Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C J Goode

Publications and source records attributed to C J Goode.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Nurse experience and education: effect on quality of care.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the relationships between the quality of patient care and the education and experience of the nurses providing that care. BACKGROUND: There is a call for more nurses with baccalaureate degrees and more experienced nurses to work in hospitals. Previous research studies have examined the characteristics, abilities, and work assignments of nurses with and without baccalaureate degrees but have not examined the quality of the patient care delivered. It is generally believed that more experienced nurses provide higher-quality care, but again few studies have actually examined this issue. METHODS: A secondary analysis of data, collected in two previous studies of the relationship between nurse staffing (hours of care, staff mix) and the quality of patient care, was used to determine the relationship between nurses' education and experience and the quality of care provided. The data were collected at the patient care unit level (42 units in study 1 and 39 units in study 2). Quality of care was indicated by lower unit rates of medication errors and patient falls. RESULTS: Controlling for patient acuity, hours of nursing care, and staff mix, units with more experienced nurses had lower medication errors and lower patient fall rates. These adverse occurrence rates on units with more baccalaureate-prepared nurses were not significantly better.

Accidental Falls↗
PubMed2000

A clinical advancement program: evaluating 10 years of progressive change.

OBJECTIVE: To report the evolution of a clinical advancement program, UEXCEL, at a western teaching hospital and the outcomes associated with evaluation over time. BACKGROUND: The clinical ladder program was initiated in 1989 to provide a professional framework for developing, evaluating, and promoting registered nurses. The program is derived from Benner's Novice to Expert model. Over a 10-year period, the program has undergone three significant revisions. Program evaluation data have been used to guide institutional change. METHODS: Structure and progression of program development and change are outlined. Evaluation data were collected using a 23-item clinical ladder satisfaction scale developed by Strzelecki. Data were collected in 1993, 1994, 1996, and 1998 using standard survey methods after institutional review board approval. Subjects were registered nurses holding clinical positions at the University of Colorado Hospital. Data were trended across units and time periods and were compared with other institutional evaluation data sets. RESULTS: Improvement in nurse satisfaction with the UEXCEL program has been steady and incremental, after low baseline measurement. Satisfaction has improved after each program revision. A significant demographic variable over time is the correlation between higher registered nurse education and program satisfaction. Human resources issues are reported with data results. CONCLUSIONS: Sustaining a clinical advancement program represents a challenge in the current health-care environment. Institutional commitment, staff involvement in revisions, and activities to improve professional nurse development are critical strategies so progress can be achieved.

Career Mobility↗
PubMed2000

Evaluating nursing administration instruments.

OBJECTIVE: To identify and evaluate available measures that can be used to examine the effects of management innovations in five important areas: autonomy, conflict, job satisfaction, leadership, and organizational climate. BACKGROUND: Management interventions target the context in which care is delivered and through which evidence for practice diffuses. These innovations need to be evaluated for their effects on desired outcomes. However, busy nurses may not have the time to locate, evaluate, and select instruments to measure expected nursing administration outcomes without research-based guidance. Multiple and complex important contextual variables need psychometrically sound and easy-to-use measurement instruments identified for use in both practice and research. METHOD: An expert focus group consensus methodology was used in this evaluation research to review available instruments in the five areas and evaluate which of these instruments are psychometrically sound and easy to use in the practice setting. RESULTS: The result is a portfolio of measures, clustered by concept and displayed on a spreadsheet. Retrieval information is provided. The portfolio includes the expert consensus judgment as well as useful descriptive information. CONCLUSIONS: The research reported here identifies psychometrically sound and easy-to-use instruments for measuring five key variables to be included in a portfolio. The results of this study can be used as a beginning for saving time in instrument selection and as an aid for determining the best instrument for measuring outcomes from a clinical or management intervention.

Conflict, Psychological↗
PubMed1999

Evidence-based clinical practice.

Healthcare professionals are trying to facilitate the use of evidence-based decision making for individual patients and patient populations they are privileged to serve. The authors describe an evidence-based multidisciplinary clinical practice model developed at the University of Colorado Hospital along with a clinical example of how the model was used to improve quality and decrease costs.

Colorado↗
PubMed1995

Outcomes of hospital-based managed care: a multivariate analysis of cost and quality.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects a hospital-based managed care intervention has on the cost and quality of care. METHODS: The intervention consisted of a CareMap and a nurse case manager. The CareMap contained both a critical path and a set of expected patient outcomes. The study population comprised all women who delivered by cesarean during the 18 months of the study and who were cared for in the maternity unit at a tertiary-level university hospital. The effects of the intervention were determined by comparing the after group with the before group in regard to length of stay and costs of care post-cesarean delivery, patient ratings of quality of care, and the physical recovery of the patients by discharge and 1 month later. RESULTS: After the implementation of hospital-based managed care, the average length of stay decreased 13.5% (0.7 days) and the average costs decreased 13.1% ($518). These decreases were statistically significant and remained so after controlling for co-morbid and complicating conditions. Patients perception of the quality of care increased from 4.26 to 4.41 on a 1-5 scale, a statistically significant increase. In particular, patients believed that they had an increased level of participation in their care. The physical recovery scores obtained at discharge did not change. CONCLUSION: Hospital-based managed care can reduce resource use, length of stay, and cost associated with hospital care while maintaining or improving the quality of care. Whether these effects are reproducible and generalizable to other conditions should be addressed in future studies; the duration of these effects should also be examined.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Evaluation of research-based nursing practice.

To determine the effectiveness of a research-based clinical intervention, a planned program of evaluation must be in place. The evaluation consists of two components: determining whether the intervention was implemented as intended and, if not, what barriers prevented the implementation; and determining whether the intervention produced the expected outcomes. Evaluation provides essential data for decision making and helps staff determine whether the intervention should be accepted, rejected, or modified for use in their setting. Research utilization activities complement QAI programs, and many patients benefit from new research-based practice innovations. Through research utilization, clinical practice becomes vital to nursing research because clinical practice provides the testing ground for research findings. Knowledge generated under controlled situations is evaluated in the real world of clinical practice, and clinical data produced through evaluation provides a rationale for practice that can be meaningfully understood both inside and outside the nursing profession.

Clinical Nursing Research↗
PubMed1993

Improving practice through research: the case of heparin vs. saline for peripheral intermittent infusion devices.

Peripheral intermittent infusion devices are commonly used to administer periodic doses of medications to adults and children. Research findings provide a strong base for changing practice to using saline instead of heparin to flush these devices in children over 28 days old and in adults. This research-based change in practice will enhance the quality of care that patients receive and decrease the costs of their care.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Recognizing staff nurse job performance and achievements.

While recognition for work has been positively related to nurses' job satisfaction in the research literature, specific types of recognition that would be most meaningful have not been identified. In this descriptive survey, 341 randomly selected staff nurses rated the extent of meaningfulness of 38 head nurse recognition behaviors. The most meaningful, in order of importance, were monetary rewards commensurate with performance, private verbal feedback, and written acknowledgment. Three other categories of recognition were identified as moderately meaningful: public acknowledgement, schedule adjustment, and opportunities for growth and development.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

Use of research based knowledge in clinical practice.

The authors describe three research utilization projects that used a knowledge-driven approach to nursing practice. The activities involved in developing and implementing these research utilization projects included: (1) preparing nurses to read, critique, and use research; (2) identifying and reviewing research studies in a common area to develop a research base; (3) transforming the research based knowledge into a protocol to be used in the clinical area by nurses caring for patients; and (4) evaluating the protocol to see whether it is being implemented as expected and whether it is producing the predicted results. This practical utilization is discussed and illustrated in a systems theory model.

Body Temperature↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Nurse staffing and patient outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Nursing studies have shown that nursing care delivery changes affect staff and organizational outcomes, but the effects on client outcomes have not been studied sufficiently. OBJECTIVE: To describe, at the level of the nursing care unit, the relationships among total hours of nursing care, registered nurse (RN) skill mix, and adverse patient outcomes. METHODS: The adverse outcomes included unit rates of medication errors, patient falls, skin breakdown, patient and family complaints, infections, and deaths. The correlations among staffing variables and outcome variables were determined, and multivariate analyses, controlling for patient acuity, were completed. RESULTS: Units with higher average patient acuity had lower rates of medication errors and patient falls but higher rates of the other adverse outcomes. With average patient acuity on the unit controlled, the proportion of hours of care delivered by RNs was inversely related to the unit rates of medication errors, decubiti, and patient complaints. Total hours of care from all nursing personnel were associated directly with the rates of decubiti, complaints, and mortality. An unexpected finding was that the relationship between RN proportion of care was curvilinear; as the RN proportion increased, rates of adverse outcomes decreased up to 87.5%. Above that level, as RN proportion increased, the adverse outcome rates also increased. CONCLUSIONS: The higher the RN skill mix, the lower the incidence of adverse occurrences on inpatient care units.

Accidental Falls↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Outcomes from use of an evidence-based practice guideline.

The aim of evidence-based guidelines is primarily to improve patient outcomes without adding to the existing cost of care because both payers and policymakers want to identify health care costs that do not result in benefit to the patient. The purpose of the reported project was to generate a practice guideline for the treatment of uncomplicated acute cystitis in a female population, to determine the extent to which the guideline would be used by providers and to measure the cost and quality of outcomes from its use. A retrospective chart review was used to gather pre-guideline practice and cost data. Measurements included the type, frequency, and duration of antibiotic therapy and the use of urine cultures and both complications and routine followup visits. The implementation of an outpatient practice guideline resulted in a significant change in antibiotic prescribing and a trend toward a change in ordering cultures and clinic followup. There was also a significant decrease in treatment costs.

Acute Disease↗