Biomedical subjects

C M Cartwright

Publications and source records attributed to C M Cartwright.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Does being against euthanasia legislation equate to being anti-euthanasia?

This study investigated issues raised in qualitative data from our previous studies of health professionals and community members, which suggested that being opposed to euthanasia legislation did not necessarily equate to being anti-euthanasia per se. A postal survey of 1002 medical practitioners, 1000 nurses and 1200 community members was undertaken. In addition to a direct question on changing the law to allow active voluntary euthanasia (AVE), four statements assessed attitudes to euthanasia with or without a change in legislation. Responses were received from 405 doctors (43%), 429 nurses (45%) and 405 community members (38%). Compared with previous studies there was a slight increase in support for a change in the law from medical practitioners, a slight decrease in support from community members and almost no change among nurses. Different interpretations of the results of the four attitude questions are possible, depending on the perspective of the interpreter.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

End-of-life decision-making: community and medical practitioners' perspectives.

OBJECTIVE: To examine current attitudes and knowledge of the community and medical practitioners in Queensland to end-of-life decisions. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey by postal questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS: 387 general practitioners and medical specialists and 910 community members from the Queensland electoral roll. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Responses to five questions about end-of-life decision-making, and to legislative changes relating to such decisions. RESULTS: The overall response rate for medical practitioners was 67% and for community members was 53%. 78% of community members (age adjusted) and 54% of doctors thought that a doctor should comply with a patient's request to turn off a life-support system; 68% of doctors through people would still ask to have their life ended even if pain were controlled, compared with 54% of community members; 70% of community members thought the law should be changed to allow active voluntary euthanasia, compared with 33% of doctors; and 65% of community members thought that a doctor should be allowed by law to assist a terminally ill person to die, but only 36% of doctors agreed. 79% of doctors and 75% of community members agreed that people would still ask for assistance to end their lives even if optimal palliative care were freely available. CONCLUSION: Community members supported greater choice and control over end-of-life decisions, while doctors were less supportive of some of the options canvassed. In a climate of community participation in health care decisions, it is important to better understand the basis and meaning of these different views. Further detailed research is recommended.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1997

Self-determination in terminal care. A comparison of GP and community members' responses.

OBJECTIVES: To examine health practitioner and community concerns, priorities and preferred options regarding patient self-determination in terminal care. METHOD: A postal questionnaire was sent to 229 general practitioners in two areas of Queensland (Brisbane and Wide Bay) and to 1100 community members throughout Queensland. Questions covered a range of end of life decision making issues, including where people wish to die, the use of advance directives and proxy decision makers, and possible barriers to such options. RESULTS: GPs and community members held very different opinions on most issues: community members were divided between home, hospital and hospice as a preferred place to die, while GPs strongly favoured home as their preferred place to die. Both groups supported the use of advance directives and proxies, but differed significantly with respect to barriers preventing the use of such options. CONCLUSION: Clarifying differences in perceptions and preferred options between the two groups on end of life decision making should not only improve communication and interactions between GPs and their patients but also allow both groups to become full participants in current policy and practice debates on end of life decisions.

Adult↗