Search PubMedSearch

Biomedical subjects

C J Downing

Publications and source records attributed to C J Downing.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Demodulation, predictive coding, and spatial vision.

We argue that some aspects of human spatial vision, particularly for textured patterns and scenes, can be described in terms of demodulation and predictive coding. Such nonlinear processes encode a pattern into local phasors that represent it completely as a modulation, in phase and amplitude, of a prediction associated with the image structure in some region by its predominant undulation(s). The demodulation representation of a pattern is an anisotropic, second-order form of predictive coding, and it offers a particularly efficient way to analyze and encode textures, as it identifies and exploits their underlying redundancies. In addition, self-consistent domains of redundancy in image structure provide a basis for image segmentation. We first provide an algorithm for computing the three elements of a complete demodulation transform of any image, and we illustrate such decompositions for both natural and synthetic images. We then present psychophysical evidence from spatial masking experiments, as well as illustrations of perceptual organization, that suggest a possible role for such underlying representations in human vision. In psychophysical experiments employing masks with more than two oriented Fourier components, we find that peaks of threshold elevation occur at locations in the Fourier plane remote from the orientations and frequencies of the actual mask components. Rather, as would occur from demodulation, these peaks in the frequency plane are related to the vector difference frequencies between the actual masking components and their spectral centers of mass. We offer a neural interpretation of demodulation coding, and finally we demonstrate a practical application of this process in a system for automatic visual recognition of personal identity by demodulation of a facial feature.

Algorithms

Visual attention modulates signal detectability.

The mechanism by which visual-spatial attention affects the detection of faint signals has been the subject of considerable debate. It is well known that spatial cuing speeds signal detection. This may imply that attentional cuing modulates the processing of sensory information during detection or, alternatively, that cuing acts to create decision bias favoring input at the cued location. These possibilities were evaluated in 3 spatial cuing experiments. Peripheral cues were used in Experiment 1 and central cues were used in Experiments 2 and 3. Cuing similarly enhanced measured sensitivity, P(A) and d', for simple luminance detection in all 3 experiments. Under some conditions it also induced shifts in decision criteria (beta). These findings indicate that visual-spatial attention facilitates the processing of sensory input during detection either by increasing sensory gain for inputs at cued locations or by prioritizing the processing of cued inputs.

Adult

Expectancy and visual-spatial attention: effects on perceptual quality.

When we expect important stimuli at a particular spatial location, how does our perceptual sensitivity change over space? Subjects were cued to expect a target stimulus at one location and then required to perform one of the following tasks at that and three other locations: luminance detection, brightness discrimination, orientation discrimination, or form discrimination. The analysis of subjects' performance according to signal detection theory revealed changes in both sensitivity and bias for each of these tasks. Sensitivity was maximally enhanced at the location where a target stimulus was expected and generally decreased with distance from that location. Factors that influenced the gradient of sensitivity were (a) the type of task performed and (b) the spatial distribution of the stimuli. Sensitivity fell off more steeply over distance for orientation and form discrimination than for luminance detection and brightness discrimination. In addition, it fell off more steeply when stimuli were near each other than when they were farther apart.

Attention