Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C J Kerk

Publications and source records attributed to C J Kerk.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Factors affecting minimum push and pull forces of manual carts.

The minimum forces needed to manually push or pull a 4-wheel cart of differing weights with similar wheel sizes from a stationary state were measured on four floor materials under different conditions of wheel width, diameter, and orientation. Cart load was increased from 0 to 181.4 kg in increments of 36.3 kg. The floor materials were smooth concrete, tile, asphalt, and industrial carpet. Two wheel widths were tested: 25 and 38 mm. Wheel diameters were 51, 102, and 153 mm. Wheel orientation was tested at four levels: F0R0 (all four wheels aligned in the forward direction), F0R90 (the two front wheels, the wheels furthest from the cart handle, aligned in the forward direction and the two rear wheels, the wheels closest to the cart handle, aligned at 90 degrees to the forward direction), F90R0 (the two front wheels aligned at 90 degrees to the forward direction and the two rear wheels aligned in the forward direction), and F90R90 (all four wheels aligned at 90 degrees to the forward direction). Wheel width did not have a significant effect on the minimum push/pull forces. The minimum push/pull forces were linearly proportional to cart weight, and inversely proportional to wheel diameter. The coefficients of rolling friction were estimated as 2.2, 2.4, 3.3, and 4.5 mm for hard rubber wheels rolling on smooth concrete, tile, asphalt, and industrial carpet floors, respectively. The effect of wheel orientation was not consistent over the tested conditions, but, in general, the smallest minimum push/pull forces were measured with all four wheels aligned in the forward direction, whereas the largest minimum push/pull forces were measured when all four wheels were aligned at 90 degrees to the forward direction. There was no significant difference between the push and pull forces when all four wheels were aligned in the forward direction.

Analysis of Variance↗

Correlation of injury occurrence data with estimated maximal aerobic capacity and body composition in a high-frequency manual materials handling task.

This article evaluates the correlation between injury occurrence, step test estimated maximal aerobic capacity (VO2max), and body composition in a high-frequency manual materials handling task. The study used 212 highly trained male manual material handlers working for a major materials handling company. Three locations across the United States (western, midwestern, and southeastern) were chosen based on similarity of size and function. An estimated maximal aerobic capacity was obtained for each participant using a submaximal bench step protocol. Also, a percentage body fat estimation was randomly obtained for approximately 25% of the participants. The correlation between injury occurrences, absolute VO2max, relative VO2max, and percentage body fat were analyzed. Also, the relationship between both VO2max estimations and percentage body fat was analyzed. Finally, the correlation between location VO2max and percentage body fat was studied. Results indicated no significant difference between absolute VO2max, injury, or percentage body fat. Relative VO2max suggested a significant relationship with injury occurrences and body composition. Body composition also indicated a significant correlation with injury occurrences. Finally, location played a significant factor in injury occurrence, step test estimated VO2max, and estimated body composition. This investigation demonstrates significant evidence of the predictability of employee injury occurrence and the fitness estimation methods used. In a high-frequency manual materials handling task, high occurrences of injury were significantly correlated with low estimated relative maximal aerobic capacity and high estimated percentage body fat.

Accidents, Occupational↗

Ergonomics.

The ergonomist seeks to reduce incidence and severity of occupational musculoskeletal disorders as well as improve productivity and work quality. Thus, ergonomics addresses both the employee and employer.

Ergonomics↗