Lingual orthodontics: a status report. Part 5. Lingual mechanotherapy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to C M Alexander.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The effects of diabetes mellitus on serum thyroid hormone parameters were studied in 54 patients divided into 4 groups. Treated asymptomatic patients (group I) had normal thyroid values which did not correlate with serum or urinary glucose. Untreated nonketoacidotic patients (group II) showed a mild persistent depression in T3 and an elevation in rT3. Patients with ketoacidosis with a brief history of symptoms (group III) had a moderate T3 decrease and a mild rT3 elevation which quickly resolved with treatment. Ketoacidotic patients with a long history of symptoms (group IV) had marked depression of T3 and elevation of rT3 which was only partially rectified by treatment. Serum T4 was generally normal, except for a minimal decrease on the day after admission, probably resulting from rehydration and a subsequent increase associated with an increase in TSH. We concluded that thyroid hormone parameters were not influenced by variations in serum glucose, but seemed to reflect the effects of a preexisting catabolic state, ketoacidosis, or both.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To describe and understand current care of simvastatin-treated patients with combined hyperlipidemia in routine clinical practice. DESIGN: A 6-month prospective observational study. Demographics, simvastatin dosage, cardiac risk factors, and lipid profile were collected from August 1997 to December 1998 at 20 sites (230 patients) across the United States. RESULTS: Overall mean percentage of reduction in total cholesterol levels was 27% (P<.001), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was 35% (P<.001), and triglyceride values was 28% (P<.001). Among those patients with low baseline high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) values (<0.91 mmol/L [<35 mg/dL]) (N = 49), there was a 17% increase in HDL-C (P< or =.001); 35% of these patients achieved National Cholesterol Education Program HDL-C goal (ie, < or =0.91 mmol/L [> or =35 mg/dL]). Coronary heart disease (CHD) patients were given significantly higher initial doses (mean, 15.1 mg) compared with non-CHD patients (mean, 11.5 mg) (P< or =.001). Overall, 74% of patients achieved LDL-C goal (52% on starting dose, 22% after 1 titration). Among those patients who were not at goal and had a follow-up lipid profile result available, only 1 patient (2%) was at the maximum dose (80 mg); 69% were receiving 20 mg or less. Approximately 63% of patients with CHD, 80% of patients with 2 or more risk factors, and 91% of patients with fewer than 2 risk factors achieved LDL-C goal. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple factors contribute to LDL-C goal achievement in a usual care setting. A significant opportunity exists to increase the number of patients who achieve LDL-C goal by appropriate dose titration and/or give patients a higher initial dose of simvastatin.
BACKGROUND: Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have a marked increase in coronary heart disease (CHD) events relative to those without DM. In a previous report from the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study using a clinical case definition of DM (n = 202), simvastatin-treated patients had significantly fewer CHD events compared with placebo-treated control subjects. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of simvastatin therapy on CHD in patients with DM and impaired fasting glucose levels. METHODS: Using the 1997 American Diabetes Association diagnostic criteria, we assessed the effect of simvastatin therapy post hoc for an average of 5.4 years in Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study patients with normal fasting glucose (n = 3237), impaired fasting glucose (n = 678), and DM (n = 483). RESULTS: Simvastatin-treated patients with DM had significantly reduced numbers of major coronary events (relative risk [RR] = 0.58; P = .001) and revascularizations (RR = 0.52; P = .005). Total (RR = 0.79; P = .34) and coronary (RR = 0.72; P = .26) mortality were also reduced in DM, but not significantly, due to small sample size. In impaired fasting glucose (IFG) subjects, simvastatin use significantly reduced the number of major coronary events (RR = 0.62; P = .003), revascularizations (RR = 0.57; P = .009), and total (RR = 0.57; P = .02) and coronary (RR = 0.45; P = .007) mortality. CONCLUSION: Our results extend previous findings in patients with DM to a larger cohort, confirming the benefit of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin treatment on CHD events. In addition, significant decreases in total mortality, major coronary events, and revascularizations were observed in simvastatin-treated patients with impaired fasting glucose levels. These results strongly support the concept that cholesterol lowering with simvastatin therapy improves the prognosis of patients with elevated fasting glucose levels (> or =6.0 mmol/L [> or =110 mg/ dL]) or DM and known CHD.
The purpose of the study was to describe the effect of physician reminders on the measurement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and treatment to achieve an LDL-C goal of < or = 100 mg/dL in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients. After reminders were initiated, the number of CHD patients without a documented LDL-C was reduced from 30% to 18%, between January 1997 and July 1998, and the percentage of CHD patients achieving the LDL-C goal improved from 10% to 27%. Thus, reminders can be an effective tool in improving cholesterol management of CHD patients. In contrast, a cholesterol-lowering clinic made available to some physicians, in addition to the reminders, was rarely used.