Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Forbes

Publications and source records attributed to C Forbes.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Identification of mesophilic and thermophilic fermentative species in anaerobic granular sludge.

Large quantities of biodegradable food waste in the form of fruit and vegetables are still being deposited in landfill sites in Ireland. The development of an anaerobic digestion process using fermentative species which degrade the carbohydrate-rich waste could divert the food waste from landfills. We identified fermentative species grown on glucose and sucrose at mesophilic and thermophilic temperatures using molecular biology techniques. The dominating fermentative bacteria of the mesophilic sludge were of the Bacteroidetes and Spirochaetes classes. Although both groups of bacteria are typically fermentative their substrate range appears to be limited. The dominating fermentative bacteria in the thermophilic sludge was Thermoanaerobacterium aotearoense of the Clostridia class. The indications are that Thermoanaerobacterium aotearoense may be highly suitable to biodegrade a carbohydrate-rich influent feed due to its possibly very rapid growth rate and also an extensive substrate range.

Anaerobiosis↗
PubMed2006

A systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of neuroimaging assessments used to visualise the seizure focus in people with refractory epilepsy being considered for surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To review the effectiveness and/or accuracy, cost-effectiveness, and predictive value of neuroimaging of the cerebral cortex to visualise the seizure focus in people with refractory epilepsy being considered for surgery. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases, Internet searches, hand searching and consultation with experts. METHODS: A systematic review was undertaken according to published guidelines. Results of diagnostic accuracy studies were analysed according to the imaging test evaluated. For each study the proportion of patients who were correctly localised, not localised, partially localised or incorrectly localised by the index test was calculated. Due to the heterogeneity present between studies, statistical pooling was not performed. Instead, a narrative synthesis of results is presented. For studies using multivariate analysis to look at the association of neuroimaging findings and outcome following surgery, all factors considered in the analyses were presented. Studies were grouped according to the neuroimaging technique investigated and the findings discussed with reference to possible sources of heterogeneity between studies. RESULTS: No randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified, with the majority of studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of various imaging techniques in the localisation of epileptic seizure foci. There was significant heterogeneity (p<0.05) between studies for at least one of the localisation categories (correctly localised, not localised, partially localised and incorrectly localised) for all imaging techniques. Possible explanations for this heterogeneity include differing study designs, index test characteristics, reference standards and population characteristics. Test performance was more promising in studies restricted to patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Ictal single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) generally had more correctly localising (70--100%) and fewer non-localising (0--7%) scans than other techniques evaluated in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Results for computed tomography and interictal SPECT suggest that these tests are relatively poor at localising the seizure focus. Volumeric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and position emission tomography (PET) appear promising, and subtraction ictal single photon emission computed tomography co-registered to magnetic resonance imaging (SISCOM) and magnetic resonance spectrosopy (MRS) less promising than ictal SPECT, but these technologies have been assessed in fewer studies. T2 relaxometry was reported in only one small study with inconclusive results. Seventeen studies (33 evaluations) provided sufficient data on the association of a localised scan with outcome following surgery to calculate a relative risk. The majority of evaluations (24/33) suggested that patients with a correctly or partially localised scan had a better outcome following surgery than those with an incorrectly localised or non-localised scan. However, this association was statistically significant in only three studies, two evaluating routine MRI [(relative risk (RR) 2.74, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.32 to 5.67; RR 1.28, 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.63] and the other SISCOM (RR 2.12, 95% CI: 1.01, 4.44). Nine studies used multivariate analysis to investigate the association of MRI (7 studies), MRS and volumetric MRI (1 study), PET (3 studies), SPECT (1 study) and SISCOM (3 studies) with the outcome following surgery. There was a trend for localisation of abnormalities to be associated with a beneficial outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the limitations of the included studies, the results of this review do little to inform clinical practice, with insufficient evidence regarding effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of imaging techniques in the work-up for epilepsy surgery. Given the inadequacy of existing data, there is a pressing need for studies investigating the utility of imaging techniques in the work up for epilepsy surgery. The most reliable method to achieve this is the RCT, which could examine the single tests or combinations of tests on patient outcome. The authors suggest that it is important that clinicians, patient groups, policy makers and healthcare/research funders meet and debate the most appropriate way to investigate these technologies.

Cerebral Cortex↗
PubMed2005

Clinical effectiveness, tolerability and cost-effectiveness of newer drugs for epilepsy in adults: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the clinical effectiveness, tolerability and cost-effectiveness of gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), levetiracetam (LEV), oxcarbazepine (OXC), tiagabine (TGB), topiramate (TPM) and vigabatrin (VGB) for epilepsy in adults. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases. Internet resources. Pharmaceutical company submissions. REVIEW METHODS: Selected studies were screened and quality assessed. Separate analyses assessed clinical effectiveness, serious, rare and long-term adverse events and cost-effectiveness. An integrated economic analysis incorporating information on costs and effects of newer and older antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) was performed to give direct comparisons of long-term costs and benefits. RESULTS: A total of 212 studies were included in the review. All included systematic reviews were Cochrane reviews and of good quality. The quality of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was variable. Assessment was hampered by poor reporting of methods of randomisation, allocation concealment and blinding. Few of the non-randomised studies were of good quality. The main weakness of the economic evaluations was inappropriate use of the cost-minimisation design. The included systematic reviews reported that newer AEDs were effective as adjunctive therapy compared to placebo. For newer versus older drugs, data were available for all three monotherapy AEDs, although data for OXC and TPM were limited. There was limited, poor-quality evidence of a significant improvement in cognitive function with LTG and OXC compared with older AEDs. However, there were no consistent statistically significant differences in other clinical outcomes, including proportion of seizure-free patients. No studies assessed effectiveness of AEDs in people with intellectual disabilities or in pregnant women. There was very little evidence to assess the effectiveness of AEDs in the elderly; no significant differences were found between LTG and carbamazepine monotherapy. Sixty-seven RCTs compared adjunctive therapy with placebo, older AEDs or other newer AEDs. For newer AEDs versus placebo, a trend was observed in favour of newer drugs, and there was evidence of statistically significant differences in proportion of responders favouring newer drugs. However, it was not possible to assess long-term effectiveness. Most trials were conducted in patients with partial seizures. For newer AEDs versus older drugs, there was no evidence to assess the effectiveness of LEV, LTG or OXC, and evidence for other newer drugs was limited to single studies. Trials only included patients with partial seizures and follow-up was relatively short. There was no evidence to assess effectiveness of adjunctive LEV, OXC or TPM versus other newer drugs, and there were no time to event or cognitive data. No studies assessed the effectiveness of adjunctive AEDs in the elderly or pregnant women. There was some evidence from one study (GBP versus LTG) that both drugs have some beneficial effect on behaviour in people with learning disabilities. Eighty RCTs reported the incidence of adverse events. There was no consistent or convincing evidence to draw any conclusions concerning relative safety and tolerability of newer AEDs compared with each other, older AEDs or placebo. The integrated economic analysis for monotherapy for newly diagnosed patients with partial seizures showed that older AEDs were more likely to be cost-effective, although there was considerable uncertainty in these results. The integrated analysis suggested that newer AEDs used as adjunctive therapy for refractory patients with partial seizures were more effective and more costly than continuing with existing treatment alone. Combination therapy, involving new AEDs, may be cost-effective at a threshold willingness to pay per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) greater than 20,000 pounds, depending on patients' previous treatment history. There was, again, considerable uncertainty in these results. There were few data available to determine effectiveness of treatments for patients with generalised seizures. LTG and VPA showed similar health benefits when used as monotherapy. VPA was less costly and was likely to be cost-effective. The analysis indicated that TPM might be cost-effective when used as an adjunctive therapy, with an estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 34,500 pounds compared with continuing current treatment alone. CONCLUSIONS: There was little good-quality evidence from clinical trials to support the use of newer monotherapy or adjunctive therapy AEDs over older drugs, or to support the use of one newer AED in preference to another. In general, data relating to clinical effectiveness, safety and tolerability failed to demonstrate consistent and statistically significant differences between the drugs. The exception was comparisons between newer adjunctive AEDs and placebo, where significant differences favoured newer AEDs. However, trials often had relatively short-term treatment durations and often failed to limit recruitment to either partial or generalised onset seizures, thus limiting the applicability of the data. Newer AEDs, used as monotherapy, may be cost-effective for the treatment of patients who have experienced adverse events with older AEDs, who have failed to respond to the older drugs, or where such drugs are contraindicated. The integrated economic analysis also suggested that newer AEDs used as adjunctive therapy may be cost-effective compared with the continuing current treatment alone given a QALY of about 20,000 pounds. There is a need for more direct comparisons of the different AEDs within clinical trials, considering different treatment sequences within both monotherapy and adjunctive therapy. Length of follow-up also needs to be considered. Trials are needed that recruit patients with either partial or generalised seizures; that investigate effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in patients with generalised onset seizures and that investigate effectiveness in specific populations of epilepsy patients, as well as studies evaluating cognitive outcomes to use more stringent testing protocols and to adopt a more consistent approach in assessing outcomes. Further research is also required to assess the quality of life within trials of epilepsy therapy using preference-based measures of outcomes that generate cost-effectiveness data. Future RCTs should use CONSORT guidelines; and observational data to provide information on the use of AEDs in actual practice, including details of treatment sequences and doses.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Stool viruses among paediatric patients from a Nairobi clinic, Kenya.

OBJECTIVE: To document the clinical presentation and prevalence of stool viruses among children presenting with symptoms of acute gastroenteritis (AGE) at Gertrude's Garden Children's Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya. DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. SETTING: A private paediatric clinic in Nairobi. RESULTS: Viral antigen was detectable in the stool samples of 21 (rotavirus alone in ten cases, adenovirus alone in seven cases, and both viruses in four cases). Diarrhoea was almost universally present (20/21 cases) and was reported more frequently than in a control group of ten children with clinical acute gastroenteritis whose stools tested negative for viruses. Fever, an elevated total leukocyte count, and neutrophilia were commonly observed in patients with viral gastroenteritis. Eight children with viral AGE were treated with antibiotics and eight children were admitted to hospital. CONCLUSION: A viral etiology can frequently be identified among children in Nairobi with AGE. Fever, an elevated leukocyte count, and neutrophilia were not helpful in differentiating viral from non-viral AGE in this series. Supportive management consisting of outpatient oral rehydration therapy without antibiotic treatment should be considered in the non-toxic child with AGE.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2002

Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is the third most common cancer world-wide. Increasing the uptake of screening, alongside increasing informed choice is of great importance in controlling this disease through prevention and early detection. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of interventions aimed at increasing uptake, and informed uptake of cervical cancer screening. SEARCH STRATEGY: Twenty-three electronic databases (to March 2000) were searched with no language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), or quasi-RCTs of interventions to increase uptake/informed uptake of cervical cancer screening. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data on study characteristics and quality were extracted independently by two reviewers. Where data were available, relative risks and 95% CI were calculated and a chi-squared test for heterogeneity was performed. MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-five studies were included (27 RCTs and eight quasi-RCTs). Heterogeneity between studies limited statistical pooling of data. Overall, however, invitations appear to be effective methods of increasing uptake. In addition, there is limited evidence to support the use of educational materials. The number and quality of included studies limited evidence regarding effectiveness of other interventions. Informed uptake of cervical screening was not considered by any studies. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There was some evidence to support the use of invitation letters to increase the uptake of cervical screening. There was limited evidence to support educational interventions but it was unclear what format was most effective. The majority of the studies were from developed countries and so the relevance to developing countries is unclear.

Female↗
PubMed2001

A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer is the most common gynaecological cancer with an annual incidence of 21.6 per 100,000 in England and Wales. Due to the often asymptomatic nature of the early stages of the disease, most cases are not detected until the advanced stages. Consequently, the prognosis after diagnosis is poor and the 5-year survival rate in the UK is only about 30%. Current recommendations suggest that first-line chemotherapy for ovarian cancer should involve paclitaxel and platinum (Pt)-based therapy (cisplatin/ carboplatin), however, most patients develop resistant or refractory disease and require second-line therapy. Patients may respond to re-challenge with Pt-agents if the treatment-free interval is > 6 months, but an alternative is often required. Topotecan is one of six drugs currently licensed in the UK for second-line therapy, and recent reviews suggest that it has modest efficacy in the treatment of advanced disease and performs favourably against paclitaxel. However, these reviews are based on a limited number of reports mainly consisting of non-randomised Phase I and II studies. OBJECTIVES OF THE REVIEW: To examine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of oral and intravenous topotecan (Hycamtin, SmithKline Beecham, UK) for the treatment of all stages of ovarian cancer. METHODS SEARCH STRATEGY: Sixteen electronic databases from inception to September 2000 and Internet resources were searched, in addition to the bibliographies of retrieved articles and submissions from pharmaceutical companies. METHODS INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Two reviewers independently screened all titles/abstracts and included/excluded studies based on full copies of manuscripts. Any disagreements were resolved through discussion. Only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and full economic evaluations comparing topotecan to non-topotecan regimens were included. All stages of therapy and disease were considered, and the outcomes included were survival, response, symptom relief, quality of life, adverse effects and costs. METHODS: DATA EXTRACTION STRATEGY: Data were extracted into an Access database by one reviewer and checked by a second. Any disagreements were resolved through discussion. METHODS: QUALITY ASSESSMENT STRATEGY: Two reviewers, using specified criteria, independently assessed the quality of the clinical effectiveness studies and the economic evaluations. Any disagreements were resolved through discussion. METHODS: ANALYSIS STRATEGY: Due to the limited number of studies included in the review and the fact that they compared topotecan with different comparators, the out-come data could not be pooled statistically. Clinical effectiveness data are discussed separately under the different outcome subheadings. For time-to-event data, hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals are presented where available, and for the remaining outcomes, relative risks are reported or calculated where sufficient data were available. Relative risk data are also presented in the form of Forest plots without pooled estimates. Economic data are presented in the form of a summary and critique of the evidence, and a grading (A-I) assigned to each study indicating the direction and magnitude of the cost-effectiveness data. RESULTS INCLUDED STUDIES: A total of 568 titles/abstracts were identified and screened for relevance. Full copies of 72 papers were assessed and seven published manuscripts reporting details of two studies of clinical effectiveness and one economic evaluation were included. Further details of the two clinical effectiveness studies and two new economic evaluations were identified from confidential company submissions. Overall, two international multicentre RCTs of effectiveness comparing topotecan with paclitaxel (trial 039) and topotecan with caelyx (trial 30-49) were included in the review. The three economic evaluations included in the review comprised one cost-minimisation analysis (CMA) comparing topotecan with caelyx, one cost-consequences analysis (CCA) comparing topotecan with paclitaxel, etoposide and altretamine and one cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) comparing topotecan with paclitaxel. RESULTS: QUALITY OF CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS DATA: Both clinical effectiveness studies (trial 30-49 and 039) were of reasonable quality, although it was unclear whether either performed valid intention-to-treat analyses. In addition, trial 30-49 failed to state whether the outcome assessors were blinded to treatment allocation. RESULTS --QUALITY OF ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS: The CCA (comparing topotecan with three comparators) was of poor quality and of little relevance to the UK NHS. The CMA and CEA were of reasonable quality overall and relevant to the UK NHS. However, both, in particular the CEA, suffered from methodological problems, and thus their findings should be interpreted with caution. RESULTS: ASSESSMENT OF CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS: The assessment of clinical effectiveness was based on limited data. Only two trials with a total of 709 participants were identified. In general, with a few minor exceptions, there were no statistically significant differences between topotecan and paclitaxel, or topotecan and caelyx in survival, response rate, median time to response, median duration of response and quality of life. Significant differences that were reported were mainly identified in subgroup analyses (Pt-sensitive disease and disease without ascites) of questionable validity and their relevance to a general advanced ovarian cancer patient population undergoing second-line chemotherapy is unclear. However, statistically significant differences were observed in the incidence of adverse effects. Topotecan was associated with increased incidences of haematological toxicities (including neutropenia, leukopenia, anaemia and thrombocytopenia), alopecia, nausea and vomiting. Caelyx-treated patients suffered from significantly increased incidences of Palmar-Plantar erythrodysesthesia, stomatitis, mucous membrane disorders and skin rashes. Paclitaxel was associated with significant increases in alopecia, arthralgia, myalgia, neuropathy, paraesthesiae, skeletal pain and flushing. RESULTS: ASSESSMENT OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS: The assessment of cost-effectiveness was also based on limited data, with three evaluations identified, one of which was not relevant. The two remaining studies, comparing topotecan with paclitaxel (CEA) and topotecan with caelyx (CMA), both used effectiveness data from multicentre RCTs and based their costs on 1999/2000 UK sources. The evaluations were conducted from a UK NHS perspective and findings presented in GB pounds/Euros. Topotecan for the second-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer was shown to be more cost-effective than paclitaxel (32,513 GB pounds versus 46,186 GB pounds per person in terms of any response (complete or partial), incremental cost-effectiveness = 3065 GB pounds) in all respects except cost per time without toxicity or symptoms, but less cost-effective than caelyx (14,023 GB pounds versus 9979 GB pounds per person regardless of whether the patient responded). However, direct comparisons of the cost findings between the two studies is difficult because they used different designs, different time horizons for the cost analyses and the findings were presented as costs per person for only patients who responded in one study (topotecan versus paclitaxel) and costs per person regardless of whether they responded in the other study (topotecan versus caelyx). CONCLUSIONS: This review indicates that there is little evidence in the form of RCTs on which to base an assessment of the effectiveness of topotecan as second-line therapy for advanced ovarian cancer. The evidence suggests there were no statistically significant differences overall between topotecan and paclitaxel, or topotecan and caelyx in clinical outcomes. However, statistically significant differences were observed in the incidence of adverse effects. The clinical significance of the findings is not discussed. Overall, the effects of topotecan could at best be described as modest, but the alternative agents offer no real advantages except fewer side-effects and possibly improved cost-effectiveness. Both of the clinical effectiveness studies on which this evidence is based had methodological flaws, the most serious being the lack of a blinded assessor in the topotecan versus caelyx trial, which is important for unbiased assessment of response outcomes. The economic evaluations also suffered from a number of potential problems. CONCLUSIONS: RECOMMENDATIONS FOR RESEARCH: Further good quality RCTs and CEAs are required comparing topotecan with other licensed and potentially useful (soon to be licensed) second-line treatments for ovarian cancer. At present, it is difficult to make any decisions about topotecan and other drugs for second-line therapy without good quality direct comparisons. In view of the ongoing studies identified, an update of the current review should be considered in approximately 18 months (Summer 2002) or possibly sooner if the recently commissioned National Institute for Clinical Excellence review of caelyx for ovarian cancer identifies additional data relevant to topotecan.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2000

Vascular risk factor profiles in the first phase of the Scottish Heart and Arterial Risk Prevention (SHARP) Survey, 1991-1996.

BACKGROUND: The SHARP survey data comprises personal information, family history, lifestyle and risk factor prevalence for 19,400 men and women sampled from the Scottish working population between 1991 and 1996. The purpose of the survey was the achievement of a clearer understanding of coronary risk factor prevalence in the working population of Scotland; the education of that population through counselling and advice; and a clearer appreciation of an individual's risk factor profile as a predictor for future events. In this paper a selection of attributes is explored for the information they yield about the characteristics of an apparently healthy population. Comparisons are drawn with earlier studies. METHODS: A mobile risk factor screening unit toured workplaces throughout Scotland and recorded information on age, sex, occupation, social class, personal and family history, smoking, alcohol and salt consumption, body mass index, blood pressure, glucose and total cholesterol. RESULTS: The variation in measured levels for common risk factors in a sample of apparently healthy Scottish people shows substantial differences from the measured variation in an unstratified survey. CONCLUSIONS: Across all conventional coronary risk factor measurements, working Scottish people are uniformly "more healthy" than the general population. A comparison of trend with age for male and female smokers and non-smokers in cholesterol level shows no difference between smokers and non-smokers; a similar comparison for body mass index and weight shows some consistent differences but without statistical significance.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Antiplatelet treatment does not reduce the severity of subsequent stroke. European Stroke Prevention Study 2 Working Group.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the the effect of antiplatelet therapy on the severity of subsequent stroke in patients with stroke and TIA. BACKGROUND: The Second European Stroke Prevention Study (ESPS2) recruited 6,602 patients in four treatment groups: placebo, 2 x 25 mg acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), 2 x 200 mg dipyridamole (DP), and the combination of 50 mg ASA and 400 mg DP per day. Seventy-six percent of the patients had had a stroke as the qualifying event, whereas 24% had a TIA. All patients were followed at 3-month intervals for 2 years. ESPS2 showed a benefit from antiplatelet treatment compared with placebo and an additional benefit using ASA and DP together compared with either of these antiplatelet agents alone. METHODS: In the ESPS2, the study protocol included assessment of severity of end point stroke with the modified Rankin scale once the stroke had clinically stabilized, and no further impairment was observed. There were 824 new stroke events during follow-up. In 701 of them, the initial Rankin scale was known, and this was also evaluated after each nonfatal recurrent stroke. The difference in Rankin scale between treatment groups was analyzed after recurrent stroke, and the progress in Rankin scale between entry and recurrent stroke was quantified by calculating the number of patients with a change of one or more degrees in the scale. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in these changes in Rankin scale between the treatment groups. The mean time to reach an end point of stroke was longest in patients who used ASA + DP (p = 0.057). However, there was no difference among the treatment groups in the time to death during follow-up. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that antiplatelet therapy does not influence the severity of recurrent stroke as evaluated with the Rankin scale. However, antiplatelet therapy seems to lengthen the time the patient remains free from a recurrent stroke.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Recombinant adeno-associated virus (AAV) drives constitutive production of glutamate decarboxylase in neural cell lines.

Many neurological disorders result directly or indirectly from the loss of inhibitory function. Engineering the production of GABA, an inhibitory neurotransmitter, may therefore be able at least partly to restore the lost inhibition seen in epilepsy, Parkinson's disease, or Huntington's disease. In this article, we describe a set of recombinant adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) that can deliver cDNAs encoding the GABA-producing enzyme, glutamate decarboxylase (GAD), directly into neural cells. We have characterized these recombinant AAVs in several cell lines derived from the CNS. These recombinant AAVs effectively transduced all neural cell lines, although with different efficiencies. Transduction occurred in both proliferating and nonproliferating cells, but actively proliferating cell lines had approximately six times greater transduction efficiency than nonproliferating cells. Furthermore, these AAVs maintained long-term expression of GAD in an astrocytic cell line for at least seven passages. These recombinant AAVs are promising vehicles for investigating the potential therapeutic effects of GABA in animal models of epilepsy and neurodegenerative diseases.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Use of older donor livers is associated with more extensive ischemic damage on intraoperative biopsies during liver transplantation.

Initial poor graft function is associated with increased morbidity and graft loss after liver transplantation. Donor age is a risk factor for the development of initial poor function. The severity of ischemic damage on intraoperative postreperfusion (0Post) allograft biopsy specimens is predictive of subsequent initial poor function. This study was performed to assess whether donor age is a risk factor for the development of ischemic damage on 0Post biopsy specimens. The records of 94 liver transplantations were reviewed. 0Post biopsy specimens were obtained after complete allograft revascularization. The severity of ischemic damage was graded as follows: 0, none; 1, minimal; 2, mild; 3, moderate; and 4, severe. Grafts were defined as older when donor age was 50 years or older. Other independent variables examined included donor cause of death, length of hospital stay, acidosis, serum alanine aminotransferase level, graft cold ischemia time, and degree of steatosis. Older grafts were associated with higher grades of ischemic damage than younger grafts (2.3 +/- 1.0 v 1.3 +/- 1.1; P =.003). Univariate and multivariate analysis identified donor age of 50 years or older as the only significant predictive variable of the severity of ischemic damage. In 16 transplantations involving older grafts, there was no statistically significant association between the severity of ischemic damage and incidence of initial poor function and graft loss. The use of older liver grafts is associated with more extensive ischemic damage immediately after graft reperfusion. Whether this early lesion identifies among older graft recipients those at risk for a worst outcome remains to be determined.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Second European Stroke Prevention Study: antiplatelet therapy is effective regardless of age. ESPS2 Working Group.

BACKGROUND: The Second European Stroke Prevention Study (ESPS2) was a randomized, placebo-controlled trial that investigated the efficacy of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and modified-release dipyridamole (DP), alone or in combination, in the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke. The trial demonstrated that the combination was significantly more effective than either agent used alone. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of age on the efficacy of ASA and DP, alone or in combination, in the secondary prevention of stroke in the ESPS2 population. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 6602 patients were recruited to the ESPS2 and there were 4 treatment groups: ASA (25 mg twice daily), DP (200 mg twice daily), ASA and DP in a combined formulation, or placebo. Primary endpoints were stroke, death, and stroke or death together. The endpoints evaluated in the present study were stroke, stroke and/or death, and vascular events. Stroke was the qualifying event in 76% of the patients, while 24% had a transient ischaemic attack. Patients were reviewed at 3-month intervals for 2 years. The study population consisted of 2565 (39%) patients aged less than 65 years, 2240 (34%) patients aged between 65 and 74 years, and 1797 (27%) patients aged 75 years and over. Advancing age was associated with an increased incidence of endpoints in all 4 treatment groups. The combination of ASA and DP significantly reduced the incidence of all endpoints, compared with placebo, in each age group. There was no influence of age on the efficacy of antiplatelet therapy for any of the evaluated endpoints. Relative risk reductions of treatment compared with placebo were 11.1-27.6% in the ASA group, 8.0-18.7% in the DP group, and 20.3-45.2% in patients receiving combination therapy. CONCLUSION: This study clearly demonstrates that combination therapy with DP and ASA is superior to either agent used alone in the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke, irrespective of the age of the patient.

Administration, Oral↗