Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C E Mogensen

Publications and source records attributed to C E Mogensen.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

The reno-protective role of AT(1)-receptor blockers.

In the 1970s and 1980s it became evident that progression of renal disease and blood pressure are correlated. Subsequently, it was shown that antihypertensive treatment, especially with agents that block the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), could slow the progression of diabetic renal disease. Several studies, particularly with RAS blockers, have confirmed beneficial effects on urinary albumin excretion in patients with diabetes and microalbuminuria or proteinuria. There are good reasons to explore dual blockade of the RAS with an AT(1)-receptor blocker and an ACE inhibitor. Receptor blockers may block the effects of angiotensin II more effectively than ACE inhibitors; moreover, ACE inhibitors increase bradykinins which may have positive effects on blood pressure and renal function. Such combination treatment has been found to be well tolerated and more effective in reducing blood pressure than either monotherapy. Positive effects on microalbuminuria or proteinuria have also been noted. Studies have shown that treatment with AT(1)-receptor blockers postpones end-stage renal disease and reduces the rate of decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. Moreover, albuminuria was reduced to a greater extent with AT(1)-receptor blockers than with conventional antihypertensive therapy producing the same blood pressure reductions. In summary, AT(1)-receptor blockers are effective in all stages of diabetic renal disease, and have an excellent tolerability profile. Usually the side-effect profile is comparable with placebo. In certain situations, there may be a slight, readily reversible, increase in serum potassium. There may also be a slight reduction in GFR, reflecting a decrease in glomerular filtration pressure.

Albuminuria↗
PubMed2002

Insulin resistance is accompanied by increased von Willebrand factor levels in nondiabetic women: a study of offspring of type 2 diabetic subjects compared to offspring of nondiabetic subjects.

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether levels of von Willebrand factor (vWF), fibrinogen and fibronectin are related to a parental history of type 2 diabetes and to determine possible explanatory factors for high versus low vWF and fibrinogen. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SUBJECTS, MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We compared vWF, fibrinogen and fibronectin in 88 nondiabetic offspring of type 2 diabetic subjects (relatives) and 103 offspring of nondiabetic subjects (controls). Other measurements included urinary albumin excretion rate, blood pressure, lipid profile and insulin resistance using homeostasis model assessment (HOMAIR). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in vWF (1.12 vs. 1.06 IU x mL(-1), P = 0.296), fibrinogen (3.2 vs. 3.1 g x L(-1); P = 0.263) or fibronectin (0.39 vs. 0.40 g x L(-1), P = 0.448) between relatives and controls. With multiple logistic regression we determined explanatory factors for high versus low vWF and fibrinogen. Age (P < 0.01), urinary albumin excretion rate (P < 0.05), ischaemic heart disease (IHD) (P < 0.05) were found to be significant explanatory factors for vWF above the median (1.10 IU x mL(-1)). Interaction between insulin resistance and sex was found. Odds ratio for high versus low insulin resistance was 18.39 (P < 0.001) for women and 1.92 (P = 0.32) for men. Body mass index (BMI) (P < 0.05), sex (P < 0.01), smoking status (P < 0.05) and IHD (P < 0.01) were significant explanatory factors for fibrinogen above the median (3.1 g x L(-1)). CONCLUSIONS: Levels of vWF, fibrinogen and fibronectin were not influenced by a parental history of type 2 diabetes. Insulin resistance was found to be a significant risk indicator for high vWF only in women. This may indicate that insulin resistance is a higher risk factor for women than for men, when the outcome is endothelial dysfunction possibly resulting in overt cardiovascular disease.

Case-Control Studies↗
PubMed2001

Lisinopril reduces albuminuria during exercise in low grade microalbuminuric type 1 diabetic patients: a double blind randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Antihypertensive treatment is presently recommended in most type 1 diabetic patients with microalbuminuria. The long-term effect of angiotensin converting enzymes (ACE) inhibitor (ACE-i) treatment on exercise urinary albumin excretion (E-UAE) and exercise blood pressure (E-BP) in type 1 diabetic patients with low grade microalbuminuria is not well documented. In addition, the possible predictive effect of baseline E-UAE on the progression of overnight UAE remains to be clarified. DESIGN AND METHODS: In a randomized placebo controlled double blind study the effects of 2 years treatment with either lisinopril (20 mg o.d.) or placebo was evaluated in 21 normotensive type 1 diabetic patients with overnight UAE between 20 and 70 microg min-1. Determinations of E-UAE and E-BP were performed after exercise on an ergometercycle with a load of 70% of estimated maximal VO2 for 20 min. Patients in the placebo and lisinopril groups were similar with regard to age (35.8 +/- 11.3 vs. 29.3 +/- 8.6 years), duration of diabetes (19.4 +/- 8.2 vs. 16.8 +/- 5.3 years), and HbA1c (9.0 +/- 1.0 vs. 9.4 +/- 1.7%). RESULTS: At baseline, E-UAE was similar in the two groups (placebo: 150.1 x or divide 3.7, lisinopril: 96.8 x or divide 1.8 microg min-1 (geometric mean x or divide tolerance factor)). After 2 years treatment E-UAE had increased in the placebo group, whereas E-UAE was reduced in the lisinopril treated patients (placebo: 213.6 x or divide 6.9, lisinopril: 48.3 x or divide 3.1 microg min-1, P = 0.04). The relative increase in E-UAE (E-UAE/Pre-exercise UAE) was similar at baseline in both groups (3.7 x or divide 2.3 vs. 2.8 x or divide 2.0) but significantly higher in the placebo group after 2 years (4.4 x or divide 2.4 compared with 1.6 x or divide 1.7 in the lisinopril group, P < 0.01) These changes over two years in relative increase in E-UAE were significantly different (P = 0.03). Exercise blood pressure was similar in both groups at baseline and over 2 years increased in the placebo group (from 166.5 +/- 15.1-179.9 +/- 35.6 mmHg), in contrast to the lisinopril group where E-BP was slightly reduced (from 168.5 +/- 20.6-165.1 +/- 16.6 mmHg) but the difference in blood pressure over the 2 years did not reach statistical significance. Exercise urinary albumin excretion and E-BP were closely associated (correlation for year 2: r = 0.734, P < 0.001), and also changes over the 2 years in E-UAE and E-BP were positively correlated (r = 0.53, P = 0.01). At year 2, overnight UAE, pre-exercise UAE (pre-E-UAE), E-UAE and E-BP were all closely linked (r-values between 0.6 and 0.9, P-values < 0.01). In the prediction of changes in overnight UAE over 2 years, neither baseline E-UAE nor baseline E-BP conveyed explanatory information in comparison with baseline overnight UAE and HbA1c. CONCLUSIONS: In type 1 diabetic patients with low-grade microalbuminuria, 2 years of ACE-i treatment with lisinopril significantly reduced E-UAE. Strong correlations were found between E-UAE and E-BP and also changes over 2 years in these parameters were significantly associated.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Losartan modifies glomerular hyperfiltration and insulin sensitivity in type 1 diabetes.

AIM: The effect of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan on renal haemodynamics and insulin-mediated glucose disposal was examined in normotensive, normoalbuminuric type 1 diabetic patients using a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over design. METHODS: Diurnal blood pressure, glomerular filtration rate (GFR, determined using [125I]-iothalamate), renal plasma flow (RPF, determined using [131I]-hippuran) and urinary albumin excretion rate (UAE) were measured, and a hyperinsulinaemic, euglycaemic clamp with indirect calorimetry was performed in nine patients (age 30 +/- 7 years (mean +/- s.d.), HbA1c 8.1 +/- 1.1%) following 6 weeks' administration of either losartan 50 mg/day or placebo. RESULTS: Diurnal blood pressure was significantly reduced after losartan compared with placebo (122/70 +/- 11/8 vs. 130/76 +/- 12/6 mmHg, p < 0.05). A significant decline in GFR (133 +/- 23 vs. 140 +/- 22 ml/min, p < 0.05) and filtration fraction (FF; GFR/RPF) (24.6 +/- 3.5 vs. 26.2 +/- 3.6%, p < 0.05) was observed in the losartan vs. placebo groups. RPF and UAE did not change. Isotopically determined glucose disposal rates were similar after losartan and placebo in the basal (2.61 +/- 0.53 vs. 2.98 +/- 0.93 mg/kg/min) and insulin-stimulated states (6.84 +/- 2.52 vs. 6.97 +/- 3.11 mg/kg/min). However, the glucose oxidation rate increased significantly after losartan vs. placebo in the basal state (1.72 +/- 0.34 vs. 1.33 +/- 0.18, mg/kg/min, p < 0.01) and during insulin stimulation (2.89 +/- 0.75 vs. 2.40 +/- 0.62 mg/kg/min, p < 0.03). Basal and insulin-stimulated non-oxidative glucose disposal tended to decrease after losartan; however, this was not significant. Endogenous glucose production and lipid oxidation were unchanged after treatment and similarly suppressed during hyperinsulinaemia. Glycaemic control, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol and triglycerides were stable in both losartan and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: Losartan reduces blood pressure, glomerular hyperfiltration and FF, and improves basal and insulin-stimulated glucose oxidation in normotensive, normoalbuminuric type 1 diabetic patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

What is hypertension in diabetes? Ambulatory blood pressure in 137 normotensive and normoalbuminuric Type 1 diabetic patients.

AIMS: To establish reference data for ambulatory blood pressure (AMBP) in normotensive, normoalbuminuric Type 1 diabetic patients and characterize the relation to clinic blood pressure (BP). To evaluate the statement of the third working party of the British Hypertension Society (BHS) that a target clinic BP in diabetes < 140/80 corresponds to a target day-time AMBP < 130/75 mmHg. PATIENTS AND METHODS: AMBP were performed in 172 normoalbuminuric, adult Type 1 diabetic patients, who had never received anti-hypertensive drugs. Clinic BP was determined as the mean of at least three auscultatory (Hawskley random zero manometer) and as the mean of at least three oscillometric (Spacelabs) BP values obtained just prior to ambulatory monitoring. Five patients with more than three missing hours/24 h were excluded. RESULTS: For 30 patients auscultatory clinic BP exceeded 140 mmHg systolic and/or 90 mmHg diastolic. For the remaining 137 normotensive patients day-time AMBP was 125.7/77.2 mmHg and oscillometric clinic BP was 125.3/76.5 mmHg (mean difference 0.3/0.7 mmHg; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.9 to 1.5/-0.3 to 1.7 mmHg, P = 0.6/P = 0.2). Sixty-five percent of the patients had a diastolic day-time AMBP > 75 mmHg. CONCLUSIONS: Clinic BP and day-time AMBP measured by the same method were indistinguishable. The target for day-time diastolic AMBP (< 75 mmHg) proposed by the BHS is too low and is based on the misconception that in normotensive subjects day-time AMBP is lower than clinic BP. If the BHS guidelines are strictly adhered to, the consequence may be overtreatment in patients with normoalbuminuria and no end organ damage.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

The kidney in diabetes: how to control renal and related cardiovascular complications.

The clear-cut and detailed pathogenesis of diabetic renal disease is not yet elucidated, but it is clear that both initiation and progression of renal disease in diabetes is related to glycemic control and blood pressure (BP) regulation, also seen in intervention studies. Consequently, optimal control of glycemia and antihypertensive treatment have become the cornerstones in the management of patients with diabetes. Naturally, modulating factors need to be discussed in further detail. The genetics of diabetes and its renal complications are still very complex issues that need to be explored further. Few and inconclusive data are available with respect to clinical management, for which genotyping is not required. Dietary protein content has long been an interesting avenue for possible treatment, but to date, data from patients with nondiabetic renal disease and with diabetes are not totally convincing, although further results may be published very soon. The issue is also complex because a low-protein diet may increase BP according to new studies, rendering the issue of low-protein content in the diet still more complex and controversial. Metabolic issues remain a key question, specifically with regard to glycemic control, in which data have accumulated over the past decade from epidemiological and interventional studies. There is no doubt that optimal glycemic control is crucial, but issues regarding specific glucose-related mechanisms and protein and lipid metabolism are still under investigation. The renin-angiotensin system has emerged as a key issue in diabetes, especially with regard to its inhibition by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition and angiotensin-receptor blockade. New studies suggest that more complete inhibition of this system by dual blockade may be an avenue for further study according to positive results in patients with microalbuminuric type 2 diabetes, who are at great risk. Antihypertensive treatment still remains a fundamental component, although the metabolic effects of some antihypertensive agents may be important, especially with respect to diuretics, ss-blockers, and possibly alpha-blockers. The situation becomes complex with the frequent combination of various agents in the treatment of hypertension in patients with diabetes. Conversely, ACE inhibitors may have some diabetes-protective effect, but further studies are needed.

Albuminuria↗
PubMed2001

Autonomic neuropathy in nondiabetic offspring of type 2 diabetic subjects is associated with urinary albumin excretion rate and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure: the Fredericia Study.

The aim of this study was to examine the impact of parental type 2 diabetes on the autonomic nervous system and to determine whether autonomic neuropathy is present and associated with changes in 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (AMBP) and urinary albumin excretion rate (UAER) in nondiabetic subjects with parental type 2 diabetes. We examined 223 nondiabetic offspring of type 2 diabetic subjects and a control group of 258 offspring of nondiabetic subjects. The autonomic nervous system was assessed by three cardiovascular reflex tests, 24-h AMBP was measured with an oscillometric recorder (90207; Spacelabs, Redmond, WA), and UAER was determined through three overnight urine samples. The subjects with parental type 2 diabetes had significantly lower heart rate variation in all three bedside tests (P < 0.01) than subjects without parental diabetes. The prevalence of autonomic neuropathy in the nondiabetic offspring with parental type 2 diabetes (6.7%) was significantly (P < 0.01) higher compared with the control group (1.6%). Autonomic neuropathy was associated with a higher fasting insulin level (P < 0.05), higher UAER (P < 0.001), higher 24-h mean AMBP (P < 0.01), and reduced diurnal blood pressure variation (P < 0.001) after adjustment for age, sex, and BMI. In conclusion, parental type 2 diabetes was found to be associated with alterations in the autonomic nervous system in nondiabetic subjects. The presence of autonomic neuropathy in subjects with parental type 2 diabetes was associated with higher UAER, fasting insulin level, and 24-h AMBP and a reduced diurnal blood pressure variation. This study indicates that parental type 2 diabetes has an impact on the cardiac autonomic function in nondiabetic subjects.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Increased QTc dispersion is related to blunted circadian blood pressure variation in normoalbuminuric type 1 diabetic patients.

A reduced nocturnal fall in blood pressure (BP) and increased QT dispersion both predict an increased risk of cardiovascular events in diabetic as well as nondiabetic subjects. The relationship between these two parameters remains unclear. The role of diabetic autonomic neuropathy in both QT dispersion and circadian BP variation has been proposed, but data have been conflicting. The aim of the present study was to describe associations between QT dispersion and circadian BP variation as well as autonomic function in type 1 diabetic patients. In 106 normoalbuminuric (urinary albumin excretion <20 microg/min) normotensive patients, we performed 24-h ambulatory BP (Spacelabs 90207) and short-term (three times in 5 min) power spectral analysis of RR interval oscillations, as well as cardiovascular reflex tests (deep breathing test, postural heart rate, and BP response). No patient had received (or had earlier received) antihypertensive or other medical treatment apart from insulin. In a resting 12-lead electrocardiogram, the QT interval was measured by the tangent method in all leads with well-defined T-waves. The measurement was made by one observer blinded to other data. The QT interval was corrected for heart rate using Bazett's formula. The QTc dispersion was defined as the difference between the maximum and the minimum QTc interval in any of the 12 leads. When comparing patients with QTc dispersion below and above the median (43 ms), the latter had significantly higher night BP (114/67 vs. 109/62 mmHg, P < 0.003/P < 0.001), whereas day BP was comparable (129/81 vs. 127/79 mmHg). Diurnal BP variation was blunted in the group with QTc dispersion >43 ms with significantly higher night/day ratio, both for systolic (88.8 vs. 86.2%, P < 0.01) and diastolic (83.1 vs. 79.5%, P < 0.01) BP. The association between QTc dispersion and diastolic night BP persisted after controlling for potential confounders such as sex, age, duration of diabetes, urinary albumin excretion, and HbA1c. Power spectral analysis suggested an altered sympathovagal balance in patients with QTc dispersion above the median (ratio of low-frequency/high-frequency power: 1.0 vs. 0.85, P < 0.01). In normoalbuminuric type 1 diabetic patients, increased QTc dispersion is associated with reduced nocturnal fall in BP and an altered sympathovagal balance. This coexistence may be operative in the ability of these parameters to predict cardiovascular events.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Renal involvement is related to body height in newly diagnosed diabetic women aged 40 years or over.

We scrutinized the relation between body height and renal involvement in a large population-based sample of newly diagnosed diabetic patients aged 40 years or over. The urinary albumin concentration (UAC) was measured in freshly voided morning urine in 1,284 newly diagnosed diabetic patients. The course of insulin treatment showed that at least 97.6% of the patients could be regarded as Type 2 diabetic. Linear regression analyses were done with log UAC as dependent variable, and height, age, HbA1c, smoking habits, education, occupation, body weight and systolic blood pressure as independent variables. Median age was 65.3 years. In bivariate analyses UAC increased with decreasing height for women (R (S) =- 0.090, p =0.028), but not for men (R (S) =- 0.049, p =0.20). After backwards elimination in the regression models, height remained in the model for women only (p =0.041). Our finding of a relationship between short stature and renal involvement in Type 2 diabetic female patients adds to existing evidence from studies with non-diabetic and Type 1 diabetic subjects.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Early ACE-i intervention in microalbuminuric patients with type 1 diabetes: effects on albumin excretion, 24 h ambulatory blood pressure, and renal function.

OBJECTIVES: To study the effects of ACE-i in type 1 diabetic patients with early microalbuminuria with regard to: i) UAE, ii) 24 h AMBP, including the effect on diurnal BP variation, and iii) renal haemodynamics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 58 patients with urinary albumin excretion (UAE) between 20-70 microg/min were treated for two years with either the ACE inhibitor (ACE-i) lisinopril (20 mg od) or placebo in two randomised placebo controlled double blind studies. In a subgroup of patients (n=22) we performed 24 h ambulatory blood pressure measurements (AMBP) and renal function tests (constant infusion technique). RESULTS: i) Changes in UAE over the two years were significantly different (p<0.01) in the two groups with final UAE in the lisinopril group of 19.1 microg/min x/divide 2.5 (geometric mean x/divide tolerance factor) and 44.1 microg/min x/divide 2.8 in the placebo group. In the lisinopril group 20 patients (60.6%) reversed to normoalbuminuria compared to 6 patients (24%) in the placebo group (p<0.02). ii) Clinical BP measurements revealed no differences between groups, but by AMBP significant reductions were detectable in the lisinopril group, primarily in night AMBP (systolic/diastolic: - 6.9 +/- 8.6/- 6.0 +/- 5.3 mmHg, p<0.01) as opposed to increases in the placebo group (3.1 +/- 9.3/1.9 +/- 7.3 mmHg). iii) Changes in UAE and changes in filtration fraction (FF) were positively correlated in the intervention group (r=0.9, p<0.01), i.e. the patients who showed the greatest fall in UAE were the ones with the greatest fall in FF. CONCLUSIONS: ACE-i treatment in patients with low-grade microalbuminuria reduces 24 h AMBP without attenuating diurnal blood pressure variation, reduces UAE significantly, with changes in UAE being strongly associated with changes in FF. Furthermore, compared to placebo, ACE-i reverses micro- to normoalbuminuria in a significant fraction of patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

What is the relevance of the HOPE study in general practice?

The unique findings from the HOPE (Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation) study strongly support extending the use of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor ramipril as a preventive agent for patients at high risk of cardiovascular events with normal left ventricular function. In addition, ramipril provides significant benefit in diabetic patients. These findings will impact on how ramipril is used in primary care, where ACE inhibitors are currently underprescribed. Patients reflecting the inclusion criteria of the HOPE study should be considered as suitable candidates for long-term ramipril therapy as an addition to their existing drug regimen. Screening should include control of kidney function (by serum creatinine), particularly within the first two weeks of treatment, in addition to regular monitoring of serum potassium. However, the HOPE study shows that ramipril is well tolerated at high doses and over a long treatment period. The effectiveness of therapy should also be regularly reviewed and dose adjustments made where necessary. If concern remains, referral to a specialist--a cardiologist or a diabetologist--may ultimately be necessary.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2000

Randomised controlled trial of dual blockade of renin-angiotensin system in patients with hypertension, microalbuminuria, and non-insulin dependent diabetes: the candesartan and lisinopril microalbuminuria (CALM) study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess and compare the effects of candesartan or lisinopril, or both, on blood pressure and urinary albumin excretion in patients with microalbuminuria, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes. DESIGN: Prospective, randomised, parallel group, double blind study with four week placebo run in period and 12 weeks' monotherapy with candesartan or lisinopril followed by 12 weeks' monotherapy or combination treatment. SETTING: Tertiary hospitals and primary care centres in four countries (37 centres). PARTICIPANTS: 199 patients aged 30-75 years. INTERVENTIONS: Candesartan 16 mg once daily, lisinopril 20 mg once daily. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Blood pressure and urinary albumin:creatinine ratio. RESULTS: At 12 weeks mean (95% confidence interval) reductions in diastolic blood pressure were 9.5 mm Hg (7.7 mm Hg to 11.2 mm Hg, P<0.001) and 9.7 mm Hg (7.9 mm Hg to 11.5 mm Hg, P<0.001), respectively, and in urinary albumin:creatinine ratio were 30% (15% to 42%, P<0.001) and 46% (35% to 56%, P<0.001) for candesartan and lisinopril, respectively. At 24 weeks the mean reduction in diastolic blood pressure with combination treatment (16.3 mm Hg, 13.6 mm Hg to 18.9 mm Hg, P<0. 001) was significantly greater than that with candesartan (10.4 mm Hg, 7.7 mm Hg to 13.1 mm Hg, P<0.001) or lisinopril (mean 10.7 mm Hg, 8.0 mm Hg to 13.5 mm Hg, P<0.001). Furthermore, the reduction in urinary albumin:creatinine ratio with combination treatment (50%, 36% to 61%, P<0.001) was greater than with candesartan (24%, 0% to 43%, P=0.05) and lisinopril (39%, 20% to 54%, P<0.001). All treatments were generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Candesartan 16 mg once daily is as effective as lisinopril 20 mg once daily in reducing blood pressure and microalbuminuria in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes. Combination treatment is well tolerated and more effective in reducing blood pressure.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

No deleterious effects of tight blood glucose control on 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure in normoalbuminuric insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients.

Intensive therapy aiming at near normalization of glucose levels effectively delays the onset and slows the progression of complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) and is recommended in most patients. However, in a recent report, intensive insulin treatment was found to be associated with deleterious effects on nocturnal blood pressure (BP), the proposed mechanisms being subclinical nocturnal hypoglycemia or hyperinsulinemia. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association between glycemic control, insulin dose, and 24-h ambulatory BP (AMBP) in a group of well-characterized IDDM patients. Twenty-four-h AMBP was measured in 123 normoalbuminuric [urinary albumin excretion (UAE) < 20 microg/min] IDDM patients using an oscillometric technique (SpaceLabs 90207) with readings at 20-min intervals. UAE was measured by RIA and expressed as geometric mean of three overnight collections made within 1 week. Tobacco use and level of physical activity was assessed by questionnaire. HbA1c was determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography (nondiabetic range, 4.4-6.4%), and patients were stratified into quartiles according to HbA1c levels. Mean HbA1c values in the four groups were 7.0% (n = 31), 8.0% (n = 31), 8.6% (n = 31), and 9.7% (n = 30). The groups were comparable regarding age, gender, diabetes duration, body mass index, UAE, smoking status, and physical activity. AMBP levels were almost identical in the HbA1c quartiles with night values of (increasing HbA1c order): 110/63, 112/66, 112/66, and 113/65 mm Hg (P = 0.69/P = 0.32). There was no association between tight glucose control and higher nocturnal BP or a more blunted circadian BP variation. On the contrary, a weak positive correlation between night to day ratios of mean arterial BP and HbA1c values was found (r = 0.26, P = 0.005), i.e. blunted circadian BP variation is most frequent in patients with high HbA1c values. Neither did we find doses of insulin to be associated with night BP (r = 0.04, P = 0.68). Tight blood glucose control is not associated with deleterious effects on 24-h AMBP in normoalbuminuric IDDM patients. Intensive therapy can be implemented without concerns of inducing high nocturnal BP and accelerating diabetic complications.

Adult↗