Biomedical subjects

C J Plack

Publications and source records attributed to C J Plack.

16 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1998

Basilar-membrane nonlinearity and the growth of forward masking.

Forward masking growth functions were measured for pure-tone maskers and signals at 2 and 6 kHz as a function of the silent interval between the masker and signal. The inclusion of conditions involving short signals and short masker-signal intervals ensured that a wide range of signal thresholds were recorded. A consistent pattern was seen across all the results. When the signal level was below about 35 dB SPL the growth of masking was shallow, so that signal threshold increased at a much slower rate than masker level. When the signal level exceeded this value, the masking function steepened, approaching unity (linear growth) at the highest masker and signal levels. The results are inconsistent with an explanation for forward-masking growth in terms of saturating neural adaptation. Instead the data are well described by a model incorporating a simulation of the basilar-membrane response at characteristic frequency (which is almost linear at low levels and compressive at higher levels) followed by a sliding intensity integrator or temporal window. Taken together with previous results, the findings suggest that the principle nonlinearity in temporal masking may be the basilar membrane response function, and that subsequent to this the auditory system behaves as if it were linear in the intensity domain.

Auditory Perception↗

PubMed1998

Temporal processing of the pitch of complex tones.

The effect of tone duration on fundamental frequency (F0) discrimination is greater for complexes containing unresolved harmonics than for those containing resolved harmonics [Plack and Carlyon, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 1355-1364 (1995)]. Three experiments explored this effect further. The first experiment measured sensitivity (as d') to fundamental frequency (F0) differences for two complexes, both with an F0 of 250 Hz. The first complex was low-pass filtered at 1875 Hz to create a resolved complex and the second was bandpass filtered between 5500 and 7500 Hz to create an unresolved complex. The harmonics for the resolved complex were selected so that no two harmonics were the same between the two observation intervals. Performance for both complexes was measured for tone durations of 20, 40, 80, and 160 ms. For the unresolved complex, the effect of duration was greater than that for the resolved complex and greater than the predictions of a "multiple-looks" model assuming either peripheral (before sampling) or central (after combining samples) sources of variance. The second experiment replicated these results using an F0 of 62.5 Hz with the cutoff frequencies of the bandpass filters divided by four, confirming that the effect is related to resolvability and not to spectral region. In the final experiment, F0 discrimination for pairs of complexes separated by a temporal gap was measured relative to that for one complex. Performance for the resolved and unresolved complexes was similar: Very little effect of gap duration was observed and the results were consistent with the predictions of the peripheral-variance multiple-looks model. Taken together, the results suggest that the pitch mechanism for resolved harmonics uses a relatively short sampling window of around 20 ms, while the mechanism for unresolved harmonics may use a more complex strategy for optimizing the combination of information over time, perhaps involving a flexible integration time.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Beneficial effects of notched noise on intensity discrimination in the region of the "severe departure".

Intensity discrimination for a 6-kHz sinusoidal pedestal was measured in quiet and in the presence of a noise background. In the first experiment, the level of a 30-ms pedestal was fixed at 45 dB SPL and presented in the temporal and spectral center of a 110-ms notched noise. For a noise spectrum level of between 0 and 15 dB the noise produced a substantial reduction in the Weber fraction, i.e., an improvement in detectability, compared to the condition without the noise. The second experiment showed that, unlike the situation with notched noise, narrow-noise produced no performance improvement, suggesting that the effect is dependent on noise frequency components outside the critical band of the pedestal. The third experiment showed that the improvement also occurred for a 6-ms pedestal presented in a 10-ms gap between two bursts of notched noise. The experiment rules out an explanation for the effect of the noise in terms of suppression on the basilar membrane. Finally, the effect was shown to decrease as the gap between the noise bursts was increased, in a manner at least broadly consistent with the decay of the temporal excitation pattern. It is suggested that the improvement in intensity discrimination in notched noise is due to an across-frequency comparison mechanism similar to "profile analysis," perhaps operating on a temporally smoothed central representation of the stimulus.

Auditory Perception↗

PubMed1998

Suppression and the upward spread of masking.

The purpose of this study is to clarify the role of suppression in the growth of masking when a signal is well above the masker in frequency (upward spread of masking). Classical psychophysical models assume that masking is primarily due to the spread of masker excitation, and that the nonlinear upward spread of masking reflects a differential growth in excitation between the masker and the signal at the signal frequency. In contrast, recent physiological studies have indicated that upward spread of masking in the auditory nerve is due to the increasing effect of suppression with increasing masker level. This study compares thresholds for signals between 2.4 and 5.6 kHz in simultaneous and nonsimultaneous masking for conditions in which the masker is either at or well below the signal frequency. Maximum differences between simultaneous and nonsimultaneous masking were small (< 6 dB) for the on-frequency conditions but larger for the off-frequency conditions (15-32 dB). The results suggest that suppression plays a major role in determining thresholds at high masker levels, when the masker is well below the signal in frequency. This is consistent with the conclusions of physiological studies. However, for signal levels higher than about 40 dB SPL, the growth of masking for signals above the masker frequency is nonlinear even in the nonsimultaneous-masking conditions, where suppression is not expected. This is consistent with an explanation based on the compressive response of the basilar membrane, and confirms that suppression is not necessary for nonlinear upward spread of masking.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

A behavioral measure of basilar-membrane nonlinearity in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.

This paper examines the possibility of estimating basilar-membrane (BM) nonlinearity using a psychophysical technique. The level of a forward masker required to mask a brief signal was measured for conditions where the masker was either at, or one octave below, the signal frequency. The level of the forward masker at masked threshold provided an indirect measure of the BM response to the signal, as follows. Consistent with physiological studies, it was assumed that the BM responds linearly to frequencies well below the characteristic frequency (CF). Thus the ratio of the slopes of the masking functions between a masker at the signal frequency and a masker well below the signal frequency should provide an estimate of BM compression at CF. Results obtained from normally hearing listeners were in quantitative agreement with physiological estimates of BM compression. Furthermore, differences between normally hearing listeners and listeners with cochlear hearing impairment were consistent with the physiological effects of damage to the cochlea. The results support the hypothesis that BM nonlinearity governs the nonlinear growth of the upward spread of masking, and suggest that this technique provides a straightforward method for estimating BM nonlinearity in humans.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Loudness enhancement and intensity discrimination under forward and backward masking.

There is a large deterioration in intensity discrimination performance at medium levels for a 30-ms sinusoidal pedestal presented 100 ms before or 100 ms after an intense masker [Plack and Viemeister, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92, 3097-3101 (1992)]. It has also been demonstrated that the loudness of a 30-ms sinusoidal tone burst, presented 100 ms after a masking tone burst, is enhanced at mid-levels [Zeng, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 96, 2127-2131 (1994)]. The present experiment measured intensity discrimination and loudness enhancement in both forward and backward masking. A double-staircase adaptive procedure was used to match the loudness of a 30-ms, 1-kHz standard sinusoid presented in quiet to the loudness of a 30-ms, 1-kHz sinusoid presented 100 ms after (forward masking) or 100 ms before (backward masking) a 110-ms, 90-dB, 1-kHz masking sinusoid. The mean of the thresholds from the two staircases was used to determine the amount of enhancement, and the difference between the thresholds from the two staircases was used to determine the intensity just noticeable difference (jnd). Four listeners were tested at a range of standard levels between 30 and 90 dB. For all listeners, in both forward and backward masking, the jnd and loudness were greatest at mid-levels (40-70 dB). For a given listener, there was no substantial difference between the form of the results under forward and compared to backward masking, although there was considerable variability in the size of the effects between the individual listeners. Combining all the data, for both forward and backward masking there was a positive correlation between the size of the jnd and the magnitude of the loudness enhancement, although the correlation was only significant in backward masking (p < 0.005). Taken with the results of Zeng, these data suggest a link between loudness enhancement and the jnd increase, and a link between the mechanisms underlying the effects of forward and backward masking on intensity discrimination. It is suggested that all these effects may be caused by long-term loudness integration in the auditory system.

Humans↗

PubMed1996

Temporal factors in referential intensity coding.

Three experiments investigated the finding [Plack et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 1141-1149 (1995)] that intensity discrimination under backward masking can be improved by presenting an additional, "proximal," tone burst shortly before or after the pedestal. All the stimuli used in the experiments were 30-ms, 1-kHz sinusoids. In the first experiment, intensity discrimination was measured for a 50-dB SPL pedestal presented 100 ms before an 80 dB SPL masker. A proximal tone burst was presented either before or after the pedestal, separated from the pedestal by a brief silent gap. For the conditions in which the proximal burst was before the pedestal, adding a proximal burst with a higher level than the pedestal produced an improvement in intensity discrimination. The most effective level of the proximal burst increased as the gap was increased. For the conditions in which the proximal burst was after the pedestal, two listeners showed an improvement when the proximal burst was lower in level than the pedestal, and one listener showed an improvement when the proximal burst was higher in level than the pedestal. In a second experiment, detection threshold measurements showed that good performance was not dependent on the proximal burst making the pedestal in one of the two observation intervals. The final experiment used a selective training procedure to demonstrate that listeners were basing performance on two conflicting strategies, namely, to pick the interval that sounded as if it had three tone bursts in it when the proximal level was higher than the pedestal level, and to pick the interval that sounded as if it had two tone bursts in it when the proximal level was lower than the pedestal level. A model of temporal resolution is presented that can explain certain aspects of the results in terms of the detection of "bumps" in the temporal excitation patterns produced by the stimuli. In conditions of backward masking, these relative features seem to provide a superior cue for intensity discrimination than absolute intensity, which is actively rejected as a cue.

Auditory Perception↗

PubMed1995

Intensity discrimination under forward and backward masking: role of referential coding.

The present experiments investigated the hypothesis that listeners can code intensity by reference to proximal stimuli in order to improve intensity discrimination performance in conditions of nonsimultaneous masking. The experiments used 30-ms tone bursts as the masker, pedestal, and "proximal burst." The masker level was 80 dB, the pedestal level was 50 dB. In the first experiment the silent interval between the masker and the pedestal was varied. Surprisingly, in both forward and backward masking situations, the Weber fraction decreased as the silent interval was decreased from 100 to 12.5 ms. This is consistent with the referential coding hypothesis: At short intervals performance improves because the level of the pedestal is coded by reference to the proximal masker. In a further set of experiments, the silent interval was 100 ms and an additional proximal burst was presented either 12.5 ms before or 12.5 ms after the pedestal. The proximal burst produced a substantial decrease in the Weber fraction, but only when it was close in frequency to the pedestal, and with a higher intensity. The results are consistent with the auditory system having the ability to produce a robust intensity measure by reference to proximal signals. These findings also provide further evidence that the mid-level elevation in forward masking is not solely the result of processes operating at the level of the auditory nerve.

Auditory Perception↗

PubMed1994

The detection of differences in the depth of frequency modulation.

Thresholds were measured for the detection of differences in the depth of 5-Hz frequency modulation (FM). In the first experiment, listeners detected differences between sequentially presented sinusoidal carriers. The Weber fractions for FM depth decreased from about 0.5 to about 0.3 as the baseline depth was increased from 2.5% to 20%, and were slightly higher for a carrier frequency of 0.5 kHz compared to carrier frequencies of 1, 2, and 4 kHz. In the second experiment, complex carriers were used consisting of consecutive harmonics of 125- and 250-Hz fundamentals (f0's), bandpass filtered between 1375 and 1875 Hz. Performance was worse with these stimuli than with the sinusoidal carriers: The Weber fractions for the 250-Hz f0 ranged from about 0.4 to about 2.0 across listeners, and were roughly invariant with baseline depth. The Weber fractions for the 125-Hz f0 showed a steady decrease from about 3.2 to about 0.6 as the baseline depth was increased from 2.5% to 20%, so that threshold corresponded, approximately, to a constant increase in FM depth, independent of baseline depth. The absolute detectability of the FM may have been a limiting factor for the lower two baseline depths at this f0. In the final experiment, psychometric functions were measured for the detection of simultaneous across-frequency differences in FM depth. Three conditions were tested; in the first of these the two carriers to be compared were 666- and 1500-Hz pure tones. In the second condition the two carriers were complex tones, both with f0's of 250 Hz, filtered between 125 and 625 Hz and between 1375 and 1875 Hz, respectively. The third condition was similar, except that the two (complex) carriers had different f0's of 111 and 250 Hz. In the first and third conditions performance was extremely poor, even when the FM depths of the two carriers to be discriminated were 10% and 50%. Listeners did perform substantially better, however, on the second condition. The implications of these results for the idea that listeners use differences in FM depth to perceptually segregate concurrent sounds are discussed.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed1993

Suppression and the dynamic range of hearing.

The results from experiments that have examined intensity discrimination in the presence of notched noise indicate that spread of excitation is not necessary for the auditory system to maintain a large dynamic range. In those experiments the notched noise and the pedestal were simultaneously present. It is possible, therefore, that the notched noise suppressed the pedestal, and increased the dynamic range by reducing the excitation level [A. R. Palmer and E. F. Evans, Hear. Res. 7, 305-323 (1982)]. In the experiment described here, spread of excitation was masked nonsimultaneously in order to avoid suppressive effects. The brief sinusoidal pedestal was presented in a 13-ms gap between two bursts of a masking complex. The masking complex consisted of two sinusoids at frequencies of 0.8fc and 1.2fc (where fc was the pedestal frequency), each having a level either the same as, or 10 dB below the pedestal level, and a notched noise with a spectrum level 40 dB below the level of the sinusoids. Detection thresholds were measured to ensure that the complex was effective in masking spread of excitation. Weber fractions were measured at two pedestal frequencies, 1 and 4 kHz, and at eight pedestal levels at each frequency, covering a range of 70 dB. The results indicate that, although the masking complex raised the Weber fraction by up to 10 dB in some conditions, performance was no worse at high levels than at medium or low levels. This suggests that the auditory system can maintain a large dynamic range in the absence of suppression and spread of excitation.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed1992

Intensity discrimination under backward masking.

The Weber fraction was measured for a 25-ms sinusoidal pedestal presented 100 ms before, or 100 ms after, an intense narrow-band noise. Consistent with the finding of Zeng et al. [Hear. Res. 55, 223-230 (1991)], the forward masker caused an elevation in the Weber fraction at medium pedestal levels. Surprisingly, however, a much larger midlevel elevation was observed in the backward masking conditions; in some cases, the Weber fraction was increased by over 20 dB by the backward masker. In both masking conditions, presenting a notched noise simultaneously with the pedestal reduced the magnitude of the midlevel elevation. These results indicate that it is possible to produce large masking effects on intensity discrimination in conditions where there is no possibility of the masker affecting the representation of the pedestal at the level of the auditory nerve. This suggests that there may be "central" processes underlying the original finding of Zeng et al. Despite the similarities in the results, however, it is not certain that the elevations seen in the forward and backward masking conditions were caused by the same mechanisms.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed1992

The effects of notched noise on intensity discrimination under forward masking.

Zeng et al. [Hear. Res. 55, 223-230 (1991)] reported that at moderate levels there is an increase in the intensity jnd for 25-ms sinusoidal pedestals presented 100 ms after an intense narrow-band noise. They suggested that this effect is related to the finding that low spontaneous rate (SR) auditory-nerve neurons take a considerable time to recover from adaptation [E. M. Relkin and J. R. Doucet, Hear. Res. 55, 215-222 (1991)]: 100 ms after the noise, the low-SR neurons still have elevated thresholds. Therefore, the intensity of a pedestal falling between the saturation level of the high-SR neurons and the elevated threshold of the low-SR neurons will be poorly represented in neutral firing rates, and the jnd will be high. A problem with this interpretation is that subjects may listen "off frequency." Theoretically, it should always be possible to choose a frequency channel for which the pedestal level is within the dynamic range of the high-SR neurons. In the present study, the experiment of Zeng et al. was replicated but with the pedestal presented in the temporal center of a notched noise to prevent off-frequency listening. Surprisingly, the notched noise substantially decreased the jnd at mid levels, removing or severely reducing the mid-level jnd elevation. This was true for pedestal frequencies of 1 and 6 kHz. It was also found that even if the notched noise was terminated before pedestal onset the jnd elevation was reduced. This suggests that the effect of the notched noise is not due to suppression.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

PubMed1991

Decrement detection in normal and impaired ears.

The smallest detectable duration of a brief decrement in the intensity of wideband noise was measured as a function of the depth of the decrement. In the first experiment, conditions were tested in which the noise before the decrement was more intense than the noise after the decrement, and vice-versa. These data were used to estimate the shape of an intensity-weighting function, or temporal window, describing the temporal resolution of the ear. The equivalent rectangular durations (ERDs) of the temporal windows measured in this way had values of about 5.5, 4.6, and 6.6 ms for noise spectrum levels of 10, 30, and 50 dB, respectively. In a second experiment, decrement detection was measured in subjects with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. One set of thresholds was measured in the impaired ear, and two sets of thresholds were measured in the normal ear; one with the noise level at equal SPL to the level in the impaired ear, and one with the noise at equal SL. Temporal window shapes were also estimated from these data. Only one of the subjects showed reduced temporal resolution in the impaired ear, the other two subjects having similar ERD values for all three conditions.

Aged↗

PubMed1990

Temporal window shape as a function of frequency and level.

In an earlier article [Moore et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83, 1102-1116 (1988)], preliminary work on the temporal-window model of temporal resolution in the auditory system was described. The temporal window is conceived of as a temporal integrator that slides in time and that is implemented as an intensity-weighting function. The shape of the temporal window was estimated by measuring the threshold for a brief sinusoidal signal presented in a temporal gap between two bursts of noise as a function of the duration of the gap and the position of the signal within the gap. In this paper, a much more thorough examination of the effects of level and frequency on the shape of the window is presented, using the same basic technique. Temporal window shapes were measured at four different frequencies (300, 900, 2700, and 8100 Hz) and at three different masker levels covering a 20-dB range at each frequency. The shape of the temporal window was well described by modeling each side as the sum of two rounded-exponential (roex) functions. The equivalent rectangular duration (ERD) of the window decreased from about 13 to 9 ms as the center frequency increased from 300 to 900 Hz, but decreased only slightly, to 7 ms, as the center frequency increased to 8100. The greater ERD at 300 Hz does not seem to be explicable in terms of "ringing" in the auditory filter. The ERD decreased somewhat with increasing level, for example, having a value of about 10 ms at 2700 Hz with a 20-dB masker spectrum level and about 7 ms with a 40-dB masker spectrum level.

Adult↗

PubMed1989

Detection of temporal gaps in sinusoids by normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.

A two-alternative forced-choice task was used to measure psychometric functions for the detection of temporal gaps in a 1-kHz, 400-ms sinusoidal signal. The signal always started and finished at a positive-going zero crossing, and the gap duration was varied from 0.5 to 6.0 ms in 0.5-ms steps. The signal level was 80 dB SPL, and a spectrally shaped noise was used to mask splatter associated with the abrupt onset and offset of the signal. Two subjects with normal hearing, two subjects with unilateral cochlear hearing loss, and two subjects with bilateral cochlear hearing loss were tested. The impaired ears had confirmed reductions in frequency selectivity at 1 kHz. For the normal ears, the psychometric functions were nonmonotonic, showing minima for gap durations corresponding to integer multiples of the signal period (n ms, where n is a positive integer) and maxima for durations corresponding to (n - 0.5) ms. For the impaired ears, the psychometric functions showed only small (nonsignificant) nonmonotonicities. Performance overall was slightly worse for the impaired than for the normal ears. The main features of the results could be accounted for using a model consisting of a bandpass filter (the auditory filter), a square-law device, and a sliding temporal integrator. Consistent with the data, the model demonstrates that, although a broader auditory filter has a faster transient response, this does not necessarily lead to improved performance in a gap detection task. The model also indicates that gap thresholds do not provide a direct measure of temporal resolution, since they depend at least partly on intensity resolution.

Aged↗

PubMed1988

The shape of the ear's temporal window.

This article examines the idea that the temporal resolution of the auditory system can be modeled using a temporal window (an intensity weighting function) analogous to the auditory filter measured in the frequency domain. To estimate the shape of the hypothetical temporal window, threshold was measured for a brief sinusoidal signal presented in a temporal gap between two bursts of noise. The duration of the gap was systematically varied and the signal was placed both symmetrically and asymmetrically within the gap. The data were analyzed by assuming that the temporal window had the form of a simple mathematical expression with a small number of free parameters. The values of the parameters were adjusted to give the best fit to the data. The analysis assumed that, for each condition, the temporal window was centered at the time giving the highest signal-to-masker ratio, and that threshold corresponded to a fixed ratio of signal energy to masker energy at the output of the window. The data were fitted well by modeling each side of the window as the sum of two rounded-exponential functions. The window was highly asymmetric, having a shallower slope for times before the center than for times after. The equivalent rectangular duration (ERD) of the window was typically about 8 ms. The ERD increased slightly when the masker level was decreased, but did not differ significantly for signal frequencies of 500 and 2000 Hz. The temporal-window model successfully accounts for the data from a variety of experiments measuring temporal resolution. However, it fails to predict certain aspects of forward masking and of the detection of amplitude modulation at high rates.

Adult↗