Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C L Jarvis

Publications and source records attributed to C L Jarvis.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Use of enteral nutrition for stress ulcer prophylaxis.

OBJECTIVE: To review the controversies involving the use of enteral nutrition support for stress ulcer prophylaxis and formulate recommendations. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search (1966-December 2000) was conducted using the MeSH of nutrition, ulcer, critical care, and acid to identify relevant articles. References of selected articles were reviewed, and relevant abstracts from critical care or gastrointestinal journals identified. DATA EXTRACTION: Animal and human data from prospective studies, retrospective studies, and case series were evaluated for the effects of enteral nutrition on gastric pH, intramucosal pH, gastrointestinal blood flow, development of macroscopic mucosal erosions, and hemorrhage. DATA SYNTHESIS: Intragastric administration of enteral nutrition has variable effects on gastric pH, enhances regional distribution of gastrointestinal blood flow, and may lower intramucosal pH. All substrates (carbohydrate, lipid, amino acid), when administered into the stomach, reduce the occurrence of mucosal erosions but do not entirely prevent their development. Few studies of stress ulcer prophylaxis regimens have reported use of enteral nutrition. Limited retrospective data suggest enteral nutrition support may be effective for preventing gastrointestinal hemorrhage, but the results of prospective studies are confounded by poor study design. CONCLUSIONS: Definitive recommendations regarding the role of enteral nutrition for stress ulcer prophylaxis are not possible due to the lack of prospective, randomized studies. Therefore, the use of enteral nutrition as the only therapeutic agent for stress ulcer prophylaxis should be discouraged until definitive data are available. Initiation and discontinuation of pharmacologic stress ulcer prophylaxis should be independent of enteral nutrition.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Reliability of Allen's test in selection of patients for radial artery harvest.

BACKGROUND: Allen's test is widely used to assess the ulnar collateral blood supply of the hand before radial artery harvest for coronary bypass surgery. This study was performed to determine the optimum cut-off point for a positive Allen's test and the clinical reliability of Allen's test in this role. METHODS: Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery were examined by independent observers using both Allen's test and a Doppler ultrasound test of the ulnar collateral circulation. RESULTS: We examined 93 hands in 47 patients; mean age was 63.6 years. Receiver operating characteristic analysis found that at a conventional cut-off of 6 seconds on Allen's test had a sensitivity of 54.5%, specificity of 91.7%, and diagnostic accuracy of 78.5%. At a cut-off of 5 seconds diagnostic accuracy was maximal (79.6%), with sensitivity of 75.8% and specificity of 81.7%; 100% sensitivity occurred at a cut-off of 3 seconds, with specificity of 27% and diagnostic accuracy of 52%. CONCLUSIONS: At no cut-off point does Allen's test perform satisfactorily as a discriminatory test. It should be replaced by more objective tests, such as Doppler ultrasound.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Intravenous histamine H2-receptor antagonists and parenteral nutrition: patterns of use.

Patterns of use of i.v. histamine h2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) and parenteral nutrient solutions in patients receiving both given separately or as admixtures were studied. Consecutive adult patients at a university teaching hospital were placed in an "admixed group," consisting of all those who received an i.v. H2RA as a parenteral nutrient solution additive, or a "nonadmixed group," consisting of all those who received an i.v. H2RA and a parenteral nutrient solution as separate infusions. Data were collected for many variables, including interruptions in therapy, route and method of administration, indication for use, total daily dose of H2RA, patient demographic data, and any additional anti-ulcer drugs prescribed. A total of 128 patients received 158 regimens of therapy, 60 regimens in the admixed group and 98 in the nonadmixed group. There was at least one interruption in i.v. H2RA therapy for 32% of the admixed-group regimens and 33% of the nonadmixed-group regimens. When an interruption occurred, patients in the admixed group missed an average of 40% of their daily H2RA dose, compared with 53% for the nonadmixed group. No alternative anti-ulcer drug was given on 10 (23%) of the 42 days when intensive care patients had an interruption in H2RA therapy, versus 33 (55%) of the 60 days of H2RA interruption for non-intensive-care patients. Interruptions in i.v. H2RA therapy occurred more frequently when the H2RA was a component of the nutrient solution than when it was given as a separate infusion. Supplemental anti-ulcer therapy was typically not provided during interruptions in H2RA therapy, regardless of the method of administration.

Adult↗