients operated for lumbar disk prolapse. An analysis of the socioeconomic consequences].
A new postoperative rehabilitation program consisting of intensive back training without low back pain being the limiting factor has been tested in a clinical trial and found effective compared to a more traditional training program. The objective of the present investigation was to evaluate the social economic consequences (cost-effectiveness analysis) of the introduction of this new program as a general offer for all patients undergoing first time discectomy for a herniated lumbar intervertebral disc in Denmark. Ninety-six consecutive patients operated on at the Dept. of Neurosurgery. Copenhagen County Hospital of Glostrup were randomized into two intervention groups. One group was offered intensive back training and the other group was offered traditional back training. A historical control group was also selected. The effectiveness of the training programmes was evaluated by a "Low Back Pain Rating Scale" and by the number of patients out of employment one year after operation. The social economic evaluation showed that the new intensive training programme was more effective. Savings in medical expenditure are to be expected if the new programme is offered. Further, as more people are to be expected to keep their employment, a production gain for the society can be expected as well as reduced public expenditures on social benefits.
Adult↗
Peroperative prednisolone fails to improve the clinical outcome following surgery for prolapsed lumbar intervertebral disc. A randomized controlled trial.
Ninety three patients undergoing their first conventional hemilaminectomy for lumbar disc protusion were randomized to a double blind clinical trial. Half of the patients were treated immediately following surgery with prednisolone; 50 mg per day for fourteen days and then 25 mg per day for another 14 days. The other patients were treated for the same time period with placebo tablets. Assessments using subjective and objective outcome criteria at 26 weeks, 52 weeks and 156 weeks of follow-up, demonstrated no statistically significant differences between the randomized groups. It is concluded that systemic prednisolone administration in the pre- and postoperative period does not in this study improve the clinical outcome after first time lumbar discectomy.
Adult↗