Biomedical subjects

C M Bollen

Publications and source records attributed to C M Bollen.

21 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMedDate not supplied

One-stage full-mouth disinfection to overcome intra-oral transmission of periodontopathogens.

The oral cavity offers a range of different niches where periodontopathogens can adhere and survive (e.g. the mucosa, the tongue, the tonsils, the saliva and all intra-oral hard surfaces such as teeth, dentures, oral implants). Transmission of bacteria from one niche to another is likely to occur. Recent studies, for example, illustrated that initially sterile abutments of oral implants were rapidly colonized by bacteria from the subgingival environment around teeth. This transmission of bacteria can occur spontaneously via the saliva, or by means of oral hygiene aids and/or dental instruments. Such an intra-oral transmission, if it occurs at a high speed, could jeopardize the outcome of periodontal therapy. To overcome a bacterial transmission, a 'one-stage full-mouth disinfection' was recently introduced for the treatment of periodontal infections. This new treatment strategy resulted in significant clinical and microbiological improvements when compared with the standard sequential treatment.

Journal Article↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Comparison of surface characteristics of six commercially pure titanium abutments.

Clinical studies have reported a positive correlation between the surface roughness of teeth or implants and the rate of supragingival and subgingival plaque maturation. This study compared the surface characteristics of abutments from different implant systems (Astra Tech, Bonefit, Brånemark, Core-Vent, IMZ, and Steri-Oss). For each system, two abutments were examined for surface roughness and surface hardness. The latter served as an indicator for resistance against roughening during professional or habitual oral hygiene procedures. The Ra values (in microns) of the tested abutments were: Steri-Oss, 0.10; IMZ, 0.14; Brånemark, 0.21; Bonefit, 0.23; Astra Tech, 0.27; and Core-Vent, 0.30. The Vickers hardness scores (in VHN) were: Brånemark, 154; IMZ, 208; Astra Tech, 258; Bonefit, 292; Core-Vent, 304; and Steri-Oss, 340. In comparison to most metallographically polished composites, titanium abutments showed a higher initial surface roughness and a slightly higher surface hardness. This may explain, besides the known high surface free energy of titanium, rapid plaque growth on these abutments.

Dental Abutments↗

PubMedDate not supplied

The influence of titanium abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and gingivitis: short-term observations.

The roughness of intraoral hard surfaces plays an important role in bacterial adhesion and colonization. Earlier studies have shown that rough surfaces accumulate up to 25 times more subgingival plaque than do smooth sites. In the present study, the influence of surface smoothing was studied. In six partially edentulous patients waiting for a fixed prosthesis supported by endosseous titanium implants, four titanium abutments with different surface roughness were randomly placed. After 1 month of intraoral exposure, subgingival plaque samples from each abutment were compared within each patient by means of differential phase-contrast microscopy. After 3 months, supragingival and subgingival plaque samples were taken from all abutments for differential phase-contrast microscopy and culturing. Probing depth, recession, and bleeding upon probing were scored at the same visit. Differential phase-contrast microscopy showed that subgingivally, only the two roughest abutments harbored spirochetes after 1 month. After 3 months, subgingivally, the composition of the flora showed little variation on the different abutment types, although spirochetes were only noticed around the roughest abutments. Anaerobic culturing resulted in comparable amounts of colony-forming units for all abutment types, both supragingivally and subgingivally. Subgingivally, the microbiologic composition did not show major interabutment differences. Clinically, small differences in probing depth were observed. The roughest abutment showed some attachment gain (0.2 mm) during 3 months, whereas all other abutments had an attachment loss ranging from 0.8 to greater than 1 mm. The results indicate that a reduction in surface roughness (less than a roughness of 0.2 micron) had no major effect on the microbiologic composition, supragingivally or subgingivally. These observations indicate the existence of a threshold roughness below which no further impact on the bacterial adhesion and/or colonization should be expected. However, clinical evaluation seems to indicate that a certain surface roughness is necessary for increased resistance to clinical probing.

Bacteria, Anaerobic↗