Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Goffman

Publications and source records attributed to C Goffman.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

On localization for double Fourier series.

The localization theorems for Fourier series of functions of a single variable are classical and easy to prove. The situation is different for Fourier series of functions of several variables, even if one restricts consideration to rectangular, in particular square, partial sums. We show that the answer to the problem can be obtained by considering the notion of generalized bounded variation, which we introduced. Given a nondecreasing sequence {lambda(n)} of positive numbers such that Sigma 1/lambda(n) diverges, a function g defined on an interval I of R(1) is said to be of Lambda-bounded variation (LambdaBV) if Sigma|g(a(n)) - g(b(n))|/lambda(n) converges for every sequence of nonoverlapping intervals (a(n), b(n)) [unk]I. If lambda(n) = n, we say that g is of harmonic bounded variation (HBV). The definition suitably modified can be extended to functions of several variables. We show that in the case of two variables the localization principle holds for rectangular partial sums if LambdaBV = HBV, and that if LambdaBV is not contained in HBV, then the localization principle does not hold for LambdaBV even in the case of square partial sums.

Journal Article↗

Higher dimensional mappings for which the area formula holds.

For each continuous mapping of 2 space into n space, n >/= 2, the Lebesgue area is given by the classical formula provided that the partial derivatives exist almost everywhere and belong to the class L(2). The analogous question for mappings of m space into n space, 2 < m </= n, has been open for a long time. We answer this question in the affirmative in a more general setting. Accordingly, as a special case, we show that if a continuous mapping of m space into n space, m </= n, has partial derivatives which belong to L(m) then the Lebesgue area is given by the classical formula.

Journal Article↗

An example in surface area.

For length and area, a central fact is that the value of the length of a curve or the area of a surface, as given by the Lebesgue theory, is at least as great as that given by the classical formula, whenever the latter has meaning. This is now found not to be valid in higher dimensions. We give an example of a continuous mapping of the unit cube into itself for which the value given by the formula exceeds the three-dimensional Lebesgue area of the corresponding suface.

Journal Article↗