Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C M Beasley

Publications and source records attributed to C M Beasley.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1993

The effects of renal and hepatic disease on the pharmacokinetics, renal tolerance, and risk-benefit profile of fluoxetine.

Renal and hepatic diseases have a significant impact on the plasma concentration profiles and the dose requirements for almost all drugs. This paper reviews the effect of these diseases and their associated physiological derangements on the pharmacokinetics of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine. Metabolic studies of fluoxetine in man show that more than 70% of the radiolabelled compound is excreted in the urine. Most of the urinary radiolabelled products are metabolites and not the parent compound nor its active metabolite, norfluoxetine. Cirrhosis of the liver significantly reduces the clearance of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine, but mild, moderate, or severe renal dysfunction does not affect fluoxetine or norfluoxetine pharmacokinetics. Daily administration of fluoxetine, 20 mg, for more than 2 months to renally impaired, depressed patients (who require haemodialysis) produces steady-state fluoxetine and norfluoxetine plasma concentrations that are comparable to the concentrations in depressed patients with normal renal function. Renal function is not an important determinant of the steady-state concentrations of fluoxetine or norfluoxetine, though the concentrations may be higher in patients with significantly impaired liver function.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Fluoxetine not associated with increased aggression in controlled clinical trials.

A comprehensive meta-analysis was performed to address the possible association of fluoxetine with violence or aggression. Data from the United States Investigational New Drug Clinical Trial Databases for approved and potential indications (depression, obesity, bulimia nervosa, obsessive-compulsive disorder, smoking cessation, alcoholism; n = 3992) were evaluated. Statistically significantly fewer fluoxetine-treated patients (0.15%) than placebo-treated patients (0.65%) experienced events suggestive of aggression (hostility, personality disorder, antisocial reaction). A relative risk analysis indicated that aggression events were four times more likely to occur in placebo-treated patients than in fluoxetine-treated patients. Although the possibility that some rare phenomenon was not detected cannot be excluded, this meta-analysis did not show fluoxetine to be associated with an increased risk of emergence of violent or aggressive behaviour.

Aggression↗
PubMed1993

Evaluation of suicidality during pharmacologic treatment of mood and nonmood disorders.

Double-blind, controlled clinical trial data were evaluated to assess a hypothetical relationship between fluoxetine and suicidality (suicidal acts and ideation) in patients with mood (n = 5,655) and nonmood disorders (n = 4,959) (Mantel-Haenszel incidence difference method). In mood disorders, act rates (suicide attempts/completions) were low (treatment differences nonsignificant). Substantial suicidal ideation emerged less frequently with fluoxetine than placebo and was comparable with fluoxetine and tricyclic antidepressants. Improvement in ideation was greater with fluoxetine than placebo; it was comparable with fluoxetine and tricyclic antidepressants (United States trials) and greater with tricyclic antidepressants than fluoxetine (international trials). In nonmood disorders, no suicides occurred. Act and emergent ideation rates were low (treatment differences nonsignificant). Results do not suggest a causal relationship between pharmacotherapy and emergence of suicidality. Fluoxetine or tricyclic antidepressants reduce suicidal ideation and may protect against the emergence of substantial suicidal ideation.

Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic↗
PubMed1993

Fluoxetine compared with imipramine in the treatment of inpatient depression. A multicenter trial.

Fluoxetine and imipramine were compared in a six-week, double-blind, randomized trial in 118 men and women, ages 18 to 70 years, hospitalized for major depressive disorder. Treatment groups were comparable at baseline. Median maintenance doses were: fluoxetine, 80 mg/day; imipramine, 200 mg/day. Efficacy with fluoxetine and imipramine was comparable: none of the between-treatment differences was statistically significant. Mean +/- standard deviation baseline HAMD21 total scores and change (last-visit-carried-forward analysis), respectively, were fluoxetine, 28.0 +/- 5.3 and -8.5 +/- 9.9; imipramine, 27.0 +/- 5.8 and -11.9 +/- 9.0. Response and remission rates, respectively, were fluoxetine, 54.5 and 21.2%; imipramine, 60.0 and 34.3%. Discontinuations for adverse events were comparable (fluoxetine, 21.4%; imipramine, 22.6%). Common treatment-emergent events with fluoxetine were dry mouth (28.6%), constipation (17.9%), and somnolence (17.9%); those with imipramine were dry mouth (58.1%), constipation (32.3%), and headache (22.6%). Fluoxetine was as effective as imipramine in this population of inpatients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Possible monoamine oxidase inhibitor-serotonin uptake inhibitor interaction: fluoxetine clinical data and preclinical findings.

The primary objective of this article is to review information pertinent to and emphasize the seriousness of a potential adverse monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI)-serotonin uptake inhibitor interaction by considering, within the context of preclinical data, clinical cases in which an MAOI and fluoxetine hydrochloride, a specific serotonin uptake inhibitor, were administered in close temporal proximity. Clinical cases were identified by a review of spontaneous adverse event reports submitted voluntarily to Eli Lilly and Company through its drug surveillance program and by a review of reports of MAOI interactions published in the scientific literature. A discussion of eight selected clinical cases of acute adverse reactions (seven with fatal outcomes; one with a favorable response after cyproheptadine therapy) reported to Eli Lilly and Company in which an MAOI was initiated concurrently or shortly after the discontinuation of fluoxetine and a review of preclinical data suggest a possible role of serotonin and/or serotonin-dopamine interactions in the hypermetabolic state that may occur when a serotonin uptake inhibitor and an MAOI are coadministered, although alternative etiologic processes are possible as well. Data reviewed reinforce the idea that the administration of an MAOI in close temporal proximity to fluoxetine is contraindicated.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Analyses of suicidality in double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of pharmacotherapy for weight reduction.

BACKGROUND: The obese who seek therapy may also have depression and thus a risk for suicidality (suicidal acts and ideation). For this reason and because of interest in the potential impact of a medication with antidepressant properties on suicidality in a population without a primary diagnosis of depression, we performed a comprehensive analysis of suicidality data from clinical trials in patients seeking weight-reduction therapy. METHOD: Suicidality data from 11 double-blind controlled trials in the United States Investigational New Drug fluoxetine obesity clinical trial data base (3819 randomized outpatients) were reviewed. Trials lasted 6 to 60 weeks (continuous and intermittent therapy designs). They included obese men and women (median body mass index, 35.0 kg/m2). Trials excluded patients treated with antidepressants. Incidence of suicidality was analyzed by the incidence difference method. RESULTS: No fatal suicidal acts occurred. One suicide attempt was reported in a patient receiving placebo after prior fluoxetine therapy (intermittent therapy trial). The overall incidence of suicidal ideation among fluoxetine-treated and placebo-treated patients in the obesity clinical trials was 0.24%. The difference in incidence of emergent suicidal ideation in fluoxetine-treated (0.23%) and placebo-treated patients (0.27%) was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Based on these analyses of controlled clinical trials, suicidality occurs but has a low incidence rate in the obese who seek pharmacologic weight-reduction therapy. Fluoxetine-treated and placebo-treated patients did not differ statistically significantly in the incidence of suicidality either during or after discontinuation of therapy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Fluoxetine: activating and sedating effects.

Serotonin uptake inhibitors are generally considered activating antidepressants. To assess the rates and temporal patterns of activation and sedation as well as dose-effect relationships, adverse event data were evaluated from a fixed-dose study comparing placebo and fluoxetine, 5, 20 and 40 mg/day, in the treatment of major depressive disorder (n = 363) and the pooled data from two fixed-dose studies comparing placebo and fluoxetine, 20, 40 and 60 mg/day, in the treatment of major depressive disorder (n = 746). The adverse events 'nervousness', 'anxiety', 'agitation' and 'insomnia' were considered indicative of activation; 'somnolence' and 'asthenia' were considered indicative of sedation. Activation and sedation were both statistically significant treatment-emergent phenomena (p < or = 0.05), but dose-effect relationships differed. Activation rates were relatively stable between 5 mg/day and 40 mg/day, but they increased at 60 mg/day. Sedation rates increased linearly up to 40 mg/day, and then were comparable at 40 mg/day and 60 mg/day. Discontinuations due to either phenomenon were uncommon. The temporal patterns of first occurrences and persistence of activation and sedation differed. First occurrences of activation peaked early and declined over time at all doses. First occurrences of sedation also peaked early at all doses, but there may have been greater variability in first occurrences of sedation over time in patients receiving lower doses. The persistent occurrences of sedation may decline less over time than the persistent occurrences of activation.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Fluoxetine: a review of receptor and functional effects and their clinical implications.

Downregulation of serotonin 5-HT1 receptors is the most frequently reported central nervous system neural effect of subchronic exposure to fluoxetine in rodents. However, downregulation of these receptors has not been universally demonstrated. Effects of subchronic exposure on 5-HT2 receptors are mixed. Fluoxetine exposure appears to have no effect on cholinergic muscarinic receptors. Effects on beta-adrenergic receptors are controversial, as only one laboratory has reported downregulation. The majority of studies have failed to show an effect on beta-adrenergic-receptor-stimulated cAMP generation. Electrophysiologic studies support the concept that fluoxetine facilitates net serotonergic transmission through downregulation of presynaptic inhibitory autoreceptors. Data suggest that its subchronic specificity and selectivity distinguish fluoxetine from members of other classes of available antidepressants, making it a distinct therapeutic option.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Fluoxetine: no association with suicidality in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Since (a) obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) may involve serotonergic neural transmission abnormalities also though to be related to regulation of suicide and aggression, (b) comorbidity between OCD and depression is substantial, and (c) depression is a major risk factor for suicide, a comprehensive analysis of clinical trial data was undertaken to assess the potential association of fluoxetine, a serotonin uptake inhibitor, and suicidality (suicidal acts and ideation). Pooled data from clinical trials comparing fluoxetine (n = 266) and placebo (n = 89) in patients with DSM-IIIR OCD were analyzed retrospectively. No suicidal acts occurred during placebo lead-in or double-blind therapy. Mean Hamilton Depression Scale item 3 (suicide item) scores improved statistically significantly with fluoxetine compared with placebo. Worsening in suicidal ideation was statistically significantly more frequent with placebo than with fluoxetine. Emergence of substantial suicidal ideation (change in baseline item 3 score of 0 or 1 to 3 or 4) was numerically greater with placebo than with fluoxetine (3.6% vs. 1.7%; not statistically significant). The incidence of suicidality in fluoxetine-treated patients with OCD was low, compared favorably with rates in corresponding placebo-treated patients, and was well within the range of estimates in previous studies of patients with OCD. These controlled clinical trial results suggest no undue risk of suicidality in patients with OCD treated with fluoxetine.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Fluoxetine: activating and sedating effects at multiple fixed doses.

Serotonin uptake inhibitors are generally considered activating antidepressants. To assess rates and temporal patterns of activation and sedation as well as dose-effect relationships, adverse event data were evaluated from a fixed-dose study comparing placebo and fluoxetine 5, 20, and 40 mg/day in the treatment of major depressive disorder (N = 363) and two fixed-dose studies pooled together comparing placebo and fluoxetine 20, 40, and 60 mg/day in the treatment of major depressive disorder (N = 746). The adverse events nervousness, anxiety, agitation, and insomnia were considered indicative of activation; somnolence and asthenia were considered indicative of sedation. Activation and sedation were both statistically significant (p less than or equal to 0.05) treatment-emergent phenomena, but dose-effect relationships differed. Activation rates were relatively stable between 5 and 40 mg/day, and then increased at 60 mg/day. Sedation rates increased linearly to 40 mg/day and then were comparable at 40 and 60 mg/day. Discontinuations for either phenomenon were uncommon. The temporal patterns of first occurrences and persistence of activation and sedation differed. First occurrences of activation peaked early and declined over time with all doses. First occurrences of sedation also peaked early with all doses, but there may have been greater variability in first occurrences of sedation over time with lower doses. Persistent occurrences of sedation may decline less over time than persistent occurrences of activation.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Lack of association between fluoxetine and suicidality in bulimia nervosa.

BACKGROUND: The coincidence of major depressive disorder in bulimia nervosa ranges from 35% to 80%. Because of this comorbidity and because suicidality (suicidal acts and ideation) is an inherent part of depression, assessment of the risk of suicide in patients with bulimia nervosa is of considerable interest. METHOD: Data from United States Investigational New Drug double-blind, placebo-controlled fluoxetine clinical trials in bulimia nervosa were analyzed comprehensively to assess the potential association between fluoxetine treatment and suicidality in 785 patients with DSM-III-R bulimia nervosa. Patients were predominantly women (98%), aged 17 to 63 years; of the randomly assigned patients, 16.9% exhibited 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) total scores of 17 or greater at baseline (range, 0-31). Incidence of suicidality was analyzed by the incidence difference method. RESULTS: No fatal suicidal acts occurred; 9 (1.15%) of 785 patients made nonfatal attempts; 24 (3.06%) experienced emergent (text-defined) suicidal ideation. No statistically significant increases in the incidence of suicidal acts or suicidal ideation were observed among fluoxetine-treated compared with placebo-treated patients. A smaller percentage of fluoxetine-treated (2.0%) than placebo-treated (3.8%) patients experienced emergence of substantial suicidal ideation (change in baseline HAM-D Item 3 [suicide item] score of 0 or 1 to 3 or 4 during therapy). A statistically significantly greater proportion of fluoxetine-treated than placebo-treated patients experienced improvement in suicidal ideation (decrease in HAM-D Item 3 score) from baseline to endpoint (p = .026). CONCLUSION: Analyses of the incidence of suicidal acts and suicidal ideation did not indicate an increased risk of suicidality in patients with bulimia nervosa treated with fluoxetine compared with those treated with placebo.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Fluoxetine and suicide: a meta-analysis of controlled trials of treatment for depression.

OBJECTIVE: A comprehensive meta-analysis of clinical trial data was performed to assess the possible association of fluoxetine and suicidality (suicidal acts and ideation). DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of pooled data from 17 double blind clinical trials in patients with major depressive disorder comparing fluoxetine (n = 1765) with a tricyclic antidepressant (n = 731) or placebo (n = 569), or both. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Multiple data sources were searched to identify patients with suicidal acts. Suicidal ideation was assessed with item 3 of the Hamilton depression rating scale, which systematically rates suicidality. Emergence of substantial suicidal ideation was defined as a change in the rating of this item from 0 or 1 at baseline to 3 or 4 during double blind treatment; worsening was defined as any increase from baseline; improvement was defined as a decrease from baseline at the last visit during the treatment. RESULTS: Suicidal acts did not differ significantly in comparisons of fluoxetine with placebo (0.2% v 0.2%, p = 0.494, Mantel-Haenszel adjusted incidence difference) and with tricyclic antidepressants (0.7% v 0.4%, p = 0.419). The pooled incidence of suicidal acts was 0.3% for fluoxetine, 0.2% for placebo, and 0.4% for tricyclic antidepressants, and fluoxetine did not differ significantly from either placebo (p = 0.533, Pearson's chi 2) or tricyclic antidepressants (p = 0.789). Suicidal ideation emerged marginally significantly less often with fluoxetine than with placebo (0.9% v 2.6%, p = 0.094) and numerically less often than with tricyclic antidepressants (1.7% v 3.6%, p = 0.102). The pooled incidence of emergence of substantial suicidal ideation was 1.2% for fluoxetine, 2.6% for placebo, and 3.6% for tricyclic antidepressants. The incidence was significantly lower with fluoxetine than with placebo (p = 0.042) and tricyclic antidepressants (p = 0.001). Any degree of worsening of suicidal ideation was similar with fluoxetine and placebo (15.4% v 17.9%, p = 0.196) and with fluoxetine and tricyclic antidepressants (15.6% v 16.3%, p = 0.793). The pooled incidence of worsening of suicidal ideation was 15.3% for fluoxetine, 17.9% for placebo, and 16.3% for tricyclic antidepressants. The incidence did not differ significantly with fluoxetine and placebo (p = 0.141) or tricyclic antidepressants (p = 0.542). Suicidal ideation improved significantly more with fluoxetine than with placebo (72.0% v 54.8%, p less than 0.001) and was similar to the improvement with tricyclic antidepressants (72.5% v 69.8%, p = 0.294). The pooled incidence of improvement of suicidal ideation was 72.2% for fluoxetine, 54.8% for placebo, and 69.8% for tricyclic antidepressants. The incidence with fluoxetine was significantly greater than with placebo (p less than 0.001) and did not differ from that with tricyclic antidepressants (p = 0.296). CONCLUSIONS: Data from these trials do not show that fluoxetine is associated with an increased risk of suicidal acts or emergence of substantial suicidal thoughts among depressed patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Efficacy and safety of morning versus evening fluoxetine administration.

A total of 120 patients who met DSM-III criteria for unipolar major depressive episode were equally randomized to fluoxetine a.m. or fluoxetine p.m. treatment groups, such that 30 patients were in each group at each of two sites. Patients received 20 to 80 mg of fluoxetine every day for 5 weeks; the dose was based on clinical response. Highly significant within-treatment improvement was reflected by changes in mean scores on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (total score and factors), the Raskin Depression Scale, the Covi Anxiety Scale, the Clinical Global Impressions Scale for Severity, and the Clinical Global Impressions Scale for Improvement. No significant differences occurred between the a.m. and p.m. groups for any efficacy variable. Evaluation of adverse events and vital signs indicated no clinically significant differences between the two treatment groups. The data indicate that fluoxetine is equally efficacious and well tolerated regardless of the time of day it is administered and suggest that fluoxetine may be administered at either time of day without affecting clinical course.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

High-dose fluoxetine: efficacy and activating-sedating effects in agitated and retarded depression.

The effects of high-dose fluoxetine (median 80 mg/day), standard-dose imipramine (median 200 mg/day), and placebo were studied in 706 outpatients meeting DSM-III criteria for major depressive disorder. Baseline psychomotor activity of each patient was prospectively categorized as agitated, retarded, or neither. Rates of occurrence of total and significant (leading to discontinuation) activating adverse events (insomnia, agitation, anxiety, nervousness) and sedating events (somnolence, asthenia) were compared between treatments on an overall basis and within categories of baseline psychomotor activity. Additionally, these rates were compared across baseline psychomotor activity for each treatment. Efficacy was evaluated on an overall basis and with respect to baseline psychomotor activity. There was more total activation with fluoxetine than placebo (p = 0.008), but total activation with fluoxetine (28%) showed only a trend (p = 0.092) for being greater than with imipramine (21%). Discontinuations for activation with fluoxetine (5%) did not differ from imipramine (5%). Sedation and discontinuations for sedation with both fluoxetine and imipramine significantly exceeded placebo. The only drug-drug difference in discontinuations was for sedation where imipramine (11%) exceeded fluoxetine (5%; p = 0.008). Only for the occurrence of sedation with imipramine (47% among patients retarded at baseline) was there a significant association with baseline psychomotor activity (p = 0.021). Both fluoxetine and imipramine were superior to placebo and equal in efficacy in decreasing total Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), the sleep disturbance HAM-D factor, and the anxiety/somatization HAM-D factor scores. These improvements were independent of baseline psychomotor activity.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Fluoxetine versus trazodone: efficacy and activating-sedating effects.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of fluoxetine (N = 65; median sustained dose, 20 mg/day) and of trazodone (N = 61; median sustained dose, 250 mg/day) were compared in a trial in outpatients with major depressive episode. The incidence and temporal patterns of activation and sedation were also assessed. METHOD: Men and women who met DSM-III criteria for nonpsychotic major depressive episode (but with a current episode greater than or equal to 4 weeks) and had a 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D21) score greater than 20 were selected. After single-blind placebo was administered for 1 week, eligible patients were randomized to double-blind fluoxetine or trazodone treatment for up to 6 weeks. Efficacy (HAM-D21, Clinical Global Impressions Scales for Severity and Improvement, Patient Global Impressions Scale for Improvement, Guild Memory Test) and adverse events were evaluated weekly. RESULTS: The HAM-D21 score improved within both treatment groups (p less than .001). The groups were similar with respect to endpoint mean HAM-D21 improvement. For individual adverse events that developed or worsened during therapy, more fluoxetine-treated patients reported rhinitis and tremor (p less than or equal to .05), while more trazodone-treated patients reported somnolence and dizziness (p less than or equal to .05). More combined events suggesting activation (agitation, anxiety, nervousness, insomnia) were reported with fluoxetine than with trazodone (15.4% vs. 3.3%, p less than or equal to .05), while more combined events suggesting sedation (somnolence, asthenia) were reported with trazodone than with fluoxetine (42.6% vs. 21.5%, p less than or equal to .05). Discontinuation rates for activation and sedation did not differ between treatments. Numerically, more sedation (21.5%) than activation (15.4%) was reported with fluoxetine. CONCLUSIONS: There was little clinical difference between treatments with regard to efficacy and safety. The occurrence and temporal patterns of activation and sedation differed within and between treatments.

Adult↗