Biomedical subjects

C Manegold

Publications and source records attributed to C Manegold.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

PubMed1998

Ifosfamide and gemcitabine: a phase II trial in advanced inoperable non-small cell lung cancer.

The novel nucleoside agent gemcitabine has demonstrated antitumor activity against a variety of solid tumors and is associated with low toxicity. A phase I trial in Germany of gemcitabine combined with the alkylating agent ifosfamide has shown encouraging activity against non-small cell lung cancer. The efficacy and toxicity of this combination was further evaluated in a phase II trial involving chemotherapy-naive patients with non-small cell lung cancer (mostly stage IV disease). Gemcitabine was administered at a dose of 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15, followed by a 1-week rest, while ifosfamide was given at a dose of 1,500 mg/m2 on days 8 through 12. Fifty-five patients were treated, 49 of whom are evaluable for response. Six patients were not evaluable because they had not received sufficient therapy (less than one complete cycle) because of early disease progression or early death. Twelve patients responded, for an overall objective response rate of 24.5%. The median survival time was 8.9 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 30.9%. Grades 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 30.2% and 24.5% of patients, respectively, but the incidence of infection was low. These results indicate that the combination of gemcitabine and ifosfamide is active against non-small cell lung cancer and has a mild toxicity profile, and suggest that further evaluation of this combination is warranted.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

PubMed1998

Ifosfamide and docetaxel in non-small cell lung cancer.

Ifosfamide has been in use for several decades and is generally considered to be one of the most effective drugs for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). At the same time, docetaxel is one of the new, promising drugs with high antitumor activity in various solid tumors. In NSCLC, an objective remission rate of 33% could be achieved in chemotherapy-naive patients. Currently, clinical research with docetaxel in NSCLC patients focuses on various combinations of this drug with radiotherapy and a number of different cytostatic chemicals. There are good reasons for combining docetaxel with ifosfamide. In addition to the promising antitumor activity in NSCLC displayed by both drugs, it is an advantage that docetaxel and ifosfamide have only minimal overlapping nonhematologic toxicity. Moreover, the combination seems to be well founded due to the lack of cross-resistance between docetaxel and alkylators such as ifosfamide of the oxazaphosphorine type, which have shown synergistic antitumor activity in vivo. Based on this background, two phase I studies of docetaxel and ifosfamide have been initiated.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

PubMed1998

An update on European randomized studies in non-small cell lung cancer.

Less than 25% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients present with surgically resectable stage I and II disease, and the majority of patients will eventually die of disseminated disease. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy has been shown to prolong survival and improve quality of life in patients with stage III and IV disease. In recent years, new chemotherapeutic agents (eg, gemcitabine, paclitaxel, docetaxel, vinorelbine, and irinotecan) have shown definite activity in advanced NSCLC. The activity of these agents has led to phase II studies combining them with cisplatin, producing response rates that are generally in excess of 35%. Randomized trials suggest that survival is improved when combinations of gemcitabine/cisplatin, vinorelbine/cisplatin, and paclitaxel/cisplatin are compared with cisplatin alone or cisplatin/etoposide. The following report reviews the ongoing trials in NSCLC.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

PubMed1998

Single-agent gemcitabine versus cisplatin/etoposide in patients with inoperable, locally advanced, or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a malignancy that is refractory to most currently available chemotherapeutic agents. The most frequently used systemic therapy is cisplatin-based combination therapy, which is not always suitable for patients with stage IV disease because of toxicity. Thus, any single agent with a good patient tolerability profile would be a useful alternative for those patients for whom the main purpose of treatment is palliation. The novel nucleoside analog gemcitabine has proven single-agent activity in patients with NSCLC, with consistent response rates of 20% and above. This report reviews two randomized phase II studies of single-agent gemcitabine versus cisplatin/etoposide in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

The causes and prognostic significance of low hemoglobin levels in tumor patients.

BACKGROUND: While the production and degradation of erythrocytes are carefully balanced in healthy persons several processes can lead to an imbalance in tumor patients resulting in anemia. PATHOGENESIS: Processes caused by the tumor itself can lead to a typical "anemia of chronic disease" which is normochromic, normocytic, accompanied by both a reduced number of reticulocytes and reduced iron-binding capacity. In many cases, the erythropoietin response to anemia is insufficient. Cytokines such as interleukin-1, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor seem to be involved in suppressing erythropoiesis by acting on the bone marrow and on erythropoietin production. Anemia can also be the result of cancer therapy, as is particularly prominent in patients with lung cancer receiving chemotherapy (incidence of anemia 20 to 50%). PROGNOSTIC FACTOR: Several studies have demonstrated that anemia is not only linked to an impaired quality of life but to prognosis as well. Albain et al. [2] identified a hemoglobin level of below 11 g/dl as a significant independent prognostic factor associated with shorter survival of chemotherapeutically treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The same applies to a hemoglobin level below 12.7 g/dl for radiotherapeutically treated NSCLC patients according to a study by Ohlhauser et al. (Oncology 1997;20:1689-92). Several studies have confirmed this prognostic importance of hemoglobin level for other solid tumors. TREATMENT: To correct anemia, clinicians have several options. Given the risks associated with transfusions, especially for tumor patients, recombinant erythropoietin holds promise for raising hemoglobin levels and thereby improving therapeutic efficacy and survival.

Anemia↗

PubMed1997

[Docetaxel (taxotere) in non-small-cell bronchial carcinoma].

BACKGROUND: Various new drugs with different mechanisms of action are presently under investigation for the field of solid tumors. The taxanes, Taxotere and Taxol, are among those drugs possessing a unique mechanism of action but showing pharmacological differences. CONCLUSION: The results of several phase I and II studies of Taxotere in monotherapy as well as in combination schedules with chemotherapy and Radiotherapy show Taxotere to be active in non small cell lung cancer and build the basis for further evaluation in clinical trials.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗

PubMed1997

Induction of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor by acute febrile infection but not by neutropenia in HIV-seropositive individuals.

The objective of this study was to assess endogenous granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) serum levels in HIV-seropositive individuals with persistent neutropenia or acute febrile infection. Serum levels of G-CSF were measured by enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay. HIV-seropositive subjects (n = 28) with afebrile neutropenia (< 1000 neutrophils/microliter) showed low G-CSF serum levels (i.e., median was below the detection limit) not different from those of healthy volunteers (n = 66) or nonneutropenic HIV-seropositive controls (n = 75). In contrast, patients with acute myeloid leukemia and afebrile neutropenia from chemotherapy (n = 17) demonstrated markedly elevated G-CSF levels (median, 264 pg/ml; p < 0.0001). However, HIV-seropositive patients with pneumonia (n = 17) showed increases of G-CSF serum levels (median, 152 pg/ml; p < 0.0001) similar to HIV-seronegative patients (n = 17) with pneumonia (median, 123 pg/ml; p = 0.97). The results suggest that there may be a contribution of low G-CSF serum levels to persistent neutropenia in HIV-seropositive individuals. Moreover, the different G-CSF serum levels in HIV-seropositive individuals in response to neutropenia or acute febrile inflammation suggest different mechanisms for the regulation of G-CSF.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed1997

Single-agent gemcitabine versus cisplatin-etoposide: early results of a randomised phase II study in locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: This randomised study was designed to determine the response rate survival and toxicity of single-agent gemcitabine and cisplatin-etoposide in chemo-naïve patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 was given as a 30 min intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, 15 of a 28-day cycle, cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1, and etoposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1 (following cisplatin), 2 and 3. Major eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed non-small-cell lung cancer, measurable disease, Zubrod PS 0-2; no prior chemotherapy, no prior radiation of the measured lesion, and no CNS metastases. RESULTS: 146 patients were enrolled, 71 patients on gemcitabine and 75 patients on cisplatin-etoposide. Patient characteristics were well matched across both arms. Sixty-six gemcitabine patients and 72 cisplatin-etoposide patients were evaluable. Partial responses were seen in 12 gemcitabine patients (18.2%; 95% CI: 9.8-30) and 11 cisplatin-etoposide patients (15.3%; 95% CI: 7.9-25.7). Early indications show no statistical differences between the two treatments with respect to time to disease progression or survival. Haematological and laboratory toxicity were moderate and manageable. However, hospitalisation because of neutropenic fever was required for 6 (8%) cisplatin-etoposide patients but not for any gemcitabine patients. Non-haematological toxicity was more pronounced with significant differences in nausea and vomiting (grade 3 and 4: 11% gemcitabine vs. 29% cisplatin-etoposide; despite the allowance for 5-HT3 antiemetics during the first cycle of cisplatin-etoposide), and alopecia (grade 3 and 4:3% gemcitabine vs. 62% cisplatin-etoposide). CONCLUSIONS: In this randomised study, single-agent gemcitabine was at least as active but better tolerated than the combination cisplatin-etoposide.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Invasive thymoma: treatment with postoperative radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: To assess radiation therapy and chemotherapy in the treatment of invasive thymoma and thymic carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 1981-1995, 43 patients received irradiation after total (n = 23) or subtotal (n = 20) resection. Tumors were thymic carcinoma (n = 10) or invasive thymoma (n = 33). Masaoka stage was II in 10 patients, III in 14, and IV in 19. Median total dose applied was 50 Gy (range, 10-72 Gy). Seventeen patients (five with stage III and 12 with stage IV) also received chemotherapy. RESULTS: Patients with thymic carcinoma had a median survival of 9.5 months, compared with 50 months for patients with invasive thymoma (P = .008). Patients' median survival and 5-year survival rates were 97 months and 90% for stage II, 65 months and 67% for stage III, and 32.5 months and 30% for stage IV tumors (P = .024). Overall control rate within the radiation field was 81% (35 patients) and overall local control rate within the thorax was 74% (32 patients). Of the 17 patients who received chemotherapy and radiation therapy, nine had thymic carcinoma and a median survival of 12 months (range, 1.4-23.0 months). CONCLUSION: With total doses of 45-50 Gy, local control is achievable after radical resection. Whether patients with completely resected stage II thymomas should receive radiation after surgery remains uncertain, as does the role of chemotherapy in the treatment of thymoma.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Treatment outcome and prognostic factors for primary mediastinal (thymic) B-cell lymphoma: a multicenter study of 106 patients.

PURPOSE: To define clinicopathologic features, response to treatment, and prognostic factors of primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (MBL), a CD20+ tumor recognized as a distinct entity among non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred six patients presented with disease confined to thorax (86%), bulky mediastinum (73%), superior vena cava syndrome (47%), and contiguous infiltration (57%). Ninety-nine received doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy (CHT). RESULTS: Thirty-five of 99 patients were primarily CHT-resistant, and 64 responded: 23 achieved complete response (CR) and 41 achieved response with residual mediastinal abnormality. Seventy-seven percent of responders received mediastinal radiotherapy (RT). Of 64 responders, 18 (28%) relapsed: none of 23 CR patients and 18 of 41 (44%) with residual mediastinal abnormality. Relapse-free survival rate of responders was 71% at 3 years. Actuarial 3-year survival rate was 52% for all patients and 82% for responders. Predictive factors of poor outcome were identified by logistic regression; Cox survival analysis was performed on death and relapse. Pericardial effusion (P < .001) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status > or = 2 (P = .009) predicted nonresponse (NR) and affected survival. Less than partial midway response to CHT predicted NR to subsequent therapies. Bulky disease was related to persistent mediastinal abnormality and risk of relapse (P = .025). CONCLUSION: MBL is an aggressive NHL with unique clinicopathologic aspects, often refractory to current CHT designed for high-grade NHL. Poor performance status and pericardial effusion predict NR and poor survival. Inadequate response after the first courses of front-line CHT predicts failure of subsequent treatment. Responders with bulky mediastinum or residual mediastinal abnormality after CHT are at risk of relapse. These factors should help to select high-risk patients for intensive treatments.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1997

Primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma: update of its clinicopathologic features.

The peculiar clinical, histomorphological and biological characteristics of PMBCL are reviewed. Special emphasis is given to the frequent aggressive clinical behaviour of this lymphoma in which conventional prognostic factors seem inadequate to identify high risk cases. The need for new clinical and/or biological prognostic markers is stressed.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗

PubMed1997

A randomized study of gemcitabine monotherapy versus etoposide/cisplatin in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

This randomized, multinational, multicenter study was designed to determine the response rate of gemcitabine monotherapy and cisplatin/etoposide combination therapy in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced, recurrent, and/or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (stage IIIA [if inoperable], IIIB, or IV). One group of patients received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 intravenously once a week for 3 weeks (days 1, 8, and 15) followed by a 1-week rest period. The second group received cisplatin 100 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 of each 28-day cycle in combination with etoposide 100 mg/m2, administered on days 1, 2, and 3 following the cisplatin infusion. Each patient was allowed to remain on study up to a maximum of six cycles. The planned interim analysis was based on the 117 patients in the study, 116 of whom were randomized up until November 20, 1995. The efficacy analysis was performed on the 107 patients who had data from a minimum of two cycles, whereas the safety analysis was based on data from all 116 randomized patients. In the gemcitabine arm there were 10 of 52 (19%) partial responders; in the cisplatin/etoposide arm there were four (7%) of 54 partial responders. There was a statistically significant difference in the response rates between the two arms, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.6% to 32.1% (P = .040). The median time to progressive disease was 4.2 months for gemcitabine patients and 3.7 months for cisplatin/etoposide patients. There was significantly more alopecia and nausea and vomiting in the cisplatin/etoposide arm compared with the gemcitabine arm, as well as two cases of neutropenic sepsis in the cisplatin/etoposide arm. These data indicate that single-agent gemcitabine is at least as effective as the combination of cisplatin/etoposide in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer and has an improved safety profile.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

A phase II trial of gemcitabine and ifosfamide in non-small cell lung cancer.

The novel nucleoside agent gemcitabine has demonstrated antitumor activity against a variety of solid tumors and is associated with low toxicity. A phase I trial in Germany of gemcitabine combined with the alkylating agent ifosfamide has shown encouraging activity against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The efficacy and toxicity of this combination was further evaluated in a phase II trial of chemotherapy-naive patients with NSCLC (mostly stage IV disease). Gemcitabine was administered at a dose of 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 followed by a 1-week rest, while ifosfamide was given at a dose of 1,500 mg/m2 on day 8 and days 9 through 12. Fifty-one of 56 patients were evaluable for response. Eleven partial responses were seen, for an overall objective response rate of 22%. The 6- and 9-month survival rates are 62% and 41%, respectively. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 35.8% and 24.5% of patients, respectively, but the incidence of infection was low. These results indicate that the combination of gemcitabine and ifosfamide is active against NSCLC and has a mild toxicity profile, and suggest that further evaluation of this combination is warranted.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Expression of resistance-related proteins in tumoral and peritumoral tissues of patients with lung cancer.

Twenty tumoral and peritumoral tissues from patients with lung cancer were analyzed immunohistochemically for the drug resistance-related proteins P-glycoprotein (P-170), topoisomerase II (Topo-II), glutathione S-transferase-pi (GST-pi), metallothionein (MT), heat shock protein-70 (HSP-70) and the putative regulators of resistance (ErbB1, Fos and Jun). Protein expression of Topo-II, GST-pi, MT, HSP-70, ErbB1, Fos and Jun was elevated in tumor tissue in comparison to normal tissue. The different expression of the proteins between tumoral and normal tissues was statistically significant for Topo-II (P = 0.05), MT (P = 0.03), and HSP-70 (P = 0.01), whereas ErbB1 showed a borderline significance. The expression of the proteins was frequently increased in smokers in comparison to non-smokers. In general, the increase of the proteins of smokers corresponded in tumoral and non-tumoral tissue. Different expression was only found with MT and HSP-70 which were higher in tissues of smokers.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗

PubMed1996

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the new podophyllotoxin derivative NK 611. A study by the AIO groups PHASE-I and APOH.

NK 611 is a new podophyllotoxin derivative in which a dimethyl amino group replaces a hydroxyl group at the sugar moiety of etoposide. This results in profound physico-chemical differences: NK 611 is much less hydrophobic than etoposide. Preclinical studies have shown that NK 611 is advantageous in terms of bioavailability and of the potency of its anticancer activity. A clinical phase I study was performed in cancer patients within the framework of the AIO. Additionally, its pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were investigated. NK 611 was given to 26 patients at doses ranging from 60 to 140 mg/m2 [maximum tolerated dose (MTD) 120 mg/m2] in a 30-min infusion. Plasma and urine samples were collected from 25 patients and analyzed using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay procedure. The concentration versus time curve of total NK 611 in plasma samples was best described by a three-compartment model. The overall median pharmacokinetic values were as follows (ranges are given in parentheses): mean residence time (MRT) 16.5 (5.4-42.3)h, terminal half-life 14.0 (8.2-30.5)h, volume of distribution at steady state (V(ss)) 11.4 (7.9-18.1) l/m2 and plasma clearance (Cl(p)) 15.1 (3.6-36.4) ml min-1 m-2. The total systemic drug exposure, represented by the area under the curve (AUC), varied between 53.4 and 532.0 micrograms ml-1 h. The mean AUC (+/- SD) increased with the dose from 78.7 +/- 3.7 micrograms ml-1 h at 60 mg/m2 up to 202.8 +/- 157.2 micrograms ml-1 h at 120 mg/m2. The mean urinary excretion (UE) fraction of unchanged drug at 48 h after the end of the infusion varied between 3.0% and 25.8% of the total dose delivered. Analysis of ultrafiltrate samples showed a protein binding of approx.. 99%. The percentage reduction in white blood cells (WBC) and neutrophils (ANC) correlated with the dose, AUC, and AUC(free). The best relationship between the percentage of reduction in ANC and a pharmacokinetic parameter (AUC) took a nonlinear Hill-type form. The laboratory parameter for kidney or liver function did not correlate with the AUC. The variation of pharmacokinetic parameters within each dose level was profound. The reason for this pharmacological behavior remains unclear and should be investigated in further studies.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Oral ifosfamide/mesna versus intravenous ifosfamide/mesna in non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase II trial of the EORTC lung cancer cooperative group.

BACKGROUND: Chronic oral administration of anticancer drugs may offer therapeutic advantages. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 68 patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, not previously treated by chemotherapy, were randomized to receive either ifosfamide given orally (OSI) at a dose of 1 g/day for 14 days every 4 weeks, or as a 1-hour intravenous infusion (IVI) at a dose of 1.6 g/m2/day for 5 days every 4 weeks. According to the route of ifosfamide administration, patients received either mesna i.v. or mesna film-coated tablets for uroprotection. RESULTS: Eight patients were found to be ineligible for the study and therefore excluded for all analyses. Thirty-three patients received IVI, and 27 patients OSI. One patient randomized to OSI died before treatment was initiated, leaving 59 patients fully evaluable for toxicity. Hematological toxicity was less severe for patients on OSI, but CNS toxicity was reported more frequently on OSI (39%; 12% grade III/IV), than on IVI (15%; 9% grade III/IV), which caused the premature close of the study. Other non-hematological adverse events were of modest clinical significance and comparable in both arms. Forty-nine patients were considered evaluable for response: in the IVI arm, 5 (17%) of the 29 evaluable patients obtained a partial remission, and 7 patients a no change (24%). In the OSI arm, 2 (10%) of the 20 evaluable patients obtained a partial remission, and 11 (52%) a stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: Both arms have some activity in non-small-cell lung cancer; while OSI was less myelosuppressive than IVI, it was associated with a higher incidence of CNS toxicity. Oral administration of ifosfamide, in the schedule and daily dose tested here cannot be recommended.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1996

Randomized phase II trial comparing different doses of the bisphosphonate ibandronate in the treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the hypocalcemic effect and safety of three different doses of the bisphosphonate ibandronate in tumor-associated hypercalcemia, and to identify factors predicting response. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred seventy-four cancer patients with a serum calcium level greater than 2.7 mmol/L (10.8 mg/dL) were enrolled onto the trial. If hypercalcemia persisted after fluid repletion, patients were randomly assigned to treatment with 0.6 mg, 1.1 mg, and 2.0 mg of ibandronate. Response, defined as restoration of normocalcemia, was evaluated by an intent-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-three (99%) patients were assessable for toxicity and 151 (87%) for efficacy. The administration of 0.6 mg (group A), 1.1 mg (group B), or 2.0 mg (group C) of ibandronate led to response rates of 44%, 52%, and 67%, respectively. Significantly more patients in group C responded than in group A (P = .0276). Of the various parameters examined, only the initial serum calcium level (P < .0001; odds ratio, 0.083) and the dose of ibandronate (P = .0162; odds ratio, 2.094) correlated with response. One hundred ninety-five adverse events (AEs) were reported, 99 classified as serious and 96 as nonserious. Three serious and sixteen nonserious AEs were considered related to ibandronate treatment. The three serious AEs were one case with thrombocytopenia, one with nausea, and one with fever. CONCLUSION: Ibandronate therapy led to a dose-dependent reduction in serum calcium levels. The response to ibandronate treatment correlated negatively with the initial serum calcium level and positively with the dose administered. A dose of 2 mg was necessary to achieve a response rate comparable to that in previous studies with the bisphosphonates pamidronate and clodronate. Because the incidence of drug-associated AEs was low, a dose escalation of ibandronate can be recommended for further clinical trials.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Quality of life and supportive care in the treatment of NSCLC.

The definition of quality of life (QOL) for individual patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unclear and its evaluation difficult because of the heterogeneity of the patients involved. More research is needed to determine the best means of routinely expressing and comparing QOL assessments and implementing the results of these studies into daily patient care. The role of broad supportive care in optimizing patient comfort and functionality is also an important issue. Because it incorporates not only specific palliative treatment, but also nontumor-specific measures and medical intervention, supportive care is relevant to all patients with NSCLC, whether terminally ill or suffering treatment-related toxic reactions. More education, research, and financial support are needed to optimize QOL and supportive care of patients.

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung↗